Cornell Law website omits 12 USC 95a [Archive]

View Full Version : Cornell Law website omits 12 USC 95a

David Merrill

06-03-16, 02:20 AM

I think that while searching for files I discovered why. I am a little upset with myself for not naming this file better. I do not remember who is writing or what book this can be found in... Now I remember it is found in the Public Papers and Address of FDR - and this is FDR speaking, but he had approached the former President about the TWEA.

4051

But this really says it all too. No wonder Cornell Law School is "omitting" it from the website.

4052

On another post I wrote an email to the staff (http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/aboutus/bios.cfm).

SUBJECT: Breach of Trust

Which is to presume that Cornell Law is a trusted website to begin with.

I find it a bit disturbing that, let's presume for now an IT grad student is presuming to legislate for Congress... by "Omitting" statutes from the US Code.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a

Please note that Congress has not omitted that statute.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2015-title12/pdf/USCODE-2015-title12-chap2-subchapIV-sec95a.pdf

It started bothering me enough to mention it. Please keep the law you display on your website coherent with the actual law.

Thank you.
David Merrill.

David Merrill

06-03-16, 10:17 AM

David Merrill

06-03-16, 02:15 PM

I may not have made it as clear here as I did on LMT (www.lawfulmoneytrust.com). Read that monologue by FDR above carefully. It is not a big stretch to read in that the intended AG was declaring the use of the Trading with the Enemy Act illegal. Then he suddenly died! FDR says that he submitted his request for an opinion with the new AG the day prior, but says nothing about the report back. Therefore the new AG stayed silent, in fear for his life?

P.S. The more I read it, the more convincing it becomes. The AG for HOOVER was killed on March 3rd, 1933 because he declared FDR's use of the Trading with the Enemy Act illegal.

4055

You get what you pray for! Many orders of Masonry register an oath agreeing to be killed "suddenly" should you be found in betrayal of the Brotherhood.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-21-16, 10:16 PM

allodial

06-22-16, 01:33 AM

This opens a much bigger can of worms.

Improper use of the Trading with the Enemy Act, for banking purposes; to cover for the immanent run on the Fed - then and now - is exposed right here, and now. Cornell Law School has realized this is the Achilles's Heel about Immunity and has committed fraud by omission. My naming the Subject - Breach of Trust was being polite. This is Notice of Fraud.

I emailed five or six top staff at Cornell and they have defaulted with silence.

I coin it Rectification of Judiciary. The manifestation is deviant oaths of office so that these officials can legislate from the bench, ignoring basic trust law in criminal syndicalism. - Meaning that if you appeal, you appeal to brethren within their same society of en banc attorneys.

Speaking of Achilles Heels, and this is a major piece of the puzzle IMHO, Roman military officers to whom military authority was delegated had that authority with limitations: THE AUTHORITY WAS NULL IN ROME. Consider Posse Comitatus. In Rome, the Roman military officer was without imperium, this was a protective measure. Do you suspect TWEA is effective outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States or outside of the military districts of the United States? The fraud may more lucidly be described as jurisdictional bait-and-switch.

Consider how a Legislature could pass a territorial act in front of a sleepy and mostly-confused citizenry, use smoke and mirrors to give that territorial act an extra-territorial appearance and then at some point repeal that territorial act it and have that same sleepy-headed and mostly-confused citizenry regard the repeal as having an extra-territorial effect. (Consider the psychological term 'double bind'.) When George Washington as POTUS sent Federal troops into Pennsylvania, he sent them to the District of Pennsylvania rather than to organic Pennsylvania land. The Civil War drafts affecting New York where directed at residents of "the District".

I coin it Rectification of Judiciary. The manifestation is deviant oaths of office so that these officials can legislate from the bench, ignoring basic trust law in criminal syndicalism. - Meaning that if you appeal, you appeal to brethren within their same society of en banc attorneys.

You're touching upon why corrupt attorneys lie to police, mislead them and place them in grave danger. Consider how many police have been quitting as of late for fear of their lives along with the recruitment difficulties major-city police departments have had recently. They even mislead the police by blaming so-called "Sovereign Citizens" (oxymoron) and slander folks (calling them "Right Wing Extremists") just for being sane enough to protect their own interests like any sane soul would. Consider the case of crimes being committed by criminals whose attorneys actually counsel on how to get away with crimes. If the police ever figure it out en masse... (use your imagination)--well they're already starting to. Its important to remember, it may very well be that most police are caught between an enigmatic rock and another enigmatic hard place. A primary purpose of the Michael Brown shooting and other and situations of police shooting innocent/unarmed has been not only to foment 'racial' divisions and to push 'race war' but also to deepen the divide between police and citizenry (a stronger us vs them mentality).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZR64EF3OpA

David Merrill

06-22-16, 07:47 AM

David,

So today was interesting, Got a parking ticket, Demanded lawful money on it (help me learn how to upload) walked into "payment division and served the clerk a public servant questionnaire, she refused to fill it out so i gave her her ticket demanded for lawful money back with the notice and daid when youre ready to fill it out contact me, she tried to slid it back through and i left before she did it. I took the bill for dept of ed. found the deputy cfo name and addressed the contents to him, "affivavit of Demand for lawful money and i stamped the rip off portion then accepted for value the bottom where they created a self-executing contract with added interest rates. then sent it certified, should i have sent it registered?

