The BILL is NOT a BILL

[doug555]

1931

The BILL is NOT a BILL - The New LAWFUL MONEY Currency! (http://lawfulmoney.blogspot.com/p/lawful-money-currency.html)

The Bill is NOT a BILL – it is an asset credit voucher "coupon" containing the credit amount that we must release/surrender to the Trustee (or agent thereof) by indorsing the BACK of the Bill, writing the demand for lawful money on the FRONT (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct.html), and then returning it, to accomplish "Merger (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-merger.html)" for "extinguishment" of the obligation.

See this folder (https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8BdR0w2oZY_NmpIeGkyY3NGRm8&usp=sharing) for more research information.

When the "dollar" fails, the "bills" will keep coming.

Just start using "bills" as the new currency, and lawful money, by demand!

The New LAWFUL MONEY Currency!

Read the excerpt below from “The Way to outdo England without fighting her (https://archive.org/details/waytooutdoengla00caregoog)” by Henry Charles Carey, 1865, in his “Letter 12“, pages 129-130, and substitute the "American people" for the "wealthy creditor", and see how this new honest labor-backed LAWFUL MONEY currency and a simple clearinghouse controlled by the people could turn around our economy in a matter of weeks! Imagine every adult being given a lawful money account to "draw" their credit from on a monthly basis, based on their current income and needs. Talk about a real stimulus package!!!

1933

For more information about this, see:
http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/indorsed-bill-remedy/
http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-letter.html
http://lawfulmoney.blogspot.com/p/lawful-money-currency.html

[Christopher]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

[doug555]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

I have not done this yet... I need to create all of the follow-through documents first.

Please listen to Boris's latest audio on 10/2/14 entitled "National Agenda - Usufructuary Truth (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/highfrequency/2014/10/02/national-agenda-with-special-guest-boris-on-usufructary-truth)"

Especially at the 0:28, 1:04, 1:11, 1:45 and 1:50 hour:minute marks to get some tips on these.

I believe Boris still has a fatal flaw because he is not using 12 USC 411 and demanding lawful money for all transactions... hence he is still contracting with the FED and becoming an enemy to the USA.

BTW: Why are you not using the example indorsement (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct.html), letter (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-letter.html) and procedure (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-procedure.html) ?

Also, have you rebutted on the record the presumption that the INFANT on "your" birth certificate is a decedent so that you are properly authorized (ie., upon your appearance on the record as being alive and thereby vested with reversionary interest in same) to act as General Executor of same's Estate?

Also, have you gotten it on record that you are demanding lawful money and full discharge for ALL transactions?

If not, you may be premature in your actions, and may set a bad precedent and muddy the water for others who follow this path.

Notice that Roger Elvick used to always ask those who sent him a charge "Where is the check?". Boris cited following Elvick in doing an acceptance for honor. My take is that the BILL is a CHECK, or rather a CREDIT VOUCHER, that is an instrument capable of transferring consideration (equitable title to the amount on the BILL). It just needs your indorsement, and, as indorser, under the UCC you have rights to recourse if said instrument is not presented for payment (for deposit to the United States). IMO.


Prov 24:6 (http://www.biblestudytools.com/kjv/proverbs/24-6.html)

[allodial]

have you done this? I am in the process of sending the coupon from passed bills to comcast trying to get a check back from them. And i am sending the coupon for the current to discharge the debt. i will let you know how it works. I have wrote on the front of the past coupons "Redeeming coupon for lawful money of The United States of America" and also on the front "This is not a check". I wrote this is not a check because as i understand the UCC code the coupon also seems to fit the criteria for a check and i don't fell like getting a check fraud charge of any kind. After reading what you posted I am also going to endorse the back

Could it be possible that the voucher stub is an incomplete draft?

[Michael Joseph]

Notice that Roger Elvick used to always ask those who sent him a charge "Where is the check?". Boris cited following Elvick in doing an acceptance for honor. My take is that the BILL is a CHECK, or rather a CREDIT VOUCHER, that is an instrument capable of transferring consideration (equitable title to the amount on the BILL). It just needs your indorsement, and, as indorser, under the UCC you have rights to recourse if said instrument is not presented for payment (for deposit to the United States). IMO.



Clearly the Legal Title is not in the End User. In fact the Equitable Title may not be in the End User either. For instance Trusts can be formed such as the Mass. Business Trust whereby the Legal and Equitable Titles are BOTH held in the Board of Trustees, which also has the Management of the Estate as well. The Personalty is in the End User which might be avails, profits and proceeds from a bargain and sale.

