PDA

View Full Version : Another burn victim from CTC



toddsawake
06-30-12, 03:23 AM
Hello everyone,
Well I just received another CP15 letter from Auntie today. I got one for both my wife and I on June 11th for $5k each and another one today for another $5k each for a grand total of $20k for the tax year 2009. I didn't know you could get a double "F" for the same year. I filed ctc style for 2007, 2008, and 2009. 07 have a $5k refund pending, 08 got a check for $9k and you know the story for 09. One good thing about the ctc forum though, someone named Bob from California, put a link in his comment to here. Thank god. I think I finally found the right place with some real answers.

David Merrill
06-30-12, 10:47 AM
Hello everyone,
Well I just received another CP15 letter from Auntie today. I got one for both my wife and I on June 11th for $5k each and another one today for another $5k each for a grand total of $20k for the tax year 2009. I didn't know you could get a double "F" for the same year. I filed ctc style for 2007, 2008, and 2009. 07 have a $5k refund pending, 08 got a check for $9k and you know the story for 09. One good thing about the ctc forum though, someone named Bob from California, put a link in his comment to here. Thank god. I think I finally found the right place with some real answers.


It might come down to how much you want to spend on an evidence repository. I have started a thread (http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?642-Cracking-the-Code-Recovery-Fraud-by-Omission) recently with a frugal approach. A method of getting the Treasury/Fed's attention is the Libel of Review (http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/9462/libelofreview52012.pdf) rendering a Default Judgment.



http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/613/defaultjudgmentmarks.jpg



Notice the stamp in particular. By order of the suitor, the USPS clerk acquires the authority to redeem lawful money (cancellation (http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6742/redeemedbills.jpg)).

toddsawake
06-30-12, 05:16 PM
The Name thing is a little confusing to me. Do I use First Middle and no last in the counterclaim? Or do I use First Middle Last and don't open any mail that's addressed to FIRST MIDDLE LAST?

David Merrill
07-02-12, 11:32 PM
The Name thing is a little confusing to me. Do I use First Middle and no last in the counterclaim? Or do I use First Middle Last and don't open any mail that's addressed to FIRST MIDDLE LAST?

You use First Middle of the Last family. The clerk of court will only issue process to First Middle. The Receipt will be First Middle or sometimes MIDDLE V. LAST.


Once you are a court of competent jurisdiction you adjudicate the mail as suits against you. If you are receiving mail to First Middle Last then you likely gave somebody that name (http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6872/nameinagent.jpg) as if it was you. Over time, that will stop happening except where you have chosen to be the trustee for it.