PDA

View Full Version : The insideous effect of endorsment.



David Merrill
04-15-11, 12:44 PM
This morning's BBC World News snippet is quite revealing.

Debt Repurcussion foreseen. (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjlkMDg4NmMtNjY1OS00ZTIwLWE3M mQtMjZkMDYyMGRiNzZj&hl=en)

I suggest you might listen to it twice - especially the part about somebody volunteering (http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4556/governmentbondslarge.jpg). A good example is the protectionism and denial we find on Quatloos (http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7109). Especially when they beg for a dose of the upcoming Reality (http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7109&start=40#p118178). Sure! It gets ugly (http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=7123#p117984) but you have to admit; Gregg walked right into that one:


Money that I provide part of by being a productive member of society and paying taxes to fund.

If you look at that snippet in context (linked) you might understand how Denial manifests as it starts waring thin. Gregg has been endorsing private credit and now, just this morning he will be faced with that snippet from the BBC World News, that it is quite possible that Governments will not be responsible - in fact - that is what DEFAULT means in essence. So who is left holding the note (signature bond) when the Government Defaults?


http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/5120/rubinpredictsdefaultdat.jpg


Kudos to this suitor! He is getting thousands of dollars of his own money (withholdings) back into his pocket while reducing the national debt.


http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/5241/staterefundnydepositrec.jpg

He is unvolunteering beforehand too. If the US Government defaults then like Rubin said fifteen years ago, China the the other 3/4 owners of America will be looking at those signing bond (oath of office as the Fed banks/endorsement of private credit from the Fed) for Setoff.

The essence of the political religion - Constitutional Republic - is that oaths of office are fungible fidelity bonds. - David Merrill.

David Merrill
04-15-11, 01:39 PM
Follow along if you like. Notice that the proverbial three days is being added on, to the 150th tax year (http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6479/conventionextraordinary.jpg). The deadline for filing your Returns is April 18th, not the traditional April 15th. That is the term for your Right of Refusal - Refusal for Cause. Additionally though, notice as we confront Default on the national debt that 150 years is three (days) time the Jubilee - 50 years.

Tomasz Zygmunt
04-15-11, 02:02 PM
Thank you David.

David Merrill
04-15-11, 02:22 PM
Thank you!! Sometimes I read my own articles and posts when it hits me how surreal Planet Merrill gets. I then sort and sift through the history and facts and verify the them.

Your vote of gratitude means the world.

Anthony Joseph
04-18-11, 07:32 PM
I felt compelled and inspired to execute the recordation of this document today.

First three pages:

328329330

Anthony Joseph
04-18-11, 07:36 PM
Last three pages:

331332333

logjam
04-19-11, 12:33 AM
Wow Anthony! That's some good stuff. I see you have a notary seal and recorded by your County Clerk. Did he give you any hassle for doing this? This seems to be similar to what I was asking in another thread about open and notorious notice. Does a declaration such as this need to be posted somewhere in public first to allow challenges before it can be recorded, or is the simple fact that it is now recorded sufficient? Finally, does this remove you from the tax roles?

Thanks!

Logjam

Anthony Joseph
04-19-11, 02:05 AM
Wow Anthony! That's some good stuff. I see you have a notary seal and recorded by your County Clerk. Did he give you any hassle for doing this? This seems to be similar to what I was asking in another thread about open and notorious notice. Does a declaration such as this need to be posted somewhere in public first to allow challenges before it can be recorded, or is the simple fact that it is now recorded sufficient? Finally, does this remove you from the tax roles?

Thanks!

Logjam

I didn't get any hassle from anyone; once confidence starts building up one begins to instruct the clerks rather than peevishly asking to get things done. I find the more truth I learn, the easier it is to get the sworn-oath servants to do their job. It does take time to re-condition the mind after years of falsehoods ingrained into you.

I have had this document written for some time now but you know how it goes; tweak here, tweak there and never satisfied with it. However, after all the talk about the three day grace after April 15th, I felt a need to at least publish my demand for lawful money of exchange, and my exercise of remedy from the private credit of the Federal Reserve, on the county record. I have now made a clear and declaratory statement of truth that I am absent the knowing and willing participation of endorsment of the FED's private credit and therefore retain the exclusive right of use, and highest title, of anything I possess which I have claimed by and through the Highest Order of Existence, Standing and Sovereignty; the Divine and Holy Kingdom of the Creator of ALL things - Yehovah Elohim in and through our Blessed and Righteous King, Yehoshuah HaMashiach.

JohnnyCash
04-19-11, 01:07 PM
That is good Anthony; thanks for sharing.

This particular Quatloser, Larry Williams aka Famspear/sooltauq, has been playing the role, protectionism & denial, quite a long time. He appeared increasingly agitated as tax filing deadline approached:
http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/forums/16625-freedom-watch-show-ideas/suggestions/180526-cracking-the-code-by-pete-hendrickson?ref=comments

David Merrill
04-19-11, 03:53 PM
I didn't get any hassle from anyone; once confidence starts building up one begins to instruct the clerks rather than peevishly asking to get things done. I find the more truth I learn, the easier it is to get the sworn-oath servants to do their job. It does take time to re-condition the mind after years of falsehoods ingrained into you.