Are you for real?

Try "Go Advanced" and then scroll down to "Attachments". The basic uploader works better for files in your computer. There is an option for images that you have stored out on the Web too. Like my ImageShack photos. Also there is an easy Photograph button in the tool bar; it looks like a photo of a tree.

Dept. of Ed.??

Are you saying that you have discharged a student loan using lawful money? - Or attempted to do so?

This is why I would like to see some evidence you are actually hybridizing this compendium of patriot mythology with redemption. - I want to know if you are really doing these things, or you are just dredging through my entire state Citizen/Sovereign Citizen career to bug me.

Thanks!
David Merrill.

P.S. Here is the ImageShack photograph button in use:

4164

4165

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 01:13 PM

Ill try this out and see if it works

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 01:18 PM

My affidavit wont upload, however it is a affidavit of truth/novation.

Remenber, there is no money, why are you sendin me the bill? a remedy? well i demand lawful money to settle this, here is your presentment with a supportive Affidavit.

What you thnk i come here and ACT like i know some shit to waste my time? or even your time? Negative.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 01:20 PM

The presentment is messed up. I wrote it in red and blue when i made my copy it came out magenta, my lady got the wrong one so now when i scanned it it looks like that. I sent it to Deputy CFO Tim f. Soltis. he sent me the check and I demanded lawful money to discharge dollar for dollar

Gavilan

06-22-16, 02:44 PM

i dont play bro, about this.

Do you even know what you are doing? Brother, the contradicting gibberish you are putting out there gave me a headache by me reading it.

Keep it simple Chris, I am sure you aren't playing because they will hurt you if you continue with those forms.

allodial

06-22-16, 05:18 PM

#1 - For starters Christopher-T:Farley, AFAIK I'm unaware of any of there ever having been a state of America or party to the AoC or Constitution for the U.S.A. named "Pennsylvania Republic".
#2 - Acceptance of a bill in the manner in which you illustrate may very well make it bearer (note: DO NOT SEND CASH).

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 05:41 PM

Duly noted.

Gavilan

06-22-16, 05:46 PM

Chris,

I was thinking that I should explain a bit further, if you would indulge me with a bit of your time. Try to put aside for a moment, all of what you have learned, and see if what I share with you makes sense.

Think about it this way, if you were the only man on the whole world, it all would be yours, there would be no conflict with anyone else since there would not be anyone else.

Now, if there came to be another man, the physical characteristics of reality would change. There would be two of you, and the world's physical proportion would have to be split into two interests. 50/50 if you will. But if you notice the questions would arise, how to coexist? Who to be master, who to be slave? How would you resolve conflict? Physical combat or through dialog?

Notice one thing, without a third party to judge the resolution of your conflict it would be up to you two to resolve the conflict until it would be resolved, i.e., one of you kill the other, enslaved the other, or convince the other to submit, etc.

Continuing on, if there were three of you, the proportions would change to 1/3 each, .333333333.... And the same issues would arise as before however now you could combine forces with another to subjugate the least able one. And that is how this thing/system basically works.

Now, if you humble yourself enough to read the Scriptures, pray for guidance, wisdom and knowledge, it will come to be revealed to you how to deal with your problems.

A large number of people that are running the system do not even comprehend the basic points of what I have just explained to you. So don't assume they comprehend where you are coming from.

Read the Scriptures, read the Commandments, read Deuteronomy, Leviticus, etc., there you will come to see how the law is laid out for us, and then continue to the New Testament and comprehend how our Lord Jesus' sacrifice redeemed us.

The glue that holds the system is how people use currency, you have to understand what currency is. There is a simple explanation as to how all this came about which goes something like this-

As the people became sedentary and turned agrarian, in gratitude to the Lord the people would offer the choicest portion of the harvest to the Lord at their local temple. So who do you think would be in charge of the temple, the priests of course.

Well, if the harvest was very generous the priests would find themselves in a bind with a very large amount of commodities, which would spoil and go to waste or requite much work of caring. Looking for a solution to that problem, they found that precious metals do not spoil and could be kept safe with less care than a very large amount of commodities. As a side note, in order to preserve the grain is how they discovered alcoholic drinks, by fermenting the grains or grapes.

Well, as you can imagine, a greedy priest pretty much must have got to thinking about what to do with all that treasure in the temple, and he probably figure it out that he could lend it out to make a pretty profit for himself. But you see, if he lent out the treasure and there was a famine in the land due to a poor harvest, there would not be any treasure in the temple with which to trade with other people to avert the effects of the famine. What to do, simple, issue receipts or claim checks on loan to claim a part of the treasure at the temple if the borrower needed it. That way, the bulk of the treasure would remain at the temple safe and the priest could collect his interest.

As you can see, it is a very simple progression, but this have been hidden from the people because once people understand the process, they would not be so easy to dupe.

Next, enter commerce, as people developed more advanced forms of trade, they needed better ways to barter with each other, eventually giving way to debt trading and future performance of deeds.

For example, bartering commodities is very cumbersome and inefficient, so they found in precious metals a pretty much unique commodity that was acceptable by the majority of the community. They simplified this by coining the precious metal turning it into a standard of trade, next you would borrow these coins on evidence of your pledge or promise with a written instrument, leading to the trade of those written instruments of evidence of debt. So we went from a bartering system, to a trading system to a credit system, to what we have now a hybrid credit system with token coins.

