Quashing the Russian Indictment [Archive]

David Merrill

04-07-18, 01:08 PM

I will simply show it to you:

Indictment (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1whkp7k1bscMQaeFt8hptcMO91Y-8Cw6T/view?usp=sharing)against the Russian central bank. (The address came up for at least one of the "indicted" corporations.

My response to the division in Unity. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z2grI3WdduvhuQEwcStEjXdn4t6rYZo0/view?usp=sharing)

The morning after service:

5070

But fifteen minutes later (6:30 am EST) the case was back up.

5069

Now my guess is that when no arrests are made the Case will be dismissed in the next hearing.

https://youtu.be/o158uYCdglU

lorne

06-19-18, 01:00 AM

The accusations in this case against the Russians:

create hundreds of social media & email accounts
stand in front of the White House holding a sign
encourage groups not to vote
collect intel posing as U.S. persons
open Paypal accounts with fake ID
purchase political ads
create online accounts using fake personas
post online using fake personas

Seriously? Doesn't this happen everyday, anytime something important is at stake? I assume it does; even online forums. How does this rise to the level of criminal?

marcel

07-21-18, 11:31 AM

So I was going to buy more Suds-a-Lot and someone online said it was a tool of the banksters and central bankers profit greatly from it. And on the way i heard an ad for Tide detergent on the radio. Who do i sue for conspiracy and collusion to interfere with my election to purchase Suds-a-Lot?

lorne

07-22-18, 01:15 PM

the Russians. Obviously.

5151

marcel

10-22-18, 05:55 AM

Heh, you're right, not criminal. Case not going well for Mueller. Judge orders him to clarify Russian meddling claims. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-20/judge-orders-mueller-prove-russian-company-meddled-election
Defense says he fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections. Concord's attorney has described the election meddling charges as "make believe," arguing on Monday that Mueller's indictment against Concord "doesn't charge a crime." "There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t," said Dubelier, who added that Mueller's office alleged a "made-up crime to fit the facts they have."

David Merrill

10-24-18, 02:52 AM

Thanks for bumping the thread! I saved the Response, and it is just like you say...

Motion to Dismiss (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zU6LmYzAULwETyVSLq1A67cHWrLrbTus/view?usp=sharing)
Response (https://drive.google.com/file/d/12OtJyR7gxm9o0N0YO1B3sDdj_WFv34cS/view?usp=sharing)
Motion in Support (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A6QY0PojKP70oYdsgJ0AJuaN6kS6RsWQ/view?usp=sharing)

lorne

01-27-19, 12:49 AM

I read the MUELLER team has ties to quasi-scholar Joseph MIFSUD and British intelligence.

At minimum, we can surmise that Mifsud was not a Russian agent, but was an asset of Western intelligence agencies. We are left with the impression that the Mifsud saga served as a ploy, whether he participated knowingly or not. It seems reasonable to conclude that the gambit was initially developed with participation of John Brennan and UK intelligence. Following this, Mueller inherited and developed the Mifsud narrative thread into the collusion soap opera we know today.https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/01/death-of-russiagate-mueller-team-tied-to-mifsuds-network/

Now we find the carefully concealed office of the government-backed propaganda mill:
This “network of networks”, as one document refers to them, centers around an ironically named outfit called the Integrity Initiative. And it is all overseen by a previously unknown England-based think tank registered in Scotland, the Institute for Statecraft, which has operated under a veil of secrecy.

The whole operation appears to be run by, and in conjunction with, members of British military intelligence.

According to David Miller, professor of political sociology in the school of policy studies at the University of Bristol and the director of the Organization for Propaganda Studies, the Integrity Initiative “appears to be a military directed push.”
Inside the Temple of Covert Propaganda (https://grayzoneproject.com/2018/12/17/inside-the-temple-of-covert-propaganda-the-integrity-initiative-and-the-uks-scandalous-information-war/)

And did you see the indictment accuses Concord of paying a troll farm $1.2 million a month for fake personas, false Twitter accounts, Faceberg ads, etc.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/1/eric-dubelier-emerges-robert-muellers-top-courtroo/

Question is, how much are they spending on STSC ?

5290

David Merrill

01-27-19, 09:19 AM

That has crossed my mind...

