PDA

View Full Version : Some similarities in Libel in Review as compared to Coresource Method



motla68
03-21-11, 06:07 AM
What I am doing here is commenting on the quotes taken from the pages of Libel in Review to show some similarities and insights to Coresource methodology found:

page 12


litigant is not knowledgeable of the law and relies upon the full discretion of the court to apply justice fairly and evenly

CS Voice: ( Paper sliding the authenticated BC) The person is here in special appearance for deposit to owner, I trust the court will settle this matter honorably, I am ineligible for these benefits.

page 11


This is not a tax being deposited into the Treasury, but part of the obligations of the fund to defer the quota imposed by the IMF on the United States by agreement

CS sample language written on presentment already handled by a clerk of court: 166
(have a copy of presentment and copy of proof of service on hand ready to give to bailiff)

page 6


to avoid subjecting an in-rem party to the jurisdiction of the court with reference to other claims for which such process is not available

a party discovers he has had no proper notice

CS Voice:
I do not consent to be recognized by this name as I was not properly noticed, I am here as an invited guest to correct a mistake and help the court settle this matter. You have permission (license without liability) to call me Envoy or friend.

page 4


when a statute of the United States provides, an action for the use or benefit of another shall be brought in the name of the United States.

CS Voice: If this living soul is no longer needed for actions to benefit this court, I will be leaving now.

That is all I have for now, something else might pop in my head about this at a later time, but see if any of this looks interesting to you, maybe help simplify your approach as a suitor.

motla68
03-29-11, 02:41 AM
Did anyone get anything out of this, was it worth my time? The silence is deafening.

David Merrill
03-29-11, 11:35 AM
I have linked a new rendition of the Libel of Review package (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNWY1MzE0YWYtNWIzYy00NzYzLWI1M TQtNDdjNDczNWE4MzJh&hl=en).

martin earl
05-20-11, 02:22 AM
Did anyone get anything out of this, was it worth my time? The silence is deafening.

Sorry, motla88, I have been busy. I always get something out of your posts, even if I cannot reply or recognize it at first reading.

David Merrill
05-20-11, 04:12 AM
"Or exchanged for [Lawful Money]."

motla68
05-20-11, 02:39 PM
I have linked a new rendition of the Libel of Review package (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNWY1MzE0YWYtNWIzYy00NzYzLWI1M TQtNDdjNDczNWE4MzJh&hl=en).

This is looking better, I have just skimmed over it some, what caught my eye is in the generic claim, Law of the Flag section , a bit of notice on the claim on the body already established before their foundation was laid.

motla68
05-20-11, 02:40 PM
Sorry, motla88, I have been busy. I always get something out of your posts, even if I cannot reply or recognize it at first reading.

Thank you, these kinds of acknowledgements is why I keep popping in here now an then as long as someone is getting something out of it.