If you accept the Person of State is not your creation but it is moved via your will, thus by your will you express your trust as the moving party and as such the moving party is with the liability. This is an UNDERTAKING. A one-sided contract. A promise to perform as it were is an undertaking of sorts.

Thus the Person of State is completely subject to the Uses Settled by the Creator of the Trust Agreement. So it is simple in my mind. If one has a question concerning the uses of the Person, then one must ask the Administration - else one might be in Rebellion. See this is a double edged sword if you comprehend.

Regards,
Michael Joseph

[doug555]

Could it be possible that the voucher stub is an incomplete draft?


Exactly!

See Merger (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-merger.html).

And Confusio - Merger -Extinguishment - Discharge (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8BdR0w2oZY_TWdhQzQ2bjRWN2c/view?usp=sharing).

[walter]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

[allodial]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

From reports, Amex bills have an associated bank rounting number( probably because Amex is a bank). In the "old days" (banking text books from long ago), where there are vouchers were checks. The idea was that you endorsed them payable to the biller.



Clearly the Legal Title is not in the End User.

The bill or notice itself might be considered to be abandoned.

[walter]

From reports, Amex bills have an associated bank rounting number( probably because Amex is a bank). In the "old days" (banking text books from long ago), where there are vouchers were checks. The idea was that you endorsed them payable to the biller.



In Canada if you send a statement then you must be a member of the Canadian Payment Association.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-21/

Bill payment Remittances
https://www.cdnpay.ca/imis15/eng/FAQs/Bill_Payment_Remittances/eng/faq/bill_payment_remittances.aspx?hkey=4494e337-7b17-4e4f-8bec-c2203c0218b2

Rule H6
https://www.cdnpay.ca/imis15/pdf/pdfs_rules/rule_h6.pdf

[doug555]

Its a defective bill because they don't have "consumer purchase" written on it.
It becomes defective when NOTICE is given of the defect.

Has anyone ever tried depositing a "statement" (bill) into a bank account?

This is why I suggest this indorsement (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8BdR0w2oZY_TWdhQzQ2bjRWN2c/view?usp=sharing).

BACK OF PRESENTMENT, 90-DEGREE ANGLE, HAND-PRINTED, BLUE INK:

For Deposit Only
to the account of
United States
12 USC 342

John Henry Doe



This DEPOSIT is the next step... but all of the follow-up documents need to be in place first... based on research in this folder (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8BdR0w2oZY_TWdhQzQ2bjRWN2c/view?usp=sharing) about "Confusio - Merger - Extinguishment - Discharge"

And about "indorser's recourse" in this book (http://books.google.com/books?id=gILhHZiVziEC&pg=PT73&lpg=PT73&dq=indorser%27s+recourse&source=bl&ots=oh0bG-i9-V&sig=0L9Ixw7if18YVG1bhCkE9rFNUBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-pEsVN_dM8LJgwTupIDIDw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=indorser's%20recourse&f=false).

Notice that all "statements" demand "payment".

Why are we then tendering "promises of payment" known as FRNs?

[doug555]

This is why I suggest this indorsement (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8BdR0w2oZY_TWdhQzQ2bjRWN2c/view?usp=sharing).

BACK OF PRESENTMENT, 90-DEGREE ANGLE, HAND-PRINTED, BLUE INK:

For Deposit Only
to the account of
United States
12 USC 342

John Henry Doe



This DEPOSIT is the next step... but all of the follow-up documents need to be in place first... based on research in this folder (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8BdR0w2oZY_TWdhQzQ2bjRWN2c/view?usp=sharing) about "Confusio - Merger - Extinguishment - Discharge"

And about "indorser's recourse" in this book (http://books.google.com/books?id=gILhHZiVziEC&pg=PT73&lpg=PT73&dq=indorser%27s+recourse&source=bl&ots=oh0bG-i9-V&sig=0L9Ixw7if18YVG1bhCkE9rFNUBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-pEsVN_dM8LJgwTupIDIDw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=indorser's%20recourse&f=false).

Notice that all "statements" demand "payment".

Why are we then tendering "promises of payment" known as FRNs?

The Money In Your Bank Account Was Stolen This Morning! (http://www.stage2omega.com/the-money-in-your-bank-account-was-stolen-this-morning/)

Perhaps FRNs and checkbook money will soon not circulate AS MONEY given the report at the above link.

