PDA

View Full Version : The first constitutions



David Merrill
03-04-11, 02:47 PM
To gain understanding of the nature of constitutions, remember the history of such documents. I will show you two:

1) Nehemiah, Chapter 10.
2) Fundamental Orders of 1639.

The first is very interesting as Nehemiah was a Babylonian marshal imposing the return of Babylon's recent creation, the Jew. If you remember your Bible Story and the Book of Ezra, after seventy years in captivity, the Jews were not considered fit to serve and repair the Temple Mount by the native Israelites. As Darius won the civil war he cause by sending the Jews to invade their former homeland, he appointed Nehemiah as the Marshal of enforcement.

It would seem from the Bible lesson that this kind of imposition brought with it, the bonding of government officials through Oath of Office. Swearing. This may be developed later in the thread for sure - with Jesus' admonition against swearing and all.

I want to move on with a succinct opening post to the Fundamental Orders (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImMmVjNjNjMGYtZTQ1OC00ZGEwLWFlM 2YtNjQwNDJkNTJlZjEz&hl=en&authkey=CIbB1OQI). The FO has a remarkable Preamble, even calling on Jesus Christ by Name:


http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/1868/constitutionof1638.jpg

Interestingly the capital offenses (http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/5069/capitallaws.jpg) refer to the Ten Commandments. It calls for honoring of bills and liens (http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/1687/billsu.jpg), even upon transfer by attorn (http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/8350/attorndefinitionsmall.jpg).

Through these two early constitutions though, we can begin to understand the fidelity bond ($$$) formed through the Oath of Office today. - That the oath is a curse, to pay for infidelity to the constitution:



Neh 10:1 Now those that sealed were, Nehemiah, the Tirshatha, the son of Hachaliah, and Zidkijah,
Neh 10:2 Seraiah, Azariah, Jeremiah...

Neh 10:28 And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge, and having understanding;

Neh 10:29 They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes;

Neh 10:30 And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:

Neh 10:31 And if the people of the land bring ware or any victuals on the sabbath day to sell, that we would not buy it of them on the sabbath...



Food for thought!

David Merrill.

shikamaru
03-04-11, 08:41 PM
I would like to contribute Anderson's Constitution (1754) of the Freemasons.

David Merrill
03-05-11, 12:21 AM
Yes!! I want it!!

Are you talking hardcopy?





p.s. Seriously, you would probably want to keep that in you library; but if you can link images from it...

shikamaru
03-05-11, 12:25 AM
Yes!! I want it!!

Are you talking hardcopy?

http://www.2be1ask1.com/library/anderson.html

There seem to be more ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonic_manuscripts#The_Constitutions_of_the_Moder ns

Michael Joseph
03-05-11, 05:22 AM
The New Covenant - adopted internationally 1994. - for those of you who are hung up on the Constitution of the US go and read that document at Art III - international treaties bind the United States of America and all of the other dependent States that are clearly UNDER the United States. Like all 50 today. The claim is clearly in the United States.



http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/law/Covenant94/index.html

---------------------------

Warren E. ENSMINGER v. THE FARM CREDIT BANK OF WICHITA; First National Bank of Okeene, hereinafter “Ensminger”; and, reference the following decision coming from a three judge panel:



This action was instigated to determine who has the highest title to property located in [Major and Grady] county, Oklahoma Territory state, of which the United States of America by contract, gave up all right, title or interest in said property, without any conditions set forth; and it is very clear by the defendant's pleadings that it is not that entity that is claiming the property, Mr. Butler for Federal Land Bank clearly stated that the claim is the United States, and that Federal Land Bank and First National Bank in Okeene are not of the United States of America[.] and,.



Clearly Ensminger recognizes the separation of [the] United States and [the] United States of America as being two separate and distinct entities; and, furthermore at Chisholm v. Georgia the opinions produced the following:



“To the Constitution of the United States, the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety. But even in that place, it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained and established that Constitution. They might have announced themselves "SOVEREIGN" people of the United States. But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.”; and,



“No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”

-----------------------



Remember that constitution provides for the United States to enter into International Treaties and said Treaties would by operation of law bind the USA and the fifty STATES. Silence is acceptance. And clearly even as early as Sept 24, 1789 the UNITED STATES was dictating to the STATES. Therefore the more perfect Union was formed UNDER one head. And today the hereinbefore International Treaty applies to each and every CESTUI QUE TRUST. Therefore that treaty in a sense has become part of the law of the land.

David Merrill
03-06-11, 11:05 PM
The New Covenant - adopted internationally 1994. - for those of you who are hung up on the Constitution of the US go and read that document at Art III - international treaties bind the United States of America and all of the other dependent States that are clearly UNDER the United States. Like all 50 today. The claim is clearly in the United States.



http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/law/Covenant94/index.html

Warren E. ENSMINGER v. THE FARM CREDIT BANK OF WICHITA; First National Bank of Okeene, hereinafter “Ensminger”; and, reference the following decision coming from a three judge panel:



This action was instigated to determine who has the highest title to property located in [Major and Grady] county, Oklahoma Territory state, of which the United States of America by contract, gave up all right, title or interest in said property, without any conditions set forth; and it is very clear by the defendant's pleadings that it is not that entity that is claiming the property, Mr. Butler for Federal Land Bank clearly stated that the claim is the United States, and that Federal Land Bank and First National Bank in Okeene are not of the United States of America[.] and,.



Clearly Ensminger recognizes the separation of [the] United States and [the] United States of America as being two separate and distinct entities; and, furthermore at Chisholm v. Georgia the opinions produced the following:



“To the Constitution of the United States, the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety. But even in that place, it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained and established that Constitution. They might have announced themselves "SOVEREIGN" people of the United States. But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.”; and,



“No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”

Remember that constitution provides for the United States to enter into International Treaties and said Treaties would by operation of law bind the USA and the fifty STATES. Silence is acceptance. And clearly even as early as Sept 24, 1789 the UNITED STATES was dictating to the STATES. Therefore the more perfect Union was formed UNDER one head. And today the hereinbefore International Treaty applies to each and every CESTUI QUE TRUST. Therefore that treaty in a sense has become part of the law of the land.


Thanks for that quote and great post comment!

The quote brings to my mind a video/audio production (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiSQaFvzFSA&NR=1) I listened to just this morning. This fellow sounds with it, however I differ in some fundamental principles. Rather than presume you will take ten minutes to listen to his presentation I am going to just tell you my opinion. You can compare MJ's post and the audio call as you wish.

I have a book, Inventing America; Jefferson's Declaration of Independence (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImZDQwMjIwN2UtZDgzZS00YTYwLTk2Z DUtYTI5ZmJlYjg3M2Jm&hl=en) by Garry WILLS. The introduction recites that Abraham LINCOLN's Fourscore and seven years... (Gettysburg Address) calculates to 1776, not 1789.

There are 56 Signors party to the 1776 Declaration of Independence (http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6245/usadeclarationofindepen.jpg). Obviously these are men signing with their legal names as individuals, speaking of risking in a quiet title action (that escalated to war) their lives and estates upon their treacherous signatures. Whereas with the Constitution, the signors are states in ratification. The signatures are of representatives pledging the collective will of the constituencies in social compact to form a body politic. These signatures are not of any individuals risking their estate. The people only make utterance in the Preamble, which is not a part of the Constitution as a statute. The real signors of the Constitution in my opinion are elected and appointed officials who swear or affirm an oath of office. There you have a signature, and a very strong indication of exactly who the Constitution applies to. Government officials. The Constitution regulates the behavior of those who enter into various public trusts (Article VI) generally known as government - for the purpose that those who are sovereign to the government, the people may collect and gather themselves into the higher forms of government; Townships (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImMzU4NzEwY2QtYThmYy00YWQxLWJmY 2YtYmI2ODNmOTdhN2Iz&hl=en), hundreds, tens, Frank pledges, parishes, counties, home rule cities and towns; most of which can be prefixed unincorporated as if these are incorporated they are corporations instead of jural societies.

If you want to get into any kind of discussion about the only parties to the Constitution being those in the latter 1700's then I believe the only logical argument would be that you are talking about the signors of the Declaration of Independence. Now suppose there could be any logic to dead men being the only real parties to the Constitution, rather than the States or public officials (bound to by oath we presume is different than being a party) we might want to examine some things about that.

One thing to consider is Matthew THORNTON and his return to Philidelphia in November of 1776. Matthew dearly wanted to sign the Declaration and he was really an accomplished statesman if you look at his bio so the Congress voted that it was okay for statesmen to sign after the fact! Sure enough, there is Matthew Thornton at the bottom right - last signature (http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/8152/matthewthorntonsignatur.jpg). This opened the door to subsequent trustees who are living men and women to act as parties to the Constitution - which of course means States, Territories and the like. Now we see Ratification as the designator of the parties - the States. [For a numero-linguistic hint; note the author's name on this poem. (http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7508/companioncreator.pdf)]

Spend a moment absorbing this document from fifteen years back. Page 1 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_approbation1.jpg), Page 2 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_approbation2.jpg), Page 3 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_approbation3.jpg). Especially note the use of the Great Seal on my signature. Now note that the backside (http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/1461/endorsementoforder.jpg) of this order (http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/361/endorsementfront.jpg) is endorsed, allegedly by me or my power of attorney (http://http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6872/nameinagent.jpg). There was no amount (bid amount) on the Order but I had already contacted Kaye when the state sockpuppet psychologist defrauded the court trying to destroy my mind with an indefinite psychotomimetic psychotropic "tutoring" at the State Mental Hospital. She told me she charges $1800 to $2000 for a competency evaluation so I approved the amount (http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/1722/orderendorsementtopayka.jpg) on the Order in front of settling my $20M lien. Recall:

allegedly by me...

From right above there in the paragraph?

Let's look at that again:

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/1461/endorsementoforder.jpg

Continued...

David Merrill
03-06-11, 11:06 PM
Continued...


Look there how the clerk of court assumed I had consented (endorsed) the Order (to Pay Kaye BARON) on the 18th in open court. But here is what actually happened:

http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/2992/roasecretmeeting318.jpg

Notice how prosecutor/judge GILBERT (I say that because he was senior prosecutor while I was in my "loudest" soveriegn expression phase) GILBERT tried to push his associate (Bar Association) on me as advisory counsel only "ADC". But I protested:


DEF STATES ADC CANNOT ANSWER FOR HIM

So the clerk of court, through whatever conversations occured declined to convey my consent to be fiduciary/trustee (endorsement) and cancelled the 18th as the endorsement date on the transaction. Look closely at that Register of Action's summary around the 18th and 19th! Do you see it there at the bottom? The judge met with the DA in open court, but with my alleged attorney too! - In a secret meeting that I was not invited to! Ergo we find that I gave my consent through my attorney (wink/nod) on the 19th! - the endorsement is right there.

Well they had to run that up the flagpole to Division 7, to chief district judge SAMELSON - who the lien is against to begin with. He approved it on the 23rd there, which is to say, he said I had properly consented. I have no way to know when this sticky (http://img291.imageshack.us/f/samelsonstickyrecusal.jpg/) showed up in the case file because it took weeks to go back down that far and notice it myself. It cites (mis-cites) a Colorado case for authority to impose an attorney on me. I say mis-cites because ARGUELLO wanted an attorney (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImODk2M2JhZGQtMmE5ZC00ZjI4LTk5M TEtMGUwMTgxYmJmMjg4&hl=en) at trial. I did not under any circumstances want an attorney - ergo, the secret meeting. I bet that is when that sticky note showed up though - between the 19th and the 23rd. SAMELSON had to cram Arguello into my case's circumstances in order to paint the illusion GILBERT had the authority to compel me to "consent" to power of attorney, for him to endorse the Order for me in the secret meeting of the 19th.

This gets better than that!

If you want to spend 90 minutes on it watch these videos (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNWI4OWZmNzEtMjY1My00MzJlLWE5Z mYtMjZjMmU2Y2UxNDFh&hl=en) for some insight. They are each about 30 minutes so you might just watch the last one to get some idea of the events just before they put me in the Psycho Ward for two weeks for not cooperating with that Order (http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/1722/orderendorsementtopayka.jpg) - that I endorsed prior to settling my $20M lien, by the way. (Go figure.) I should show you the transcript but it has been fudged to make it look like a warning but GILBERT actually read me Miranda in the courtroom for using the Great Seal on "his" Order! [Using it without being affiliated with State Business (a statesman) is a Class 5 Felony as you will note later on the $20M lien's finance statement.] Not verbatim but he informed me he noticed I committed a felony forgery and when I explained what I was doing he gleefully informed me that my confession was on the record. Too bad he noticed that as the deputy handcuffed me, I was smiling because I thought I had tricked him into forming a jury for me, to hear about my lien quite nicely - not much of a poker face here. Point being, during the next two weeks he must have figured it out - why the calm smile. There was not another word uttered about felony forgery and the case was dismissed because they never had any witnesses or evidence. [More. (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?20-Re-Self-Determination&p=84&viewfull=1#post84)]

After I completed the billing cycle I attempted to publish my lien. I sent it in with a notice in lieu of UCC-1 common law venue (http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/8576/20mlien11.jpg), just to get my protest to that body of law on the record, without recourse to me. It was rejected instructing me to use the UCC-1 Form so I of course used the Great Seal (http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7398/20mlienoriginalreturn.jpg) on it. The secretary of state rejected that twice for various reasons but I was warned in ALL CAPS on both instructions that using the Great Seal of Authority for the State of Colorado without being affiliated with state business was a Class 5 felony! (http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/6715/20mlien22.jpg) Now remember GILBERT charging me (prosecutor/judge) in his courtroom for a felony - and pay attention to the word affiliated (http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/8756/affiliations.jpg). [This rendition (http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/9166/20mlien23assent.jpg) without the bleed-through Certification is better to learn about the Resulting Trust.] You will need a correct definition for affiliated to understand how I convinced the SoS I am the statesman I proclaim through acceptance of fiduciary/trustee of the resulting trust; the Colorado Republic. [That's right! RAP/RuSA is coming up soon!!]

