David Merrill
09-01-16, 11:48 AM
This is an interesting find:
Court Case Search. (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=FEDERAL+OPEN+MARKET+COMMITTEE+(FOMC)+OF+the+FE DERAL+RESERVE+SYSTEM%2C+Petitioner%2C+v.+David+R.+ MERRILL.+443+U.S.+340+(99+S.Ct.+2800%2C+61+L.Ed.2d +587)+U.S.+Supreme+Court+No.+77-1387.)
Mostly because my alerting China (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImN00wbG14S1pzUHM/view?usp=sharing) would seem a cause for the Open Market Committee to be upset.
4421
I think the case might be worth reading, simply because so many people think I was involved as an attorney.
Here is an interesting example. (https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/federal-reserve-act-remedy-title-12/#comment-3707)
This one makes my point better: (https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/the-remedy-under-the-common-law-for-the-federal-reserve-act-of-1913-by-david-merrill/)
I have re-posted it here because I think it is SUPERB re: its analysis.
David Merrill is an attorney. He filed suit against the Federal Reserve while he was still a law student at Georgetown Law School in Washington, D.C. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and can be found as: FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC) OF the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. David R. MERRILL.
443 U.S. 340 (99 S.Ct. 2800, 61 L.Ed.2d 587)
U.S. Supreme Court
No. 77-1387.
Argued: Dec. 6, 1978; Decided: June 28, 1979.
It is difficult to argue when I am so flattered, even if I am joindered to an attorney. Peculiar that the misnomer on the Olympus Ordeal is "David L. Merrill". - Reminding me:
4422
Court Case Search. (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=FEDERAL+OPEN+MARKET+COMMITTEE+(FOMC)+OF+the+FE DERAL+RESERVE+SYSTEM%2C+Petitioner%2C+v.+David+R.+ MERRILL.+443+U.S.+340+(99+S.Ct.+2800%2C+61+L.Ed.2d +587)+U.S.+Supreme+Court+No.+77-1387.)
Mostly because my alerting China (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImN00wbG14S1pzUHM/view?usp=sharing) would seem a cause for the Open Market Committee to be upset.
4421
I think the case might be worth reading, simply because so many people think I was involved as an attorney.
Here is an interesting example. (https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/federal-reserve-act-remedy-title-12/#comment-3707)
This one makes my point better: (https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/the-remedy-under-the-common-law-for-the-federal-reserve-act-of-1913-by-david-merrill/)
I have re-posted it here because I think it is SUPERB re: its analysis.
David Merrill is an attorney. He filed suit against the Federal Reserve while he was still a law student at Georgetown Law School in Washington, D.C. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and can be found as: FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC) OF the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. David R. MERRILL.
443 U.S. 340 (99 S.Ct. 2800, 61 L.Ed.2d 587)
U.S. Supreme Court
No. 77-1387.
Argued: Dec. 6, 1978; Decided: June 28, 1979.
It is difficult to argue when I am so flattered, even if I am joindered to an attorney. Peculiar that the misnomer on the Olympus Ordeal is "David L. Merrill". - Reminding me:
4422