We now have alchemy to produce copper that behaves with the same electron density as gold. Joseph amassed gold into Egypt and Enlil Shaddai led Moses (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImZm92OWJYclVucGM/view?usp=sharing) to steal it to his battery on Mt Horeb.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=5192&d=1538645067

Without this sputtering available the interface between the copper mesh and the gold plating and rings would be an important factor forming the demodulation and antenna around the wings of the cherubim on the Ark. The skins and woven linens also enhanced the ESP from the already genetically enhanced genius named YHVH. - Which Ark of the Covenant contained a good deal of monatomic gold - Manna. The mysticomimetic neuropsychopharmacology of the Qetoret (Temple Incense) also played a role as we find in the Story - regarding Eli, Zachariah and of course John as a channel for Elijah the Prophet.

My point is that as I find three pillars of Knowledge; practical, theoretical and applied complimented by experiential knowledge the halo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIECXsJmY7A)amplifies the table to support knowledge - which is the gold. I am feeling very well paid.

CROSSTALK:

I recall Season 1, I think Episode 2 of Fringe.

Walter BISHOP: Oh, my God!
Lab crew: What?
Patient/lab rat anxious, connected to electronics.
Walter: I think with a little demodulation you can get free satellite TV!

marcel

01-28-19, 05:20 AM

You must be referring to the Chinese researchers (http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/12/eaau3275) who blasted charged argon gas at copper atoms to form nanoparticles that have gold-like properties.

As for monatomic gold, science says that exists only as a thin hot gas. As it cools into a liquid or solid it is no longer monatomic.

As for the two to three hundred active users who never speak, I'd say that's an attempt to tax the resources of the forum. And also to prevent new seekers getting approved to post, for how can the moderator tell the seeker from the troll?

lorne

05-03-19, 01:16 PM

Boy, talk about indicting a ham sandwich. On February 16, 2018 special counsel Robert Mueller indicted Concord Management along with two other corporate entities and 13 Russian nationals allegedly connected to the Internet Research Agency (Case 1:18-cr-00032). February 19, 2018 David Merrill sends Amicus Curiae to the court recusing Daniel L. FRIEDRICK for having a deviant oath of office. Because Russians cannot be extradited to the US it seemed highly unlikely the indictment would result in a trial. But Concord unexpectedly hired American law firm Reed Smith and appeared. The prosecution seemed befuddled and tried to say defendant wasn't properly served. Judge said doesn't matter, they're here. At some point the judge becomes Dabney L. FRIEDRICH (transgender?).

Defendant refused the summons (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?2525-Teaching-Russia-R4C) on March 14, 2018 (R4C) yet waits about a year to file that refusal into the case. Thus revealing the Russians did know the lost word in Freemasonry: NO. Just say no.

On April 16, 2019 Jeannie Rhee as counsel for the Government withdraws appearance. Judge orders hearing scheduled for May 10, 2019 is VACATED. Team Mueller drops the case.

All along it seems this case was more about PR, spin & propaganda than bringing justice to a real crime.

marcel

05-04-19, 03:44 PM

David Merrill

05-04-19, 08:24 PM

One of the govt 9 attorneys withdrew, that leaves 8. Still an active case. Did you see Concord's latest filing? Wants AG Barr and Mueller held in contempt.

"Motion to show cause why Attorney General William Barr (“AG Barr”) and Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III (“SC Mueller”) should not be held in contempt for violating United States District Court for the District of Columbia Local Criminal Rule 57.7, by releasing prohibited information and opinions regarding the guilt of the accused and the evidence in the above-captioned pending...."

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6386795/129/united-states-v-internet-research-agency-llc/

The USA has "Withdrawn" according to the docket report. It looks like you may have found a link spinning things?

At first I was fishing for the key documents, reluctant to blow $11 for a settled matter. Then I realized that the lengthy exhibits must be the entire Meuller Report, which I am very interested in having on disk at least. As well as Doc 1, the original indictment.

So far it looks like Concord (Internet Research Agency) is counterclaiming in criminal charges that MEULLER was not to have published a Report prior to trial. But this was over from very early on. I sent out the amicus brief around 3/20/18 and on 4/14/18 the Summons was Refused. So MEULLER really had no choice but to try spinning the Dems into an effective impeachment of a non-President.

Now Concord is saying that they Appeared Voluntarily so to hang MEULLER out to dry for a federal felony trial tampering - The Meuller Report. Clever!!

