How to use this Lesson Plan.

[David Merrill]

This upper area of Categories (Forum Page) is primarily what I requested of the Admin for walking a new reader or member though remedy as it exists in America today. Once I have populated the topics I will get them arranged in the order I think best for an easy introductory course through the threads that develop around these topics, according to my opening threads.

This will be an Instruction Set, to better understand how the 'saving to suitors' clause and diversity may be utilized to enhance your property rights in America.

10/10/12:
I will be spending some time editing the first posts of many of the Lesson Plan threads. I want this website to be concise and updated with current and useful information.

[Sovereignty]

An A to Z, start here flow chart works best, for me at least...

[David Merrill]

Thanks;


I have been thinking about that. Building the Category though, that has been important. My initial objective was that any one subcategory on the Forums Page would be equally edifying as any other. Just the same though; I am thinking the videos (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/forumdisplay.php?48-Remedy-Within-the-Federal-Reserve-Act) might be best for a Newbee here.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[logjam]

May I also suggest hyper-links to a wiki for definitions, &c...

[freedave]

I've studied the writings of Henrickson and others, I understand the Fed and the flaws in the monetary/central banking system somewhat, but I don't find this easy to grasp.

A simple and easy course would be appreciated -- do you have any idea when that might happen or what to do meanwhile?.

[David Merrill]

This is the Course - the Category 'Saving to Suitors' Club. Read the first posts in each thread by me and then you might get on that thread with questions and comments please.

[hal-richard]

WONDERFUL!!! ... I NEED SUCH! ... I'm just returning here from a COPD Pneumonia hospitalization that began, the very day you posted this, and ended the 11th April, and today I'm planing to attempt opening a lawful money account, using My SSA check with 'DEMAND IS MADE FOR LAWFUL MONEY, per 12 USC Sect. 411, ___ hal-richard ___: d.b.a. TRANSMITTING UTILITY' on the bank's "Signature Card".... I'll NOT be leaving here for this effort, until +/- 3:30 p.m. CT, so PLEASE give My any feedback you may have

[David Merrill]

WONDERFUL!!! ... I NEED SUCH! ... I'm just returning here from a COPD Pneumonia hospitalization that began, the very day you posted this, and ended the 11th April, and today I'm planing to attempt opening a lawful money account, using My SSA check with 'DEMAND IS MADE FOR LAWFUL MONEY, per 12 USC Sect. 411, ___ hal-richard ___: d.b.a. TRANSMITTING UTILITY' on the bank's "Signature Card".... I'll NOT be leaving here for this effort, until +/- 3:30 p.m. CT, so PLEASE give My any feedback you may have


Sure.

I see some Strawman Redemption theory that I disagreed with - you should be a TRANCEIVER UTILITY if anything. I think you best just write in:

All transactions demanded in lawful money Title 12 U.S.C. §411.

Then sign your demand:

Marshal Richard (me assuming)

That is to say, on your Signature Card.

On the backside of the check write:

Redeemed in Lawful Money pursuant to Title 12 U.S.C. §411

above your signature -

Marshal Richard dba Marshal Richard LAST
(signed) ......................(printed)



If they make you sign the Signature Card with your legal name add dba Marshal Richard LAST and they will likely make you open a non-interest bearing account and/or insist that you open a business account - get it? dba= Doing Business As.

Stay calm, especially with your condition. Even if you fail to get your account opened the way you like, your demand will be on the record. The law says:

They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...

If you can get your demand for lawful money on the record on the Signature Card and the Check you are doing great! Even if you have to strikethrough your demand, that will reflect that you made the demand - get it? You can strikethrough the demand and that is still evidence you made your demand and were coerced into striking it through. Of course, leave the bank with copies of everything - especially your demands.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[hal-richard]

THANKS MUCH and God Bless!!!! ... This is exactly what I needed! ... As an aside here; I feel I comprehend this 411 remedy, but I'm not so clear on the aspect of things in code that relieve us from the IRS USAGE FEE, by virtue of the 411 claim. Please enlighten? ... Also I need to know exactly how and where - if at all - the SSN / EIN # fits into this process. FYI I have a UCC-1 lien against the ALL CAPS NAME and #, on file with Texas SOS, April 1, 2005 - April 1, 2015, for whatever that's worth.