First though, look where (http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6262/20mlien16.jpg) this guy is from! - The Colorado Republic. The Secretary of State could not address Articles of Incorporation back to him, so they included his Articles, putting them in my custody, with the second Rejection - no explanation included. You must carefully read the Notice on Page 2 (http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/9568/20mlien17.jpg) to get the reason why. By approving the Articles, the SoS also acknowledged they knew that the territorial republic still exists! By adopting the bastard (non-patroned, no father; which... don't get me started yet about my Patroon heritage!) STATE I became affiliated (http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/8756/affiliations.jpg)with state business and so that justified the use of the Great Seal without committing a felony.

Take a look at this rule about befriending the court:


Rule 29(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure:
The United States or its officer or agency, or a State, Territory, Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia may file an amicus-curiae brief without the consent of the parties or leave of court. Any other amicus curiae may file a brief only by leave of court or if the brief states that all parties have consented to its filing.

In plain English that means this document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hcIoa5SszZVVX3VC5PHGV3G5AuJoMSd3z6lYiheONmo/edit?hl=en) would not be filed in the Circuit Court (http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/2773/uscourthouse.jpg). Yet there it is (http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/8137/amicuscuriaefiled10thci.pdf) - "Filed". Look at the signature page (http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/8947/amicuscuriae5.jpg). The clerk of court knows the rule don't you suppose? I had no consent from any of the parties or the court, and did not even pretend to in the amicus curiae. Filing the paper means I am an amicus; as State, Territory, Commonwealth or Washington DC.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Michael Joseph
03-07-11, 02:29 AM
David, I have known about this for a while and yet I had to read and re-read this post a couple of times. This is an excellent presentment.

Let us however keep the focus and realize that the Constitutions are not grants of Rights. But prior to that realize that a Right within a Trust is really just a Right of Use. And a Right of Use is Property. But before we go too far down that road; realize that those Constitutions and Declarations RECOGNIZE the existence of Rights given by a Creator. Said Creator being with the Act of Creation of man[kind].

Therefore recognize that the so called Territory, at least in my mind, is the Land and the Water, hereinafter "The Earth", that was Created by the Ancient of Days - the Self Existing One. Now realize that all of man[kind] has been granted the ability to Use The Earth by the Creator. As such, it is blasphemy for any Person [artificial or otherwise] to claim The Earth belongs to any other but the Creator. As such, the "work around" is made thru words and terms.

1a. A new State = Trust is Settled.

1. A survey is made for the Form of Matter. [the Survey is NOT the Form of Matter.]

2. A claim is made upon the Survey.

2a. Notice a claim can also be made on names. Therefore the actual object or concept can be corporeal or incorporeal.

3. Forms of Matter and Forms of Thought are referenced back to the Original Survey. Remember the Form of Matter is not the Actual Matter but it is the Survey – what it looks like or appears to be.

This new formation or construct is convenient because this formation allows for Control and Possession while recognizing that all matter belongs to the Creator of the Universe.

4. The Trust has an estate – which is made known by and thru an Asset Registry.

5. Forms of Matter can be Granted into the Asset Registry which effectively gives the State Property Rights to manage the Forms of Matter.

[I]Hello, Property is Rights of Use. The Form of Matter is based on Survey it is NOT the object or concept. Therefore the Survey of the Form of Matter is what is Registered upon the Asset Registry – and the Titles are created. Legal Title and Equitable Title. The Legal Title manages the Rights of Use or manages the Property. And the Equitable Title Uses the Right of Use or Uses the Property.

The Equitable Title is in the Registered Owner. And the State, as Trustee issues a Certificate of Title upon the Registered Owner. Now the Registered Owner may transfer the Right of Use into another Trust; yet the management of the Right of Use never leaves the State!

6. Therefore under this condition, the State receives the Grant for a small fee and issues forth a Cert. of Title to the Owner and recognizes the Owner’s Right of Use of the Form of Matter.

The actual object is without this entire setup. This entire doctrine is based on USE. The Control aspect is the management of the Use. This allows the State to manage Rights of Use = Property.

Yet my two feet stand upon the Earth that was Created by the Self Existing One and that Earth is outside of the Entire foregoing construct.

7. Again Property is a Right of Use. Therefore the one who Uses Property is an Owner holding Equitable Title. The one who manages the Property is the Trustee holding Legal Title.

If you can be shown to Trust in a System – State, then its Agents and Officers within its construct act effectively as Trustee to manage the Property and since Rights are Property, the Trustee manage the Rights.

There are many trusts today. See man in office in D.C. is both President and Commander in Chief. See UNITED STATES TRUST and LEIBER CODE. The man in those offices is Trustee. Yet, that office is bound by even higher authority.

And that discussion is for another thread.

According to the meaning of the term Legal:

LEGAL. That which is according to law. It is used in opposition to equitable, as the legal estate is, in the trustee, the equitable estate in the cestui que trust. Vide Powell on Mortg. Index, h. t.

2. The party who has the legal title, has alone the right to seek a remedy for a wrong to his estate, in a court of law, though he may have no beneficial interest in it. The equitable owner, is he who has not the legal estate, but is entitled to the beneficial interest.

3. The person who holds the legal estate for the benefit of another, is called a trustee; he who has the beneficiary interest and does not hold the legal title, is called the beneficiary, or more technically, the cestui que trust.

4. When the trustee has a claim, he must enforce his right in a court of equity, for he cannot sue any one at law, in his own name; 1 East, 497; 8 T. R. 332; 1 Saund. 158, n. 1; 2 Bing. 20; still less can he in such court sue his own trustee. 1 East, 497.

Look at definition Number Two. Read it carefully. And recognize the State apparently does not recognize the man. It cannot recognize a man.

Unequal things should not mix. That violates the Creator's Law - Thou shall not commit Adultery!


Therefore the man must grant something into Trust and then the man can then Stand in the Office of Trustee and now, well that is Much different.

Yet the foregoing construct has an underlying construct in LEGAL NAME. And said LEGAL NAME is also Registered in an Asset Registry before the fact.

David Merrill
03-07-11, 04:42 AM
Let us however keep the focus and realize that the Constitutions are not grants of Rights.

That agrees with my post. The constitutions restrict, they do not grant. They restrict the behavior of government officials - especially judicial officers in context of my experiences.

The trust is IN GOD WE TRUST. That was implemented in 1863, maybe 1864 (http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/1743/1864brokemoneyclip.jpg).

Thanks for bringing that up. The step that really stands out, in relation to my experience anyway, is:

4. The Trust has an estate – which is made known by and thru an Asset Registry.

That asset registry is the county clerk and recorder. If you look at about every document linked in this afternoon's post, it is published through the same. I will have to go through your post again slowly tomorrow to find more that means something to trusts as I understand the terms. I believe we agree though, at first glance.

I should show something about the IN GOD WE TRUST trust. That is the chief district judge Kirk Stewart SAMELSON constructed it per form in his bond, accepted for value (http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1125/oatha4v.jpg) - Oath of Office (http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/2062/oathsamelson103.jpg) - at the time of our security agreement (http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4721/uccart9securityagreemen.jpg). Remember that Finance Statement (http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7398/20mlienoriginalreturn.jpg)? Look at the date of publication in the upper right hand corner - 1/7/09. Within hours look at SAMELSON's new oath of office (http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9089/oathsamelson209.jpg)!

No mention of God!


How do you figure that works into the trust?

Michael Joseph
03-07-11, 05:33 AM
4. The Trust has an estate – which is made known by and thru an Asset Registry.

That asset registry is the county clerk and recorder. If you look at about every document linked in this afternoon's post, it is published through the same. I will have to go through your post again slowly tomorrow to find more that means something to trusts as I understand the terms. I believe we agree though, at first glance.

I should show something about the IN GOD WE TRUST trust. That is the chief district judge Kirk Stewart SAMELSON constructed it per form in his bond, accepted for value (http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1125/oatha4v.jpg) - Oath of Office (http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/2062/oathsamelson103.jpg) - at the time of our security agreement (http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4721/uccart9securityagreemen.jpg). Remember that Finance Statement (http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/7398/20mlienoriginalreturn.jpg)? Look at the date of publication in the upper right hand corner - 1/7/09. Within hours look at SAMELSON's new oath of office (http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9089/oathsamelson209.jpg)!

No mention of God!


How do you figure that works into the trust?

If you consider the Legal Title in relation to the 2nd meaning of Legal as codified hereinbefore, then it appears that that trust you mention is in regard to the Registry Entries - VAN PELT is a Registry Entry, yes? COLB is at the Registrar's office, yes? And the Survey was taken - and mom and dad helped with the survey - as First Grantors in a way - and the Survey included foot prints and finger prints, and name and all sorts of interesting information. And a new Name was Settled and Granted and Registered - VAN PELT.

We cannot know what goes thru another man's mind - especially if he is bent to a certain end - any means will do. Yet, this Judge certainly ran from his oath Under God in a speedy fashion. Perhaps he realized what a fine line he was walking - they were trying to make a Claim upon VAN PELT at first but that failed - you would not trespass the office of trustee - trustee de son tort - and you would not be fiduciary for said office. The Judge Forced you to plead against your will - your express will as I remember - and so you informed him of your actors fee.

VAN PELT failed. So they constructed a new Trust. DAVID MERRILL - I think this trust has less restrictions than VAN PELT. Question is who settled this new Trust? And again, Judge I still have questions. I love that you would not bow a knee to this deceit and trickery. They were coming for you, a man, in effort to throw you in jail and the quatlosers were downright giddy.

Back on Point: The evidence that they wanted you was the construction of a new Trust. Even in the face of NO evidence and 5 years after the fact. These guys claimed, I think putative jurisdiction - you stand before the judge. Yet, you were not there seeking judgment. You were forced to be there. So the Judge's previous Oath had been accepted binding him to the Constitutions and other international treaties by default, and in fact, the Judge admitted his binds in open court. Yet he attempts to throw off his bands before the Ever Living God by filing a new Oath in repugnance to IN GOD WE TRUST. Vengeance is mine sayeth the Self Existing One.

Yet he has a heck of a problem. In what capacity do you "appear" - remember the Survey on those tiny little feet - before the court. You are a living soul - it is your appearance and your speaking that cures the trust. But, are you speaking for your estate - or, are you speaking as a living soul - the latter gives great problems to a Trust - because a trust only deals with Uses - Never the Actual being.

So in the end, I do not know why he switched his Oaths. Perhaps to cover his butt before the Ever Living. You do not trust in him or his mates. And you have his number and he knows it. And one day you might consider placing your God established rights in Trust and make special visitation upon Him with Summons to your Court and you as Trustee - speak for your Estate - as Priest - making special ministerial visitation - calling on the Ever Living to Judge righteously.

O' Dan - i - el. At that point you have matched up Like Things - and now you have standing to state a claim upon your estate - God owns Everything! Will you pick up the mantle. I know you can handle the Sword. I have seen it. You have spoken the Truth to me when I needed it. There will be no 12(b)6 there. There is clearly a harm and there was clearly an injury.

Yet you ask a Trustee of the State to pick up your cause against a Judge?

Why don't you pick up the cause. And speak for your estate, as Priest before the Ever Living.

"Comes now True Name speaking for his dominions and estate, a regenerate man in the faith of Yehoshua H’Mashiach and making a special visitation by absolute ministerial right to...."

You have a righteous cause of action. I do not think anyone with 1/2 a brain would think you to trespass upon the UNITED STATES when clearly these officers are in breach of trust. They may claim Necessity; yet, a trial 5 years after the fact with no witnesses and no evidence and they throw you in the Psycho Ward for two weeks. This is an uphill battle for any Judge. And if this ever came before a Jury there would be big problems.

So there is always a higher power. Question is do you have standing?

--------------------------------

by the way: Notice that the UNITED STATES signed this International Treaty on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the 50 States. That is because those other States are Dependent States UNDER the UNITED STATES or said another way, they are held in Trust. Therefore that old Constitution itself is placed into Trust UNDER the UNITED STATES and in fact if you read very carefully you will see that We the People of the United States did the thing for the United States of America and the States falling silent long before 1789 - in acceptance - took orders from the UNITED STATES.

The formation of a more perfect Union.

Please go to the US DEPARTMENT OF STATE and show me the fifty Independent States - I'll wait. I will also wait for you to show me the United States of America as Independent. These are ALL dependent and as such are barred from entering into international treaties.

such as this one: http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/law/Covenant94/index.html

Sovereignty
03-07-11, 06:32 AM
Interesting discussion. How does government's incorporating and using the UCC play into this? The Feds did so in 1871, the States much later 1960's...?

Not sure I understand the whole of this thread, but perhaps in time ti will become clear.