Run out the timely clock on the R4C and then turn on MEULLER for revenge. Vengence for attacking our Russian Mobster CEO Donald John TRUMP.

I am not uploading all 427 Pages but will likely add the Meuller Report - I am sure it is on exhibit. Or at least the high points finding of fact against MEULLER.

David Merrill

05-04-19, 08:26 PM

P.S. Thanks for the link - It looks like the Court Listener enjoys putting a spin on things as much as any News. It is all in competition with social media for the attention and therefore no more valuable to me, than social media.

David Merrill

05-05-19, 02:23 AM

There you go! It has a lot of interesting answers.

David Merrill

05-05-19, 08:31 AM

Amicus curiae is "Friend of the Court" and presented to point out the law. Or a point of law. - That there was no judge on the matter. watching the docket and Concord filed a sealed writ of mandamus, ghosting authorities is a science amici curiae vs amicus briefs. The crown is so enamored at the Amicus curiae practice of law fantasy, .sealed writs for inferior friends docking judicial remedy civil or criminal without the benefit of full judicial process,.its just offshore fog maritime layer effect at the BARR reality just becomes a fog“. Its a honored position exposing fraud on any judicial fog.

Feathers (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aTkIstv-0)

I am as you say, "Dissappointed" with CONCORD as an artificial person. It seems small to quash the prosecution, and allow MEULLER a year to writhe only to try prosecuting him. - Hang him out to dry.

Maybe MEULLER needs to Refuse for Cause Dabney Langhorne FRIEDRICH and see if she will redact her oath before allowing the clerk to publish it on PACER, like Timothy BURGESS did a couple years ago.

5432

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=4916&d=1497861217

David Merrill

05-06-19, 06:09 PM

Maybe I only glanced, or possibly copied the typo but I called Dabney (https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2018/09/27/d-c-federal-judge-denies-anonymous-tip-alleging-kavanaugh-abuse/?slreturn=20190406110547), Daniel on the Amicus Curiae Doc. I wonder why I am tickled that she dated Brett Michael KAVANAUGH. You have to love the Russian strategy though; get the Federal Judge to start defending (https://www.google.com/search?q=dabney+l+friedrich&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=_JfqyZBO0YtWmM%253A%252CasTkLuJX9bOYDM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kRzGmcKwwpq_ididOCbxn9nH8P9AQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiuwdLghoTiAhXO6Z4KHXBCASEQ9QEwAnoECAkQB A#imgrc=_JfqyZBO0YtWmM:&vet=1) a party in the case.

This reveals a lot about TRUMP appointed "Judges" too. I am starting to think Deep State (https://patriots4truth.org/2018/05/15/busted-dabney-friedrich-just-another-ses-deep-state-player/) is a new Thing. I would love somebody here to post the DoJ's response to requesting the FOIA (https://www.foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/home) Dabney Langhorne FRIEDRICH oath and Commission Affidavit.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=5217&d=1542103149

5433

I suppose what captures my imagination is how beautiful I find her, in spite of "Dabney" that I always associated with a boy name.

5436

But what you are looking at there is how her former boyfriend Brett Michael KAVANAUGH has signed a properly formed oath, and then we inquire only to find it is a carefully laid trick to lure me into inviting him as "judicial oversight" to watchdog a wayward bond-dodging American judiciary!

Inquiry into KAVANAUGH's Witness, Andrew McCleod KENNEDY reveals that he must have a SO HELP ME GOD. "OATH" too. And so I begin to wonder about TRUMP's personal attorney:

5434

And where the real Animal House is? Is that Deep State is the NEPHALIM or what?

David Merrill

05-06-19, 06:43 PM

Like I said:

5442

5443

Patrick decided to publish my fuller Bible interpretation, unsigned. They put his filing at the end so to pretend it was a mistake and send it back, causing delays. I am tickled that it came up on PACER as Doc 32!

David Merrill

05-07-19, 10:04 AM

Thank you in advance. So far I am not holding my breath.

5446

I have taken a close look and believe I interpret things correctly.

5452
5453

On April 2, 2019 the Summons was finally Returned to the Court by the Process Server; but without any Refused Markings. No R4C.

5449
5450

Then 10 days later the same Doc is filed again with R4C, but no FILED marking? The R4C was the next day after the process server received the Summons - 4/4/18. My Amicus notice was around 3/20/18 so they had plenty of warning that FRIEDRICH was no real judge.

