We are moving to North Dakota. Meet at location X. Circle wagons and start hunting buffalo for afternoon lunch. Sever all commercial connections.
This means no toilet paper, iPhones or frappucinos.
Printable View
We are moving to North Dakota. Meet at location X. Circle wagons and start hunting buffalo for afternoon lunch. Sever all commercial connections.
This means no toilet paper, iPhones or frappucinos.
I believe most just glazed over the point of the thread and, more importantly, the supporting study and research material provided by Boris. I can tell because by the quick and assuming responses some gave which compared this approach erroneously with past "remedies".
Can anyone here verify, with first hand knowledge and testimony, that mere use of 'FRNs' creates an automatic and true liability for 'return of income' taxation?
usufruct
The right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing.
usufructuary
One who has the right and enjoyment of an usufruct.
The duties of the usufructuary are,
1. To make an inventory of the things subject to the usufruct, in the presence of those having an interest in them.(The certificate of live birth / birth certificate)
2. To give security for their restitution; when the usufruct shall be at an end. (Promise to pay: contract under seal = state as usufruct)
3. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct.
4. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent.
5. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense.
Now, think again about the purpose of this thread "Usufruct surrender..."
Look at the above critically and decide for yourselves what position most are in conventionally and what position is proposed by Boris regarding surrender, a proper claim and acknowledging what is already true as per the extant United States military occupation.
I don't know. The 'what' that is being redeemed could be FRN, or it could be those who use FRN, or both.
As to the reason they are being redeemed, again I don't know. It can be presumed the reason is for providing for moving between jurisdictions, or moving out of a jurisdiction altogether.
The means is apparently the act of making demand. It does not say whether the demand be in writing or if it may be made orally.
@ Anthony Joseph
"Can anyone here verify, with first hand knowledge and testimony, that mere use of 'FRNs' creates an*automatic and true*liability for 'return of income' taxation?"
What a great question!
Hmm... another great question. Well, since according to the code a demand must be made, and since a demand can only be heard by the Treasury or Fed through a "transmitting utility" like a person, then the answer must be, no.
I guess that conclusion also tells me the demand must be made in writing.
I just realized that 12USC411 doesn't say a demand must be made. It only prescribes one method for redemption.
If the State (ie. United States) "holds title to that person", then why is it not fulfilling the duties regarding said person...
1. To make an inventory of the things subject to the usufruct, in the presence of those having an interest in them.(The certificate of live birth / birth certificate)
2. To give security for their restitution; when the usufruct shall be at an end. (Promise to pay: contract under seal = state as usufrucut)
3. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct.
4. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent.
5. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense.
???
Oh that's easy; people are assuming they have title to the person, and are acting as sureties for the person.
If I had more time at the moment, I have a thoughts I'd like to share. But I have a few things to take care of, so if I remember them later, I'll share.
When you return...
"People are assuming they have title to the person" is one part; the other part is that it is the automatic and default presumption of the 'actors' for the State that ALL people are "assuming they have title to the person", and, TITLE to everything in said person.
Now, go back to the original premise of this thread and decide for yourself if there is a solution to overcoming these assumptions and presumptions.
Oh absolutely! Just one example is with a Notice of Mistake;
http://www.notacitizen.com/index.php...mple-documents
"owner" ~= "surety". Having full title is another thing. I was told even the Russians or German officers asking "papers please" knew this.
The "duty" isn't voided; it's transferred to the one who acts as if the duty belongs to him/her. When we make adverse claims of already seized interests, we are labeled as "enemies of the State" and we obligate ourselves to fulfill the "duty" which would otherwise be the obligation of the actual usufructuary - the State.
If you wish, go to peace and surrender the 'usufruct'; surrender adverse claims to that which has been already seized and that which amounts to nothing more but mere "earthly/worldly treasures" and illusionary "profits" derived therefrom. If one makes clear declaration that one is without TITLE and/or OWNERSHIP claim(s) over already seized and vested interests of the 'United States', how can one be held lawfully liable for obligations and duties pertaining to said interests?
