PDA

View Full Version : Chicago Cop Didn't Realize He Was Being Photographed



allodial
09-16-15, 04:37 PM
Chicago Officer Didn’t Realize Moment Was Caught in Photo Until It Spread Like Fire on the Internet (http://right180.com/2015/09/10/chicago-officer-didnt-realize-moment-was-caught-in-photo-until-it-spreak-like-fire-on-the-internet)

2891

2892

pumpkin
09-16-15, 11:52 PM
Thanks for posting. I think it is sometimes easy to forget, that if you were in a fiery car crash, most cops would try to pull you to safety, or if someone held you hostage, most cops would risk their life to free you. Cops aren't all bad and all the ones I know are good guys. Ignorant as most of the rest of us, but good guys.

allodial
09-17-15, 01:29 AM
Quite a lot of them are good people like in any profession. I tend to believe that harsher penalties should be pressed against those that foment civil unrest because among other things they endanger the lives of honest, good law enforcement professionals. Putting the rogues in check improves things for everyone including cops. Those wearing the uniform are supposed to know better. When they perpetrate crimes it should be taken seriously not covered up by an evil cabal. The moment they are ultra vires, the uniform becomes a mere disguise and immunity does not apply anymore--that is a fact.

A cop helping a homeless man among other things reduces crime and promotes the King's Peace.

loveunderlaw
09-22-15, 04:44 AM
Good for him! The Lefrist MSM networks don't like showing stuff like this on their nightly news reports, they'd rather stir the citizens up over Trayvon Martin type of cases, instead of society seeing them as decent people who try to keep the peace as much as they possibly can.

shikamaru
09-26-15, 08:11 AM
Good for him! The Lefrist MSM networks don't like showing stuff like this on their nightly news reports, they'd rather stir the citizens up over Trayvon Martin type of cases, instead of society seeing them as decent people who try to keep the peace as much as they possibly can.

Too bad "Tayvon Martin" type cases have been occurring for decades.

The bad and abusive behavior of law enforcement, particularly with respect to African-Americans, is being brought to light thanks to modern technology and the media.

One kind act by one law enforcement official isn't going to absolve the decades of abuse, tyranny, color of law actions, and state sanctioned murders US law enforcement have been getting away with for decades.

allodial
09-26-15, 05:54 PM
Too bad "Tayvon Martin" type cases have been occurring for decades.

The bad and abusive behavior of law enforcement, particularly with respect to African-Americans, is being brought to light thanks to modern technology and the media.

One kind act by one law enforcement official isn't going to absolve the decades of abuse, tyranny, color of law actions, and state sanctioned murders US law enforcement have been getting away with for decades.

In Georgia, law enforcement trainees are told basically "Since you know the law, if you break the law you will get the maximum sentence allowable if convicted." The incident and the Georgia perspective points to the remedy. Consider the following:

#1. There are lots of awesome people working in law enforcement;
#2. The good guys and the People must work together to keep the rotten eggs out of law enforcement and out of all offices;
#3. Persons holding law enforcement positions who violate the law should be considered for perpetrating subversion or sedition in willfully undermining the King's Peace or promoting social unrest--the point is that it is not a mere poo poo law break their acts should be taken as a serious affront along the lines of treason, conspiracy against rights (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241), sedition, subversion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subversion);
#4. Military should not pair up with law enforcement since military should be available to put rogue law enforcement in check. A 'tight brotherhood' should not be established between law enforcement and the military.
#5. Police who do things to incite people to get angry or panic should be at the least charge with disturbing the peace and receive the maximum available penalty. If someone is peaceful and you use hidden needles or tactics to encourage someone to get angry or take necessary defensive measures for you overstepping your powers, you should be tried for assault and disturbing the peace.
#6. Police trainers or higher-ups who promote dastardly behavior should be included as conspirators when any cop is charged (they learn it from somewhere).
#7. The FCC issues licenses. But licensees should have no more power or right than the FCC can.
#8. Any cop that unnecessarily uses force or deadly force should be tried for felony assault, manslaughter or murder which would bar them from holding office or holding a job as a police officer.
#9. Every law enforcement officer who goes ultra vires criminally or in trespass against guaranteed rights is civilly or criminally liable for at the least dereliction of duty (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dereliction_of_duty), deliberate indifference (http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/DeliberateIndifference.aspx) and such (see criminal negligence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence));
#10. Those who are easily made fearful or who have temper control problems should not be allowed to hold law enforcement jobs involving direct interaction with the public.