I am think that I heard it incorrectly on TV - Dabney L. as Daniel? I wonder if this is keeping her awake at night?

David Merrill

05-07-19, 10:17 AM

Here is what I mean:

5454

That says the Summons has been Returned unexecuted! But it was Returned executed on 4/2/19. Then the R4C was returned on 4/12/19 and so the Summons was "reverse-executed" by Dabney Langhorne?

Smooth!

5455
5456

No wonder Rudolph William is landing in the middle of the mess? This is happening in the White House? In the Oval Office? Meetings between KAVANAUGH, FRIEDRICH, KENNEDY, GUILIANI and TRUMP?? All planning and managing risk?

5457

Docs 126 and 124 look pretty identical. From the beginning there has been egregious error and attempts to correct. Ever since the writ of mandamus followed my Amicus Curiae.

What do you all think of that Motion to Show Cause?

David Merrill

05-07-19, 03:31 PM

Looking at the Docket Entry #127 as acknowledgement of one attorney withdrawing then, is unrealistic in my opinion with all the markings and the Amicus Curiae considered. Somebody at the Russian Embassy knew to immediately R4C and apparently pass it immediately to the process server to return to the court. After nearly a year, the process server returned a forged (without the R4C) Summons to the court, so the Russians (IRA) returned their copy of the R4C to the court ten days afterward, terminating the case within the year time limit.

It even looks to me like MEULLER (DoJ) et al were hoping that by cutting it close, the Russians might not catch the Return and miss the deadline. I suspect that during those ten days, the Russians were wording the criminal counterclaim Motion to Show Cause, out of anger.

David Merrill

05-08-19, 04:39 PM

When loading my Android I noticed something cool!

The pdf files work great but when I "Save As" jpg the R4C Summonses decode improperly. I experimented a bit and believe this is spyware encrypted into the pdf file by the PACER Tech, at that stage of publication. More recent devices will not detect any protocol errors. It is likely so DoJ investigators can easily find where the pdf files are being made available, like right here on StSC.

Maybe the Russians are doing it?

I even went back to the pdf that was not R4C'd and re-saved it jpg. And it comes up fine on the Android still. So it is not something that changed with my devices.

https://youtu.be/Ws1XdzTmRrc

marcel

05-09-19, 12:42 AM

Why aren't the trolls weighing in on this?

We have 3 summons, one each to:
Internet Research Agency - doc 124 - REFUSED
Concord Catering - doc 125 - REFUSED
Concord Management - doc 126 - REFUSED

The process server, Eric J. Reese, declares to have "executed and returned this summons" and "I delivered a copy of the summons to SERGEI PTOR OF THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION on..." The date is blank on 124 & 125. The only summons with a date is doc 126 for Concord Management, the only party to appear and answer.

So does the server bring the original and a copy, or just the original and ask to use Sergei's copier to make defendants copy? Because they're exactly alike except for color vs B&W.
And notice each summons has strikeout lines that are initialed on the left by what appears to be S-squiggle. And the refusals appear to be initialed by that same S-squiggle. I think that is Sergei Ptor initialing; who may not even be authorized to receive service.

5458
Docs 117, 118 and 119 are blue-ink originals; return of service.

marcel

05-10-19, 12:27 PM

The government filed a 5 page Memo in Opposition yesterday:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6386795/130/united-states-v-internet-research-agency-llc/

David Merrill

05-10-19, 03:43 PM

My guess is the Russian Federation has as much interest in keeping the "prosecution" looking alive as TRUMP does, being that he is unimpeachable. He is not even the President.

There is nothing happening because Dabney is not a federal judge. And she was allegedly appointed by a fraud for a President (2017). The "defendants" are actors, but prepaid. Everybody thinks TRUMP is President. Dinner theater.

P.S. At a glance, I do not see the USA continuing any prosecution. More, the USA is behaving the defendant now.

lorne

05-17-19, 01:39 PM

Yeah, with the prosecution releasing prohibited information and opinions regarding the guilt of the accused and the evidence is indication this case is more about PR, spin and propaganda than justice. Manufacturing a false narrative (Russia bad, Trump bad). What we're finding out is ... the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign, and Russia didn't "hack" the election. And even if the allegations are true, all we have is a little campaign advertising by some Russians. Nevermind moving the needle, a paltry $100k spent isn't even enough to wake the needle. And someone points out:
we have -at least- 4 major omissions in the Mueller investigation and report:

1) the Mueller report failed to consider whether the dossier authored by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele was Russian disinformation (and Steele was not charged with lying to the FBI).