Michael Joseph
03-07-11, 03:07 PM
do you imagine that the Federal Government is the UNITED STATES? In my opinion the Federal Government is a private bankers union that runs the show by covenant. if you read that international treaty carefully you will notice how the UNITED STATES is very careful not to impair their borders and boundaries or its Property or Right of Use.

That may be stretching the ole tent chords of the mind a bit; but consider.

shikamaru
03-07-11, 07:42 PM
Interesting discussion. How does government's incorporating and using the UCC play into this? The Feds did so in 1871, the States much later 1960's...?

The Uniform Commercial Code did not exist prior to the 1950s.
The UCC are simply suggestions from private organizations to harmonize state commerce rules.
These suggestions become law only upon adaption by a legislature.

According to records off the net, several municipal corporations were abolished and formed into the municipal corporation known as the District of Columbia....

In my opinion, time would be better spent studying incorporation and franchises rather then the UCC.

shikamaru
03-07-11, 07:44 PM
do you imagine that the Federal Government is the UNITED STATES? In my opinion the Federal Government is a private bankers union that runs the show by covenant. if you read that international treaty carefully you will notice how the UNITED STATES is very careful not to impair their borders and boundaries or its Property or Right of Use.

That may be stretching the ole tent chords of the mind a bit; but consider.

Holy smokes!
I confused the agent with the principal. Good call :).

David Merrill
03-09-11, 04:51 AM
Interesting discussion. How does government's incorporating and using the UCC play into this? The Feds did so in 1871, the States much later 1960's...?

Not sure I understand the whole of this thread, but perhaps in time ti will become clear.


I like the way Michael Joseph thinks and can explain relationships (trusts).

There is no proof or evidence that the US is a corporation rather than the original body politic. There was and still is a condition of emergency called extraordinary occasion (http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6479/conventionextraordinary.jpg), but that was ended in the 1970's (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImODVkMmJiYzktMDdlYS00ZWFkLWI4Z WMtNmJiMWI0ZmU1MzEx&hl=en). No State or Confederation of States may secede from the Union[/I].] Look carefully - to understand MJ's post thoroughly you have to notice the beginning of the first tax year - April 15th.

RAP/RuSA stands fundamentally on the precept that the de facto is a Corporation. Here is the scoop (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImN2Q3YTg1NzktOGEyNi00MTYzLThjM DAtZTBmNjllMWRjODA5&hl=en) on what really happened. If you want to Google up a photo of the City Council of Washington DC (the municipal corporation formed in 1871) then you will be hard pressed to recognize anybody from the Obama Administration there. Do you start to get it. It was me who showed RAP/RuSA the real USA Incorporated (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNDllZDU0ODYtOTFkNC00ODdkLWFjY zItN2EwODFiYzk3N2Yz&hl=en) but alas, that corporation is for promoting sports events! But if you spend a few minutes reading you might forgive the adherents to RAP/RuSA for getting caught up in Internet Spin. But with a flawed fundamental, like the USA and the States are corporations you might better understand why RAP/RuSA after over a year of James Timothy TURNER's lies (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYmU2MTllNTYtYWI4ZS00OTQ3LTljZ DgtNzhlMzg3YjAxNWE0&hl=en), is still not on the map nor will it ever be - no surveyed boundaries (http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/6628/territoryact.jpg).

We should wander past the Fed Act of 1913 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImM2EzYjY5ZWItMDUxOC00OTViLWIwN zMtNGViZjJkZmIyMzYx&hl=en&authkey=CLXNm7oE) to explore how MJ thinks (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjQ3ZjI4YTUtZDdjZS00MjllLWE2Y jgtZWQzNGYwZDkxZDU4&hl=en) a moment. Listen to what Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire says about the Judiciary Act of 1789 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYjhjMmE2OTYtYjA2MC00ODA3LTk2M 2MtNTk5ZGNhYzMzYTA0&hl=en). By 1790 we find that the districts (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Act_-_districts.jpg), through the District became responsible for the debts of the US government. The District is of course a municipal corporation like I showed you - formally since 1871 - [B]city of Washington, District of Columbia.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Michael Joseph
03-09-11, 05:14 PM
We should wander past the Fed Act of 1913 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImM2EzYjY5ZWItMDUxOC00OTViLWIwN zMtNGViZjJkZmIyMzYx&hl=en&authkey=CLXNm7oE) to explore how MJ thinks (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjQ3ZjI4YTUtZDdjZS00MjllLWE2Y jgtZWQzNGYwZDkxZDU4&hl=en) a moment. Listen to what Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire says about the Judiciary Act of 1789 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYjhjMmE2OTYtYjA2MC00ODA3LTk2M 2MtNTk5ZGNhYzMzYTA0&hl=en). By 1790 we find that the districts (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Act_-_districts.jpg), through the District became responsible for the debts of the US government. The District is of course a municipal corporation like I showed you - formally since 1871 - city of Washington, District of Columbia.


Regards,

David Merrill.


First off, thank you for the compliment. Considering the coefficients of friction the angle and the motion (http://www.studyphysics.ca/newnotes/20/unit02_circulargravitation/chp07_2d/lesson27.htm) .....Wake up.....ROFL...

I give credit to the Ever Living and I would just like to point out that a District is an overlay of the Territory.

Have you ever wondered why the Maps exist? Do you suppose it is so that you can find our way from point to point? Consider now a Map is the Result of a Survey. And the Map just drives the nail in this discourse. The Map is the "appearance" of the Land [Form of Matter]. But my five year old can tell you the Map is NOT the Land [Form of Matter]

Sometimes Notary Publics are used to lend Credence - Faith to a record. And the word groupings may say something like "such and such APPEARED before me". How do you like that?

Remember the Survey that was performed the day you were Born - a Record was created based on a Survey of the Child and said Record was Registered into an Asset Registry. And years later, a living soul - clearly using a certain Name - a Registered Name - "Appears".

The Living Soul is without this construct - the "Appears" goes to the Record = Legal Name = Cestui Que Trust. Appears is an EVENT. And said Event implies Trust [verb now].

Gathering the loose ends - Just as a living soul is NOT a Name or Trust or Record - a Map based on Survey is NOT the Land. The Map - try not to get too upset - REPRESENTS - Claims or Rights.

Do you suppose that some have more Rights to the Land than you? Have you "staked your claim"?

-------------

Do you suppose that Unequal things should mix? Do you not see the Trust? Actually more than one. I have found when i "stack" trusts - most men and women go to sleep in the 2nd Level of Trusteeship. And Perhaps some Trusts provide Specific Services....


-------------------

Do you really think a Trust needs Ratification? A trust exists due to the actions or non-action of living souls. Lets say the United States was Settled and noone- ever benefited Under it. Does that nullify the Trust? - Absolutely NOT. If men and women take benefits from Under the Trust - by and thru - access easements constructed - sort of like a Legal Name - does that Nullify the Trust? Absolutely NOT it validates the Trust. As the Trust exists for the benefit of a particular Sub-set; yet, others may benefit from the generosity of said sub-set - in case of United States - "ourselves and our Posterity". A fancy way to say - The Creators today and our children tomorrow.

The Creators pledged to themselves to Create a new Trust for the benefit of another. The Trust was created first - United States. Then the United States did a thing for the "United States of America" and now the other 50 States by Agreement. Why could the United States do this thing for those now 51 Dependent States?

Because those who Created the United States took on ALL of the Liability of "The United States of America" - which is the Style of the original 13.

http://www.usconstitution.net/articles.html#Article1

Article I. The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America."

Article XII. All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of congress, before the assembling of the united States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said united States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.

And the people did not utter one Peep in protest. Yet, just as the one People of the United States exercised their right of exile away from the King - so the United States recognizes that others may want out from under its shadow.

Therefore the United States stands as Surety for the debts and therefore takes the liability and therefore is Independent.

Now, I can hear the gainsayers.....Read Art II. Those States long ago waived that status. By Silence. You say no, right? When is the Last time Georgia, or South Carolina or Texas ever entered into an International Treaty? I'll wait.

No, the United States was settled and then, by and thru the men who occupied [yes it was commercial] it, the United States did a thing for others - and therefore the United States is Domestic Sovereign over all Under its Shadow.

The Constitution was the issue of the men and women occupying the United States Trust. There were only a few. Said Constitution was the manner in which the other Trusts would do business Under the United States Trust.

The Constitution was "of" or said another way "from" the United States and said Constitution was made "For" the "United States of America.

Therefore if you stop to consider - the State is the greatest asset protection plan ever invented. And it is much more than that - it is a means for which - Great wealth may be accumulated and stored - because it is fed by many tributaries that flow into it. it is also a means to Oversee and Manage Assets. Yes, there are many people who are just downright ignorant and they need to be guided. Why, because they refuse to take full responsibility for themselves and they "willingly" remain ignorant.

------

You say "willingly" ignorant. Well lets take a look at Scripture. How many have studied Scripture? How many have studied Geology? Taken the time to consider mechanisms of light in regard to the heavenly bodies?

2Pe 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

That was not Noah's Flood friend. I shall go no further.

------

Yet, I am in no way degrading the men who settled the United States. These men disagreed with the King of England and wanted out from under his thumb. Therefore LAWFULLY they exercised their right of exile - now called self determination - and made a new thing; whereby they themselves and their issue - Posterity - might benefit and others may receive benefit and blessings as well. Yet THEIR constitution FOR their STATES, held in Trust, Remember the Trustee is with the Legal Title - is INTERNAL to their State.

Just like the Registered Record based on the Survey that effects the CESTUI QUE TRUST - LEGAL M. NAME is internal to their Trust. Why?

1. United States, as Trustee holds 51 States [estate]
2. The Registered Record - COLB is made from within the 51 States

Will you pick up the Record Name and Use it? You can.

There are other existing trusts; yet, this simplistic model shows the nature of Trust Stacking and why if you make a claim from Legal Name status it will be 12(b)6 [ed]. How you gonna make a claim using a Trust Creation against the Trust. Talk about Double minded. Yet, notice the patience of the system dealing with the ignorant. The Administrators could haul you in for Trespass. Yet, according to Scripture - forgive my trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.

I don't know the recipe, I'm just sayin'.....

Joshua Scott
03-09-11, 06:24 PM
ah, self determination. The idea of creating a thing for me to use, in order to abolish presumption of trespass. PUBLIC NOTICE of this thing so that other may be aware not to trespass on me.

Thanks for mapping that out.. heh, the irony of making a reality of such a blue print.

David Merrill
03-09-11, 11:02 PM
I would like to prescribe a trip to your local movie theater to view Adjustment Bureau. You snapped a position into place for me to describe better the Bigger Picture about the Patroons Michael Joseph. Thank you. To do that I am grabbing a post from Religion - My Take (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?30-Religion-My-take/page2&highlight=patroon):


That is food for thought. I want to pick up more about Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON soon in relation to my own Patroon heritage. While listening to his first 35 minutes I was busy Googling and came across some amazing facts of history. The VAN PELT milestone (http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/3596/vanpeltmilestone.jpg)sets in the Brooklyn Historical Society; but you have to take in the setting and context fully. I hope to explain it fully so that you all can grasp what I am saying.

We also want to look at the Charter:

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/4227/freedomsandexemptions1.jpg

Look there at Article VI on the right column. That describes the enjoyment of the lands and a perpetual inheritance. Somebody mentioned that the Levites owned land... incorrect. The Levites got no lands in the priesthood package, they got the cities. The cities only own land necessary to run the city - like this Facilities Operations (http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/7674/monumentscenter.jpg) photo. Start here to get a better look at the initial 77 METRO operations:


1Ch 6:55 And they gave them Hebron in the land of Judah, and the suburbs thereof round about it.

I am going to get pragmatic in the next few posts on this thread. I was looking for the proper location in the Lesson Plan and I think MJ found it for me. I am descended from an original Patroon who had a large stone wall on his Manhattan estate - namesake for Wall Street, so I hear; Teunis Jansen Laenen VAN PELT and there is some heritage passed through a codified anointing ceremony. For now though, I am throwing something out there that strongly suggests a dimension, somewhat like what we find depicted in a network of doors, shortcuts - Re: Adjustment Bureau (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJ0TP4nTaE). The Center, honest to God of the Golden Rectangle is the municipal operations in the linked aerial photo above:


http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/4255/monumentsfibonaccispira.jpg

The custodians of the best record of the territorial Colorado Republic are at the NW Corner - the Masons. They have a library (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Freemason_library.jpg) and museum (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Mason_Bible.jpg) there. They have some extraordinary treasures (http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/2055/scanesmall.jpg), [letter] that would be in national archives like the Smithsonean Institute except they have been expressly given to the Masons, by masons. The one that I think MJ may relate to well is this one - the Priest Breastplate:


http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Temple_gemstones.jpg

Whether there is anything to the Knights Templar connection and French Bloodline of Jesus Christ or not, this historical tracing can be found up there on Mesa Hill overlooking the City of Colorado Springs/METRO. Chapter 1 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_METROchapter1.pdf), Chapter 2 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_METROchapter2.pdf), Chapter 3 (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_METROchapter3.pdf). [Buying the 1995 perspective of the authors is erroneous in my opinion. I think it best to consider Michael BAIGENT's, Senior Editor of Freemasonry Today take found in the latter half of Holy Blood, Holy Grail that the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is a forgery. That means that the document existed before Victor E. MARSDEN translated it to frame the Jews. The original authors were likely an early rendition of Dan BROWN's Priory of Sion. The "Jews" have been substituted in - forgery.]

