Thanks for posting the link doug555.
It was nicely laid out.
Printable View
A birth certificate is a passport to the benefits and obligations of a political entity. The surname is entirely commercial. The city shown (or county or township) is the political subdivision of the state. The body politic of a county are cities, villages and townships. There are no people in any county yet a county is a subdivision of the state. The state is a state capital ... a city .. to which territory is attached. The birth certificate then is a political franchise in its own right yet does not make you a member of a county because 1) again , no people in any county and 2) like joins with like ... the living do not join with legal fictions such as political subdivisions are.
From these details you may craft your own remedy.
what about how COLB used to be on some type security paper, but now when people go get one it is on the bank note type paper. The old copies have a raised seal from the court while the newer copies on the bond paper have the seals pre printed on the paper and the new ones also have a cusip number on the bank note paper. My old one i have does not have a cusip number like the newer ones I have do.
Why would they change the process? It has to mean something to switch from a copy certified and embossed to a bank note paper with seals already on the paper. And also the ones I have that are no the bank note paper have a sentence at the bottom where it talks about being true and correct in half normal type, while the rest of the sentence is in all capital letters. Why would they have the last half the sentence written in all capitals?
I find K.W. quite knowledgeable and want to be able to contact him hoping he might help me with my situation.
Also i was once able to access some of the recordings but the next day i was not allowed to with the server. Any one know why?
Is there a way for me to connect with K.W.?
Here is the birth certificate of someone in my family that I broke down so that one can see what is going on. The important part is the word 'informant' at the top of column 7. There is only one proper definition - in any law dictionary.
Attachment 2085
Thanks for the image. It might be easier to read the print this way.
I believe part of the fuss and run-around with birth certificates is that #1 its a charter document or evidence of a charter #2 the real issue is the significance of a charter or royal warrant. I'm not sure what is fraudulent about the birth certificate. The MOTHER ENTITY and the FATHER ENTITY created a joint venture or spinoff in such and such a jurisdiction called "{NAME OF CHILD} and presumingly knowingly and willingly introduced the information into a specific register. If you try to claim copyright to a name on a birth certificate in say Australia or New Zealand they will likely tell you quite frankly that the name is their property. That its their property is informative.
Note that the registrar is the registrar of births, deaths *and* marriages. A birth certificate is most always testimony of the record keeper of an entry's existence. The consequence or significance of the entry is a separate matter from which going on and about birth certificate itself might be a distraction. The certificate is *evidence of* something.
P.S. It is more likely that they created the office (or berth) entered into by the 'child' with help of 'parents'. Also being a subject of a king or queen might be a type of servitude. If someone enters into a type of servitude that leads to say, 'civil death' then perhaps the event is a birth (or entry into a berth) and a death at the same time? Minus the extreme emotionalism it might be easier to see.
I suspect that if all the particulars of a birth certificate and such were known, it might not be all that useful apart from knowing oneself.Quote:
cursive (adj.) 1784, from French cursif (18c.), from Medieval Latin cursivus "running," from Latin cursus "a running," from past participle of currere "to run" (see current (adj.)). The notion is of "written with a running hand" (without raising the pen), originally as opposed to the older uncial hand.
great thread! thanks everyone! I am eating up (listening to) the stuff from KW here at the moment in my media player.
I also want to add kurt kallenbach's stuff to the mix here as I havnt seen it mentioned.
more about that can be found here: https://trustandcontract.wordpress.com/Quote:
The Birth Certificate “person” is a CATHOLIC VESTMENT or Holy Orders delivered by tradition! It is an official CAPACITY/GARMENT worn by all those holding CATHOLIC OFFICE.
This is just the mystery religions playing out in the worship of Diana. The silversmiths [the silver chord part] have been about their Craft for a long time now.
Act 19:24 For a certain man named Demetrius, a silversmith, which made silver shrines for Diana, brought no small gain unto the craftsmen;
Act 19:25 Whom he called together with the workmen of like occupation, and said, Sirs, ye know that by this craft we have our wealth.
Act 19:26 Moreover ye see and hear, that not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be no gods, which are made with hands:
Commentary: Religion is an Idol.
Act 19:27 So that not only this our craft is in danger to be set at nought; but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana should be despised, and her magnificence should be destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worshippeth.