2) Mueller’s portrayal of Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud as a Russian agent – when available evidence suggests he may have been a Western agent.

3) Mueller declined to talk to the VIPS, who offered evidence that the DNC servers were not hacked but content was copied onto a disk at the server’s location

4) Mueller refused to hear Julian Assange, who offered evidence that it was not the Russians that had provided WikiLeaks with the emails.https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2019/05/mueller-never-wanted-the-truth/

and we have AG BARR appointing DURHAM to investigate FBI spying:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-13/barr-appoints-us-attorney-investigate-fbidoj-spying-trump-has-investigated-fbi

On May 15th Concord attorney Eric DUBELIER filed 11-page REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION...

David Merrill

05-20-19, 12:41 AM

I visited today:

Poor Dabney; this looks like Russia is pretty confident about the felony witness/jury tampering accusations. Rough! Having to prosecute the DoJ like that.

David Merrill

05-20-19, 04:32 PM

On May 15th Concord attorney Eric DUBELIER filed 11-page REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION...

Thanks! The actual Doc is more like 200 pages. Lots of email and Tweets...

I am hopeful we will be seeing Dabney's DoJ default here soon - on the FOIA Request (https://www.foiaonline.gov/foiaonline/action/public/home) for her oath of office. I really do enjoy reader participation. It tells me that I am not the only one learning from source materials, and it tests my interpretations too.

David Merrill

06-11-19, 09:44 AM

We (brain trust) acquired a default on Dabney's oath:

5477

In a panic attack the Chief of the response staff delivered:

5478

5479

5480

5481

I say 'panic attack' because within an hour an email rejection without any signature was sent. Just the sort of thing that only makes sense among a lot of shouting and firing, things being thrown - stuff like that.

Continued next post:

David Merrill

06-11-19, 09:52 AM

Here is the rejection letter from the same DoJ, anyway:

5482

5483

Spouting "special circumstances" yet in the wake of delivery.

5484

Her witness, Thomas HOGAN shows no more promise of being bonded...

So looking over her behaviors, she is busy defending the Department of Justice (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=5485&d=1560246628)against Concord's motion for an order to show cause why the DoJ should not answer for felony jury/trial tampering - the Mueller Report! But then, without a bond it makes sense that she would turn Defense Attorney for the DoJ as pet "judge" of a non-President/businessman.

You can't make this stuff up!

David Merrill

06-17-19, 10:30 AM

Examining Docs 136 and 138 it looks like we have frightened the USA into looking for a restraining order against CONCORD. Looking above. the cat is already out of the bag.

5497

It looked very slippery of Dabney to be defending the USA!

5498

lorne

06-23-19, 09:03 PM

Yep, FRIEDRICH and witness HOGAN both with invalid oaths.

Before Russiagate, you may recall MUELLER's first show trial was to put the late Lyndon LaRouche in jail on bogus nonsense.
https://youtu.be/MG0VmjX8M-c

LaRouche believed the US was controlled by the City of London
https://larouchepac.com/20180503/empire-based-london-wont-give-they-must-and-can-be-defeated

lorne

06-25-19, 05:42 PM

Boy, reading some of the history of MUELLER's prosecution of LaRouche and what jumps out is the similarities to the targeting of TRUMP and Concord Management some 35 years later. Have a look:
https://larouchepac.com/20190514/background-larouche-case-fraudulent-prosecution-lyndon-larouche

Central to the implementation of what became known as the “Get LaRouche Task Force” was a coordinated effort among government agencies, private political opponents of LaRouche, and the news media. This was organized in at least three meetings in early 1983 at the home of John Train, a New York investment banker active in U.S. and British intelligence circles. Among the attendees at the meetings were officials from the FBI, CIA, Wall Street Journal, NBC News, and other news organizations. The meetings held at Train’s home led to an unprecedented national and international defamation campaign against LaRouche comprised of thousands of news articles and broadcast reports. This defamation campaign escalated substantially after two LaRouche candidates, running for Lt. Governor and Secretary of State, won the March 1986 Democratic primary in Illinois.