One potential problem is when the cops are part of the same family (nepotism), the same secret societies or brotherhoods (KKK, etc.) and they use those connections to circumvent the law, to hide evidence and allow their secret obligations to each other to trump public law and order. Its ironic and sinister that cops are propagandized into referring to those people who insist the law upheld as "anti-government" , when in fact:

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND GOVT. OFFICIALS WHO REFUSE TO REMAIN INTRA-VIRES ARE IN FACT 100% ANTI-GOVERNMENT--IT IS THEY WHO ARE AGAINST GOVERNMENT BY REFUSING TO BE SUBJECT TO THE LAW. IT IS THEY WHO ARE IN TRANSGRESSION AGAINST ROMANS 13. COPS AND SOLDIERS ARE NEVER THE HIGHER POWER AT ROMANS 13 THOUGH THEY MAY BE AGENTS THEREOF AND CAN BE AGENTS THEREOF ONLY WHILE INTRA VIRES AND LAWFUL. IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED THAT A COMMAND TO DO THAT WHICH IS LAWFUL IS NEVER, EVER, EVER AN "ORDER". AN ORDER MUST ALWAYS BE A LAWFUL COMMAND.

COPS: A COP IS NOT YOUR BROTHER/SISTER WHEN HE/SHE THROUGH CRIMINAL ACTS INCREASE THE LEVEL OF DANGER TO WHICH YOU ARE EXPOSED IN THE LINE OF DUTY. THEY ARE POTENTIALLY NO MORE THAN FELONS IN DISGUISE--ONCE ULTRA VIRES THE UNIFORM BECOMES A MERE DISGUISE OFFICIAL IMMUNITY ENDS AND IS 100% UNAVAILABLE--IF THAT WERE UNTRUE THERE WOULD BE NO NEED TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE AMONG FELONS POSING AS COPS IN RELATION TO HEINOUS OFFENSES PERPETRATE BY THEM. FOR HELP DEALING WITH ROGUES YOU CAN GO TO THE GOVERNOR, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, TO THE COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY RATHER THAN TO YOUR IN-HOUSE POLITBURO--YOU CAN EVEN GO TO THE VERY SOVEREIGN PEOPLE THE PROPAGANDIST HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TURN YOU AGAINST.

Related:

Misprision of Felony (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4)
Conspiracy Against Rights (uniform as disguise) (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241)
Criminal Negligence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence)
Deliberate Indifference (http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/DeliberateIndifference.aspx)

george
09-26-15, 06:29 PM
the media seems to be selective in which "type" cases they cover. (and stir into a frenzy)

I think to view these transgressions of law on mankind separately (black/white/green whatver) is an error. actually I think to see ourselves separately is probably an error too.

about that last line alodial, who are the "sovereign people"? and metro1313 seems to make the other options you listed prior to them not of much use.

allodial
09-26-15, 06:48 PM
the media seems to be selective in which "type" cases they cover. (and stir into a frenzy)

I think to view these transgressions of law on mankind separately (black/white/green whatver) is an error. actually I think to see ourselves separately is probably an error too.

about that last line alodial, who are the "sovereign people"? and metro1313 seems to make the other options you listed prior to them not of much use.

It is well established and well settled that corporations or artificial entities can never be greater than living souls--that the creature cannot have more powers than its creator. Corporations cannot technically join with or communicate non-corporations. Its important to perceive that municipal police officers are not 'law enforcement' in the organic sense and that municipalities and their municipal police departments most always only ever employee men who hold the position of State or Federal peace officers. Corporations are soul-less. However, states aren't necessarily corporations.


I set out on this ground which I suppose to be self evident, "that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living;" that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it. -Letter of Thomas Jefferson to James Madison

Corporations are not among the living. If you hold a State Driver's license or ID without reservation, you are likely going to be construed to be a member of the "Land Merchant Marine" (thusly civilly dead). The term negro (see necro (http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/necro-)) was code for civilly dead it had nothing to do with having a tan. Note membership in a coven or similar organization can even result in a 'death' status. If you watch carefully you will likely see police charged with causing the death of a person rather than with the murder of a man. For further insight, consider these juristic puzzles:


How do you kill the dead when they are already dead?
How can the dead be put to death when he is already dead?
If the earth (i.e. the land or an estate) belongs in usufruct to the living then do the dead need licenses? Do they obtain such licenses from the living or from the dead?


All persons {corporations, partnerships or other legal entities} born {created/established/chartered} or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof {corporations and all statutory entities are subject to the jurisdiction by default}, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty , or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Related:

Capitis Deminutio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitis_deminutio)

xparte
09-27-15, 04:13 AM
The media plays as big a role as the justice system A Man,s repression is never reported on. Its replaced with A person and racial tension. The act of making a guy in a cop outfit with a gun a hero is the papers job to have a Cop or a news paper offer a persona claim or ones person created said transgressions that are dead in and of law in the first place. Then devise a mankind racially separately according to a dead corporate race is short any heroes. george your prolific statement is both metaphysical I think to view these transgressions of law on mankind separately (black/white/green whatever) is an error and metaphorical I think to see ourselves separately is probably an error too. If we are all dead including the heroes then how can one separate fair is never dead a peace officer is living proof .