So what happens now? Well, here is where your knowledge and learning comes into play, if you comprehend how the system works, you can learn to be as free as any man has been able to be on this earth. But you have to get yourself together, you have to understand the blessings of the Lord, else you would not be able to come to live in peace, the flesh will destroy itself and your spirit will remain trapped in this existence. If you comprehend that if you come to love the Lord with all your heart and all your mind, and learn to love yourself and love your neighbor as you love yourself, your whole life will change for the better, you would find patience and understanding.

I hope this helps you, if you have any questions don't hesitate and post them here. I will do my best to help answer them.

Cheers!

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 05:51 PM

ag maniac

06-22-16, 06:15 PM

I'd hate to be having my chain yanked (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=chris%20farley)

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 06:43 PM

Gavilan,

I didn't see your post until i posted (above). That is actually enlightening, a good way to put. I believe in all of Gods book(s), I believe in the messengers in which He (god) revealed to Mankind in and all of its Respective Nations to Teach how to Contract, Marry, Procreate, Worship, Fast, Charity, and Vist the House of God. and warned about a time is coming,will come, and is pre-ordained to come. where we will be judged for which manner we carried ourselves in all the latter. We have in our Country and all Countries so many people, Sooo many People that are expieriencing hardships for what? For something that don't exist something made up for someone elses benefit that was taken back through contract by threat coersion and duress, I went to get this ID thing they say is required by "Law" to have on your person, I asked her the "Statute" she gave it to me but wouldn't print it (then I would have her certify it as a Public Servant) however, I said that since it's a requirement may I have a paper Application, she said of course Electronic and she needed a BC SS and Two proofs, I tried to express that thiss SS card is not used to Identification and see if she can find the "Statute" she couldn't. (mind you I am polite this whole time) so in regard to the address I expressed my Travels and im the Care of and had Two Proofs of hers. I was coersed into signing an Affidavit of SSN which signed "under duress" they would not provide me there required ID without forceing me to provide a number that Doesn't belong to me. then when asked to Sign the ID I was underduress to step in and restrict my Signature under ucc1-308/under duress. She asked for payment and I asked again how I am required to pay for such which I really dont want to consent to however, if not may be held surety, I dont want to contract" So i gave her the card under duress and "demanded lawful money where again she wanted to coerse me to sign, she didnt accept it gave me the original back and forsed me to sign and i again restricted it.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-22-16, 06:47 PM

LMAO I didn't expect that. That was good bro, funnnnny. yes, it is. No relation though

David Merrill

06-22-16, 10:35 PM

From then to now, I believe the access to information i've been able to ACTUALLY research rather than the only information available (at the time) since this was not allowed in the [facility], I have been able to simplify things, to the best of my knowledge. gain more understanding. hopefully.

I hope you have a good time here.

My apologies for being kind of busy with other stuff. You made a comment that "There is no money." And I put you in a box I feel I know because I actually was doing that with POMC's twenty years ago, with great success. Then the DA saw me try to open up an account for paying parking tickets with one and had me on "theft".

I just got cocky. I do not teach the discharge against the fact that there is no definition by Congress for "money". I just got an email broadcast on the brain trust today in fact:

Crosstalk:

Just had a paralegal friend comment on this. He has this exact verbiage from 1997 from the guy who wrote it and is sitting in prison. I received it from another person.. but he didn't claim to write it.

If anyone decides to use this.. please get David's help and proceed with extreme caution. Our courts are set up to control us.. not help us succeed.

suitor

This suitor was compelled to come clean after broadcasting:

I find this interesting since so many of us have been convicted of crimes that were civil matters and not criminal.

The article below should remove all doubt within you about how we are all in danger of land piracy by the continuing criminal enterprise called the Crown Temple B.A.R., the Inns of the Court, Middle Temple, in CITY OF LONDON, the Attorners/Brokers for the Satanic Zionist-Jesuit Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banking Cabal. This is why these bankruptcy Administrators are called Attorners and Brokers.

How do they do this? By fraud, deception, lack of full disclosure, presumption, or as I call it, the tentacles of presumption upon the P.O.W., a.k.a. the Enemy of the State under Martial Law, which is the U.S. citizen/PERSON/OFFICE OF THE PERSON. Again, the U.S. citizen is the STRANGER/DECEDENT/DEAD ENTITY/DEBTOR, and again with emphasis, claiming U.S. citizen status is beyond stupid, as it means RESIDENT ALIEN, held as collateral for the DEBT by the Captor/Occupier on the District of Columbia.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4 has already timed out through 3 bankruptcies, therefore is forever under water. Does Admiralty Maritime Law come back to mind? The B.A.R. Attorneys are perpetrating Barratry, and Press-Ganging as they coerce you into the OFFICE OF THE PERSON. You’re not the DECEDENT, but that’s who the dirt bags commit land piracy against when they take the living man, ;john-henry: Doe and force at gunpoint into the OFFICE OF THE PERSON, JOHN H. DOE. Do not waste any of your energy listening to the Attorners lying to you. They’re foreclosed from parity with the tangible, so they rape you in the name of the DECEDENT. Every B.A.R. Attorner who does this is a criminal bastard, who should be hanging from a rope.