Judges in courts of competent jurisdiction (courts of record) instruct clerks.

Richard Earl
04-19-11, 04:27 PM
I would like to add my demand as well to this thread. It seems with sell-offs happening in government lately, maybe my demand will set me apart from the other poor folks that are still endorsing their currency.

346

David Merrill
04-19-11, 04:44 PM
Most excellent Richard Earl! Thank you for sharing that with us.

jtmcclain
10-23-11, 03:59 PM
I am new to the forums, but Let me see if I can make sense of what I have read today.

Write up a notice, similiar to what Richard Earl wrote above. Get it Notarized and filed with US District court. Get and keep a copy of this. This will make all direct deposits from my employer lawful money.

I can either keep paying in to the IRS or claim "Exempt" on my W-4. If I pay in weekly, I should get a refund back of all money paid in.

When I file in April, I am assuming I can send in the notarized copy of the form every year and I will have no IRS liability, correct?

Sorry if I sound like an idiot, but I have never been good at the legal stuff. If there is somewhere in the forums for a new person to go please direct me there.

David Merrill
10-23-11, 11:03 PM
I am new to the forums, but Let me see if I can make sense of what I have read today.

Write up a notice, similiar to what Richard Earl wrote above. Get it Notarized and filed with US District court. Get and keep a copy of this. This will make all direct deposits from my employer lawful money.

I can either keep paying in to the IRS or claim "Exempt" on my W-4. If I pay in weekly, I should get a refund back of all money paid in.

When I file in April, I am assuming I can send in the notarized copy of the form every year and I will have no IRS liability, correct?

Sorry if I sound like an idiot, but I have never been good at the legal stuff. If there is somewhere in the forums for a new person to go please direct me there.


You got it! It is even simpler than I have described it but for direct deposit, it is getting impossible to alter the Signature Card to accomodate your demand anyway. So I advise after your direct deposit if set up you would get proof of service that you served a notarized/certified copy on your bank too.


I doubt that they would shut down your account about it, upset as it might make the attorneys there.

Sabo
02-18-12, 08:20 PM
I would like to add my demand as well to this thread. It seems with sell-offs happening in government lately, maybe my demand will set me apart from the other poor folks that are still endorsing their currency.

346

Just out of curiosity, noting the Case and Document numbers on the heading - should one first open a Misc. Case File and attach the document to that file, or is that header a product of the District Court's record filing? In other words, am I entering in that information in the header?

Just looking to get order of operations here.

Also, kind of a silly question, but this is a public document now, correct? Isn't there some implication to have Routing and Account numbers out in the open like that?

Thank you!

David Merrill
02-20-12, 10:49 PM
Just out of curiosity, noting the Case and Document numbers on the heading - should one first open a Misc. Case File and attach the document to that file, or is that header a product of the District Court's record filing? In other words, am I entering in that information in the header?

Just looking to get order of operations here.

Also, kind of a silly question, but this is a public document now, correct? Isn't there some implication to have Routing and Account numbers out in the open like that?

Thank you!

Hi Sabo;


Many suitors start with a Libel of Review (https://docs.google.com/document/d/18eglCMnLuLDn1dxW_JLdKZlzd65p6fxsmnKFeYcPxxA/edit#).

I am unsure of what you mean by "implication". The public trust is basically that if somebody uses the information for criminal purposes they may be prosecuted.

I was walking the other day and found an Ace Hardware debit card. I carried it to the mailbox.

Sabo
02-21-12, 03:57 AM
David,

I've looked at this Libel of Review archive before, but it's just a number of unrelated documents with no instruction nor any real information as to its purpose. Haven't been able to make heads or tails of it thus far. I must be missing something obvious. :-/


I am unsure of what you mean by "implication". The public trust is basically that if somebody uses the information for criminal purposes they may be prosecuted.

I was walking the other day and found an Ace Hardware debit card. I carried it to the mailbox.

Sure, 'may be' - but then again thieves are getting more sophisticated (just look at the IRS, amirite?). In fact, having typed that, while I was originally talking about individual criminals; what's to stop the IRS from using that information to 668 the bank for alleged debt?

And even going back to individual criminals, if your account and routing numbers are wide open in public, is the bank really going to give you much sympathy if something were to happen? (Maybe legally they have to help you, but something still doesn't seem right to me about having that as a matter of public record.)
Call me paranoid, I suppose.

Just trying to have a conversation so I can fully understand everything, including my reservations.

Thank you for the response.

David Merrill
02-21-12, 11:24 AM
David,

I've looked at this Libel of Review archive before, but it's just a number of unrelated documents with no instruction nor any real information as to its purpose. Haven't been able to make heads or tails of it thus far. I must be missing something obvious. :-/



Sure, 'may be' - but then again thieves are getting more sophisticated (just look at the IRS, amirite?). In fact, having typed that, while I was originally talking about individual criminals; what's to stop the IRS from using that information to 668 the bank for alleged debt?