Act 19:28 And when they heard these sayings, they were full of wrath, and cried out, saying, Great is Diana of the Ephesians.
Commentary: By Diana insert any name for any Religion today - by Ephesians is meant the entire world. You did see that great whore riding the beast at the 2015 Superbowl 1/2 time. False Religion - giving life to the beast system - by and thru the people and all their masks - person.
But I have peace in Elijah who in the Power of Yehovah, climbed the mountain and withstood the 450 priests [lawyers]. He asked them "perhaps Baal is taking a bathroom break?" Where is he?
1Ki 18:27 And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.
========
Thank you for this study but I find it to be made within the framework of a larger frame. Therefore, there is no remedy.
Remedy is made by implied and expressed trust. Declare thyself and go in and begin to possess. Remedy is not expressed in learning how to use tools that someone else fashioned FOR YOU.
In the end the question must be asked: What is it that I want? Is it to have the use of more money? Is that the remedy I seek? Is it to have access to Estates? If that is what you seek then, you have no remedy at all for Estates are DERIVED from Property. Is it to have dominion? Well if that is what you seek, then you can just stop listening to the guru's because that is NOT what they are teaching.
They teach how you can access some Estate UNDER the dominion of a higher claim. Therefore making that one subject - yet still - to the one who established said claim. Layers donkey, ONIONS have layers.
The system is predicated upon greed - I want. It is based upon the mindset of what can I get. The "it's mine" crowd.
I mean C'mon folks think about it - do you really think that a system built upon signing some chit here and there to extinguish debt is love based? That is a "get" system. Love is based in giving. The former is "self love" - symbolized by a black sun and a red moon.
Birth Certificates - what a joke. A certificate of trust is issued upon a class of beneficiaries. Trust Law folks - it gives the beneficiary an interest in the Estate [established in Claim by another - framing remember] but it does NOT give the beneficiary access to the management and control over the Trust Property. Where did you establish a claim? The only claim most ever get around making are claims in Estates that may or may not be granted according to the laws that govern the Estate. To create the Estate and have dominion over it is so far from their consciousness that the only office left for those who would claim against the Will is that of Constructive Trustee. The MAKER of the false claim has the liability for his SIN. For how can the benefits of trust flow out upon the receiver and the receiver not be obligated upon certain terms? And now the beneficiary thinks to refuse his/her obligations by making false claims - this is the very definition of DISHONOR. And therefore let him pay for his own sin! Trustee de son Tort.
Those who read the Scriptures have you not understood?
Luke 11:46 And He said, "Woe unto you also, ye Lawyers! for ye heavy laden men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch gently not the burdens with one of your fingers.
You think the two choices placed before you are your way out? Hardly. You think to gain mastery over an Estate in which you hold neither the legal or the equitable title to the property? For there is a claim on the Soul, the Estate and all Lands - the triple crown. Can you spot the falseness in the Claim which doled out the three Testamentary Trusts?
The two swords are really in the hand of one entity - it only appears to be two swords until you begin to see that the governments [a legal fiction] bear in their symbology the laurel wreath - canon law. Therefore we are back to Baal worship - mystery religion.
I had a friend who went to Mexico to an U.S. embassy and walked in with the papers referencing the ACCOUNT in the NAME, [Number of the Name] and my friend told the attendant he wanted to annul HIS United States citizenship. The response was simple "stop doing the acts that make you a citizen". Can you hear that?
Are you so confused that you actually think a piece of paper makes you anything? If I trust you then my deeds will reflect my trust. This is just so simple. If I have no trust then I am going to disappear off the radar screen. An account is open, but there is nothing to give account. It was not mine - it was never mine - it will never be mine. The trustees created a B.I.C. which evidences an interest in trust but it is up to the trustees to administrate the Trust Business.
The world is run on Trust Law. There are only two trusts that matter in this world and both are religious. For the political is just an outgrowth of the religious for there can be no political absent virtues and morals. It is easy to see where your trust lies - I just look to see what you cling to. Meaning your expressions in signature and your deeds [actions].
A great tree has been erected and many take shadow under its leaves - but it is a false tree. What makes you think that this is the only tree? Perhaps conditioning? Perhaps you might be a new planting? Maybe? If you are satisfied to undertake within and under the three city-state worldwide control matrix [vatican city, city of washington, and city of london] then learn the rules. Better get reading - you have a lot to learn.