Meaning he could no longer be ignored. Admittedly this is the defendant's side of the story but accepting just half of it is still quite an indictment of the federal judiciary. I believe we can count on this, if David or the suitors ever gain traction (a following) then what we have here is a blueprint for a similar defamation campaign and targeting by the deep state.

lorne

07-12-19, 01:28 AM

Now judge Dabney is in on the quashing. In her opinion & order released July 1 (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6185644/Sealed-Order.pdf), she says MUELLER's indictment of a Russian troll farm "does not link the defendants to the Russian government," and "alleges only private conduct by private actors."

"It is significant and prejudicial that the government itself drew a link between these defendants and the Russian government," adding "In short, the Court concludes that the government violated Rule 57.7 by making or authorizing the release of public statements that linked the defendants' alleged activities to the Russian government..."

https://www.rt.com/usa/463880-judge-mueller-concord-russiagate/

David Merrill

07-12-19, 07:53 AM

Thanks for bringing this up. Here we find the geopolitical social engineering tweaking the Rectification of Judiciary. The Opinion and Order were first SEALED. Like Dabney is reading about herself here.

5517

That quote in the article is from Doc 48 attached.

Recall how I filed and published amicus curiae, enabling all the Defendants the Refusal for Cause they used on the Summonses.

5520

5521

To get it you have to pay attention to the Dates and look at the docket report too. The Return of the Summons was not filed for a year, then ten days later it comes out that the Defendant had Refused the Summons for Cause on the same day?

This is really an exceptionally fine ride!

marcel

07-12-19, 10:29 AM

Taxpayer called, said they want their $35 million back.

Facebook VP of advertising, Rob Goldman, tossed a major hand grenade in the "pro-Trump" Russian meddling narrative in February when he fired off a series of tweets the day of the Russian indictments. Most notably, Goldman pointed out that the majority of advertising purchased by Russians on Facebook occurred after the election, were hardly pro-Trump, and they was designed to "sow discord and divide Americans", something which Americans have been quite adept at doing on their own ...

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-11/judge-shreds-mueller-evidence-kremlin-meddling

David Merrill

07-14-19, 05:48 PM

Witnesseth:

To global server farms and data silos.

I was careful to be rotating the bot screening in the registration process regularly. So all these email addresses have been keyboarded into the StSC User database by human hands. I suggest you download the attachments and then Search for (http://www.dave-cushman.net/computing/country_suffix.html) ".ru", for example. Compare to ".cn" for China. [I removed the email roster because of potential misuse, and for the privacy of Users not involved with Presidential Appointments.]

https://countrycode.org/

Communication is creation and vice versa. The Platform is the true church (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=5525&d=1563126445) - outside the domain of 501(C)(3) and ministering redemption to the Pope, as the Bishop of Rome - CASTLE CHURCH - For the Redemption of the Office BISHOP (http://bishopcastle.us/forum/main-forum/pragmatism?filter_sort=title&filter_order=asc).

Doc 1 of the Olympus Ordeal. Remember that Paul was Roman.

David Merrill

07-23-19, 03:00 AM

Maybe a little more explanation will help.

The 'saving to suitors' clause' of 1789 is intended for consulate and ambassadors foreign, where the law of the flag might come into question. What law, of what state should be applied during trial?

5537

Look at Footnote (d):

5538

So can you for a moment comprehend why as it becomes time for a Businessman instead of a President, to execute the bankruptcy we appointed through this conduit the man who has been through five personal bankruptcies?

marcel

07-23-19, 02:27 PM

Whose flag do you sail under?

Yes, if many more people demand lawful money, somebody will go bankrupt.

THE CIRCUS IS COMING
Mueler is scheduled to testify before 2 congressional committees tomorrow (Wednesday) but not-a-judge Dabney has warned against speaking out about the case.
So it seems he risks having this case dismissed. But maybe that's what they want now that "Russia attacked the 2016 election" is revealed a manufactured narrative. “There's no big there there,” Strzok texted. There was no crime. And you can't have obstruction of justice without a crime.

Could be this case is now doing more harm than good to the agenda of whoever hired Mule-er to run this hit job.

David Merrill

07-23-19, 03:41 PM

Christopher Thomas

07-24-19, 09:14 PM

marcel

07-25-19, 02:04 PM

David Merrill

07-25-19, 04:53 PM

It is complicated, yet so simple. Maybe we are conditioned to expect complicated? So we fail to see how simple it really is - Redemption.