Get your nose into the material below so you can see what they do. There has never been a treaty of peace after the War of Northern Federal Aggression of 1863. Attorney Abraham Lincoln was truly a despicable piece of garbage, serving his Lord and Master, Rothschild. There was never any lawful authority for Attorneys or the B.A.R. to participate in Constitutional government, so what is in place today? A military coup d’etat by the Crown Banksters and their foot soldiers, the Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners.

White men make the best slaves, because they believe they’re free. Correct your status. Take a laxative, and drop that U.S. citizen status in the toilet. U.S. citizens relinquished their rights for “benefits.” What good slaves! They pay taxes they don’t even owe.

IT IS ALL ABOUT BONDS

What they’re doing in these courts is all about Bonds. When you go into the courtroom after you’re arrested, they use two different sets of Bonds. What they do when your arrested they fill out a “Bid Bond”. The United States District Court uses 273, 274 & 275. SF = “Standard Form”. Standard Form 273, Standard Form 274 & Standard Form 275.

This is the United States District Court.

There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.
O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, everyone of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.

That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. The attorneys are there to create a smoke screen.

What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment.” Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment.”

Who do they sell it to?

Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why no one has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.

What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.

Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments – anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. It’s Mercantile Civil Law.

The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the court room is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert.Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.

Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.

An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.

What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.

If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what their doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.

Continued...

David Merrill

06-22-16, 10:36 PM

from above...

I know I’ve been there. EVERYBODY IS FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM: ALL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS ARE FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM.

How many of you have heard of REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust or PZN which means Prison Trust? Prisoners are real estate? They own all the real estate because they hold the Bonds on them. You haven’t redeemed your Bond, so they didn’t close your account.

Here’s what goes on: A contractor comes in or any corporation could come in and tender a Bid Bond to the US District Court and they buy up these court judgments and anytime you issue a Bid Bond there has to be a reinsure. So they get a Reinsurance Company to come in and act as Surety for the Bid Bond, then they bring in a Performance Bond. All of these Bonds; Bid, Payment & Performance are all Surety Bonds and anytime you issue a Bid Bond it has to have a Surety guaranteeing or reinsuring the Bid Bond via issuing a Performance Bond.

Then they get an underwriter and that would be either an Investment Broker or an Investment Banker. They come in and underwrite the Performance Bond which is reinsuring the Bid Bond.

What does the underwriter do with the Performance Bond? The underwriter takes the 3 Bonds and pools them and creates what is known as Mortgaged Backed Securities. When you pool these MBS, they are called BONDS and are sold to a company called TBA, which is the Bond Market Association – this is an actual Corporation.

These converted Bonds, now MBS’ are investment securities and being sold the international level. CCA is one of the tickers on the NY Stock Exchange. Others include; CWX, CWD & CWG. When it goes to Frankfurt = CWG, when it goes to Berlin = CWD and so on.

Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.
This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.

They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non acceptance.They are making a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.

Be as gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. You can’t act like an insurgent or belligerent. If you do, they will treat you like one; they’ll beat you up.

What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.
In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond.

Here is where to begin: Start with what we call a conditional acceptance.

With the conditional acceptance you can say: “I’m more than happy to give you my name, if you can show that charging papers have been put into the court record. I have not seen any papers that show any charges exist.”
That’s a “Negative Averment”. What you are doing is rebutting the presumption that they have charges against you. They work off presumptions. They don’t have to have anything. You must rebut their presumptions.

I went down there and asked them for the Bid Bond. I said I want the Bid Bond back. I asked for full settlement and closure of the account. It’s your money that they create and the same thing is going on in the Banks and with these Bonds – they monetize these Bonds.

Then ask for legal counsel. The reason why you have to have an attorney, and I cannot emphasize this too strongly, is because the attorney while in a courtroom is they are working on the public side and you are working on the private side. The court cannot talk to you except through your attorney. You need a mouth piece; a microphone. That is what attorneys are – a mouthpiece. Everyone on the Public side is insolvent and bankrupt. You are not.

This is situation is called a Fiction-of-Law. They will not allow you to defeat this “Fiction-Of-Law”. Why? In Admiralty Maritime Law everything is colorable. It has the appearance of being real but is not real.

They will appoint legal counsel for you. You then instruct the attorney that you are doing a “LETTER OF ROGATORY” or letter of advice. This is also called an “Acceptance for Honor” and you want an accounting of what the total amount of the Bill is post settlement and closure of this account.

Then you give your CUSIP and AUTOTIS number and your case number.

Here’s the wording you use: “I accept your charge(s) for Value and Consideration in return for Post Settlement and Closure of Case # , account# 123-45-6789 [put down your 9 digit social security number] and put down CUSIP# [your ssn] & AUTOTRIS# [your ssn w/o dashes]. Please us my exemption for full settlement and closure of this account as this account is prepaid and exempt from levy. (Date it and endorse it as the Authorized Representative.)

(AUTOTRIS means Automated Tracking Identification System. This is the same as your social security number without the dashes. When I said that they didn’t even want to talk to me…when you say CUSIP & AUTOTRIS they know exactly what you’re talking about.

CUSIP is The COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM SECURITIES IDENTIFICATION PROCESSES. . CUSIP uses your Social Security Number to identify you because the Birth Certificate is a Security. It is an investment security and they have all the original Birth Certificates which are registered at the State level with the Department of Human Recourses and then they go to the Department of Commerce and the Federal level and then to the DTC (Depository Trust Corporation).