That is probably for a thread itself. I have gobs more documentation and evidence to support some extraordinary renditions of mental models based in history and fact. The main focus I hope though is that Fibb Spiral Golden Rectangle of Monuments on a topographic map. That is reality there. Those squiggly lines represent hills and valleys that mean good hiking boots and mountain bike technique - reality. I am leading up to quoting MJ's post and interleaving this into my next post.

I want to conclude this one by saying I have no more God-given unalienable rights than any of you reading this material just because I am related to an original Patroon of NYC - GUILLIANI's Capital City of the World. Out on the proverbial limb though, I will say that this ancestry and other items about my family tree have led me to an understanding of American History that interleaves nicely with what MJ and Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire in the audio snippet above are saying about trust. I think even an attempt to see things my way will be edifying, or at least entertaining.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Michael Joseph
03-12-11, 03:54 AM
i just saw the movie and loved it. Laughing out loud because right at the moment as i am typing this broadcast an Apache Helocopter is flying overhead...shaking the house....it is most likely just a coincidence. However, humorous in light of the fact that I just finished watching that movie and started typing this response.

Yehovah be blessed for ever and ever. And the Zadok do not inherit lands they inherit God. As Zadok stayed with David and did not go to Serpent Rock in participation with Adoniyah and Abiathar, the False Prophet, backed by Joab, the Military Commander.

Yet to the disciplined ones - out of Nathan not Solomon. Turning the key of David.

I loved this movie. Thank you. I shall not sell my inheritance for a bowl of soup. I shall contend as Ya'ocob.

[inserted by Michael Joseph]

1:25 For he is gone down this day, and hath slain oxen and fat cattle and sheep in abundance, and hath called all the king's sons, and the captains of the host, and Abiathar the priest; and, behold, they eat and drink before him, and say, God save king Adoniyah.

[there are two Jesus' - Adoni-yah - can be translated "Lord Yah"; yet this one is a Fake - I don't see anyone flying away on a big bird, i see David, taking care of business]

1:26 But me, even me thy servant, and Zadok the priest, and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, and thy servant Solomon, hath he [Adoniyah] not called.

For I, michael joseph will gladly be left behind working in the field waiting. Psalm 37: 7,20,34,40

13:9 But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be [brow] beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them. [Adoniyah and his ilk]

13:10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.

13:11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Spirit.

--------

In the end Love was the power over intellect.

--------

I am not sure exactly what door was opened for you David Merrill, but I look forward to your next post. Again, thanks.

Shalom,
mj


P.S. Did you notice "she" came walking thru a door and the EVENT opened doors of numerous possibilities.

David Merrill
03-12-11, 08:48 PM
It is a difficult movie to discuss without ruining. Think Love is substituted for Responsibility and you will get my point about self-governance. I plan to relate this to Resulting Trust in a few posts yet but find it difficult to get around how subscribing every thought to Jesus CHRIST (title - annointed - Messiah), meaning complete relenquishing of free agency, for the Elect is the only key to getting off a prescribed Plan. Throwing it all away is the only way to gain it all.

Ten years ago I took responsibility for all the debt (http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/992/beijing2.jpg). Sure! - dismiss it as that Crazy Planet Merrill (http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=6987). All I am saying is that is what I signed my name to - the agreement between me and the Bank and Fund, there it is published in black and white. When they fell into dishonor (thirty days) I awoke wondering what form Judgment would take - September 11th, 2001. You can look at the dates for yourself. I am not lying about the events I am telling you of and you will recall that the Stock Market shut down for the proverbial three days. [Funny how I was doing some carpentry work and Air Force One, carrying President BUSH came in on an irregular flight path - banking to show the Presidential Seal plain as day... (Colorado Springs). I mean so close I could inspect the tread on the landing gear too.] That Stock Market Door, we will walk past it for now, but remember where it is, okay?

They (Mattathias Yohannan of the DAMON family) made the choice to throw it all away and instead the potential for having everything became very real. So we open up a few shortcuts.

Enter the door at about 1670 with the Red Tree - the Rosenbaum - carrying seventy souls (http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/4227/freedomsandexemptions1.jpg) to New Utrecht - Manhattan Island under the banner of the Dutch East Indies Trading Company,

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=81&d=1299963716

...move quickly on to the next door and find yourself in front of the Van Pelt "Manor" (http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5489/vanpeltmanor2.jpg) in c. 1790 where Master Mason George WASHINTON greets the village children (http://www.bklyn-genealogy-info.com/Town/Rambles/VanPelt6.html) waiting until last for young Peter VAN PELT to put his hand on his head - in a style of Samuel (Saul) and Nathan (David) to offer a word that would stick with him like an annointing:


At last, after many anxious scannings of the road, they saw him riding toward the little school-house, and the children lined up and waited until he approached. Litte Peter VAN PELT was on the end of the line, and he was the last boy to whom George Washington spoke; and to little Peter he looked very tall, as he came near to him and
laid his hand on Peter's head.

"Be a good boy, my son," said Washington, "and you will be a good man."

Little Peter VAN PELT probably remembered this admonition, but how far it shaped his life's course is not known. He did grow up to be a good and a great man, entering the ministry and achieving fame throughout the county. When Washington died, Peter VAN PELT delivered a sermon...

Like I showed you, the milestone (http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/3596/vanpeltmilestone.jpg) is kept safely in the Brooklyn Historical Society with a small collection of WASHINGTON memoribalia. One consideration is that the photo (http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/9344/vanpeltmilestonec1925.jpg) behind the milestone preserves its original biblical intent as a monument (http://img848.imageshack.us/img848/5859/vanpeltmilestonewithpho.jpg).

Another consideration is the preservation of that monument - Van Pelt "Manor" - is not a manor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Pelt_Manor) at all.


However, author Harold D. Eberlein states: "there never was a duly and legally constituted Van Pelt Manor and this appellation has no defense whatever on any historic grounds.

Historically speaking then, my ancestors never relenquished the original charter for British fealty! Manorial law is British and the Van Pelt Estate is still under the original Dutch East Indies Trading Company charter. You might think maybe so but the door opens on modern-day Milestone Park (http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/4132/milestonepark.jpg) in Brooklyn, where the stone building was finally torn down after a fire in the 1950's.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=80&d=1299962443


People may not get concerned with why Milestone Park is named so, maybe they do. Something that I am sure few people consider is that the historical story (http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/6489/milestoneparkmilestonem.jpg) is standing on a separated portion of physical land! There is a fifteen foot-wide easement (http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/48/milestoneparkplacard2s.jpg).

Then again, that door may only work right from Planet Merrill!

Michael Joseph
03-12-11, 11:43 PM
It is a difficult movie to discuss without ruining. Think Love is substituted for Responsibility and you will get my point about self-governance. I plan to relate this to Resulting Trust in a few posts yet but find it difficult to get around how subscribing every thought to Jesus CHRIST (title - annointed - Messiah), meaning complete relenquishing of free agency, for the Elect is the only key to getting off a prescribed Plan. Throwing it all away is the only way to gain it all.

Exactly, Yehoshua = Yehovah Saves <==> Deut. 6:4

Therefore, Yehoshua, in my opinion is the Presence of Yehovah = Trustee. Yehovah, as both Creator, Settlor and First Trustee is Yehoshua.

Therefore the claim is private beneficiary Under The Word of God = Yehoshua = Yehovah Saves.

The Lions with there mouth closed - sitting before - Dan-i-el = God is my Judge.

Remember the Resgistered Owner upon a particular Registry is with the claim of the "estate" of a particular State = estate. And the Trustee oversees the estate. The Registered Owner may be siezed in fee simple from within the estate. Yet the estate is bounded by surveyed boundaries and claims.

Yet, God holds EVERYTHING. There is a Registry - Book of the Lamb/Life. There is a Trustee - Yehoshua. There are those written in the book. This is Divine Trust. I now refer the reader to Psalm 37: 7,20,34 and 40.

But we are not to trespass upon our brother. Are not all Souls the belonging of Yehovah? Therefore who is with the Claim? And who will settle the dispute and what law form will be used? Depends on the Claim and from what construct the Claim arises.

The Divine Trust is with the highest Claim. Jeremiah 17:7 and 17:5. Psalm 2.

shalom,
mj

P.S. Consider that the Elect are not subject to the Prescribed Plan - and as such can be used by the Creator to effect the prescribed plan. Pre-justification in first Age. See Romans 8:33. Who shall lay any charge upon the Elect of God - it is God that justifieth.

There is positive and negative election. Negative: Did not Yehovah harden Pharoah's heart? Positive: Was the man lame or blind by his choice or did Yehoshua say so that God may be glorified - that is Election.

The Prodigal Son is absent Election with free will; lower teaching (Israel - ten tribes)
The Elder Son is with Election; lower teaching (Judah);

The father to the elect son - all that I have is yours.

The Elect Son is not better than the other sons, it just goes to the first age and the works done in that age; the elect son is absent free will and will be used as the father sees fit to bring the plan to completion - the test. The elect son shall not see death and is not subject to 2nd death.

Thus it is not the duty of man to judge. As man does not have perfect knowledge of the Age that was and the acts of his fellows in that Age. To judge is to usurp the Trustee. Trustee de son Tort.

P.S.S. Matityahu which means "gift of God" and Yôḥanan, which means "God is gracious"

P.S.S.S The Elect Son comes to work in the Vineyard in the last fifteen minutes of the work day. Yet all who worked in the day get paid exactly the same. The express duty is to deliver a message to the World. Letting the Holy Spirit speak; and, God knows he can trust these as they have been refined and tested and proved and not found wanting. Ref. Abraham and Sarah - honor thy father and thy mother.

more to come....i await your next post with anticipation...

Treefarmer
03-13-11, 01:49 AM
Sure! - dismiss it as that Crazy Planet Merrill.!

LOL!
That was hilarious.
I needed a little bit of dark twisted humor from the murky underground to remind me of what's out there, past the treeline where the pavement starts.
Thank you David for going where I would never dare go, so I can experience vicariously.

David Merrill
03-13-11, 03:05 AM
LOL!
That was hilarious.
I needed a little bit of dark twisted humor from the murky underground to remind me of what's out there, past the treeline where the pavement starts.
Thank you David for going where I would never dare go, so I can experience vicariously.


After a while that place numbs you. However I believe that Demosthenes (http://www.deathandtaxes.com/bio.htm) will never cease to be disturbing. She has media connections, and is considered an expert on the Sovereignty Movement. However she has no credentials in law enforcement, investigation and is under no supervision. She befriends people (http://alina_stefanescu.typepad.com/totalitarianism_today/2004/12/beware_of_helpf.html) on the Internet in order to stab them in the back (http://www.triallogs.com/smf/index.php?topic=307.0).

I have waded through a lot of that infantile behavior for a few priceless tidbits. It was all worth it.

David Merrill
03-19-11, 10:04 AM
Exactly, Yehoshua = Yehovah Saves <==> Deut. 6:4

Therefore, Yehoshua, in my opinion is the Presence of Yehovah = Trustee. Yehovah, as both Creator, Settlor and First Trustee is Yehoshua.

Therefore the claim is private beneficiary Under The Word of God = Yehoshua = Yehovah Saves.

The Lions with there mouth closed - sitting before - Dan-i-el = God is my Judge.

Remember the Resgistered Owner upon a particular Registry is with the claim of the "estate" of a particular State = estate. And the Trustee oversees the estate. The Registered Owner may be siezed in fee simple from within the estate. Yet the estate is bounded by surveyed boundaries and claims.

Yet, God holds EVERYTHING. There is a Registry - Book of the Lamb/Life. There is a Trustee - Yehoshua. There are those written in the book. This is Divine Trust. I now refer the reader to Psalm 37: 7,20,34 and 40.

But we are not to trespass upon our brother. Are not all Souls the belonging of Yehovah? Therefore who is with the Claim? And who will settle the dispute and what law form will be used? Depends on the Claim and from what construct the Claim arises.

The Divine Trust is with the highest Claim. Jeremiah 17:7 and 17:5. Psalm 2.

shalom,
mj

P.S. Consider that the Elect are not subject to the Prescribed Plan - and as such can be used by the Creator to effect the prescribed plan. Pre-justification in first Age. See Romans 8:33. Who shall lay any charge upon the Elect of God - it is God that justifieth.

There is positive and negative election. Negative: Did not Yehovah harden Pharoah's heart? Positive: Was the man lame or blind by his choice or did Yehoshua say so that God may be glorified - that is Election.

The Prodigal Son is absent Election with free will; lower teaching (Israel - ten tribes)
The Elder Son is with Election; lower teaching (Judah);

The father to the elect son - all that I have is yours.

The Elect Son is not better than the other sons, it just goes to the first age and the works done in that age; the elect son is absent free will and will be used as the father sees fit to bring the plan to completion - the test. The elect son shall not see death and is not subject to 2nd death.

Thus it is not the duty of man to judge. As man does not have perfect knowledge of the Age that was and the acts of his fellows in that Age. To judge is to usurp the Trustee. Trustee de son Tort.