[Christopher David]

Of course, leave the bank with copies of everything - especially your demands.

Starting the first of the year, my employer's bank refused to make copies of my paycheck, unlike before, when I would get front and back copies of the transacted check with the damand on the back.

[David Merrill]

THANKS MUCH and God Bless!!!! ... This is exactly what I needed! ... As an aside here; I feel I comprehend this 411 remedy, but I'm not so clear on the aspect of things in code that relieve us from the IRS USAGE FEE, by virtue of the 411 claim. Please enlighten? ... Also I need to know exactly how and where - if at all - the SSN / EIN # fits into this process. FYI I have a UCC-1 lien against the ALL CAPS NAME and #, on file with Texas SOS, April 1, 2005 - April 1, 2015, for whatever that's worth.

This is developing off the Topic - please start a new thread, maybe about the IRS USAGE FEE. Indeed you are bringing a lot of baggage from the Strawman Redemption! That is interesting and great to have you.

In looking over the lesson plan freedave, the new suitor is usually led through a Libel of Review, which is a formative and comprehensive lesson plan about identity, record-forming and redeeming lawful money. So try to get that perspective from the Libel of Review. Especially study the example Clerk Instruction in it.

[freedave]

I have looked at many posts and have a general idea of what this is about.

I am experienced at editing high-tech magazine articles for some large circulation publications, I know what it takes to make things understandable to most people, and I am having difficulty getting a workable understanding of this.

Is there anyone I could converse with by email or phone and get my questions answered?

One question I have is this:

Is it correct that the "income" tax is an excise tax on the use of FRN's?

[Shuftin]

Is it correct that the "income" tax is an excise tax on the use of FRN's?This may be of some interest to you. http://www.suijurisforum.com/media-blackout-161-federal-tax-charges-0-convictions-t1329.html

[freedave]

Thank you for this, Shuftin -- I had seen data about this not long after it happened.

The conviction might be considered evidence that the "income" tax is not an excise tax on the use of FRN's, though it might possibly be an excise tax which might include the use of the U.S. coins.

Do you feel that you have a good understanding of the theory and use of the remedy discussed on this forum?

[Shuftin]

Thank you for this, Shuftin

Do you feel that you have a good understanding of the theory and use of the remedy discussed on this forum?Me??? Not even close. Causal knowledge at best.

[David Merrill]

The Income Tax succinctly described is an irrecusable obligation (http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/convincing.html).


However, if anyone else accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS and delivered to the Federal Reserve banksters. Actually the federal income tax imparts two separate obligations: the obligation to file a return and the obligation to abide by the Internal Revenue Code. The obligation to make a return of income for using private credit is recognized in law as an irrecusable obligation, which according to 'Bouvier's Law Dictionary' (1914 ed.), is "a term used to indicate a certain class of contractual obligations recognized by the law which are imposed upon a person without his consent and without regard to any act of his own." This is distinguished from a recusable obligation which, according to Bouvier, arises from a voluntary act by which one incurs the obligation imposed by the operation of law. The voluntary use of private credit is the condition precedent which imposes the irrecusable obligation to file a tax return. If private credit is not used or rejected, then the operation of law which imposes the irrecusable obligation lies dormant and cannot apply.

[freedave]

Thank you very much for this, David.

Based upon your response I assume that the answer would be, "Yes, the income tax is an excise tax upon the use of FRN's" -- is that correct?

And what is the basis for or evidence for the validity of the statement that if anyone else (other than Congress) accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS...?

[David Merrill]

Thank you very much for this, David.

Based upon your response I assume that the answer would be, "Yes, the income tax is an excise tax upon the use of FRN's" -- is that correct?

And what is the basis for or evidence for the validity of the statement that if anyone else (other than Congress) accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS...?