Any 'use' of persons in commerce benefits the State; we receive NOTHING of intrinsic value in return for our labor. Debt currency and credit provides only discharge and people get "paid" by way of said debt obligations - debt is not fair and just compensation for one's labor.
Stop acting like an OWNER and let the actors for the State administrate its own liabilities from within its own created realm.
Or, be an OWNER and take the burden on for yourself; this is what most people are doing anyway.
The use of the word "surrender" implies that you must be Owner of something in some respect in order to "surrender" it.
Why else would they even be sending you a "bill"?
Boris uses "naked owner" to describe why they are approaching you for the "NAME".
In Trust, and in military seizure, ownership has been split into legal and equitable title.
The State seized (by pledge or military conquest) LEGAL title only.
The COLB is evidence of equitable title (indemnification), which title you are holding now when you appear to be alive on the record (via UCC-1 or other county record).
This equitable title is the 'reversionary interest" that re-vests to you upon your "appearance to be alive", and this equitable title is what you indeed "surrender" to State, which then now holds BOTH Legal and Equitable Titles, causing the usufruct to end (page 407, point II "Merger") and distinguishing the associated debt by operation of law (12 USC 95a(2).
IMO, this is how I see Boris's technology working...
Thanks Anthony!
Your contributions are helping me find more clarity as I meditate on them.
Here are some more insights that hit me as I meditated on your comments about "adverse claims":
1. When companies, as sub-corps under the charter of the US Corp, send us bills, they cannot be "charging" us as that would be making an "adverse claim" against itself, and making itself an "enemy of State". So, if the "bill is not a bill" (a charge, an adverse claim), then what is it? Perhaps it is exactly as it says on most bills... a "PAYMENT"... a credit voucher that is capable, upon indorsement, of transferring (surrendering) a portion of the equitable title to the public credit that you are are "entitled" to as "one of the people" who are the source of the credit of the nation.
2. If money is essentially just a medium of exchange, then why couldn't "bills" simply act AS money, once indorsed as "Received" and signed on the front with lawful money demand, and then, on the back, just write, "For Deposit Only to the account of United States Treasury (12 USC 342)" [or to each State's treasury/clearinghouse as #3 proposes]?
3. I just watched about an hour long presentation on http://endofamerica.com (Snapshots here) which explained how soon the US Dollar will lose its power as the international reserve currency. If that happens, we will desperately need a replacement domestically, just as internationally it is already being replaced by the BRICS countries. Perhaps each of the united States could agree to use "indorsed bills" as "currency", and form trade agreements among themselves just as BRICS did. Just form State clearinghouses to process this "currency", and grant every man and woman over 18 a $10,000/month credit limit to stimulate this new economic paradigm with a currency that is "labor-backed". To qualify for this "credit limit", one would have to provide proof monthly that one is actually working and truly producing an economic benefit so that inflation does not undermine the State's local economy, and its exchange rate with other States in their agreements.
All it would take to get this started would be a brave Governor who would simply declare a "State of Emergency" and implement this policy, and undertake a State-wide educational campaign explaining this policy to its inhabitants and its neighboring States. This emergency truly may occur as a result of what happens July 1, 2014.
Can you imagine how immediately popular this first State would become overnight! Everyone who was unemployed would immediately move there so they could "pay" their "bills", and work at a job they truly enjoyed and was effectively contributing a product or service that is abundantly in demand because of the last 20 years of people going without things because they couldn't afford them?
This model would stimulate local economies, since the currency is local-based. It would restore manufacturing to America. And if suppressed inventions were released, it would change the world!
This model has been proven to work already. The George Rapp Harmony Society is one example. Lincoln's "Greenback" Monetary Policy is another.
Maybe ex-Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura needs to be approached with this proposal...
I don't see the need for replacement "bills" when we have all this bitcoin, gold & silver, and lawful money available.
Find the asylum state (Image and Likeness of God) and abide there. This is why the Libel of Review prevents irregular extradition from the asylum state.
I sense that MJ and Allodial understand my last post, maybe quite a few readers do...