Judges and lawyers don’t understand commercial law. They do not teach commercial law at law school. They have a special school for them and it’s on a “need to know” basis.
_______
§ 3-419. INSTRUMENTS SIGNED FOR ACCOMMODATION.

(a) If an instrument is issued for value given for the benefit of a party to the instrument (“accommodated party”) and another party to the instrument (“accommodation party”) signs the instrument for the purpose of incurring liability on the instrument without being a direct beneficiary of the value given for the instrument, the instrument is signed by the accommodation party “for accommodation.”

(b) An accommodation party may sign the instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser and, subject to subsection (d), is obliged to pay the instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. The obligation of an accommodation party may be enforced notwithstanding any statute of frauds and whether or not the accommodation party receives consideration for the accommodation.

(c) A person signing an instrument is presumed to be an accommodation party and there is notice that the instrument is signed for accommodation if the signature is an anomalous indorsement or is accompanied by words indicating that the signer is acting as surety or guarantor with respect to the obligation of another party to the instrument. Except as provided in Section 3-605, the obligation of an accommodation party to pay the instrument is not affected by the fact that the person enforcing the obligation had notice when the instrument was taken by that person that the accommodation party signed the instrument for accommodation.

(d) If the signature of a party to an instrument is accompanied by words indicating unambiguously that the party is guaranteeing collection rather than payment of the obligation of another party to the instrument, the signer is obliged to pay the amount due on the instrument to a person entitled to enforce the instrument only if (i) execution of judgment against the other party has been returned unsatisfied, (ii) the other party is insolvent or in an insolvency proceeding, (iii) the other party cannot be served with process, or (iv) it is otherwise apparent that payment cannot be obtained from the other party.

(e) If the signature of a party to an instrument is accompanied by words indicating that the party guarantees payment or the signer signs the instrument as an accommodation party in some other manner that does not unambiguously indicate an intention to guarantee collection rather than payment, the signer is obliged to pay the amount due on the instrument to a person entitled to enforce the instrument in the same circumstances as the accommodated party would be obliged, without prior resort to the accommodated party by the person entitled to enforce the instrument.

(f) An accommodation party who pays the instrument is entitled to reimbursement from the accommodated party and is entitled to enforce the instrument against the accommodated party. In proper circumstances, an accommodation party may obtain relief that requires the accommodated party to perform its obligations on the instrument. An accommodated party that pays the instrument has no right of recourse against, and is not entitled to contribution from, an accommodation party.

These are honorable people but it takes a long time to learn to abide in rules of evidence.

allodial

06-23-16, 01:18 AM

These are honorable people but it takes a long time to learn to abide in rules of evidence.

The process of notice and grace should be taught in grade school, junior high and high school. Of course, if it were, most everyone would get the importance of maintaining and having an evidence repository.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-23-16, 02:59 AM

Dr. [S.K.]? Really smart gentleman. I believe I read that in '12-13'. Yes, I believe that whole hardely, I even asked for the [facilities] articles of Incorporation to see in what ways they were using my signature in an accomodation manner that I dont consent to. thats when statements from [Parole] remembering me vividly andd trying to "ensure" me that they are trying there best and consider early release blah blahblah. yes that is enlightening. matter of fact I feel if you was to use the GSA forms with a request of Article of Incorporation and Rescinding of signature(if needed) or enforse restricted signature along with an affidavit of neg. aver. and forms 90 and 91 (release of real and personal property) they are in a check-mate position within the realm of bankruptcy to oblige. may-be.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-23-16, 03:08 AM

Alodial,

I agree with you brother, I feel our teacher do not get enough credit for the importance of there job. however, us as parents generation and generation was deceived to believe that someone else determines what our children learn and watched as it diminished. now hey are teaching kids in some school one world govenance (if that is a word) think of the Habaes Corpus, ask ANY kids in highschool or college. i'll use my age group. i was born in 88. I would say 3 out of 10 MAY know of or heard of a habeas corpus. 0 knows how to properlly draft one. and you should not need a ATTORNey for the excercise of the 5th due process right. when i say that I am the ex rel: Real party in intrest. do we know what we are saying? yet we lost that.

allodial

06-23-16, 03:28 AM

That started with age segregation in schools back in the 1800s (age of consent laws were another edge to that sword). That set up obstacles to interfere with older students educating younger students and served to put walls of separation between age groups so that younger students could be taught one thing and older students could be taught something else--educational compartmentalization. The older students would presume the younger students were being taught the same thing. Over time, they could teach "the Earth is a triangular pizza" and "stars are made of molten baby powder" and who would know.

Its amazing how many parents believe "they're teenagers" as an excuse for the behavior of their children when the truth: they're actively and intentionally indoctrinating kids against parents. Feminism: genders as a separate species. "Pop culture" teens as separate species, adult as idiot enemies (started in the 50s, British import).