I was thinking more outside the definition for excise. I believe that there is quite a bit of patriot mythology around excise tax as mentioned in the Constitution. The Income Tax is not unconstitutional; it is non-constitutional. You sign a contract if you endorse cash given to you or cash in any form.

Basis for what? You have two components there. The basis for the first is FDR saving the Fed from the run in 1933 (20-year charter expired). The basis for the second is that you do not get private credit from the Fed for free.

I elaborate on that greatly elsewhere because this thread is introductory. I suggest that if you are reading and are confused that you inquire in the thread that you wonder about.

[freedave]

I think you are saying that if one endorses a check, one is signing a contact. If so, how would one find out what the contract is?

And how would one endorse cash in any form, or do you mean use cash in any form?

What is the nature of the private credit -- is it something the user (other than the U.S. Gov't) is required to pay back?

What does FDR saving the Fed from the run in 1933 have to do with accepting private credit?

Where is the contact stating that there is a fee for accepting private credit?

Where is the contact stating that there is a fee for using this private credit to purchase goods and services or for any other use?

I am asking these questions because I don't see that searching through threads is a workable route towards understanding this -- I have watched your video and looked at a number of threads.

[David Merrill]

I think you are saying that if one endorses a check, one is signing a contact. If so, how would one find out what the contract is?

And how would one endorse cash in any form, or do you mean use cash in any form?

What is the nature of the private credit -- is it something the user (other than the U.S. Gov't) is required to pay back?

What does FDR saving the Fed from the run in 1933 have to do with accepting private credit?

Where is the contact stating that there is a fee for accepting private credit?

Where is the contact stating that there is a fee for using this private credit to purchase goods and services or for any other use?

I am asking these questions because I don't see that searching through threads is a workable route towards understanding this -- I have watched your video and looked at a number of threads.

Instead you are asking specific questions on a thread that is not specifically about what you are asking. Find a thread that is related to your questions and ask again there please.

[freedave]

What thread would that be?

If I had something of value which could potentially help save the populations of earth from the devastating influence of the banksters, I would want to make it as simple and easy as possible for people to understand.

[David Merrill]

Any thread about redeeming lawful money.



P.S. Several people are proving that remedy described on this website is spelled out clearly enough to be of benefit.

[dasanco]

Have all the categories now been created?

I am new to your site and would like to review your course material. The categories listed seem to be alphabetical. May I presume they are all of equal weight of knowledge. Meaning, no particular information needs to be understood before pursuing the information of any particular category.

If that not be the case, perhaps simply prefixing each with a single letter or numbering indicating a grade or level. In the simply of examples maybe just one of three (3) letters; B, I and A. Indicating Beginners, Intermediate and Advanced, respectively.

[taycamstu]

Where, exactly are the instructions?

[taycamstu]

I mean, where is the instruction set?

[Treefarmer]

The title of this thread is possibly misleading.

This discussion forum is by no means a course in anything. It is not set up to lead anyone through any kind of lesson plan.
It is instead a discussion forum for people who had previously enjoyed conversing with each other on another, now defunct, discussion forum called suijurisclub dot net.

After that forum disappeared, many of us missed it so much that we created this forum, in the hopes of continuing our discussions, and even improving our discussion experience, if possible.
I think we succeeded.

I love you guys and gals!
You are always in my prayers.

This is a place where ideas and anecdotes can be shared, information can be posted, and questions and plans can be discussed.
Take it for what it is: a forum for discussion.

Feel free to ask questions and do your own research.
May the Holy Spirit guide you in your way.

Bright blessings

[shikamaru]

You want a lesson plan? I can design you a lesson plan.

What would you like to learn ?

[taycamstu]

How to pay less in taxes, legally and without IRS resistance, as has been mentioned on the site, thanks.



You want a lesson plan? I can design you a lesson plan.

What would you like to learn ?

[shikamaru]

How to pay less in taxes, legally and without IRS resistance, as has been mentioned on the site, thanks.

How deep do you want to go down that rabbit hole?