I play chess with a fellow who has lived peacefully for almost 15 years, completely off the Grid, on my mathematics. You have to pay attention to who came into the Courtroom:
http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/8...ateprayer1.jpg
http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/8...ateprayer2.jpg
My point though is that over the chessboard we are naturally confrontational, in fact I have to admit it; he has won every conversation that we have ever had!
I looked at what Boris does and thought, This guy is fighting his way off the actual theater of war. The song remains the same...
[In other words, this fellow I play chess with resides in My Peace - Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions Granted to Patroons; 1629.]
The presumption in EVERY court case is that both parties are adverse claimants, unless the 'Plaintiff' is 'UNITED STATES' or ''STATE OF XXXXX'; then only the 'Defendant' is presumed an adverse claimant 'Enemy of the State'. EVERY 'NAME' in 'Plaintiff' vs "Defendant' scenarios are 'United States' creations and/or vested interests. The theater of war is the commercial realm and every transaction made within that realm absent the sole and direct administration by an 'United States' officially sworn representative signifies belligerent commercial activity (war-like stance) amidst the extant military occupation on this land.
Peaceful acknowledgment/surrender of what has already been seized is the only viable option to overcome the default presumption of "Enemy of the State" status. It is the possibility of 'reversion' (a claim that TITLE is "mine") that keeps most people in said default 'Enemy' status.
It is known that the people are the 'spoliated owners' and that said people have been seized of all TITLES. If we continue the illusion that we are the current OWNERS of these seized TITLES, we are treated as enemy combatants in the commercial theater of war. Hence the thousands upon thousands of codes, statutes, ordinances, etc. to keep the 'enemy' at bay and under control. Only an OWNER or TITLEHOLDER is subject to said codes,... etc. If we continue to act as if we are, we will be held liable as if we are - that is similar to 'trustee de son tort' as Michael Joseph has offered in the past. In other words, if you want it, you got it, and; that means ALL of it - liability, obligation, responsibility for the 'NAME' and everything TITLED/OWNED in said 'NAME.
A proper and recognized surrender of the 'Usufruct' (via UCC-1 & UCC-3) declares the default presumption as erroneous and remands the State as Usufructuary of the 'NAME' and EVERYTHING in said 'NAME'. Any and all use of, and in, 'NAME' benefits the 'State' in the commercial realm and hence 'State' should also bear the FULL liability. The 'USE' of our energy and labor has been appropriated via TITLE seizure so we owe NOTHING; we are FULLY immune and our use of the 'NAME' is FULLY indemnified and acquitted of ALL charges. The 'State' is responsible for discharging ALL debt and claims against its own 'NAME'.
"All property belonging to the debtor/bailee belongs to the secured party"
Could it all really be that simple?
Let us work today while it is day for night comes and no man can work.
Finding the Keys are hidden, intentionally, I find the LOGOS being suppressed into fleshly carnal thought. Therefore I will wait in hope and patience in trust for I am dead in Christ as my life is in His Trust.
Therefore I claim as a Femme Covert - If you don't like it take it up with my Husbandman - The Christos. I rest in Him.
Shalom,
MJ
Here is latest video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWXFtUcmUeE
Please comment here in this thread after viewing...
That is from the 2:30 Minute Mark.Quote:
This is NOT what we are doing with Treasury Direct...
There is some comparison made by an advocate of Tim TURNER and the Republics project too. There I have plenty of warnings, and we have men with well-intention sitting in prison.
It strikes me that you are warning people to stay far away from Boris? I am thinking that is your message - Flee!
P.S. I have not watched more than 5 minutes of the video linked. The cameraman might have put the microphone closer to Boris at least. It would have been good to not position Boris so he silhouettes all the time too.
P.P.S. I glanced at the original post link from March too. The Colorado Affair looks to be a project stemming from the Republics? I am familiar enough with the networking here to intuit that many adherents would be tenacious and promoting such things. I have to say that I am not studying this very much and so will reserve opinion but this takes me back to the Montana Freeman days...
You may sense already the aversion I have to Boris. I would have to spend some more time telling you exactly why. One look at the UCC Form he authored has me avoiding him.