It is better to give than receive. For the servant is greatest. up is down, yes? Good is called bad and wicked good. What a Land of Confusion - and not enough love to go around.
=========
Can't you hear the "witch language" in the music - the woman in red is always addressed - She will give you your hearts desires - Lucifer is the end game. He/She wears many masks - welcome to the theatre. Now take your seat and Choose ye this day whom ye shall worship. Will it be the two choices placed before your eyes Lucifer vs. Satan - or perhaps you will find the "straight and narrow gate" - that which your eyes don't perceive. Ask yourself "who established the choices" and "what is the agenda".
Has your life been a pre-arranged set of false choices? Delivered up before you so that you might choose one - absent thinking - you seize on what is before your eyes of perception - the twin actors dancing for you - choose me, no choose me. Which one will you choose? The Juggler or the Clown - you never understood that it ain't no good - you let other people get your kicks for you.
Do you have the courage to choose neither? Or does fear grip you into non-action - which is to say consent.
Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of blood and flesh, Himself also likewise took part of flesh and blood.....
Heb 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were through all their lifetime subject to bondage.
Hebrews 2:15 references a straight path - The Way. Unperceived because it is not offered up as a viable choice. Instead [pick your religion] the mysteries of Nimrod/Semiramis/Tammuz are taught - false Jesus. Who can find The Way? Well first one must deny the choices placed before him as the only available solutions. Why does all the world see only a man? I guess men are like that - conditioned beasts - to only react to that which they perceive by and thru their Central Nervous System - the Serpent that went down into the MIDST of the Garden. Man's rationale.
Consider yet again - Has your life been a pre-arranged set of false choices?
Your Estate huh? Perhaps you have volunteered your energy in support of that which hates you? Have you considered the twin pillars of Hegel? But oh how those Onions and Garlics can be so delicious to the flesh -
If I must choose - I pick neither. What do you choose?
Said another way - what is my intent of my deed? Is it self centered - is it in faith - or is it in Love [service and charity].
Let it be love.
Regards,
Michael Joseph
Thanks for this verse MJ.
Jesus replied, "And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them.
Check this one out...from the vault...
U.S. Supreme Court
Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
Briscoe v. LaHue
No. 81-1404
Argued November 9, 1982
Decided March 7, 1983
460 U.S. 325
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Held: Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976 ed., Supp. V) does not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial. Pp. 460 U. S. 329-346.
(a) The common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process. Section 1983 does not authorize a damages claim against private witnesses. Similarly, judges, Pierson v. Ray,386 U. S. 547, and prosecutors, Imbler v. Pachtman,424 U. S. 409, may not be held liable for damages under § 1983 for the performance of their respective duties in judicial proceedings. When a police officer appears as a witness, he may reasonably be viewed as acting like any witness sworn to tell the truth, in which event he can make a strong claim to witness immunity. Alternatively, he may be regarded as an official performing a critical role in the judicial process, in which event he may seek the benefit afforded to other governmental participants in the same proceeding. Nothing in § 1983's language suggests that a police officer witness belongs in a narrow, special category lacking protection against damages suits. Pp. 460 U. S. 329-336.
==================
Cops don't lie - never seen one lie yet. And yet EVEN STILL folks place their trust in this house of death. What a farce. Slaves have no say so in their masters affairs. The creation is not greater than the Creator. It really is just that simple. Subjects need licenses or permission to marry. Which is to say to Contract.
Still want shade under that tree?
Christ is the ONLY way out. Thus curse which we live under has been placed in totality upon Christ. This is foretold and signaled by Moses raising up the brazen serpent in the wilderness -
Num 21:8 And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.
"The Way" is the straight and narrow path. It has nothing to do with religion. Nevertheless men continue to feed a system that hates them. Furthermore, the government being in and of itself a political system [a legal personality - a fiction] can only understand fictions. Yet men as brute beasts continue to lay down and die before the Alter of Baal in worship of that which they cannot obtain. So they seek to understand the Statutes, Laws and Commandments to appease their rulers - maybe that will be the way out - NOPE. Just more oppression.
One seeking to put me in a box the other day called me a Jew. I literally spit out my drink I was laughing so hard. How weak is the mind of man - confining, defining....denying the Christ. In Christ am I michael joseph.
