PDA

View Full Version : Citizenship, is this the reason they has to pass the 14th Amendment?



Gavilan
09-10-16, 02:38 PM
I came across Attorney General Bates opinion on citizenship you all may find very enlightening:


https://books.google.com/books?id=1v3d_OiiMWAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=citizenship&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW_p3jiIDPAhVDHR4KHcRGBZMQ6AEIJTAA#v=on epage&q=citizenship&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=KuIWn68H4j0C&pg=RA2-PA75&lpg=RA2-PA75&dq=opinions+of+attorney+general+vol+1+page+506&source=bl&ots=_2oYW4Jyln&sig=oiWzdbkBIsRdPO5akkM3RL4KA10&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjvqK7E9IDPAhXCvhQKHaJ5DxsQ6AEIHjAA#v=on epage&q=opinions%20of%20attorney%20general%20vol%201%20p age%20506&f=false

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2/370/case.html

https://books.google.com/books?id=RY1JAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA509&dq=attorney+general+wirt+citizenship+person+of+col or&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9s-TkgYHPAhUBaz4KHe8tCloQuwUILzAD#v=onepage&q=attorney%20general%20wirt%20citizenship%20person %20of%20color&f=false


Ok, as linked above, I came across this opinion from Attorney General Bates where he is asked about a "colored" man in command of a ship if he was a citizen of the United States, previously Attorney General Wirt had the opinion that colored people could not be citizens of the United States.

These are from Bates.
4451
4452

This is from Wirt
4453

4454

The case Wirt cites is this:

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2/370/case.html

shikamaru
09-10-16, 03:01 PM
My opinion:

They had to pass the 14th to get over the ruling of Scott v. Sanford (1857).

There are levels to status:

1) citizen
2) denizen
3) alien whether resident or foreign
4) slave

Condition refers to whether free or servile.

Ultimately, this is about the opinions of some officers in some body corporate.

Under the law of nature, all men are free. It is man's law that seeks to involuntarily subjugate another and then rationalize it as law (positive law), religion, philosophy, or whatever.

Gavilan
09-10-16, 03:04 PM
My opinion:

They had to pass the 14th to get over the ruling of Scott v. Sanford (1857).

There are levels to status:

1) citizen
2) denizen
3) alien whether resident or foreign
4) slave

Condition refers to whether free or servile.

Read Bates opinion, he breaks it down for us. The case you cite was not novel, they had already ran into such issues previously.

shikamaru
09-10-16, 03:07 PM
Read Bates opinion, he breaks it down for us.

1. These opinions are decades before the Dread Scott decision.
2. An attorneys general of a State is an officer of the government of that State. Different states treated "people of color" differently given their prejudices and history.

Gavilan
09-10-16, 03:35 PM
1. These opinions are decades before the Dread Scott decision.
2. An attorneys general of a State is an officer of the government of that State. Different states treated "people of color" differently given their prejudices and history.

That's right, which Bates explains therein.

shikamaru
09-10-16, 03:45 PM
That's right, which Bates explains therein.

Which explains the Dread Scott decision decades later to standardize the law across the several States which leads to the Civil War and ultimately the 14th Amendment to overturn that Supreme Court ruling.

Gavilan
09-10-16, 03:49 PM
Which explains the Dread Scott decision decades later to standardize the law across the several States which leads to the Civil War and ultimately the 14th Amendment to overturn that Supreme Court ruling.

Yep, that's what I was thinking. But you know, it didn't overturned the ruling, that ruling is still law.

shikamaru
09-10-16, 03:57 PM
Yep, that's what I was thinking. But you know, it didn't overturned the ruling, that ruling is still law.

My understanding is that Supreme Court rulings can be overturned by constitutional amendment which is what we have here.

Gavilan
09-10-16, 04:11 PM
My understanding is that Supreme Court rulings can be overturned by constitutional amendment which is what we have here.
Here is a link to the case. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/60/393/case.html

I am short of time at the moment, but I will see if we can discuss this further a bit later.

shikamaru
09-10-16, 04:24 PM
Here is a link to the case. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/60/393/case.html

I am short of time at the moment, but I will see if we can discuss this further a bit later.

If this is still law, where is this law practiced in these United States?

Gavilan
09-10-16, 11:01 PM
If this is still law, where is this law practiced in these United States?

Are you talking about slavery? or Citizenship?

shikamaru
09-11-16, 12:48 PM
Are you talking about slavery? or Citizenship?

Citizenship.

Slavery has been transmuted into voluntary servitude and incarceration. That affects all people in these United States. Some of the aforementioned affects some more than others disproportionately.