PDA

View Full Version : F.D.R. Warned Us About Public Sector Unions



allodial
03-06-15, 04:51 AM
The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers, however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers. F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”

Government collective bargaining means voters do not have the final say on public policy. Instead their elected representatives must negotiate spending and policy decisions with unions. That is not exactly democratic – a fact that unions once recognized.

George Meany was not alone. Up through the 1950s, unions widely agreed that collective bargaining had no place in government. But starting with Wisconsin in 1959, states began to allow collective bargaining in government. The influx of dues and members quickly changed the union movement’s tune, and collective bargaining in government is now widespread. As a result unions can now insist on laws that serve their interests – at the expense of the common good.

Union contracts make it next to impossible to reward excellent teachers or fire failing ones. Union contracts give government employees gold-plated benefits – at the cost of higher taxes and less spending on other priorities. The alternative to Walker's budget was kicking 200,000 children off Medicaid.

Governor Walker’s plan reasserts voter control over government policy. Voters’ elected representatives should decide how the government spends their taxes. More states should heed the A.F.L.-C.I.O. Executive Council’s 1959 advice: “In terms of accepted collective bargaining procedures, government workers have no right beyond the authority to petition Congress — a right available to every citizen.”

Related: F.D.R. Warned Us About Public Sector Unions (http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/18/the-first-blow-against-public-employees/fdr-warned-us-about-public-sector-unions)
Anti-Free Market Republicans Want to Kill the USPS to Create a Monopoly for UPS and FedEx (http://www.politicususa.com/2013/02/15/anti-free-market-republicans-kill-usps-create-monopoly-ups-fedex.html)

shikamaru
03-06-15, 08:51 AM
I'm sure the warnings go all the way back to Federalist No. 10 written by James Madison on the dangers of "factions" to the whole political community.

walter
03-06-15, 04:44 PM
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=public&searchmode=none

public (adj.)
late 14c., "open to general observation," from Old French public (c.1300) and directly from Latin publicus "of the people; of the state; done for the state," also "common, general, public; ordinary, vulgar," and as a noun, "a commonwealth; public property," altered (probably by influence of Latin pubes "adult population, adult") from Old Latin poplicus "pertaining to the people," from populus "people" (see people (n.)).



all public actions are done for the state's best interest.
so when the state says its for the public's best interest they are saying it is for their own best interest.