P.S.S. Matityahu which means "gift of God" and Yôḥanan, which means "God is gracious"

P.S.S.S The Elect Son comes to work in the Vineyard in the last fifteen minutes of the work day. Yet all who worked in the day get paid exactly the same. The express duty is to deliver a message to the World. Letting the Holy Spirit speak; and, God knows he can trust these as they have been refined and tested and proved and not found wanting. Ref. Abraham and Sarah - honor thy father and thy mother.

more to come....i await your next post with anticipation...


Read the header on the Bill of Exchange.


http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/992/beijing2.jpg


Like I was saying on another thread... High Priest of the DEITI. [Dutch East Indies Trading Industry.] Or maybe, as you put it - trustee of the original estate. It is difficult to deny when there it is on paper. I sure did not know it when I wrote it, that somebody would be explaining it to me ten years later. But if you look at the date then you see that the Stock Market was shut down for the proverbial three days upon Judgment 30-Days following the Order.

http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/2369/beijing3.jpg

I recall at the county clerk's office, one morning walking in for some business and finding the Proof of Service on the already computer screen.


http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/onscreen.jpg
Nobody was in yet so it must have been an inquiry from Washington, or somebody on the east coast - two hours later. Cecilia, my clerk there seemed a bit rattled that I showed up to see that and she always treated me like maybe I was CIA after that.

You speak of capital integration (http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/8163/capitalintegrationirono.jpg). The two heads become one again. No more dichotomy of character. People know their names. That is when somebody can establish relationships that remain the same over time and surviving the flurry of words of art.

The two heads represent the Tribe of Dan - with two homesteads - one of them up north on Mount Hermon. Judges chapter 18. [Same linguistics (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImOWMwMjUxZTYtZmViNy00NmI1LWEyN zItMDgxYzFkZWMxNmVi&hl=en). Same Name. (http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/72foldName.gif) Same old accusation - commercial warfare of genocide [CIVIL DEATH included] and temple desecration.] The etymology (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImMDEzNmI3ZTAtZWRlMy00NDUwLWE3Y mEtMmJhODYzZDJkOWIy&hl=en) though, that seems to clench it. The fire in the belly is the indictment. It is like poison to the dichotomy - the truth is. [That sherri topaz has a unique pentagram cut (www.ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Pentagramsig.jpg).] -Integrating the Cube Sum Number Locks into the Equation (http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/3828/slasttheoremsanitized.jpg).


Regards,

David Merrill.

Frederick Burrell
03-29-11, 09:56 AM
Third time reading this thread, and its finally sinking in. I guess I'm just slow.lol. Great posts by all. FB

David Merrill
03-29-11, 11:02 AM
Third time reading this thread, and its finally sinking in. I guess I'm just slow.lol. Great posts by all. FB

Thanks!! From All I presume.

Interestingly I just posted (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?156-Coming-out-of-babylon&p=1119&viewfull=1#post1119) a related thought.

David Merrill
04-15-11, 04:22 AM
The essence of the political religion - Constitutional Republic - is that oaths of office are fungible fidelity bonds.


David Merrill.

Darkcrusade
04-24-11, 04:40 AM
The Foundation of America

The following are excerpts from The Compact, Charter, and Laws of The Colony of New Plymouth and The Articles of Confederation of The United Colonies of New England, begun in 1620. They are from a book published in 1836 for the state of Massachusetts.



The Great Patent of New England

Charter of The Council established at Plymouth, in the county of Devon, for the planting, ruling, ordering and governing of New England in America, signed November 3rd, 1620, eight days before The Mayflower Compact.

JAMES, by the grace of God, King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, & c.

To all whom these presents shall come, greeting:--Whereas, upon the humble petition of divers of our well disposed subjects, that intended to make several plantations in the parts of America, between the degrees of thirtyfour and fortyfive, We, according to our princely inclination, favoring much their worthy disposition. in hope thereby to advance the enlargement of the christian religion, to the glory of God Almighty, as also by that means to stretch out the bounds of our dominions, and to replenish those deserts with people, governed by laws and magistrates.......

And forasmuch as we have been certainlygiven to understand, by divers of our good subjects, that have, for these many years past, frequented those coasts and territories between the degrees of forty and fortyeight, that there is no other the subjects of any christian king or state, by any authority from their sovereign lords or princes, actually in possession of any of the said lands or precincts, whereby any right, claim, interest, or title, may, might, or ought, by that means accrue, belong, or appertain unto them, or any of them.

And also, for that we have been further given certain to know, that within these late years, there hath, by God's visitation, reigned a wonderful plague, together with many horrible slaughters and murders, committed amongst the savages and British people there heretofore inhabiting, in a manner to the utter destruction, devastation, and depopulation of that whole territory, so as there is not left, for many leagues together, in a manner, any that do claim or challange any kind of interest therein, nor any superior lord or sovereign, to make claim thereunto, whereby we, in our judgment, are persuaded and satisfied, that the appointed time is come in which Almighty God, in his great goodness and bounty towards us, and our people, hath thought fit and determined, that those large and goodly territories, deserted as it were by their natural inhabitants, should be possessed and enjoyed by such of our subjects and people, as heretofore have, and hereafter shall, by his mercy and favor, and by his powerful arm, be directed and conducted thither; in the contemplation and serious consideration whereof, we have thought it fit, according to our kingly duty, so much as in us lieth, to second and follow God's sacred will, rendering reverend thanks to his Divine Majesty, for his gracious favor in laying open and revealing the same unto us, before any other christian prince or state; by which means, without offence, and, as we trust, to his glory, we may with boldness go on to the settling of so hopeful a work, which tendeth to the reducing and conversion of such savages as remain wandering in desolation and distress, to civil society and christian religion, to the enlargement of our own dominions, and the advancement of the fortunes of such of our subjects as shall willingly interest themselves in the said employment, to whom we cannot but give singular commendation for their so worthy intention and enterprise.

We, therefore, of our special grace, mere motion, and certain knowledge, by the advice of the lords and others of our privy council, have, for us, our heirs, and successors, granted, ordained, and established, and, in and by these presents, do, for us, our heirs, and successors, grant, ordain, and establish, that all that circuit, continent, precincts, and limits, in America, lying and being in breadth from forty degrees of northerly latitude, and in length by all the breadth aforesaid, thoughout the main land, from sea to sea, with all the seas, rivers, islands, creeks, inlets, ports, and havens, within the degrees, precincts, and limits of the said latitude and longitude, shall be the limits, and bounds, and precincts of the second colony.

And to the end that the said territories may forever hereafter be more particularly and certainly known and distinguished, our will and pleasure is, that the same shall, from henceforth, be nominated, termed, and called by the name of New England, in America, and by that name of New England, in America, the said circuit, precinct, limit, continent, islands, and places in America aforesaid, we do, by these presents, for us, our heirs, and successors, name, call, erect, found, and establish, and by that name to have continuance forever.

And lastly, because the principal effect which we can desire, or expect of this action, is the conversion of, and reduction of the people in those parts, unto the true worship of God and christian religion, in which respect we would be loath that any person should be permitted to pass, that we suspected to effect the superstition of the church of Rome, we do hereby declare, that it is our will and pleasure, that none be permitted to pass in any voyage, from time to time to be made into the said country, but such as shall first have taken the oath of supremacy; for which purpose, we do, by these presents, give full power and authority to the president of the said council, to tender and exhibit the said oath to all such persons as shall, at any time, be sent and employed in the said voyage.

Articles of Confederation

between the Plantations under the Government of the Massachusetts, the Plantations under the Government of New-Plymouth, the Plantations under the Government of Connecticut and the Government of New Haven with the Plantations in Combination therewith,

signed August 29th, 1643

Whereas wee all came into these parts of America with one and the same end and ayme namely to advance the Kingdome of our Lord Jesus Christ and to enjoy the liberties of the Gospell in puritie with peace. And whereas in our settleinge (by a wise Providence of God) we are further dispersed upon the Sea Coasts and Rivers then was first intended, so that we can not according to our desire with convenience in one Government and Jurisdiction: And whereas we live encompassed people of several Nations and strange languages which hereafter may prove injurious to us, or our posteritie. And forasmuch as the Natives have formally committed sondry insolences and outrages upon several Plantations of the English and have of late combined themselves against us. And seeing by reason of those sad Distractions in England which they have heard of, and by which they know we are hindered by that humble way of seeking advice, or by reaping those comfortable fruits of protection which at other times we may well expect. We therefore do conceive it our bounden Dutye without delay to enter into a present Consotiation amongst ourselves for mutuall help and strength to all our future concernements: That as in Nation and religion so to other Respects we bee and continue one according to the tenor and true meaneing of the ensuing Articles: Wherefore it is fully agreed and conlcuded by and betweene the parties or Jurisdiceons about named and they joyntly and severally doe by these presents agree and conclude That they all bee and henceforth bee called by the Name of The United Colonies of New-England.

The signers of the Articles were:

John Winthrop, Governor of Massachusetts,
Tho. Dudley, Geo. Fenwick, Thomas Gregson, Theoph. Eaton, Edwa. Hopkins.

Twenty-nine years later, on September 5th, 1672, they created:

Articles of Confederation between the Plantations under the Government of Massachusetts;
The Plantations under the Government of New Plymouth;

and the Plantations under the Government of Connecticut.

The Articles opened with:

"Whereas wee all came into these partes of America with one and the same end and aime, viz. To advance the kingdome of our Lord Jesus Christ; and to Injoy the Liberties of the Gospell in puritie with peace; And whereas in our settleing by a wise providence of God wee are further dispersed upon the sea coasts and Rivers then was first intended; soe that wee cannot according to our desire with conveniencye comunicate in one Government and Jurisdiction; and whereas wee are compassed with people of severall nations and strange languages; which hereafter may prove injurious to us and our posteritie and forasmuch as the natives have formerly commited sundry insolencyes and outrages upon severall Plantations of the English; and have several times combined themselves against us; and seeing by reason of our distance from England (our deare native Countrey) wee are hindred both from that humble way of seeking advice and reaping those comfortable fruites of protection which wee might otherwise well expect; wee therefore accoumpt it our duty as well as saftey To enter into a condeaderation for mutuall healp and succor in all our future concernments; that as in nation and religion; soe in other respects; wee be and continue one; according to the tenure and true meaning of the Insueing articles;"
There followed thereafter several articles to define the nature of the relationship between the English colonies and the document was then signed by sixteen men. In all subsequent official business conducted thereafter, the Christian character of the Colonies was clear and could not be mistaken in its intent.

This was true not only in the articles of confederation between the various colonies, but also in their court documents.

motla68
04-24-11, 02:41 PM
Great post! Darkcrusade.
If one can read in between the lines here the Republic has always been there for us to choose and much like these club of men had signed on to a compact with each other for the glory of God we can do the same by our actions, NOT by legal construct, but by merely expressing intent, by building the equity up in the Treasury for the Glory of God, we give all just as in the story of bible where the old woman gave all she had and much like her being indemnified and taken care of for basic life, liberty and happiness we can do the same if we stop having love for the money. It seems that this is what Lincoln was protecting more then anything else, protecting the Republic from the bankers and that leads on to the rumors of who shot lincoln.
In summary we are not doing it because we have trust in mammon, but expressing trust for the Glory of God.

Darkcrusade, checkout the attachment and see if that treatise expands upon the thoughts of your post some as I attempted to do here.

397

Peace be upon you.

David Merrill
06-01-11, 04:05 PM
This interesting book just came to my attention.

http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC00853809&id=p6rHoG10peIC&pg=PP7&lpg=PP7&dq=%22deduced+from+the+political+history+and+condi tion%22#v=onepage&q&f=false

Thank you Trust Guy!!

Trust Guy
06-01-11, 04:27 PM
You're quite welcome . We're all sorted out now .

allodial
06-02-11, 03:32 PM
This interesting book just came to my attention.

http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC00853809&id=p6rHoG10peIC&pg=PP7&lpg=PP7&dq=%22deduced+from+the+political+history+and+condi tion%22#v=onepage&q&f=false

Thank you Trust Guy!!

The classical foundations of the American Constitution: prevailing wisdom By David J. Bederman
http://books.google.com/books?id=fm8Gfi1TmkQC&printsec=frontcover&cd=1&source=gbs_ViewAPI#v=onepage&q&f=false

Likely at a library...somewhere.

Also...
The early security confederations : from the ancient Greeks to the United Colonies of New England (Frederick K. Lister).
The later security confederations : the American, "new" Swiss, and German unions (Frederick K. Lister)

and...

HISTORY AND ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH A FULL ACCOUNT OF THE CONFEDERATIONS WHICH PRECEDED IT OF THE DEBATES AND ACTS OF THE CONVENTION WHICH FORMED IT; OF THE JUDICIAL DECISIONS WHICH HAVE CONSTRUED IT; WITH PAPERS AND TABLES ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE ACTION OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE UNDER IT.

BY NATHANIEL C. TOWLE,
COUNSELLOR AT LAW, WASHINGTON, D.C.

link 1 (1860) (http://books.google.com/books?id=A3AFAAAAQAAJ&dq=History%20and%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Constitut ion%20of%20the%20United%20States%2C%20with%20a%20F ull%20Account%20of%20the%20Confederations&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false)
link 2 (1871) (http://books.google.com/books?id=N40thy8_2UAC&dq=History%20and%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Constitut ion%20of%20the%20United%20States%2C%20with%20a%20F ull%20Account%20of%20the%20Confederations&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false)

Darkcrusade
06-02-11, 04:30 PM
The so -called Civil war--the South was not trying to invade the North. It was not a civil war. It hardly saved America. We are all slaves now.