This is exactly why the Indorsed Bill Remedy (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/indorsed-bill-remedy/) is needed ASAP!

In conjunction with the Usufruct Remedy (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/)

If so, then the only thing left in circulation AS MONEY will be just the BILLS themselves.

Why not just indorse, return and enforce them as the negotiable instruments that they truly are?!

If dishonored, resurrect McFadden's 1933 charges lodged in the Judiciary.

David, would you know how to get a certified copy of those documents?

[doug555]

A good successful example in Italy of a "Debt-Free Alternative Currency (http://www.thrivemovement.com/local-merchants-southern-italy-thrive-debt-free-alternative-currency)"


LOCAL MERCHANTS IN SOUTHERN ITALY THRIVE OFF OF DEBT-FREE ALTERNATIVE CURRENCY
A professor in Guardiagrele, Italy proves that debt-free money is highly desireable and effective by issuing an alternative currency.

Giancinto Auriti

The Wall St. journal reported in October 2000, that a wealthy Italian Professor, Giancinto Auriti, “hoped to convince the world that central bankers are the biggest con artists in modern history.” He claimed that when money is loaned out at interest by banks, it has roughly half the purchasing power than if it were divided among the people for free. So he decided to test his theory in his small hometown of Guardiagrele, Italy. He issued a debt-free alternative currency, called simec, and offered it at an exchange rate of 1-to-1.

Simec
www.simec.org

Soon enough people discovered that one simec had the purchasing power of two lire and goods started flying off the shelves! Participating merchants were thrilled while stores that didn’t accept simec were empty. 2.5 billion simec circulated rapidly.

Due to its success, local merchants eventually formed a committee, with the Professor as the head, to keep the program going.

This program needed a wealthy benefactor to get it started (which the government could easily do itself), but it still shows the great potential of debt-free currency to facilitate economic growth and prosperity.



P.S. The above is not meant as an endorsement of "Thrive".


Also see: The Utopian Country (http://www.simec.org/sim/traduzioni-dal-sito/testi-inglesi/83-the-utopian-country.html)

Also see: Indorsed Bill Remedy (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/indorsed-bill-remedy/) and Usufruct Currency (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-currency.html)

[David Merrill]

What a great website Doug! (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/) I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.

[allodial]

What a great website Doug! (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/) I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.

Might that have something to do with inheritance?

[doug555]

Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
What a great website Doug! (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/) I love that slogan:

Accessing Your Own Value.



Might that have something to do with inheritance?

You're right!

THE Inheritance! (http://pentecostnation.wordpress.com/the-birthright/)

[David Merrill]

When heritage is coherent with destiny there is peace.

The only place where heritage can be coherent with destiny is the present.

[doug555]

When heritage is coherent with destiny there is peace.

The only place where heritage can be coherent with destiny is the present.

Exactly!

Promising to pay in the future (by using FRNs) is causing WAR, and why we are "enemies".

PAYING NOW by using lawful money (USNs in the forms of FRNs) causes PEACE.

This CHOICE is hidden in plain sight in HJR 192 (http://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/hjr-192/).

Start "Accessing Your Own Value" - your Birthright of Creative Energy granted to you as wo/man by Your Creator at Birth - NOW and create PEACE!

[David Merrill]

That is the essence of redemption.

[doug555]

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-response-i-received-back-from-judge.html (http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-response-i-received-back-from-judge.html)


"...

Finally, everyone worldwide needs a lesson in the mechanisms of fraudulent convertible debt. A fraudulent convertible debt is a debt created by fraud that is converted into new ownership and used by the perpetrators as investment capital. The most typical example is the billing you receive every month for electrical service (at least in America this is true).

What appears to be a bill comes addressed to YOUR NAME in capital letters and your address. Unknown to you, this "billing statement" isn't really a true bill and it isn't addressed to you. It is addressed to a franchise of a governmental services corporation and the "statement" is actually a voucher allowing you to cash in a "dividend" equal to the amount shown as due and owing-- but of course, you are never told this and you are never told how to fill out the coupon for credit. Instead, if you don't submit payment you are threatened with disconnection, and in this way, you are coerced into paying the bills of a governmental services corporation's franchise.

..."