Two sides to taxes: the finance/accounting side and the legal side.

If you earn income, you are liable for tax. That's how I see it. Receiving income is the taxable activity.
I'm hoping others will chime in for I know some will disagree with what I stated above.

Here are some simple tips:

1) Dividend income is taxed at a lesser rate than working income. Shift from working income to dividend income.
2) Many people have too much of their income withheld. This overage is the "refund" you receive at the end of the year. Adjust your W-4 to boost your take home pay.
3) Tax avoidance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_avoidance) is a valid strategy for reducing the amount one pays in taxes.
4) A business can be an excellent strategy for tax reduction as well as opening options for tax avoidance and reduction.
5) If you adjust your lifestyle, there can be tax reduction and tax avoidance strategies in there.
6) Discover how to qualify for various deductions, this can reduce your taxable income.
7) Discover how to qualify for credits, this can reduce and offset your tax liability.

The above is all my opinion, of course.

[shikamaru]

Think of all the activities you engage in throughout the day that are taxed i.e. using electricity, water, gas, shopping, driving, watching TV, tenuring land, etc.

You can re-engineer your lifestyle to reduce and/or eliminate these taxable events and activities.

[Treefarmer]

Think of all the activities you engage in throughout the day that are taxed i.e. using electricity, water, gas, shopping, driving, watching TV, tenuring land, etc.

You can re-engineer your lifestyle to reduce and/or eliminate these taxable events and activities.

If you have more time than $$, tax avoidance can be a fun and entertaining hobby:)

[shikamaru]

If you have more time than $$, tax avoidance can be a fun and entertaining hobby:)

That is awesome. :)

[Himself]

Hello All.

Thought i would leave a quick little introduction here (wasn't sure the proper place). I have enjoyed reading/studying a great deal of the material here-and finally feel the remedy close at hand. Just wanted to give a great BIG THANKS to all who have put forth the effort to extend the knowledge that is so desperately needed. Of particular mention to David, I sure am glad you were trying to free the minds over there at the DailyPaul, my wife who is an avid DPer tipped me off to your latest posts ever there, and once i started reading i couldn't stop. I have been searching for truth and freedom for a few years now, and have always been let down in the end by all the "gurus" lack of anything concrete- just a bunch of theories and best guesses. When i seen your material, everything i had learned in the past and had moved on from because of lack of proof, clicked in to place so completely thanks to the missing piece of the puzzle which you supplied. Now i can truly understand the SC opinions about the income tax, and the fact that it IS a voluntary tax system. What a relief it is to finally see the way out.

Again, a big thanks to all of you for helping dismantle this veil of illusion. I look forward to having future conversations with all you. :)

[Alberta Rose]

Thanks;


I have been thinking about that. Building the Category though, that has been important. My initial objective was that any one subcategory on the Forums Page would be equally edifying as any other. Just the same though; I am thinking the videos (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/forumdisplay.php?48-Remedy-Within-the-Federal-Reserve-Act) might be best for a Newbee here.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Hello,
I am new here and am having a difficult time understanding a lot of the lingo so I tried to follow the link on the videos and couldn't find any such thing. The link just led to a bunch more threads so I am reversing myself back to the start of the maze here. :confused: Are there really any introductory videos that discuss the concepts here?

Alberta Rose

[fishnet]

Hello,
I am new here and am having a difficult time understanding a lot of the lingo so I tried to follow the link on the videos and couldn't find any such thing. The link just led to a bunch more threads so I am reversing myself back to the start of the maze here. :confused: Are there really any introductory videos that discuss the concepts here?

Alberta Rose

Alberta, try this direct link to the video (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjA0NTQ5MTItNTg2Mi00N2QyLWE5Y 2UtMDMzNGU0YWE3NWE5&hl=en)

[Treefarmer]

Alberta, try this direct link to the video (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjA0NTQ5MTItNTg2Mi00N2QyLWE5Y 2UtMDMzNGU0YWE3NWE5&hl=en)

Thank you fishnet, that was going to be my suggestion too.

