David Merrill
07-12-20, 09:32 AM
I have been using Cornell's law website for a long time and recently this seems much clearer:
https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title12/chapter2/subchapter4&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title12-section95&num=0&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title12-section95a&num=0&edition=prelim
I enjoy how this makes it clear that these "emergencies" are for the member banks (endorsers of the Fed's private credit).
6039
6040
6041
Having the Trading with the Enemy Act omitted from the Bankers' CODE clears a lot of clutter about remedy.
All on one neat page:
6038
https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title12/chapter2/subchapter4&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title12-section95&num=0&edition=prelim
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title12-section95a&num=0&edition=prelim
I enjoy how this makes it clear that these "emergencies" are for the member banks (endorsers of the Fed's private credit).
6039
6040
6041
Having the Trading with the Enemy Act omitted from the Bankers' CODE clears a lot of clutter about remedy.
All on one neat page:
6038