Silly me -- I did not check my PM's -- I just replied.
Printable View
Rather than " Exempt ", ...Martin Earl...
I would prefer " Not Subject To " ;)
..."Not subject to...", I LIKE that! Would make a nice change to my private plate.
I found somebody who is "endorsing" checks similarly to what is suggested here.
And he will actually talk to me and answer my questions, so I think I will now do it.
He recommends including "without prejudice."
Great! Maybe he can register and chat room with us?
The following is from this thread: Exactly what does the IRS agent think? Post of 03-29-11, 06:39 PM:
"I was pushing my friend to discuss our redemption of lawful money with his sister that works in a legal department at IRS. She was very resistant and she would not discuss it even privately. I think they have a policy there at IRS.
It has been 4 weeks since IRS has received my 1040 and my continuous insistence and questioning whether there are any new developments at the IRS regarding demanding lawful money per Title 12 USC 411; this Monday she finally said that typically IRS has 6 weeks to respond (sort of legal zone) and when someone is demanding lawful money he is considered out of the FR System. The IRS is creating a special file and that person's activities are being scrutinized by them."
What I need to know is this: Would the creation of a special file by the IRS and the scrutinizing of the person's activities be triggered by demanding lawful money or by the 1040?
That's the type of special IRS file I'd like to have. I imagine the IMF (individual master file) to say something like this:
filer indicates redemption of lawful money beginning 4/2005. Confirmed by bank inquiry. Status: non-taxpayer. Recommendation: no action. AGENTS: do not go there; this one knows too much about the central bank scam; can't risk the revelation of state secrets.
That would be great, but it doesn't answer the question.