Abraham Lincoln destroyed the Philosophical Union and imposed a Physical Union--Force over Reason--using bayonets and a train of usurpations worse than England's George III--the reason for seceding from England in the first place--and Lincoln UNDID Jefferson's works and thereby added teeth (an understatement) to Hamilton's Proto-Fascist national banking super state agenda.

They were both Revolutionary Wars. Re: the first War: The British are coming! Re: The second War: the British and their ways are already here with their Mercantilist agendas enforced by Abraham Lincoln's War of Northern Aggression.

Lincoln's 'Second American Revolution'
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo32.html


Freedom--from tyranny and its train of usurpations--is necessary and essential but not sufficient. See Thomas DiLorenzo's "How Capitalism Saved America" (now remnant thanks to the planks of Abraham Lincoln's Unnecessary War. It was also the bloodiest war in American History and waged on civilians and later on the Indians).

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance90.html
Other entries:
http://www.google.com/custom?sa=Search&cof=LW%3A500%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fw...

The Southern cause was "NOT [just] close to being somewhat justified." It was right and completely justified.

Lincoln's stated purpose in the war was to destroy the principle of the Declaration of Independence that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. Southerners no longer consented to being governed by Washington, DC, so Lincoln waged total war against them for four long years. Of course, he didn't put it this way but instead sugarcoated his objective with language about "saving the Union." At the time many Americans — including dozens of Northern newspaper editors — considered the act of compelling a state to remain in the Union at gunpoint to be destructive of the voluntary union of the states. And they were right.

The Unknown Lincoln
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo26.html
Understanding the large body of knowledge that intellectuals Ayn Rand and Ludwig Von Mises and their students-- including the ground breaking work of Thomas Dilorenzo's, "The Real Lincoln", and Stephan Kinsella's illuminating work on CopyRight copywrongs and its co-destruction of a Division of Labor society--are essential to UN-Blinding what IS UnSeen and impossible to glean by just reading what one's masters write, teach and spread around.

Lysander Spooner, the author of the 1845 book, The Unconstitutionality of Slavery and a celebrated abolitionist, wrote in his 1870 essay, "No Treason," that "all these cries of having ‘abolished slavery,' of having ‘preserved the union,' of establishing a ‘government by consent,' and of ‘maintaining the national honor' are all gross, shameless, transparent cheats — so transparent that they ought to deceive no one." Thanks to 140 years of propaganda in the government schools, these "cheats" now appear to deceive nearly everyone.

Notes: Lysander Spooner who authored The Unconstitutionality of Slavery in 1845, ...
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&cof=L:http://www.lewrockwell.com/lewr...

War is hell for those who wish to secede from exploitative empires.

As soon as Gandhi began influencing millions of Indians, he and some 60,000 of his followers were imprisoned in 1930. This led Winston Churchill to declare that "Gandhi-ism and all it stands for [peaceful resistance to tyranny] will, sooner or later, have to be . . . crushed." "Gandhi had replaced Lenin as Churchill's arch nemesis," writes Baker.

A New Look at How Wold War II Happened
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo142.html
Sherman was every bit as much a racist and white supremacist as Lincoln. He was also an anti-Semite, and of course hated red-skinned people almost as much as he hated South Carolinians — and would later kill them in even greater numbers.

Slaves were raped, pillaged, and murdered indiscriminately along with the white population of the South, and Sherman did nothing to stop it. *This is documented*.

It has been claimed in print that Sherman was some kind of egalitarian who was motivated by indignation over the degree of racial inequality in the South. (Cisco proves what delusional liars such Lincoln (and Sherman) cultists as Victor Davis Hanson are in "Abuse of African-Americans" by Sherman's army in Cisco's final, stomach-turning chapter.

...The union of the founders was destroyed in 1865. War Crimes Against Southern Civilians explains in great detail how, in addition to killing some 300,000 dissenters to rule by Washington, D.C. on the battlefield, the U.S. Army, under the micromanagement of Abe Lincoln, also murdered tens of thousands of Southern civilians, including thousands of slaves and free blacks, while stealing tens of millions of dollars of their private possessions as well. None of it was necessary, of course, for the purpose of ending slavery; all other countries on earth ended slavery peacefully during the nineteenth century. This included the British, Spanish, French, Dutch, and Danish colonies, where 96 percent of all the slaves in the Western Hemisphere once existed. The purpose of the war was to finally realize the Hamiltonian dream of a consolidated, monopolistic government that would pursue what Hamilton himself called "national greatness" and "imperial glory." The purpose of the war, in other words, was a New Birth of Empire, one that would hopefully rival the Europeans in the exploitation of their own citizens in the name of the glory of the state.

Malice Toward All, Charity Toward None: The Foundations of the American State
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo123.html


This country cannot be fixed by "going back to the constitution" because:

1. Those in conflict cannot agree to which of the "constitutions" by date and amendment to "go back to."

2. The "constitution" itself was a counter revolution to the agreed government set up at the revolution. It thoroughly repudiates the 5 truths articulated in the Declaration of Independence as the causes and premises for the Declaration by declaring itself to be the "supreme" law/sacred text of the land. Thus creating itself as a "sovereign" with divine right to rule because its subjects have elected representatives to plead and petition the sovereign. The eventual corruption was systemic from the initiation as articulated by the "Anti-Federalists." They were right and the Federalists were wrong.

All that is going on today "politically" is a verbal religious war by different denominations who will eventually resort to coercive lethal force to make their interpretation of their version of made up law/sacred text paramount to all the others.

Is it time to change your religion?

http://www.lib.unc.edu/blogs/civilwar/index.php/2011/05/30/30-may-1861-to-the-president-of-the-united-states-sir-the-course-of-despotism-is-that-of-rapid-and-aggravated-progression/

Billy James
07-12-11, 03:05 PM
It seems , We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this is peculiar.

Thus division from those evolved.

So whom does this apply to?

Michael Joseph
07-13-11, 02:56 AM
It seems , We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this is peculiar.

Thus division from those evolved.

So whom does this apply to?

If all men are created equal, then one man has no right in another man to represent another man, unless said Right is Granted. However, if Artificial Persons are seen as Things, then representation of a Thing does not create a problem - as Rights in Things, regarding an estate - are in fact easily represented. As the cestui que trust is going to want his/her/its interests preserved.

David Merrill
07-14-11, 10:30 AM
The issue about pro se on the Libel of Review for example. I recently advised the new suitor - if the US clerk demands a signature on the bottom line to simply write -


Lawful Money Demanded.





http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/2751/civilcoversheet.jpg

Darkcrusade
09-07-11, 01:06 AM
By what right do men exercise power over each other?" - Auberon Herbert

So why is it that I have to do what some bureaucrat says I have to. Why must I give a portion of my income to Washington DC, so that they can redistribute it to the rich and well connected? What right do they have to the fruits of my labor? Am I their slave? If not, why am I coerced at the point of a gun to do the bidding of the government?

shikamaru
09-07-11, 11:43 AM
By what right do men exercise power over each other?" - Auberon Herbert

So why is it that I have to do what some bureaucrat says I have to. Why must I give a portion of my income to Washington DC, so that they can redistribute it to the rich and well connected? What right do they have to the fruits of my labor? Am I their slave? If not, why am I coerced at the point of a gun to do the bidding of the government?

To answer your question:

Force, coercion, threat, duress, fraud, and sometimes by agreement :)

allodial
11-05-12, 03:33 PM
Let us however keep the focus and realize that the Constitutions are not grants of Rights.

That agrees with my post. The constitutions restrict, they do not grant. They restrict the behavior of government officials - especially judicial officers in context of my experiences.

Perhaps it might be helpful to see the Constitutions as, rather than sources of some rights, being guarantees of rights of non-citizens by virtue of, among other things, limiting the authority of the State actor.

allodial
08-26-15, 04:30 AM
... If you want to Google up a photo of the City Council of Washington DC (the municipal corporation formed in 1871) then you will be hard pressed to recognize anybody from the Obama Administration there. Do you start to get it. It was me who showed RAP/RuSA the real USA Incorporated (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNDllZDU0ODYtOTFkNC00ODdkLWFjY zItN2EwODFiYzk3N2Yz&hl=en) but alas, that corporation is for promoting sports events! But if you spend a few minutes reading you might forgive the adherents to RAP/RuSA for getting caught up in Internet Spin. But with a flawed fundamental, like the USA and the States are corporations you might better understand why RAP/RuSA after over a year of James Timothy TURNER's lies (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYmU2MTllNTYtYWI4ZS00OTQ3LTljZ DgtNzhlMzg3YjAxNWE0&hl=en), is still not on the map nor will it ever be - no surveyed boundaries (http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/6628/territoryact.jpg).

We should wander past the Fed Act of 1913 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImM2EzYjY5ZWItMDUxOC00OTViLWIwN zMtNGViZjJkZmIyMzYx&hl=en&authkey=CLXNm7oE) to explore how MJ thinks (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImNjQ3ZjI4YTUtZDdjZS00MjllLWE2Y jgtZWQzNGYwZDkxZDU4&hl=en) a moment. Listen to what Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire says about the Judiciary Act of 1789 (https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1EaV_bU7VImYjhjMmE2OTYtYjA2MC00ODA3LTk2M 2MtNTk5ZGNhYzMzYTA0&hl=en). By 1790 we find that the districts (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Act_-_districts.jpg), through the District became responsible for the debts of the US government. The District is of course a municipal corporation like I showed you - formally since 1871 - city of Washington, District of Columbia.

Seems Wikipedia has an expanded write-up on this.


Under the U.S. Constitution, the District remains under the jurisdiction of Congress. However, at various times in the city's history, Congress has devolved some of its authority to District residents and their elected representatives. The possible paths of bills, emergencies, and temporaries through the power structure of Washington, DC as dictated by the Home Rule act.

When Congress passed the Residence Act on July 16, 1790, they called for a new permanent capital of the United States to be located on the Potomac River. The federal district originally comprised land in the form of a square measuring 10 miles (16 km) on each side donated by the states of Maryland and Virginia. The Residence Act also provided for the selection of a three-member board of commissioners, appointed by the President, charged with overseeing the construction of the new capital.[1] Two other incorporated cities that predated the establishment of the District were also included within the new federal territory: Georgetown, founded in 1751,[2] and the City of Alexandria, Virginia, founded in 1749.[3] A new "federal city" called the City of Washington was then constructed on the north bank of the Potomac, to the east of the established settlement at Georgetown.

In 1800, Congress created a joint commission to recommend the governance for what was then called the Territory of Columbia. The joint commission recommended a governorship and a 25-member legislative assembly.[4] This would have been the federal district's first legislature. However, the Organic Act of 1801 officially organized the entire federal territory under the control of Congress, but did not establish an overarching government for the entire District as recommended. In 1802, the original board of commissioners was disbanded and the City of Washington was officially incorporated. The city's incorporation allowed for a local municipal government consisting of a mayor appointed by the President and an elected six-member council.[5] The local governments of Georgetown and Alexandria were also left intact.[6] In 1820, the Congress granted the City of Washington a new charter, which allowed for an elected mayor.[7]

This piecemeal governmental structure remained essentially intact until the passage of the Organic Act of 1871, which created a new government for the entire District of Columbia. This Act effectively combined the City of Washington, Georgetown, and unincorporated area known then as Washington County, into a single municipality as Washington, D.C. exists today.[8] In the same Organic Act, Congress created a territorial government which consisted of a legislative assembly with an upper-house composed of eleven council members appointed by the President and a 22-member house of delegates elected by the people, as well as an appointed Board of Public Works charged with modernizing the city. In 1873, President Ulysses S. Grant appointed the board's most influential member, Alexander Robey Shepherd, to the new post of governor. Shepherd authorized large-scale projects to modernize Washington but overspent three times the approved budget, bankrupting the city. In 1874, Congress abolished the District's local government in favor of direct rule.

The territorial government was replaced by a three-member Board of Commissioners; two members appointed by the President after approval by the Senate and a third member was selected from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. One of the three members would be selected to act as President of the Board.[10] This form of government continued for nearly a century. Between 1948 and 1966, six bills were introduced in Congress to provide some form of home rule, but none ever passed. The commissioner form of government was replaced in 1967 by a mayor-commissioner and a nine-member city council appointed by the President.

Note the easy-overlooked and poignant factor of pre-DC and pre-USA municipalities being brought into the District. My off-the-cuff and rough analysis at this time is that #1 Those cities were freed from state constitutional confines. #2 Those cities were originally independent meant they were made 'homerule' in the district. #3 That Washington county, Georgetown and city of Washington were merged, the incorporation of a county (in a sense orphaned by Maryland) made the entire electorate presumed incorporated. #4 That it took a special act in 1895 to fully merge Georgetown is telling. The flag might suggest that DC got its power from Georgetown (a colonial municipality), city of Washington and county of Washington.


...the Organic Act of 1871, which created a new government for the entire District of Columbia. This Act effectively combined the City of Washington, Georgetown, and unincorporated area known then as Washington County, into a single municipality as Washington, D.C. exists today.

Quite a significant legal feat: the merger of the City of Washington, Georgetown [older than the Constitution for the United States of America] and unincorporated Washington County into a single municipality called Washington, D.C. Note, three stars on the DC flag.

2779
2778
Its interesting to note that Congress can pass a resolution (in the districts) to prevent a bill from becoming a law.