Perhaps Boris's implementation of the remedy based on the military rule paradigm is mistaken...
BUT, as I stated earlier,
It appears that there is an aversion to even consider this military rule based paradigm, and its true origin for our nation.Quote:
Perhaps we can focus on building upon this "military rule" based paradigm, and integrate it with the "lawful money" paradigm.
Perhaps even a more fundamental and subliminal aversion is at work here... An antagonism against OBEYING the Creators' Seven Annual Holyday PLAN for Man-kind?
Read Our ‘Military Rule’ Cause & Cure in its entirety and tell me if this is not so... and why we should not address this original CAUSE of our people's captivity in order to begin solving our current military captivity as implemented via the Lieber Code.
Thank you for explaining that to me.
I took a better look at this Outline.
I recall Boris in front of a large flat screen displaying his computer and at that time was impressed with his style. However with the remedy being written into Title 12 USC §411 it is difficult for anybody to capture my attention outside the scope of remedy Congress has already provided. This remains the case, especially with his recent presentations, and the header about the Colorado Affair. I know intuitively Tim TURNER's The Republics folks are still busy around Boris and from the comment Marked above Boris admits to having studied out that doctrine and claims to have learned from their mistakes, at least.Quote:
12 USC 95a(2) … and no person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance of and in reliance on, this section, or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder.
I am grabbing that as a Tell, as I am still reluctant to spend a lot of time on Boris - as an indication you intend to fight your way off the battlefield - the term enforce.Quote:
However, I believe that using UCC 3-603(b) about a dishonored payment would make more sense than using UCC 2 about a "protected purchaser" as far as enforcing this remedy is concerned.
Because of your patience with me, I feel that you deserve for me to address this:
Congress has already pruned out the Military Action of 1861 - culling it down to a couple pages of legislation, stipulating what will remain is the ability to declare another Bankers' Holiday when this immanent run on the Fed develops enough to matter. They did this in around 1976. This is why as I view Boris as you present him to us, I redact his presentation down to Title 12 USC §§ found in 95. Those Sections are the Trading with the Enemy Act still in effect.Quote:
Read Our ‘Military Rule’ Cause & Cure in its entirety and tell me if this is not so... and why we should not address this original CAUSE of our people's captivity in order to begin solving our current military captivity as implemented via the Lieber Code.
I really hope it does not come off as being lazy on my part. I find it greatly efficient; allowing me to dedicate my time to other pursuits. Regarding Boris though, I encountered something interesting in ACIM (A Course in Miracles) class yesterday morning:
Accordingly Boris visited briefly offering his perspective - I colored him through my filter tinted by his UCC-1 lien against the hospital where he was born. This came off quite belligerent and Anthony Joseph made a presentment demanding I explain how come a mortgage was released if not for an identical UCC-1 suit/lien riding on it. So presuming there is some truth to MKULTRA (Bill THETFORD's Subproject 130 - Displacement Hysteria/Imagination Disorders) dosing Helen SCHUCMAN with LSD for 7 years to produce the ACIM book - combined with the Holy Spirit as I will not open it without a group of loving people to help me out, I am only seeing a shadow of my own formation around Boris and his work.Quote:
Chapter 13; Section V; Paragraph 2 - Each one peoples his world with figures from his individual past, and it is because of this that private worlds do differ. 2 Yet the figures that he sees were never real, for they are made up only of his reactions to his brothers, and do not include their reactions to him...
But at least I feel that I have explained why I will not sit through these subsequent video presentations where the camera is closer to all the audience conversations and they get distracted by their own thoughts so we don't even really hear Boris. Thank you though, for narrowing it down to the one link there. I might get to it.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. I like Boris' succinctness - presuming this is written by Boris:
Perhaps it is because I have written out the Laws of Moses and the entire Pentateuch (Torah) too, that I simply make this presumption. That is the purpose of doing so anyway, so that the Holiday Structure becomes a natural part of my thinking. I recall spending a dedicated six weeks at these two projects!Quote:
Here is the main point of this entire post:
We are under "military rule" today because we are continuing the MISTAKE of our ancient Israelite ancestors. We are still ignoring the ancient holyday statutes of the Creator, Our Father, in heaven, which are designed to help us know Him and understand His Divine Plan for us. These holydays are the SIGNS that keep us on track to eternal life, and show the way out of modern Egypt's "military rule".