=====================
quoting the writings of E. Swedenborg as follows:
And the serpent was more subtle than any wild animal of the field which Yehovah God had made; and he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
By the "serpent" is here meant the sensuous part of man in which he trusts; by the "wild animal of the field," here, as before, every affection of the external man; by the "woman," man‘s self-centered love and his love for the world [Own]; by the serpent’s saying, "Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree?" that they began to doubt. The subject here treated of is the third posterity of the Most Ancient Church, which began not to believe in things revealed unless they saw and felt that they were so. Their first state, that it was one of doubt.
The most ancient people did not compare all things in man to beasts and birds, but so denominated them; and this their customary manner of speaking remained even in the Ancient Church after the flood, and was preserved among the prophets. The sensuous things in man they called "serpents," because as serpents live close to the earth, so sensuous things are those next the body. Hence also reasonings concerning the mysteries of faith, founded on the evidence of the senses, were called by them the "poison of a serpent," and the reasoners themselves "serpents;" and because such persons reason much from sensuous, that is, from visible things (such as are things terrestrial, corporeal, mundane, and natural), it is said that "the serpent was more subtle than any wild animal of the field."
[2] And so in David, speaking of those who seduce man by reasonings:--
They sharpen their tongue like a serpent; the poison of the asp is under their lips (Ps. 140:3).
And again:--
They go astray from the womb, speaking a lie. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent, like the deaf poisonous asp that stoppeth her ear, that she may not hear the voice of the mutterers, of a wise one that charmeth charms (sociantis sodalitia ) (Ps. 58:3-6).
Reasonings that are of such a character that the men will not even hear what a wise one says, or the voice of the wise, are here called the "poison of a serpent." Hence it became a proverb among the ancients, that "The serpent stoppeth the ear."
In Amos:--
As if a man came into a house, and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him. Shall not the day of Jehovah be darkness and not light? even thick darkness, and no brightness in it? (Amos 5:19, 20).
The "hand on the wall" means self-derived power, and trust in sensuous things, whence comes the blindness which is here described.
[3] In Jeremiah:--
The voice of Egypt shall go like a serpent, for they shall go in strength, and shall come to her with axes as hewers of wood. They shall cut down her forest, saith Jehovah, because it will not be searched, for they are multiplied more than the locust, and are innumerable. The daughter of Egypt is put to shame, she shall be delivered into the hand of the people of the north (Jeremiah 46:22-24).
"Egypt" denotes reasoning about Divine things from sensuous things and memory-knowledges (scientifica). Such reasonings are called the "voice of a serpent;" and the blindness thereby occasioned, the "people of the north." In Job:--
He shall suck the poison of asps; the viper‘s tongue shall slay him. He shall not see the brooks, the flowing rivers of honey and butter (Job 20:16, 17).
"Rivers of honey and butter" are things spiritual and celestial, which cannot be seen by mere reasoners; reasonings are called the "poison of the asp" and the "viper’s tongue." See more respecting the serpent below, at (verses 14 and 15).
In ancient times those were called "serpents" who had more confidence in sensuous things than in revealed ones. But it is still worse at the present day, for now there are persons who not only disbelieve everything they cannot see and feel, but who also confirm themselves in such incredulity by knowledges (scientifica) unknown to the ancients, and thus occasion in themselves a far greater degree of blindness. In order that it may be known how those blind themselves, so as afterwards to see and hear nothing, who form their conclusions concerning heavenly matters from the things of sense, of memory-knowledge, and of philosophy, and who are not only "deaf serpents," but also the "flying serpents" frequently spoken of in the Word, which are much more pernicious, we will take as an example what they believe about the spirit.
[2] The sensuous man, or he who only believes on the evidence of his senses, denies the existence of the spirit because he cannot see it, saying, "It is nothing because I do not feel it: that which I see and touch I know exists." The man of memory-knowledge (scientificus), or he who forms his conclusions from memory-knowledges (scientiae), says, What is the spirit, except perhaps vapor or heat, or some other entity of his science, that presently vanishes into thin air? have not the animals also a body, senses, and something analogous to reason? and yet it is asserted that these will die, while the "spirit of man" will live. Thus they deny the existence of the spirit.