Above cite supports info found at below:
https://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/18/ (https://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/18/)
http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-currency.html (http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p/usufruct-currency.html)
https://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/indorsed-bill-remedy/ (https://iuvdeposit.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/indorsed-bill-remedy/)

Also see: http://www.annavonreitz.com/index.html (http://www.annavonreitz.com/index.html) for more of her info.

[allodial]

In Canada if you send a statement then you must be a member of the Canadian Payment Association.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-21/

Excellent point. In Canada sales tax and income tax are unified under CRA. In the USA sales/use and income are split between the Federal and State levels. If you charge/bill on the retail/sales level in the USA -> a vendor license (State Tax ID) number is typically required. Also, major billers in the USA tend to be members of an electronics payment service--there is a widely used one. The first few numbers on a bill at the bottom tend to identify the biller uniquely.

***

Cross-linking to French, "bill" is another word for "note".

[Moxie]

If a man's birth certificate is authenticated for another country, and the man has no SS#, is the Bill Indorsement remedy something he still can use?

[David Merrill]

To be frank, it is not something anybody "uses" as the lawful money is pegged to the elastic currency in value. One makes the demand and that unlocks the mysteries that the love of mammon has configured in between one's ears. Making the demand is key.

To your point though, I am quickly becoming convinced that the remedy applies to all 44+ member states on the Bretton Woods Agreements as the Amendments (c. 1976) lifted gold as the fixed exchange rate (domestic and foreign) and instated the fixture of SDR's (Special Drawing Rights = paper gold) for the new "floating" exchange rate. BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa plus Indonesia) has made a successful effort to form their own independent basket, but that was because I knocked the good faith and credit of the United States down a notch:

Click Here for large photo. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImRU9tQzRjbmQwVzg/view?usp=sharing)

and Click Here (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZnFoX3k5MEtJYjg/view?usp=sharing) too.


Don't forget this one (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZjU0NDYyNDYtOWYxZi00MWRhLWEwY2YtODVhM TAwNDRkNjI4/view?usp=sharing&authkey=CPKio_YK).

[Moxie]

the love of mammon has configured in between one's ears.


Excuse me?

[Michael Joseph]

To be frank, it is not something anybody "uses" as the lawful money is pegged to the elastic currency in value. One makes the demand and that unlocks the mysteries that the love of mammon has configured in between one's ears. Making the demand is key.

To your point though, I am quickly becoming convinced that the remedy applies to all 44+ member states on the Bretton Woods Agreements as the Amendments (c. 1976) lifted gold as the fixed exchange rate (domestic and foreign) and instated the fixture of SDR's (Special Drawing Rights = paper gold) for the new "floating" exchange rate. BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa plus Indonesia) has made a successful effort to form their own independent basket, but that was because I knocked the good faith and credit of the United States down a notch:

Click Here for large photo. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImRU9tQzRjbmQwVzg/view?usp=sharing)

and Click Here (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZnFoX3k5MEtJYjg/view?usp=sharing) too.


Don't forget this one (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZjU0NDYyNDYtOWYxZi00MWRhLWEwY2YtODVhM TAwNDRkNjI4/view?usp=sharing&authkey=CPKio_YK).

For Cain said "Am I my brother's keeper" - Let my brother enjoy all the debt I pile on his head whilst I continue in my folly endorsing the 3rd party central bank which enslaves us all - And so with love for self Cain killed Abel. And day and night Abel stands before the throne of God seeking judgment. Mammon is indeed between the ears - at its core is self-love and self-centeredness above all else.

Cain's Carnal mind rules - Me, Me, Me, Me, Me....because you know when one first comes to the path one is only seeking to find how one may keep more for Me. It never dawns on them until much later that to gain more is to be able to give more.

Get busy living or get busy dying - but Cain and Abel are One in Trust. For what Cain does for himself he does unto Abel. When you consider the expansion of debt as a result of ordering up new currency [the true inflation] then one may FINALLY see with new eyes - Cain kills Abel every day thru the selfish acts of many seeking only their Own. As the old adage says "to each his Own".

Greed is akin to serving Mammon. Mine, Mine, Mine the mating call of the Carnal mind.

[David Merrill]

I apologize. In the sustainable Holy Instant I forget that my directness might be taken personally. I also can in pain and fear, perceive sustainable debt as an attack on my peace...


Thank you MJ!

[Moxie]

Ok thank you!

I've decided it's probably easiest to use an LLC as an entity in commerce.

[David Merrill]

When setting up the accounts, remember to demand redemption in lawful money.