Once, I went to purchase Acrylic sealer from a store. I was at a location that required ID. Of course, I left ID in the car. I don't smoke or purchase alcohol so why should I carry ID around just to buy art supplies. Well the young guy (prob 18 years old) he said "Well you know people get high on this stuff on parking lots. Someone got arrested for that. You know, we have to be treated the same." So I'm like: "What does someone sniffing art supplies on a parking lot have anything to do with me?" (I use sealer for archival purposes.) So I asked: "If that guy *points* over there murders someone, you get to go to jail too, right?" The look on his face evidenced activation of gray matter that had never been used. I left the stuff, went to a different store and bought it without ID, principles.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-23-16, 05:17 AM

Well I hope something clicked in his brain "a piece of the riddle" spoke in the brother's movie clip posting. I like the way you handled the situation. It even speaks of this in His (God) final book where there would be a time where Kids would Disrespect there Mothers and try to be there Parents Parent. which you see on reality shows. speaking of such earlier I walked out as unfortunately I do smoke but not in the house, the tv was left on and it was a reality show. the regular couple 1-2 kid household scenerio and the dude is mad about not having sex for 4 days or whatever and the three year old is there eating at the table, may not be paying any mind to mommy and daddy but heres the kicker, (im not into these shows, im analytical and i get drawn to things in an attempt to make sense of something hense this convo) The chick acknoweledged that the daughter was present and should wait, he said it doesn't matter she doesnt know what were talking about and she says (daughter) he wants to watch tv. my question is how many kids who have kids watch this crap and how many kids may be paying attention at that particular time TV or in actual reality.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-23-16, 05:21 AM

This is from earlier today I spoke of earlier

Christopher-T:Farley

06-23-16, 05:29 AM

Actually that is a similiar Tactic that was used from Willie Lynch. this way however involved a way that would gain control both ways, turn against the ones who should be responsible to pass down the knowledge (long lost) and brainwash them once they turn away. then they will teach there kids whatever they was brainwash by society to do and kids where shut there ears because this is the boomer generation or i dont know all the names but i never understood why we "track" ourselves like that, I am only aware of knowing as much as you can about your enemy to win a war, well were all supposed to be good people so why are we tracking eachother so much, you know?

David Merrill

06-23-16, 02:06 PM

I am only aware of knowing as much as you can about your enemy to win a war, well were all supposed to be good people so why are we tracking eachother so much, you know?

This is the sort of thing I was talking about. Forgiveness and reconciliation are the answers. Redemption is the key. - Just as Jesus taught it. And Jesus was certainly not the only teacher.

YOU CANNOT FIGHT YOUR WAY OFF THE BATTLEFIELD.

Fortunately I am long past collecting examples of how not to do things. I strongly suggest that we all evaluate this kind of comment in light of the Topic Subject. The Trading with the Enemy Act is still being omitted from Cornell Law's website.

Click Here. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a)

Gavilan

06-23-16, 02:16 PM

Forgiveness and reconciliation are the answers. Redemption is the key. - Just as Jesus taught it. And Jesus was certainly not the only teacher.

YOU CANNOT FIGHT YOUR WAY OFF THE BATTLEFIELD.

Fortunately I am long past collecting examples of how not to do things. I strongly suggest that we all evaluate this kind of comment in light of the Topic Subject. The Trading with the Enemy Act is still being omitted from Cornell Law's website.

Click Here. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a)

Amen! David.

Gavilan

06-23-16, 02:25 PM

It is surprising to me how I suddenly catch myself being combative when thinking about the harm they inflict upon me, when you immediately realize that they may not know they are harming you, because they are under the impression you are wrong and they are correct even though it's also their responsibility to know the law.

It's then I immediately ask for forgiveness, and guidance as to how it is the proper way to proceed. What if it was me that was doing the harm and wasn't perceptive that I was doing the harm, how would I would like to be informed and treated? It's then when we must show patience, be patient, and give notice of our position with the aim of informing the other party. If they choose then to act maliciously, then it is on their head.

Michael Joseph

06-23-16, 02:26 PM

This is the sort of thing I was talking about. Forgiveness and reconciliation are the answers. Redemption is the key. - Just as Jesus taught it. And Jesus was certainly not the only teacher.

YOU CANNOT FIGHT YOUR WAY OFF THE BATTLEFIELD.

Fortunately I am long past collecting examples of how not to do things. I strongly suggest that we all evaluate this kind of comment in light of the Topic Subject. The Trading with the Enemy Act is still being omitted from Cornell Law's website.

Click Here. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a)

For Jesus taught us to pray...

"Forgive us our transgressions as we forgive those who transgress against us".....

Jubilee.

For how can a servant who is forgiven much turn now upon another who owes him little?

"Looks, like Homer Stokes is the kind of fella who wants to cast the first stone" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYzy9-QWj6o)

"He's a Suitor" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXmeBUZtdI8)

David Merrill

06-24-16, 02:21 PM

Somebody pointed out that I might use the direct-government website for the US Codes.

Of course the Trading with the Enemy Act was first to confirm... "Omitted" too. This is strange because Congress has not done that.

Click Here. (http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:12%20section:95a%20edition:p relim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title12-section95a)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true)

Gavilan

06-24-16, 02:48 PM

David Merrill

06-24-16, 03:34 PM

Please do:

Ask for a Reference Librarian.

(202) 707-5080 Library of Congress.

Gavilan

06-24-16, 03:56 PM

Please do:

Ask for a Reference Librarian.

(202) 707-5080 Library of Congress.

Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.

David Merrill

06-24-16, 03:58 PM

I am not finding the GPO link functional, from the first post.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/US...bchapIV-sec95a

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionUScode.action?collectionCode=USCODE

That sounds worth keeping an eye on...