[3] Philosophers also, who would be more acute than the rest of mankind, speak of the spirit in terms which they themselves do not understand, for they dispute about them, contending that not a single expression is applicable to the spirit which derives anything from what is material, organic, or extended; thus they so abstract it from their ideas that it vanishes from them, and becomes nothing. The more sane however assert that the spirit is thought; but in their reasonings about thought, in consequence of separating from it all substantiality, they at last conclude that it must vanish away when the body expires. Thus all who reason from the things of sense, of memory-knowledge, and of philosophy, deny the existence of the spirit, and therefore believe nothing of what is said about the spirit and spiritual things. Not so the simple in heart: if these are questioned about the existence of spirit, they say they know it exists, because the Lord has said that they will live after death; thus instead of extinguishing their rational, they vivify it by the Word of the Lord.
pretty interesting snake interpretation MJ! you sure have alot to say about things though ;-)
I have family who call dragonflys "snake doctors" I asked why but they dont know, they have just always called them that. its a mystery.
Im finding what Kurt has been saying about this subject fascinating. a lot of it seems to fit nicely into this puzzle but he's just another man with alot to say. however, I do think what he presents is worth further investigation.
I think I see what your saying though. seems like "blind faith" sometimes I have it without even thinking but when I try and actually use it, (this one anyway) doesnt work. hard to explain but beyond ordinary thought. it also seems to work against "me" sometimes (without thinking) so its not something to take lightly this "realm" but it seemed to work much better as a child. (literal, when very young age)
actually, its always active but theres that whole war going on too so we all deal with it differently.
We each have a path to walk. This is what amuses me concerning the modern church - they actually think they can save. Hilarious if it wasn't so sad. These are so self-centered they actually boast that they can get the saving done. Absurd.
He breathed on them and said, Receive ye the Holy Spirit (John 20:22).
Gen 2:15 And Yehovah God took the man, and put him in the garden of Eden, to till it and take care of it.
By the "garden of Eden" are signified all things of the celestial man, as described; by to "till it and take care of it," is signified that it is permitted him to enjoy all these things, but not to possess them as his own, because they are the Lord’s. [Usufructuary - a husbandman]
The celestial man acknowledges, because he perceives, that all things both in general and in particular are the Lord‘s. The spiritual man does indeed acknowledge the same, but with the mouth, because he has learned it from the Word. The worldly and corporeal man neither acknowledges nor admits it; but whatever he has he calls his own, and imagines that were be to lose it, he would altogether perish.
That wisdom, intelligence, reason, and knowledge (scientia), are not of man, but of the Lord, is very evident from all that the Lord taught; as in Matthew, where the Lord compares Himself to a householder, who planted a vineyard, and hedged it round, and let it out to husbandmen (Matthew 21:33); and in John:--
The Spirit of truth shall guide you into all truth; for He shall not speak of Himself, but what things soever He shall hear, He shall speak; He shall glorify Me, for He shall receive of Mine, and shall declare it unto you (John 16:13, 14).
And in another place:--
A man can receive nothing except it be given him from heaven (John 3:27).
=====
Yes. A child - innocence. A child can walk naked without shame. A child is welcome in the Kingdom of God. We turn away from God and create fig leaves to cover or hid our indiscretions. We can no longer stand before perfect love and peace. Thus Adam/Eve hid themselves from Yehovah Elohim.
Before: Gen 2:25 And they were both naked, the man [Adam] and his wife, and were not ashamed.
After: Gen 3:10 And he said, "I heard Thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself."
Birth certificate .... reification ...
I suspect there are occult roots to the birth certificate or its based on such principles.
I dont know how I missed it but Doug555 did previously mention Kurt K. my bad. I may have got KK & KW mixed up. Ive been listening and reading alot from these two lately as it seems they are both on the right track and not holding out on us. I get the feeling many of the others very much are holding out quite a bit but probably they have good reason for doing so.
yes, reification! thanks shikamaru. I have the same suspicions but didnt have the word for it. my spellchecker is not familiar with it either LOL
what Im wrestling with now is finding a way to verify our suspicions. I like the process KW suggests using declaratory judgments but that only goes so far. from what Ive learned about it so far it is a fairly safe method to use also. I might follow his bread crumbs to get familiar with actually "filing"
R4C & LOR is where I would like to go also but something hasnt clicked for me on those fronts just yet but I must give DM credit because he was the most helpful to me in learning who I am.
thanks
Is there an unwritten rule that we must abbreviate KW's (Kurt Warner) name?
