PDA

View Full Version : The Origins of Communism in California



allodial
09-22-16, 07:10 PM
The Origins of Communism in California

Examining the long march to Communism in California shows that it took Progressives over a hundred years to achieve their totalitarian California dream.

In 1879, the NY Times reported on the new California Constitution which was instigated by… wait for it… the Labor Party. Wouldn’t you know, community organizers peddling their Communism way back then. In the article, “Communism in California,” notice that their oppressive, totalitarian dream was instituted through taxation and taking control of land and railways. Does this sound similar to what they’re doing at an accelerated pace today? It certainly parallels what Nancy Pelosi brought to the House floor in 1992, which she called “Agenda 21” and said it is the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development program.

Most notable in the 1879 NY Times article is the author’s apparent realization of the danger of enacting a mild form of Socialism that would lead to a Communist California, while at the same time finding comfort in the fact that it’s happening in a “distant part of the country.” The author may have presumed it would prove disastrous before infecting other States and spreading throughout the US like a violent and deadly virus. Little did the author know that it would be emanating from our very own White House, with an iron fist, within 130 years. (source/more--interesting comments (http://www.pravdareport.com/news/world/americas/20-09-2016/135660-california-0/))

4534

Question: Why don't Communists ever suggest that worker unite to get a % of profits or equity from the companies they work for? Why did Communist accountant put an end to so-called California capitlists doing just that (read about the end of ESOPs in Sillicon Valley; even janitors got wealthy if the owners go wealthy but Communists put and end to that practice. If they are pro-worker, why? Instead they encourage workers to give large sums to Unions and Pension Plans that.. well were robbed. Hmmmmm.)



The mandatory expensing of stock options would effectively destroy broad-based stock option plans which enhance financial opportunities for workers at all levels, stimulate economic growth, and help create the new economy of the 1990s, a new economy, as I mentioned before, that we are still feeling the effects of today. --THE FASB STOCK OPTIONS PROPOSAL: ITS EFFECT ON THE U.S. ECONOMY AND JOBS [2004](source (http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/bank/hba95438.000/hba95438_0.HTM))