Finally, StSC has been removed from Google's blacklist.
Also, so far I'm pleased with the new protections that have been put in place. Again, I say, time will tell!
Printable View
Finally, StSC has been removed from Google's blacklist.
Also, so far I'm pleased with the new protections that have been put in place. Again, I say, time will tell!
This is indeed a very entertaining website chat. Thank you for your work.
Please remember the Donate Button. If you specify website maintenance for StSC funds will be forwarded where they are deserved for all the work. I suppose it is flattering that somebody has apparently paid live people to register and plant malware.
Am I the only user getting spam / malware links via private message?
No, I got this one from user "PhipDrelo" on April 18:
"??????????? ???? ?? https://vanna-professional.ru/restavratsiya-vann"
Attachment 5509
I recently saw we had only 73 users when clearly we're paying for 250 user-bots. I'd say a refund is in order. How much does it cost to have a forum constantly hit with 250 click bots anyway?
I have an idea. We have quite a user base around here and I sometimes wonder if I can email everybody. I will write a Thread opening post about a response to a judge who filed her oath but a day after somebody she had arrested was inquiring at the Secretary of State. Then I will email all the users. If you read this, here or there please tell me if you get the email.
Please let us know if you get a User Broadcast about Dabney's new order and opinion? I am testing that out again.
I did not receive anything new on that particular subject.
Attachment 5529
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.
What is that supposed to mean bro?
https://duckduckgo.com/install?t=hv
came across better technology for search engines
https://youtu.be/SrsCEbi5N7Y
Why am I getting this ...
Attachment 5622
I would say it's due to the way this forum handles security, not necessarily a phishing attempt. Then again I'm using different security software than you.
If you open a browser and enter "savingtosuitorsclub.net" you will get the non-secure version (http) of the site and see the "Not secure" notice leftside of the location box:
Attachment 5627
This indicates the site is either not using a security certificate, or using a self-signed certificate. A website doesn't always need a secure connection. For example if it's just presenting data: http://legacy.weeklyreader.com But if logging users in, entering passwords, making transactions, etc. then security (a private connection) is necessary.
If you manually enter "https://" as a prefix to "savingtosuitorsclub.net" to enforce a secure connection if available, you will see the "Not secure" change to the locked padlock icon indicating a secure connection!
Attachment 5628
So it appears the site does own a valid security certificate signed by a certificate authority, it's just not enforcing its use.
TL;DR, website has a valid SSL certificate it's just mis-configured and not always using it.
Ok the https trick does work, thanks. However several times while navigating the site padlock switched to unlock.
And what do you think of this...
Attachment 5630
I see what you did. Went to virustotal.com and did URL check for savingtosuitorsclub.net.
I think if the admins are so lackadaisical about site security then maybe they deserve the label... Phishing site.