Anyone know what a Kentucky Colonel is?
And does it have anything to do with KFC?
Attachment 2250
No, but I can see your reflection in the picture. Made me so hangry I jumped in the smart car 'n went to the drive thru window.
Clown: mmm yeah, I'd like an aspergers with cheese, some small fries for my pants, and a slap in the face with cold mackerel.
Idjit wearing a headset: You want a drink with that?
Clown: I'd like a drink before all that. You got any single malt scotch?
Idjit: No, we only have sodas and rat poison.
Clown: I see. Do you know where the nearest MickeyD's is?
Idjit: No sir. You do know you're at the Wells Fargo drive-up teller window, right?
Clown: Well... yeah. So what's your point?
no Idea but there seems to be alot of them: http://kycolonels.org/famous-colonels/
didnt see Niki Hayden (former motoGP World Champ AKA "The Kentucky Kid") listed so how good can it be?
Says that Colonel Sanders was commissioned a "Kentucky Colonel" by the governor in 1935. Whether it's a secret society or not I can't say. Perhaps they guard his secret recipe of eleven herbs and spices that comprise the unique taste of his chicken.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonel_Sanders
Thanks guys. That's what I was after. Certificate was displayed on his wall like he was proud of it and I snapped a picture. KENTUCKY COLONELS does look like a Mason organization. Supporting the Bankster's agenda...
http://kycolonels.org/timeline/Quote:
1933 Kentucky Colonels Will Rogers, Clark Gable, Mae West, Eddie Cantor and others produced “Parade of Kentucky Colonels” broadcast nationally on CBS radio. The “variety show” program’s purpose was to promote President Roosevelt’s National Recovery Act, part of the President’s New Deal Program.
And this bit about Colonel Sanders is funny...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonel_SandersQuote:
His legal career ended after he got engaged in a courtroom brawl with his own client.
Birth Certificate....
Certificate of your birth which means,
the evidence that you were born.
If you dont have one,
let me ask you this,
when was your birth day?
Your question begs a framework of philosophy - that which is past, present and future is statistical - an average man. May as well number him now. But man is never average. It is like searching for the average size rock in a creek bed. Lets say the mean is 100 grams, well you might go your whole life and never find the average rock. Man is not average man is ever changing. But the man in mass society becomes a cog in the machine subject to those who keep the machine running. Man consents to be a member of said society else he would do what was needed to remove himself from a presumption.
But a presumption upheld is no longer a presumption. Therefore in choice man chooses to become that number whereof he argues concerning codes that govern the machine.
We were born before the wind - before matter came to be - the thought preceded that which is now. The time is now to throw the Jonah within you overboard! For any certificate begs a certificate giver [grantor]. Begging the question, did that certificate come with any obligations?
Begging the question: Is this the first time around the wheel? I don't know and religion can't help either. In fact if one were to cut open my skull to examine my brain I highly doubt they would ever find any of the thoughts which once delighted and tormented me in this life. Thoughts such as "when was I born" cannot be found in space or time. For begging the philosopher I asked "wherein this room can my thoughts be found?"
Man is nothing without consciousness. Nevertheless the men in the Ship will always row row row in order to bring the ship to shore safely - which is to say - my lower conscious mind will always seek to rule the house. My mom and dad informed me of the day of my birth into this world. No birth certificate can replace their word.
My word assures my deeds. Consider now the term "Sacred Honor". Yet many will argue within the shell framed nicely as their prison. Yet I find God is not an American - or any respecter of persons. Certificates are fences! Some have made them into prison walls.
Regards,
Michael Joseph
To Man: "Know thyself, and you shall know the Universe."
The evidence that edward has is his testimony.
Ever watch CSI shows on the TV?
Do they ever go to trial? No.
The defendant always waves his rights to remain silent and testifies.
No court is ever needed for judgement, just the sentencing.
Edward, have you ever seen anyone get asked for ID in court?
No right?
Have you ever seen anyone answer to the NAME on the BC in court?
Why yes, all the time. Right?
What happened there?
Did someone stand up as surety for government property?