Re: Georgetown

Georgetown is a historic neighborhood, commercial, and entertainment district located in northwest Washington, D.C., situated along the Potomac River. Founded in 1751 in the Province of Maryland, the port of Georgetown predated the establishment of the federal district and the City of Washington by 40 years. Georgetown remained a separate municipality until 1871, when the United States Congress created a new consolidated government for the whole District of Columbia. A separate act passed in 1895 specifically repealed Georgetown's remaining local ordinances and renamed Georgetown's streets to conform with those in the City of Washington.


The United States possess {note plural use} full and unlimited jurisdiction, both of a political and municipal nature, over the District of Columbia.

It is within the constitutional power of Congress, in legislating for the creation of a commission charged with public duties, to provide that some members of it shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and that other members of it shall consist of officers in the service of the United States, who had been appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, when the duties of the new office are germane to those of the offices already held by the latter.

Congress may increase the duties of an existing office without rendering it necessary that the incumbent should be again nominated, confirmed and appointed. Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282 (1893) (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/147/282/case.html)


By 1790 we find that the districts (http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_Act_-_districts.jpg), through the District became responsible for the debts of the US government. The District is of course a municipal corporation like I showed you - formally since 1871 - city of Washington, District of Columbia.

Are there any U.S. State bankruptcy courts anywhere to be found? Why not?

allodial
08-26-15, 05:02 AM
(Continued from previous post (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?24-The-first-constitutions&p=18741&viewfull=1#post18741))

United States bankruptcy courts are courts created under Article I of the United States Constitution. They function as units of the district courts and have subject-matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases. The federal district courts have original and exclusive jurisdiction {such a familiar set of terms} over all cases arising under the bankruptcy code, (see 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a)), and bankruptcy cases cannot be filed in state court. Each of the 94 federal judicial districts handles bankruptcy matters. The current system of bankruptcy courts was created by United States Congress in 1978, effective April 1, 1984.[1]

The bankruptcy judges in each judicial district in regular active service constitute a "unit" of the applicable United States district court (see 28 U.S.C. § 151). The bankruptcy judge is appointed for a term of 14 years by the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the applicable district is located (see 28 U.S.C. § 152).

Technically, the United States district courts have subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy matters (see 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a)). However, each such district court may, by order, "refer" bankruptcy matters to the bankruptcy court (see 28 U.S.C. § 157(a)). As a practical matter, most district courts have a standing "reference" order to that effect, so that all bankruptcy cases in that district are handled, at least initially, by the bankruptcy court. In unusual circumstances, a district court may in a particular case “withdraw the reference” (i.e., take the case or a particular proceeding within the case away from the bankruptcy court and decide the matter itself) under 28 U.S.C. § 157(d).

Hmmm "original and exclusive jurisdiction" ...so very familiar.

What Happened to the Virginia Side?


From 1840 to 1846, Alexandrians petitioned Congress and the Virginia legislature to approve retrocession. On February 2, 1846, the Virginia General Assembly agreed to accept the retrocession of Alexandria if Congress approved.

2780

pumpkin
08-26-15, 01:39 PM
To answer your question:

Force, coercion, threat, duress, fraud, and sometimes by agreement :)


Yes, all the above. But from my studies, they create an account for you. Actions of account are equitable. IMO, deny the account. Also, I am finding that the state (government) does not make a claim, they just file some BS paperwork and get a summary judgment. On a non-existent case.

shikamaru
08-26-15, 08:04 PM
Yes, all the above. But from my studies, they create an account for you. Actions of account are equitable. IMO, deny the account. Also, I am finding that the state (government) does not make a claim, they just file some BS paperwork and get a summary judgment. On a non-existent case.

Recall what an account at law is.
An account, at law, is a chose in action or right to sue for recovery of a debt or obligation.

pumpkin
08-27-15, 11:19 AM
An account, at law, is a chose in action or right to sue for recovery of a debt or obligation.

Yes, and it is very restricted. Actually, you must be or have the qualities of a guardian, bailiff, or receiver. But they will come against you, with some papers showing an amount and some account numbers creating the presumption. I got a property tax bill with numbers all over it. I have no idea what they mean, but I am not a guardian, bailiff or receiver nor do I have any qualities of such. The IRS does the same thing, a bunch of numbers and some resembling amounts due and some indicating an account.

allodial
08-27-15, 08:33 PM
Same model is pervasive: account owner or account holder is surety on the account. When they don't have enough credit/money on hand to satisfy the owner's liability they bill the owner then presume the owner is refusing to pay in dishonor if the bill is not paid or discharged timely.

shikamaru
08-29-15, 01:46 PM
An account, at law, is a chose in action or right to sue for recovery of a debt or obligation.

Yes, and it is very restricted. Actually, you must be or have the qualities of a guardian, bailiff, or receiver. But they will come against you, with some papers showing an amount and some account numbers creating the presumption. I got a property tax bill with numbers all over it. I have no idea what they mean, but I am not a guardian, bailiff or receiver nor do I have any qualities of such. The IRS does the same thing, a bunch of numbers and some resembling amounts due and some indicating an account.

This just recently hit me.

More important than the account is the record. More focus (and study) should be on the record.

allodial
08-29-15, 10:52 PM
This just recently hit me.

More important than the account is the record. More focus (and study) should be on the record.

An account is an abstract term for a bundle of records. It may be that an account only ever consists of journals, transcripts, ledgers and associated papers (tied together under the same "record number" or "account number").

shikamaru
08-30-15, 12:05 AM
An account is an abstract term for a bundle of records. It may be that an account only ever consists of journals, transcripts, ledgers and associated papers (tied together under the same "record number" or "account number").

Interesting....

... this reminded me of the term 'title' with its associated definition as a bundle of rights.

pumpkin
08-30-15, 12:49 PM
The account is presumed. If it is examined by the court, it does not hold up as an account. You must have the qualities of a guardian, bailiff, or receiver, or you cannot be held to account. But an account can have 'amounts due' and account numbers. Here is a book discussing the subject:
https://books.google.com/books?id=vKMxAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA244&lpg=PA244&dq=qualities+of+a+guardian,+bailiff,+or+receiver+a ction+of+account&source=bl&ots=cYZxQ4hRTe&sig=pNHAqFwiENGql3RoXibcneQQnSo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAmoVChMItIT-2-vQxwIVydIeCh1I2QHC#v=onepage&q=qualities%20of%20a%20guardian%2C%20bailiff%2C%20 or%20receiver%20action%20of%20account&f=false

allodial
09-01-15, 12:00 AM
The account is presumed. If it is examined by the court, it does not hold up as an account. You must have the qualities of a guardian, bailiff, or receiver, or you cannot be held to account. But an account can have 'amounts due' and account numbers. Here is a book discussing the subject:
https://books.google.com/books?id=vKMxAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA244&lpg=PA244&dq=qualities+of+a+guardian,+bailiff,+or+receiver+a ction+of+account&source=bl&ots=cYZxQ4hRTe&sig=pNHAqFwiENGql3RoXibcneQQnSo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAmoVChMItIT-2-vQxwIVydIeCh1I2QHC#v=onepage&q=qualities%20of%20a%20guardian%2C%20bailiff%2C%20 or%20receiver%20action%20of%20account&f=false

You're talking in the framework of a typical court case. Account and record are pretty much synonymous. A monetary account such as those relating to banking or finance are simply records. The Court of the Exchequer (a court of equity?) is a financial/monetary court you could say. Perhaps also see merger of law and equity.

xparte
09-05-15, 09:27 PM
And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. its a old story of greed control Christ was the greatest shit disturber and the world owes him nothing and you owe the world less following the truth backwards is moving forward no worship no war no problem for me or you but it is not what a greedy world ever wanted i hate religion not any one who has faith in a written word is wrong just make sure its author or its authority is not JUST HIS STORY z=Q? following Christ is taking up the cross one nail at a time

Michael Joseph
07-30-16, 09:00 PM
If all men are created equal, then one man has no right in another man to represent another man, unless said Right is Granted. However, if Artificial Persons are seen as Things, then representation of a Thing does not create a problem - as Rights in Things, regarding an estate - are in fact easily represented. As the cestui que trust is going to want his/her/its interests preserved.

Consider also that when it is said all "men" are created equal the phase does not refer to man-kind as a whole but rather, in my opinion speaks to the allegorical meaning. For clearly if the Settlors agreed that all men were created equal, then they would not be happy to hold some men as slaves as many of them did.

Rather by "men" is meant those who issue forth a claim upon the Earth in God under Providence to steward the Earth as Trustee and as vassal kings sitting in the Mercy Seat of Christ. Therefore, it is true that in this sense all "men" are created equal. And those so called "men" leave their mother [church] and father [state of nativity] and take a wife [citizenry]. And the husbands [men] or leadership love their wives [citizenship] and the wives [citizens] submit themselves to their husband [leadership]. Therefore the two cleave to each other and the two become one.

These two form State. And at international law according to the Law of Nations, these two form a Moral Person. Therefore, Husbands love your wives!

For years I have struggled with the concept that why did not all of Israel come up the Mountain to Sup? In the stead of all coming up the Mountain, they elected a Moses [Rational Intellect] to go for them. We can externalize the story but it gets more real when we internalize the story and see that most of us have lived all of our lives on the Mountain of Ai [Wasteheap - Left Brain] where we live in a constant state of duality - in Pisces the dual fish [good and evil]. We are as Peter that great fisherman that fished all the Age Long [Night] and did not catch one single GREAT FISH in his own five sense limited mind.

But then he as Moses crossed over the Red Sea [Corpus Collosum] to lead his people [thoughts and desires] into the Promised Land. But we see that Rational and Intellect cannot ascend to the Promised Land [Moses died] but that Joshua [Yehoshuah] led the people into the Land. That is to say once they crossed over see March 21, June 21, Sept 21 and Dec 21 they came into Bethel [House of God - Right Side of the House]. There they found intuition and experience.

Looking back at Noah we see one captain [you] in one boat [consciousness]. Remember the 12 rowers [diciples in the boat]? When Christ came to the 12 walking on water Peter stepped out and could ascend with his eyes on Christ. But when he began to rely upon Ai [his own intellect] he sunk into the mire.

Now let me tie this all together. As we begin to cross over the Red Sea from Ai to Bethel we leave the natural estate [red and ruddy] as brute beasts [lower conscious beings] and we take on the manhood of Spiritual Beings receiving the title Man. Jesus was called Son of Man for indeed in that respect the Spiritual Man is son of the Celestial Man [the All the one absent a name, the Ain Soph].

And thusly it is said that the Man [Eth Ha Awdawm] is granted Husbandry in the House of God. And it is said "it is not good that man should be alone". Thusly from within Man's Dominion is formed and fashioned Woman. And these two are One in Sacred Trust in God our Founding Father and our Lord Jesus Christ [His and Our King - Magnus Regent]. As there is one emanation from God of which and for which all is subject to - so too the mirror reflects the same image in the Earth.

And therefore so to is the same fractal realized within the fractal of mankind. And this fractal is not subject to form of matter in regard to male or female. Nevertheless we can know the eternal by looking at the created. For the created symbolizes the eternal. And finding a woman in the earth there must be aspect of my consciousness that is both male and female. Male [intellect = Left = Ai]; Female [Intuition = Right = Bethel]. Nevertheless in order to bring forth a child there is need of seed which is of a male.

As such, this is the root cause of why Jacob's thigh was put out of joint and he was made to limp. This is merely allegorical to the extent that Jacob no longer relied upon his own intellect and experiences based on his five sense limited mind and he was made halt to remind him of those limitations. Rather Jacob was granted a new name in God = Israel = Prince. As in a Prince[ly] mind. So that now, from an enlightened state of being our feminine nature is as a chaste virgin being presented to Christ as the Chrism Oil descends from above and our Lamps are made full.

Thusly we can see that all Men are in deed created equal for their is only ONE WAY - and that way is straight and narrow and is without the broad traditions and falsity of the orthodox houses which are anti-christ. For these teach that we cannot be transformed into the image and likeness of Christ. And furthermore that we may not sit down as vassal kings/queens in the mercy seat with our Great Lord and Savior and Redeemer who is The Way of Being - Jesus Christ.

For once one knows the truth and does the truth, then the truth sets one free. If one desires to be king, then one must claim in God - For the Property is in God and we are mere Husbandmen who Steward the kingdom. Farmers or Trustees as it were - tilling the ground to bring forth the good fruit pleasing unto God and man.

What is shocking to me is that many will read the foregoing agree with its premise and then argue how can they use law of another Man's House in order to gain a benefit in another Man's House. And I saw a beast rising out of the sea...indeed....and much cattle.

Jonah 4:11 And should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?

Notice Jonah is a Man who was content to sit under his Gourd in God and watch the world die. Nevertheless all that Jonah is was granted of him by God for God makes the Man. And thusly are all Men created equally.

Gal 4:1 Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;
Gal 4:2 But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.
Gal 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:

For the Kingdom exists and the Princes as heirs of the Kingdom undertaking in the Grant for the mutual benefit of all. For we see in Unam Sactum a Claim in God as follows:

God as Grantor
Pontiff as Grantee

but later we see in the triple crown [three testamentary trusts]

Pontiff as Grantor
Princes over kingdoms as Grantees

Therefore the kingdoms are subject to a higher power [Grantor] and the Grant may be revoked as long as there exists the office and a Man to occupy within. Thusly is the Church [Mother] Apostolic. And since no claim has come forth to challenge Unam Sanctum the Curia and the Cardinals continue on as Trustees and Administrators of the Triple Crown.


