PDA

View Full Version : The Fall of Orthodox England: The Spiritual Roots of the Norman Conquest, 1043-1087



allodial
01-31-15, 10:38 PM
I came across this about seven years ago. This discloses hidden pieces of the puzzle behind English history.

Link here -> The Fall of Orthodox England: The Spiritual Roots of the Norman Conquest, 1043-1087 (http://www.annunciationscranton.org/files/PDF/104_THE_FALL_OF_ORTHODOX_ENGLAND.pdf)

Note the occurrences around 1,000 years after the Jerusalem Temple Destruction/Judgement and about 1,000 years from the Resurrection.

Related: The Fall of Orthodox England: The Ecclesiastical Roots of the Norman Conquest, 1043-1087 (html variant) (http://www.romanitas.ru/eng/THE%20FALL%20OF%20ORTHODOX%20ENGLAND%205X8.htm)
The Fall of Orthodox England: The Spiritual Roots of the Norman Conquest, 1043-1087 (2011 version) (http://www.orthodoxchristianbooks.com/downloads/305_THE_FALL_OF_ORTHODOX_ENGLAND.pdf)

george
02-01-15, 01:10 AM
hi allodial,

what do you know about the orthodox and non orthodox calendars and the 13 day difference?

I heard the guys on talkshoes not a citizen group talking about that, I need to listen to that show again. it was pretty deep but it was said that they were used as a way to have a 13 day advanced notice somehow (among other things)

calenders would certainly be a solid jurisdiction, no?

shikamaru
02-01-15, 04:26 PM
I had absolutely no idea the Pope at that time, Alexander II, gave blessing to William the Bastard (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/643991/William-I) to invade England nor did I know William's French name, Guillaume II or Guillame le Batard.

WoW.....

Mind blowing as always, allodial .....

allodial
02-05-15, 05:00 AM
hi allodial,

what do you know about the orthodox and non orthodox calendars and the 13 day difference?

I heard the guys on talkshoes not a citizen group talking about that, I need to listen to that show again. it was pretty deep but it was said that they were used as a way to have a 13 day advanced notice somehow (among other things)

calenders would certainly be a solid jurisdiction, no?

2236
2237
Quite an interesting topic. Seems you are asking about the alleged 13-day gap concerning the shift from the Julian to the Gregorian. However, its suggested that 90 days were added in the transition to the Julian calendar. I looked up some links for you in the past few days... There's even a guy that suggests that its 'really' 1793 or something--missing hundreds of years.

And yes, the calendar you utilize could carry some presumptions.


The calendar of the Roman Republic was based on lunar phases. Pagan Roman priests, called pontiffs, were responsible for regulating the calendar. Because the pontiffs could also hold political office, it provided opportunity for abuse. Intercalating1 an extra month could keep favored politicians in office longer, while not intercalating when necessary could shorten the terms of political opponents.

By the time of Julius Cæsar, months were completely out of alignment with the seasons. Julius Cæsar exercised his right2 as pontifex maximus3 (high priest) and reformed what had become a cumbersome and inaccurate calendar.4

In the mid-1st century B.C. Julius Cæsar invited Sosigenes, an Alexandrian astronomer, to advise him about the reform of the calendar, and Sosigenes decided that the only practical step was to abandon the lunar calendar altogether. Months must be arranged on a seasonal basis, and a tropical (solar) year was used, as in the Egyptian calendar....5

Notice that Sosigenes' big innovation was an abandonment of lunar calendation:

The great difficulty facing any [calendar] reformer was that there seemed to be no way of effecting a change that would still allow the months to remain in step with the phases of the Moon and the year with the seasons. It was necessary to make a fundamental break with traditional reckoning to devise an efficient seasonal calendar.6

To bring the new calendar into alignment with the seasons required adding an additional 90 days to the year. This was done in 45 B.C., creating a year of 445 days. "This year of 445 days is commonly called by chronologists the year of confusion; but by Macrobius, more fitly, the last year of confusion."7 The first puzzle piece in establishing the truth of the calendar, is to realize that the Julian week of 45 B.C., did not look like the Julian week when Pope Gregory XIII modified it, and thus did not look like the modern Gregorian week of today. This is the first assumption made by both Jews and Christians, regardless of the day on which they worship.8