David Merrill

07-25-19, 04:56 PM

I can't get into that.

JORDAN: . . . [W]hen the Special Counsel’s Office interviewed Mifsud, did he lie to you guys too?

Can’t get into that.

JORDAN: Did you interview Mifsud?

Can’t get into that.

JORDAN: Is Mifsud Western intelligence or Russian intelligence?

Can’t get into that.

What did you have for breakfast?

That's covered in the report.

It's now clear Mueller didn't write the Mueller Report.
https://youtu.be/TTPPzCXGh6g

This is delightful! Thank you for sharing or I might get into that. Once you buy into illusion you might spend a lifetime wandering through Fable, Myth, Legend, Parable and Hallucination. I might start calling these The Five Foibles (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=5533&d=1563726513).

David Merrill

12-31-20, 04:00 AM

Some things are very revealing about Russia, TRUMP and Hunter BIDEN (https://www.biography.com/personality/hunter-biden).

I get it about diversity. Saving to suitors' is all about that. What mystifies me is how Hunter could just drop off a laptop at a computer store, to recover data from his drive - to begin with? Much less that he would refuse to pick it up when it was done?

It makes me think that his business dealings with Russia and accomplishments in the Ukraine were meant to become public as counterintelligence.

David Merrill

12-31-20, 04:06 AM

It gets saucy though. Better stuff than the Internet Research Agency above, with GUILLIANI as TRUMP's personal attorney spiking the little computer shop for leaking all the abandoned gossip.

walter

12-31-20, 05:21 PM

It makes me think that his business dealings with Russia and accomplishments in the Ukraine were meant to become public as counterintelligence.

Political theater at its finest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_u3YRZb74w

David Merrill

12-31-20, 06:26 PM

Some comical moments in the thread at the beginning...

I heard Dabney L. as Daniel and had her oath (http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#CLAIMS)all along. So I showed the chief judge oath instead on the Amicus Curiae brief. Also I plugged a 13 instead of 18 into the search engine and found SEALED v SEALED to mean a conspiracy - as my Amicus brief was served on the clerk of court.

No mistakes - no accidents. If I had ended the melodrama that fast, then the Hunter debacle would probably have missed my attention altogether.

I might spend some time reading through this thread and so digest exactly what is happening with my real time geopolitical social engineering platform; and how this Saving to Suitors' consulate works in embassy. Clubs and Associations are high on the political home rule municipal jurisdiction court of record authority. We have known that for a long time. Real people in Russia register here all day long. I can see when they sleep and when they are up working. I see them using TOR browsers...

What was GUILLIANI doing? Why make such a fuss over Hunter's promises to Russia? And his commitments to projects underway in the Ukraine?

Combined with dropping off, and then leaving his disk for recovery until it was abandoned tells me we have two Russian puppets under one Russian puppeteer.

David Merrill

12-31-20, 09:51 PM

https://twitter.com/RepArmstrongND/status/1154075118932545536

This is interesting.. Representative ARMSTRONG speaks of "Federal Recusal". I'm guessing within this tornado of confusion behind MUELLER and this collusion mumbo...
I don't pay to much attention to all this "drama"
but am I wrong about this...? if, presidential candidates try to influence American's to vote for them and "President's" deal with other foreign powers than why wouldn't other foreign powers want to or not do business with a certain presidential candidate? surely, business with other countries will have positive or negative effects on this nation so...What I am basically asking is.., What is the problem? I mean TRUMP was saying things about U.K. Prime minister before he was a prime minister so TRUMP tried to interfere? I don't see the issue.

Does not the same go for the Puppeteer?

[The geopolitical social engineer?]

And did you see the indictment accuses Concord of paying a troll farm $1.2 million a month for fake personas, false Twitter accounts, Faceberg ads, etc.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/1/eric-dubelier-emerges-robert-muellers-top-courtroo/

Question is, how much are they spending on STSC ?

5290

It’s not Rudolph W. Giuliani, a former U.S. attorney and now President Trump‘s ubiquitous defender, or any of cable TV’s prosecutors-turned-pundits.

He is Eric A. Dubelier, a litigator for the Reed Smith law firm who knows international law and the D.C. playing field.

This is how I quashed it after a few years, anyway. I emailed the Amicus brief with Dabney's oath to several attorneys at Reed Smith.

6332

See how her oath changes "So help me God." to "SO HELP ME GOD"?

6333