So what is on trial currently? The Husbandmen who would run the kingdom into the ground for greed, lust and prestige. The three snakes in the hand of Hercules. Love is on trial -and patient are the saints. Have you ever noticed that a confessional booth is EXACTLY like a courthouse? If you think the confessional booth is not a Juridical construct - think again.

Many make claim to common law thinking themselves to be somewhat - but says Paul - they add very little. For he who makes a use of law to gain a benefit is suppliant or subject to the jurisdiction of the Kingdom - Man [King].

The Heavens are God's Throne [Higher Mind] and the Earth [Lower Mind] His footstool. Both realms are subject to God and thus the Divine Law. We however, may consent to waive our rights in God and consent to another testament.

And every kingdom must be liable for its deeds and the treasury its surety. Now read this and Understand the Great and Wonderful Way of God - which is the Power of God called Jesus Christ:

Heb 7:22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.

THEREFORE comes first the Claim. If Providence allows, then Grantor is God and Grantee is the Claimant.

The Claim is subject to a Survey - else there might exist a trespass.

The Grantee is Chief Trustee [King] which may grant out Property Rights and Estates from said Claim to others who may freely choose to undertake on behalf of the Kingdom.

Any such future grant is QUALIFIED subject to the original Grant and can be no greater. For any subset of a set can be no greater than the set.

Would to God that all would come up the Mountain - but Jesus said to the Men - "the poor you have with you always."

By the Graces and Mercies of God the people are beginning to awaken as the Man with the "Water Pitcher" is pouring out His Spirit upon all Flesh [Lower Mind].

Let us fan the Divine Spark within. Have you ever wondered why the powers that be desire, rather require, that the State be a 3rd party to our marriages? Now you see why. You TWO have the unlimited potential to FORM STATE. For it only takes TWO. The two become one.

xparte
08-04-16, 04:21 AM
In the human soul there are needs which cause people to seek each other out; people are united by experiencing similar needs. The upbringing of a child means that one soul is caring for another. Anyone who reads a bible or any book is drawn out of the egoistic circle of his individual life, for it is not he alone who absorbs the author's thoughts; even when he is only half-way through any book he is already sharing these thoughts with a great company of other readers. And so, through this kinship of soul-experience, a certain human community is formed. This is an important characteristic of spiritual life and seeing a spiritual path that it has its springs in freedom, in the individual initiative of the single human being, and yet it draws men together, and forms communities out of what they have in common.This site is what i consider the springs of freedom not some babbled brook. As wherein the individual initiative or the ability to assess and initiate things independently. The pristine springs cant be muddied the Christ life belongs not to single men but to the fellowship of men. It is different with what can be called, in a strict sense, a political life, the life of civic rights, which brings administrative order into human affairs. You see, however hard one may try to discover, with the most exact methods of spiritual awareness , the deeper connections of political life ... one can find no relation between this political life and the Spiritually sensible. Political life is entirely of the earth Materially We must clearly understand what this signifies.what shall we take as a preeminently earthly type of legal relationship? The relation to property, to ownership. If I own a plot of land, then it is solely by political means that I am given an exclusive right and tenure of the land. It is this which enables me to exclude all others from using the land, building on it, etc. So it is with everything that has to do with public law. The sum total of public law, together with the means taken to protect a society from external interference — all that makes up political life in the strict sense.The first truth was conveyed by Christ Jesus when in the old phraseology he said: “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” Faced with the pretensions of the Roman Empire, He wished above all to separate everything to do with political life from all that bears the imprint of the spiritual . But when the purely earthly State seeks to make itself the bearer of a spiritual earthly impulse for example, the State seeks to assume responsibility for religious life, or for education then we have the situation characterised by the deeper teachings of religion, Wherever an attempt is made to mix the spiritually sensible with the earthly-political, "the poor you have with you always." a policy that Political life is entirely of the earth. Materially Misconduct you have with you always.

David Merrill
08-04-16, 06:29 PM
In the human soul there are needs which cause people to seek each other out; people are united by experiencing similar needs. The upbringing of a child means that one soul is caring for another. Anyone who reads a bible or any book is drawn out of the egoistic circle of his individual life, for it is not he alone who absorbs the author's thoughts; even when he is only half-way through any book he is already sharing these thoughts with a great company of other readers. And so, through this kinship of soul-experience, a certain human community is formed. This is an important characteristic of spiritual life and seeing a spiritual path that it has its springs in freedom, in the individual initiative of the single human being, and yet it draws men together, and forms communities out of what they have in common.This site is what i consider the springs of freedom not some babbled brook. As wherein the individual initiative or the ability to assess and initiate things independently. The pristine springs cant be muddied the Christ life belongs not to single men but to the fellowship of men. It is different with what can be called, in a strict sense, a political life, the life of civic rights, which brings administrative order into human affairs. You see, however hard one may try to discover, with the most exact methods of spiritual awareness , the deeper connections of political life ... one can find no relation between this political life and the Spiritually sensible. Political life is entirely of the earth Materially We must clearly understand what this signifies.what shall we take as a preeminently earthly type of legal relationship? The relation to property, to ownership. If I own a plot of land, then it is solely by political means that I am given an exclusive right and tenure of the land. It is this which enables me to exclude all others from using the land, building on it, etc. So it is with everything that has to do with public law. The sum total of public law, together with the means taken to protect a society from external interference — all that makes up political life in the strict sense.The first truth was conveyed by Christ Jesus when in the old phraseology he said: “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” Faced with the pretensions of the Roman Empire, He wished above all to separate everything to do with political life from all that bears the imprint of the spiritual . But when the purely earthly State seeks to make itself the bearer of a spiritual earthly impulse for example, the State seeks to assume responsibility for religious life, or for education then we have the situation characterised by the deeper teachings of religion, Wherever an attempt is made to mix the spiritually sensible with the earthly-political, "the poor you have with you always." a policy that Political life is entirely of the earth. Materially Misconduct you have with you always.

I want to filter that through Legal Identity; The Coming of Age of Public Law (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZ3VKRWtaelRVU2M/view?usp=sharing) by Joseph VINING.

4362

Toward the end of my abridged rendition you might get that those balanced into the CHRIST Mind are a class action.

Michael Joseph
08-04-16, 07:49 PM
Toward the end of my abridged rendition you might get that those balanced into the CHRIST Mind are a class action.

Right - these have come to the positive nature of Saturn and have entered into the Sanctuary whereof there is balance. They eat the bread by the Light. No longer are they confined and defined by symbols.

Yes brother - Php 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

A great key which turns the door is comprehending the difference between: "Jesus Christ"; "Christ Jesus", "Jesus", "the Lord Jesus Christ" and "Christ"

the writers were not lazy. Leadership must be balanced and not self seeking [serving]. Let he who would be the greatest be the servant to all.

Shalom,
MJ

xparte
08-04-16, 07:50 PM
In the political life of rights, on the other hand, we have to do with something which makes us all equal before the law. We are concerned with the relation of man to man. We have to ask, what our right should be. No question of rights exists among animals. In this respect, also, we are raised above the animals, even in our earthly affairs. But if we are connected with a religious community, or with a group of teachers, then — just as much as in civic relationships — we come up against personal claims, personal wishes. In the economic sphere, it is through the overcoming of self that something valuable, not derived from personal desires, comes to expression — brotherhood, responsibility for others, a way of living so that the other man gains experience in never acting .[My person the actor] This is also the true Christ-Knowledge for our time and the immediate future. That is what we shall learn and impart if we are willing, today, to listen to the Christ. He Himself said “I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.” This means: Christ did not speak only during His time on earth; His utterance continues, and we must continue to listen for it. We should not wish merely to read the Gospels (though certainly they ought to be read over and over again); we should listen to the living revelation that springs from His continued presence among us.“Make new your ways of thinking” (as His forerunner, John the Baptist, said: “Change your thinking”), “so that they may reveal to you man's threefold nature which demands also that your social environment on earth shall have a threefold membering a body soul and spirit. the people from whom Christ Jesus was born looked on themselves as the chosen people, and they believed that happiness would come to the world only if all other peoples were to die away, and their own stock to spread over the entire face of the earth. In a certain sense that was a well-founded belief, for Jehovah, the God of this people, had chosen it as his people, and Jehovah was regarded as the one and only God.this was a justified perception for the old Hebrew people, since out of this old Hebrew people Christ Jesus was to emerge. But with the enactments of the Christ this way of thinking should have come to an end. After that, it was out of date: in place of the recognition of Jehovah we should have come the recognition of Christ — the recognition which compels one to speak always of humanity, just as, Christ does I think Jehovah might have had his fill of politics And Christ is the proxy vote written especially within all humanity when we aren't acting what should we be doing IMBO enjoying the garden is the integrity i place in Christ and the one who sent him.A re gifting of Hebrews is Abraham not the father of all nations well who's your daddy.Great Law Book that bible it again may be a tad too Jehovah in any event the Christ is a Man of redemption. the hard act to follow is only when your acting with only a body and a soul but a man's threefold nature is with a spirit.

David Merrill
08-05-16, 11:18 AM
https://youtu.be/GQLFf9ZdWPY?t=295

Therefore the sultan ingests the imprint of the 153 genomes and combines that with the requirement to study the Law:

4363

It is the willingness to lose his identity in the commonwealth of his brethren, that equips him to lead.


In the political life of rights, on the other hand, we have to do with something which makes us all equal before the law


This is the essence behind Nehemiah 10 - the first written Constitution.



P.S. That is an amazing post xparte! Those words are worth considering carefully.

David Merrill
08-05-16, 02:22 PM
...John the Baptist, said: “Change your thinking”), “so that they may reveal to you man's threefold nature which demands also that your social environment on earth shall have a threefold membering a body soul and spirit.


4364


the people from whom Christ Jesus was born looked on themselves as the chosen people, and they believed that happiness would come to the world only if all other peoples were to die away, and their own stock to spread over the entire face of the earth. In a certain sense that was a well-founded belief, for Jehovah, the God of this people, had chosen it as his people, and Jehovah was regarded as the one and only God.this was a justified perception for the old Hebrew people, since out of this old Hebrew people Christ Jesus was to emerge.


What the commercial priestcraft depends upon is the teaching that the RUACH is what God breathed into Adam - the Breath of Life. RUACH is emotional. Important, yes, but the NESHEMAH is what God breathed into Adam - His Mind - NESHMAT CHAIM.

4365

4366

xparte
08-05-16, 04:17 PM
Do not ask to-day for any abstract ways to the Christ; ask for these concrete ways. Seek to understand the way through your personal thinking, which consists in becoming inwardly tolerant towards the opinions of mankind at large, and developing social interest for the thoughts of other men. to act out of the spirit. When our actions spring from this achieved idealism we are acting in accordance with the intentions of the Christ.Minus all priestcraft that wishes only for our spirit stiffed indoctrination and compliance to o nly a earthly body and soul [destroy this temple and its spirit will rise] Christ did not descend from worlds above the earth in order to achieve merely earthly ends,He was offered the same priest craft and refused. He came down to the earth from higher realms in order to fulfill a divine earthly purpose. We shall grow towards Him only if we cultivate idealism in ourselves, so that Christ, Who represents the earthly divine within the realm of earth, can work through us. Spirit can be realized with intentions, are we no different than Paul in saying about Christ: “Not I, but Christ in me.” I see how one needs a principle of justice. To-day we have reached a stage when principles of justice can be derived only from the spiritual world. And again and again it must be pointed out that nowadays it is not enough to keep on and on declaring Christ People must recover belief in the spirit. and be redeemed from the material misconduct. Mention Christ in the principle of justice the earthly justice he labored for is not some spiritual jurisdiction he needs help with the Christ is “wind,” “breath,” Mind or “spirit.” and God put wind, breath, mind, spirit. In his living creature. All this gives us further warning not to think merely of belief in the spirit, but to try above all to make such an encounter with the spirit that it gives us strength to see through the reality of the material, our external worlds Bullshit . That proof is by the way one looks at things, seeing them in the light of the spirit. is just getting agreement with all adversaries Materially Physically Spiritually .

David Merrill
08-05-16, 04:48 PM
The Christians assume that Jesus came to deliver Israel from the Romans; while Paul clearly delivered Christians to Rome. It would be much more appropriate according to the first constitution - Nehemiah 10 - that Jesus intended to deliver the Temple Mount from the Jews (Babylon).

Where I was born, there is a labyrinth - I will go think this over. I was born on the NW Corner of the Golden Rectangle.


4367


4368

allodial
08-12-16, 09:42 PM
The curses of Deuteronomy it seems could extend to adverse affects on the mind, beliefs and identity. Identifying historical traces with Babylon instead of Old Dynasty Egypt might to lead to error and obscurity, mystery and puzzlement. Identifying with Babylon, one might misidentify Moses as an invader of Egypt rather than a Hebrew-Israelite member of an Egyptian royal family who mercifully intervened for Pharaoh to give him time to refrain from breaching trust and hold up the original covenant or, alternatively, face Divine wrath. False doctrine invading royal courts seems, if unchecked, to most always lead to breech of trust. To misidentify with Babylon one might fail to see that, rather than having been for bolstering Moses' ego, the miracles worked by or through Moses were for getting Pharaoh to repent.

4381