Welcome to the forum Alberta Rose.
I hope you enjoy your learning experience and time here.
Feel free to ask questions right in the threads where you would like clarification.

[David Merrill]

Hello,
I am new here and am having a difficult time understanding a lot of the lingo so I tried to follow the link on the videos and couldn't find any such thing. The link just led to a bunch more threads so I am reversing myself back to the start of the maze here. :confused: Are there really any introductory videos that discuss the concepts here?

Alberta Rose


Hi Alberta Rose;


I apologize about my management of links over time. Please post at any failed link that there is a problem and I will spot it on New Items and can correct the problems as we go.

Public Money v. Private Credit (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImYmZlMTU5ZGQtYTIyZi00NjZjLWIyMzctOWFkZ jhhZDM1MGEy/edit).

Federal Reserve Act - Remedy (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImNjA0NTQ5MTItNTg2Mi00N2QyLWE5Y2UtMDMzN GU0YWE3NWE5/edit).



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU6fxC5CXMg

[Alsailssouth]

Thanks David. I too am new here and new to BB's. I also want to get up to speed as quick as possible. Very interesting case on the judges. I just need to learn how to navigate quickly I guess. I'm logged in from my office presently. Thanks for all of your hard work.

[Alsailssouth]

Who is Henrickson?

[LearnTheLaw]

The Income Tax succinctly described is an irrecusable obligation (http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/convincing.html).


Thanks for this piece of the puzzle, however I have a question in regards to this "the user voluntarily incurs the obligation".

If "We the people" have no other choice but to use FRN's, then isn't it no longer "Voluntary"???

"Waivers of Constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences."
Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 (1970)

[David Merrill]

Thanks for this piece of the puzzle, however I have a question in regards to this "the user voluntarily incurs the obligation".

If "We the people" have no other choice but to use FRN's, then isn't it no longer "Voluntary"???

"Waivers of Constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences."
Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 (1970)

The choice is how you bond the FRNs.

Do you endorse private credit and approve of fractional lending or do you redeem them in lawful money by demand? If you do the latter then you keep all the obligations to the US through the Secretary and the US Treasurer signing each bill.

[LearnTheLaw]

The choice is how you bond the FRNs.

Do you endorse private credit and approve of fractional lending or do you redeem them in lawful money by demand? If you do the latter then you keep all the obligations to the US through the Secretary and the US Treasurer signing each bill.


I am still learning and absorbing the lessons that you're teaching [which I do find extremely interesting] and I am trying to blend them in with all of the other things I have been learning, so please forgive me if I seem to throw some off of the wall theories out there.

I do like other peoples opinions on them, as well as passing on info that others may not have.

[shikamaru]

Thanks for this piece of the puzzle, however I have a question in regards to this "the user voluntarily incurs the obligation".

If "We the people" have no other choice but to use FRN's, then isn't it no longer "Voluntary"???

"Waivers of Constitutional rights not only must be voluntary, but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences."
Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 (1970)

You could avoid the usage of FRNs via self-production, trade and barter, etc.

[LearnTheLaw]

You could avoid the usage of FRNs via self-production, trade and barter, etc.

Yes I could barter or use a private currency, but not everyone in this country is willing to do business that way.

That wasn't the purpose of my post.

Since the Gov, IRS and the Courts all operate under 'Equity' or 'Contract' law I thought everyone here would find that quote useful since coercion nullifies all contracts

[shikamaru]

Since the Gov, IRS and the Courts all operate under 'Equity' or 'Contract' law I thought everyone here would find that quote useful since coercion nullifies all contracts

Depends if you can get a court to acknowledge such or ... raise the heat sufficiently high enough they dismiss one's case on the grounds of "In the interest of justice ...."

[Keith Alan]

Yes I could barter or use a private currency, but not everyone in this country is willing to do business that way.

That's exactly what I've been thinking! Just so you know, I would trade with you, if geography wasn't a problem. I imagine there are thousands of people who would be willing to trade amongst themselves, if only they could do it with any practicality.