Gavilan

06-24-16, 04:22 PM

David Merrill

06-24-16, 04:55 PM

Please poke around in the Congressional Records and see?

allodial

06-24-16, 08:57 PM

This is what I found about three days ago: link (pdf) (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title12/pdf/USCODE-2011-title12-chap2-subchapIV-sec95a.pdf).

Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.

You ask "Redundant with what portion of the code"?

***

Remember, one might have to be diligent to keep them from blurring the distinctions between United States territorial jurisdiction and that of the several states. Whether a state officer pretends to not know or doesn't know is irrelevant.

Things the U.S. Congress in its territorial mode might be able to legislate over Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, federal courthouses, U.S. military bases doesn't have any potency or weight among the several states of the American confederacy. The several states are not "the Land" (as pertains to the "law of the Land"). Something being "the law (lore) of the land" means for due process it is part of that body of documents or principles which judges have to take judicial notice in court cases. "the land" or estate of the United States is limited to its territories, districts and possessions. The several states are neither its territories, its districts nor its possessions.

David Merrill

06-24-16, 11:15 PM

Please do:

Ask for a Reference Librarian.

(202) 707-5080 Library of Congress.

This is what I found about three days ago: link (pdf) (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title12/pdf/USCODE-2011-title12-chap2-subchapIV-sec95a.pdf).

Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.

You ask "Redundant with what portion of the code"?

***

Remember, one might have to be diligent to keep them from blurring the distinctions between United States territorial jurisdiction and that of the several states. Whether a state officer pretends to not know or doesn't know is irrelevant.

Things the U.S. Congress in its territorial mode might be able to legislate over Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, federal courthouses, U.S. military bases doesn't have any potency or weight among the several states of the American confederacy. The several states are not "the Land" (as pertains to the "law of the Land"). Something being "the law (lore) of the land" means for due process it is part of that body of documents or principles which judges have to take judicial notice in court cases. "the land" or estate of the United States is limited to its territories, districts and possessions. The several states are neither its territories, its districts nor its possessions.

Therefore no reporting on the GPO. It is not an action by Congress. This is an internal policy change and there is no discussion on the Floor.

Lacking discussion on the Floor this smacks of the cover-up I described. After all, there is no statute of limitations on murder, and a case does not go cold just because the murderer(s) are deceased. There has been a lot of activity on YouTube lately and this is really time for me to authorize Jubilee:

https://youtu.be/DU6fxC5CXMg?t=1713

Major credit for what is coming up (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImbmV1RVFTUlVNM2c/view?usp=sharing) is due to readers and members here, and to a learning tool I developed two decades ago I call the "brain trust". Communication is creation and only beings of like order can truly communicate.

4177

4178

4179

4182

4183

David Merrill

06-24-16, 11:29 PM

I enjoy how my true bill used the citation from Our Country - about how the Salem Witch Hunts came to an abrupt end:

4195

4196

David Merrill

06-24-16, 11:41 PM

P.S. A suitor requested some help reviving an evidence repository, that has been staving off rigorous and aggressive revenue agents now for years.

Here you go:

Simply explain to the clerk of court in the Clerk Instruction.

"Ms. PRETENDER is not a judge, as she has signed an oath that deviates in form from that prescribed by law. She has no judicial or sovereign immunity and is therefore culpable as an individual for any harm that may come to me or my estate due to interfering with my evidence repository. Please notice how her, So help me God, has been altered to all upper case letters. If she makes any further attempts to legally advise you about your job, request for me that she provide a written explanation why her oath of office is deviant from the plain English grammar and form prescribed by Congress."

4188

You might wonder why I speak again of already having the Creative Ownership... Well at least I hope so. The Senior Judge assigned to the case (http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges) is recused at the starting gate. His oath of office is deviant from prescribed law.

4187

David Merrill

06-24-16, 11:55 PM

But this gets better! It looks as though he has recused himself? This marking was returned by the process server.

4189

So I thought that I had a handle on which judge is on the case...

4190

Also, it looks like I held up all filings for over a day, while they figured out I retain the authority - outside the sacrificial system of Levi, in the Order of Melchizedek; however they might perceive that knowledge.

4191

I wish I had caught the time and date, but there were no posted filings; at all. And there are including bankruptcy cases in admiralty, over a hundred cases file per day.

Then they all showed up, but not mine; not for several more hours.

4192

So you might enjoy how that box for specifying details got so screwed up, and why you can no longer read which judge is assigned my cause (JUBILEE), if any.

David Merrill

06-25-16, 12:03 AM

So the clerk has fudged the dating of the filing system! Look here; my case shows up as having been filed on the 22nd...

4193

And this is always the opportunity of a lifetime should you know when to spot it. Trustee for the Resulting Trust.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-25-16, 01:17 PM

Gavilan

06-25-16, 01:30 PM

Man, why am I not able to draft things right? just when I feel I put it together, I am wrong. The one's i filed is now looking for an answer and I keep running through options to settle this. That was well put, David. well put bro. you motivate me to do more research.

https://thelegaldictionary.org/dictionary/sinderesis/

SINDERESIS

“A natural power of the soul, set in the highest part thereof, moving and stirring it to good, aud adhorring evil. And therefore sinderesis never sinneth nor erreth. And this sinderesis our Lord put in man, to the intent that the order of things should be observed. And therefore sinderesis is called by some men the ‘law of reason,’ for it ministereth the principles of the law of reason, the which be in every man by na- ture, in that he is a reasonable creature.” Doct. & Stud. 39.