Why Our Calendars Skipped 11 Days in 1752 (http://mentalfloss.com/article/51370/why-our-calendars-skipped-11-days-1752)
Phantom time hypothesis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis)
Is a Chunk of History Missing? (https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/Phantom%20Time.HTM)
Historian Says the Middle Ages Never Happened: Phantom Time Theory (http://www.hope-of-israel.org/weeklycycle.html)
The Great Gregorian Calendar Conspiracy (https://knowledgedrift.wordpress.com/strange-oddities-of-history/the-great-gregorian-calendar-conspiracy/)
Time's Greatest Conspiracy Theory: The "Continuous Weekly Cycle" (http://www.hope-of-israel.org/weeklycycle.html)
ab urbe condita (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita)

allodial
02-05-15, 05:25 AM
I had absolutely no idea the Pope at that time, Alexander II, gave blessing to William the Bastard (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/643991/William-I) to invade England nor did I know William's French name, Guillaume II or Guillame le Batard....

2245
2238
2244

Have you the considered William's link to the Vikings (https://knutthelastviking.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/william-the-conqueror-the-actual-last-viking/)and the Norman/French connection? Interestingly he grew up in Normandy and was son of Robert I, Duke of Normandy. Where did the Allied Forces land on D-day (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings) (June 6, 1944) about 961 years after 1066?

2240
(oh ...my...what ...a... coincidence) (The movie Edge of Tomorrow was an obvious D-Day "revisitation" ...it was released on June 6, 2014 on the 70th Anniversary of D-Day--the architectural structure in the movie is said to have been commissioned by François Mitterrand alleged Grand Orient (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AGrand_Lodge#Grand_Orient_definition) lodge member)

https://jaysanalysis.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/emily_blunt_in_edge_of_tomorrow-wide.jpg

george
02-05-15, 07:04 AM
And yes, the calendar you utilize could carry some presumptions.


very much so it seems. the date we place on our papers (if any) is quite significant. "what is your birthdate?"

the masons have different calenders too, and they differ also between lodges. this subject is a key IMO

I think the saturnalian priests we all are familiar with (as well as the catholic ones and others of course) know the significance of time definitions. ole chronos

I have started living on natural time as it is in harmony with nature and natures laws but man and mans laws are not harmonic and do not resonate so it makes some things difficult. but also by knowing the jurisdiction the masses are in you can work around some problems so I see how it sorta works for the magi that way too.

ever forget what day of the week it is? I love that!


edit to add: just remembered a fragment... something like julian/oldtestament/death vs gregorian/newtestement/life something like that.. used to determine life or death in that so called book of life but reverses depending on jurisdiction or which side of the issue. its really heavy though and some "believers" I think are not up to the task.

I was just contemplating how the first shall be last and the last shall be first too.. oh man! wait..

allodial
02-05-15, 09:43 AM
I have considered the notion that when you write the date on, say, a love letter, you sign the love letter, you are placing the body of the letter under the collection of events symbolized by say "June 6, 2014". As in the date itself represents all events, happenings, transactions of the time period specified.


"what is your birthdate?"

You ever look at ID or a passport or the like and notice how it might say "Date of Birth" but it doesn't necessarily say date of birth of WHAT or WHO? I mean if you really look at it it doesnt say "Date of birth of the person who was photographed for this document". It just says "DATE OF BIRTH" or the like. I've seen cops point at an ID card and ask "Is this you?" A question wide open to interpretation. I have seen someone answer something like "How can that be? I'm over here."

george
02-07-15, 05:51 AM
I stumbled upon some more related bits and history, check this out!

https://trustandcontract.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/livery-company.pdf

shikamaru
02-07-15, 04:38 PM
I stumbled upon some more related bits and history, check this out!

https://trustandcontract.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/livery-company.pdf

Guilds are some of your earliest corporations. Guilds also have their roots in Roman law and history. We are talking all the way back to the early kings of Rome.

From reading the first page of the document, Freemasonry is setup in a similar structure.

JohnnyCash
02-07-15, 05:00 PM
Out of all your personas, which is your favorite?

george
02-07-15, 07:00 PM
Guilds are some of your earliest corporations. Guilds also have their roots in Roman law and history. We are talking all the way back to the early kings of Rome.

From reading the first page of the document, Freemasonry is setup in a similar structure.

yes, if not exactly the same. this doc is pretty rich it seems.

thanks

stoneFree
02-10-15, 02:13 AM
Out of all your personas, which is your favorite? I believe his "Binbokusai Yagyuu" character is in the running.

JohnnyCash
02-11-15, 04:34 PM
That is so wong.