Everything else is a STUMBLINGBLOCK and will not deliver us from today's "military rule" until we correct THAT MISTAKE.
These Holydays constitute the core foundation of the Mosaic common law because they reveal the Divine Plan.
Trying to restore the other ancient institutions of Mosaic common law while ignoring these FOUNDATIONAL holyday statutes will prove fatal to such efforts.
I should add though, the Gifts of the Holy Spirit according to ACIM are:
1) To have; give all to all
2) To have peace; teach peace to learn it
3) Be vigilant only for God and His kingdom.
So I imagine that soon I will put that on the front of a T-Shirt and the backside will read:
Quote:
YOU CANNOT FIGHT YOUR WAY OFF THE BATTLEFIELD!!
David Merrill I am about that same exercise. I understand authority. I mean consider CAREFULLY the question "By what authority do you act?". Now Satan is going to love that one! Why? Because it implies institutions and he [Satan] controls all of them! As for my perspective I do see multiple Satan's but I also see One at their head. I don't buy into this U2 programming - the Devil inside - that would mean that our Christ was indwelt with Satan. I don't buy it.
However back on point.
If I am asked that question what would be my response? For indeed how is my authority established? If I am a MeLoCH [king] then my authority is in my hand [Qof] and what should be in my hand is a Staff [of Instruction = Torah]. And I should make a Use of that Staff to comfort and lead the people.
Yes, indeed the King's read the Scriptures quite a bit differently than do others. And the Election see it a bit different than others as well. Each as he is called by the King of kings.
Considering the Great Shepherd's Staff:
Psa 23:1 The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
Psa 23:2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.
Psa 23:3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
Psa 23:4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
Psa 23:5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.
Psa 23:6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.
I see the valley of the shadow of death as this flesh age! My comfort is The Word of God. Now if I have it in my hand - that double edged sword, if it is written in my mind, then I am SEALED. And no wind [doctrine] can remove me from the Rock of my Foundation.
My Authority is The Word. Therefore O' Judge you take up your argument with God. I am merely the King's servant.
Mat 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
The Light is The Word of God.
Therefore I imply and express my Trust in God. My deeds match my expressions. I do not seek a See [ty] as in Holy See [capitol] - rather I seek a place not made by the hands of men.
Yehovah Shammah = The LORD is There.
Eze 48:35 It was round about eighteen thousand measures: and the name of the city from that day shall be, The LORD is there.
I rest in Yehovah in my Savior Yehovah is Salvation [Yehoshuah].
For I find the FIRST BORN of CREATION was light! The Word
Psa 27:1 The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the LORD is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?
Psa 119:105 Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.
Now therefore to the Seven Candlesticks = The Churches - which hold the Light - The Word. I am a church unto myself - for I find I am a temple for my God. I am called to walk in the order of Melchizedok [King and Priest] with the Word in my Hand and Mind - Sealed unto Righteousness - carrying the double edged sword as my Authority.
This dear Reader is what gives Authority to a king. Else one absent the Seal bears another seal [in his hand and in his forehead].
See now the trust? Eden is all around you!
Shalom,
Michael Joseph
I have finished the Psalm to song in the same key found in this snippet. It is lovely!
My observation is that the Veil was as thick as a man's hand because it is a braid of 613 threads - for the mitzvot - the Law. And I do not observe lightly as I will attend Bible Study tonight with the Christians who proclaim to be saved by this Substitution; through the Shed Blood of Yehoshuah. So by and through this substitution, this nod to animal sacrifice they bump their head still into the Law they feel Jesus fulfilled. For the Melchizedek priest however, the Veil is Rent, top to bottom and we enter the Throne Room unobstructed by anything but our unnatural (conditioned) fear of the Will of God.