And even going back to individual criminals, if your account and routing numbers are wide open in public, is the bank really going to give you much sympathy if something were to happen? (Maybe legally they have to help you, but something still doesn't seem right to me about having that as a matter of public record.)
Call me paranoid, I suppose.

Just trying to have a conversation so I can fully understand everything, including my reservations.

Thank you for the response.

The key phrase seems minor in this paragraph:


http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/4061/claimallthatthereis.jpg


...and dares to claim all that there is (http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/8445/billofexchange.pdf)...

So far there is no instance of the IRS attornies taking advantage of a demand for redemption to submit as evidence as endorsement.

Thomas JEFFERSON was influenced by John LOCKE as he said something (top of Page 2 (http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2005/freewillvgodswill.pdf)) to the effect, No man can possibly be saved by a religion that he does not trust. Conversely no man can construct redemption from constructions and reproducible mental models (mathematics) that he does not understand.

If you study the template for the LoR note two points. 1) The example clerk instruction. 2) The attachments. Then you might realize the documents are much more related to each other than you now think. Also, get a look at this document (http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/626/admiraltybindsthewholew.pdf). Interrelated by a municipal "Crown" or district Navy a single notice in admiralty has a global effect in the natural law.

Perhaps though Paragraph 3 of the Instructions is a better aid to the above photographed Page:


3) default judgment. After 21 days the issue is ripe for default judgment. There is a bill of exchange on file with Richard Grasso NYSE since August 13, 2001 for all the money in the world to back your judgment by fidelity bond (secured confidence.) However, it is preferable to simply rely on the truth - that the defendant never filed in the appropriate district court prior to exercising a claim. Compared to the truth, the bill is only ink on paper; a representation of the Bible's original estate belonging to the rightful heirs. Nobody has challenged the bill to date but confidence in the truth goes a lot further and requires no citing the bill.

Of course you have to develop such a belief set. Having walked hundred of people through the LoR process I can assure you that I have not found anybody who needs the fluff that gets dismissed knowing the objective before filing. The Lesson Plan in the LoR is to:

1) discover your true identity and notify the district (METRO/Global Municipality).
2) learn the fundamentals of record-forming (become the court of record).
3) make your global demand to redeem lawful money.

Now go back in red to my premise. You have to understand the objective for the metaphysics to be effective. The photo above is from Ernest Shurtleff's (http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/7910/namemetaphysicsclose.jpg) The Science of Mind. In infinite mind every thought has been thunk - past, present and future. Eternity is not a very, very long time; it is clawing through the psychotomimetic delirium (http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/5245/psychotomimeticdrugs.jpg) of pseudonomania (http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3922/pseudonomania.jpg)and experiencing every event horizon become one singularity - the time collapse (http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/5100/timecollapse.pdf) in Bill THETFORD's A Course in Miracles.

Remedy is between your ears.

A suitor said that recently and we have been playing with it.


http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/3089/daniellionden.jpg

To me the symbol is that the lions saw the Image of God in the Prophet Daniel. A Course in Miracles is a public rendition of MK-ULTRA where William THETFORD lost his moral compass during the Cold War, first developing Project Bluebird that developed into MK-ULTRA. MK-ULTRA left a big wake of damaged goods (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYWE3NjhmNTMtNmE1MC00NzJhLWFhN zEtY2FjNmUwZTQxYjQx). You can find spoofs on MK-ULTRA in Hollywood's Jacob's Ladder, Men Who Stare at Goats and especially Patrick STUART's character JONAS who is likely a direct spoof on Bill THETFORD - Conspiracy Theory.

Helen: Bill! I am hearing voices! They are telling me to write.
Bill: Trust me Helen (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_c60Sp7Gtc&feature=player_detailpage#t=197s). Write whatever the voices say and show me.

Bill (thinking): [Of course you are hearing voices! I dosed you with enough LSD 25 to fake a chimpanzee Apollo Moon Landing!]

The Shed Blood of the Second Advent could well be Helen SHUCKMAN's mental health. You have to read ACIM in context of Jesus talking to get that though.

Conditioning would have you believe a material-based cause and effect scenario when conditioning is nothing but the program (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImOTFkZTQzNjEtZjM5Yy00NWRlLTliZ TItZmU4MmEwOTZkOTE3). Remember what the Merovingian (admiralty - King Merovee (Hebrew Mar = Sea) was born of a sea monster raping his mother while she swam in the ocean) said about cause and effect.

reggy409
04-27-12, 10:48 PM
Hi Sabo;


Many suitors start with a Libel of Review (https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B1EaV_bU7VImNWY1MzE0YWYtNWIzYy00NzYzLWI1MTQ tNDdjNDczNWE4MzJh&pli=1).

Hello David,

I live in Cap Hill - Denver.

I like your style.

The google docs link for the LOR that you provided is not working. Would you please repost?

David Merrill
04-28-12, 02:24 PM
Thank you very much!

I am glad you mentioned that link. I have goofed up with that on Google Docs and cannot recover the old link.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18eglCMnLuLDn1dxW_JLdKZlzd65p6fxsmnKFeYcPxxA/edit#