Search your heart, ask for knowledge, wisdom, and guidance. The answer will come to you, if you are doing it because of the right motives. Be humble, being right and yet proud may take you down the wrong path. See the book of Job.

Christopher-T:Farley

06-25-16, 06:17 PM

Gavilan,

Thank you for that, I wasn't even aware of that word. let alone even existing in the black's law. however, per your information, and im sure you've seen my memorandum (above) I attempted to file, yet the clerk didn't and now there is a liabilty someone has to answer for again, I might be injured by such warrant or claim. Since i do have a certified mail receipt that I sent the paperwork to be filed for the person a presumed claim is against, I stated that I clearly challenge jurisdiction, (even though the person signed a court jugement due to lack of knoweledge a couple years back ) I stepped in, since i'm being injured due to this claim with support that jurisdiction can be challenged at anytime and where there is no juridiction all judgements are 'Void'. Well, I find myself in a position where they didn't honor that. If I file a Motion to vacate in support of lack of jurisdiction with the superior court, will they accept if I use there own 'statutes' and 'rules' and case-law however filing as a 3rd party and requesting individual 3rd party capasity? will I unknowingly sub-ject?

Soulution

02-07-19, 12:53 AM

Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.

The reason why Law Cornell (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a) and the gov website (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2015-title12/pdf/USCODE-2015-title12-chap2-subchapIV-sec95a.pdf) both have 12 U.S.C. § 95a omitted is not done with malicious intent like fraud via omission. What Gavilan said (quoted above) was correct: 12 U.S.C. § 95a has been omitted due to redundancy. The statute is now found at 50 U.S.C. § 4305(b)2 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/4305)

The language of 50 U.S.C. § 4305 is the same except this version says "subdivision" whereas 12 U.S.C. § 95a says "section":

(2)Any payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery of property or interest therein, made to or for the account of the United States, or as otherwise directed, pursuant to this subdivision or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder shall to the extent thereof be a full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation of the person making the same; and no person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance of and in reliance on, this subdivision, or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder.

I was looking into this at a law library a couple months ago, and was reading some case law on the issue (I'll have to find the specific cases again, and will post them then) and found that the use of the original statute - 12 U.S.C. § 95a - is no longer recognized by the court as having authority. The courts no longer recognizing the statute as having authority along with the aforementioned reason of redundancy is why 12 U.S.C. § 95a has since been omitted.

David Merrill

02-07-19, 04:41 AM

It no longer applies to banking. For the longest time (153 years) it applied to banking.

Soulution

02-28-19, 07:31 AM

David Merrill

02-28-19, 10:47 AM

What do you mean when you say "it"? The statute 12 U.S.C. § 95a is from the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, right? What happened in 1866 - 153 years ago?

Also, why does the supplemental statute 50 U.S.C. § 4305b no longer apply to banking? The language is the same as 12 U.S.C. § 95a, plus § 95a is omitted for redundancy because of the supplemental statute 50 U.S.C. § 4305b.

Thank you for asking. I like when people get interested enough to pay attention.

FDR used the 1917 Statute for a bogus war against the Great Depression applying what was intended for foreign nationals on American soil to the US citizen in general, specifically those who might have alliances intended toward Germany. However this of course applied to US citizens who simply felt allied with their mother country. So its use was very sketchy but STOEHR v WALLACE in 1921 decreed the TWEA was only for wartime. So the question redacts to whether the Great Depression was an actual enemy of the state.

The 153 is tricky because the effect happens in year 154, after 153 years and there is a 49th and 50th year following the seven year release, and the 50 year jubilee applied in the Delegation of Authority to the Triumvirate to execute the Super Jubilee - the 70th Jubilee (3,500 years) since the invasion of Canaan. Also, the Jubilee was in 2016, not the current 2019 so adjust for that to 1864.

1861 plus 153 is 2014 plus the fallow years for 49 and 50 years according to Bible law. So add two years to 2014 and get 2016.

To grasp this one really has to study the Bible as a history lesson covering the greater Mesopotamian region, including Canaan and Egypt. As technology and intelligence accelerates through Joseph's (FDR) extorted gold, and Moses' stolen, same gold utilized in the production of manna and the transceiver Tabernacle then we begin to see the recent cover up.

George Walker BUSH Sr. was Director of Intelligence for a couple years in the '70's as we saw the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements implementing Paper Gold - SDR's. Then we see the same BUSH as Bloodline President invade Kuwait - Ur of Chaldea in the early '90's destabilizing Saddam's regime. But the history was still revealing that the NEPHALIM have survived through the BRANCH or Stem of Jesse - the "sons of God" in Genesis 6 were still found in Canaan at Numbers 13:33. So George Walker BUSH Jr. invaded Babylon with Shock and Awe.

Remember how the museums with the Bible Story relics were destroyed?

Just as we were recovering the Bible Story from the wrath of commercial priestcraft the NEPHALIM bloodline did its very best to destroy the tracks leading to solving the mysteries in mass. I will scan a few pages from the Sword and the Grail book by Andrew SINCLAIR later today.