Did someone take an "assignment" that was created by another entity and claim it as theirs?
Was something pledged?
Third party contracts.
The birth certificate grants you judicial rights created by man by legislation.
These rights can and will be removed to suit the flavour of the day.
You are walking around placing value and equity in a NAME that your mom and dad did not give you?
Them you claim the property as yours.
Them you defend the claim.
What a good "surety" you turned out to be.
When one starts to claim rights they better know what rights they are trying to claim.
You claim the wrong one and you grant jurisdiction.
"Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."
Who requires the evidence? Evidence for whom?
Does the God of creation and nature require a birth certificate?
A birth certificate is evidence of incorporation into a corporately organized society.
It is the beginning of the creation of an account in which to assess credits and debits across multiple sub-systems of that corporately organized society.
This corporately organized society happens to be the state.
When a warrant is issued for the accused ? The NAME on that certificate indicates a person only a person arrests a person or paper vs paper. Fighting a warrant for ones arrest is declining any offer to settle a charge that is on paper 72hrs in jail seems to be the only way any man using his true name can properly excuse a person from all charges No one claims it the NAME after 72hrs a Man is resurrected its biblical as hell the book the hook Christ fought tax and trust laws his spirit of fairness with protest to being a DECEDENT was 72hrs rise from the paper birth and death certificates are written on stone visit a grave yard this is what they own?
Another point of interest.
The Name on the BC is ...DOE JOHN JR.
But when you order one up it gets sent to ...JOHN DOE
Two different persons. Which one are you?
"Ma'am, you must not understand, I am not MARTIN FISHER and that paper does not have my name on it, I cannot accept it. On and for the record, do you have the right to tell me who I am?"
In any court of law (if there is one) how do you go about telling the judge and you have no jurisdiction over me? Oh you say you do prove it.
It seems we keep coming back to this concern. An estate begs an actor in and for it. Look up CHARGE in John Bouvier. Then look up LEGAL. Then observe trustee de son tort - constructive trustee.
If you are not answering in and for that name which you are authorized to answer to, then you are practicing law without license in a private law boundary.
Replace JOHN DOE with the FRIENDLY TRUST COMPANY. If you are trustee then you are authorized to speak for the trust, if not and no trustee has appeared then you had best be a licensed attorney.
I completely agree with you MJ, you had me did up some of my old notes. (no pun intended)
Please understand that EVERY time you get paid with PROMISSORY NOTES, such as FRNs, there IS A new mini TRUST formed at that moment, as you HAVE NOT received a full payment.
Funds are being held or exchanged in an account. “in trust”.
If you got paid with silver or GOLD MONEY, then you would receive payment in FULL, and there would be NO TRUST necessary.
So if you get paid with FRNs, which are not redeemable in anything real, like the reserves the central banks have like gold (money), then you're a GRANTOR/DONOR of that trust, and as such should have authority to instruct the trustee (Fed Reserve or the U.S. corporation A,B,C) to SETTLE any public debts that the JOHN DOE trust has or develops.
That's how A4V works in theory, but that rarely works alone, because some status paperwork and operation understanding are needed first, to rebut their presumption that you are making false claims to “the name” vs. operating properly as agent or executor of that estate officially and with competence.
SOMEONE else gets the REAL GOLD money that you earned by your labor, so they must give you something in return.
Since it is not you, it's the person(s) who gives you paper "money", which is the Federal Reserve and U.S. corporation.
The Fed Reserve and U.S. Corporation who are the TRUSTEES of the trust, of which you're a grantor.
You are also the beneficiary (the one who received benefits) unless you give that position away, as people easily do.
This also made clear by the courts, as they have ruled that FRNs are OBLIGATIONS of United States, which mean there is a trust formed to serve that obligation.
The courts don't spell it out in language average people can comprehend easily, but it means that the U.S. corporation is the TRUSTEE for the trust involving FRNs, and as they won't redeem those in gold money.
You are the grantor with power of appointment, and can order settlement of public charges as your remedy to public debts or “charges”, until such time when they DO redeem FRNs in gold money.
This is also how your birth estate functions; aka ALL CAPS NAME estate.
n. 1) a person to whom title to property or a business interest is transferred for the sole purpose of concealing the true owner and/or the business machinations of the parties. Thus, the straw man has no real interest or participation but is merely a passive stand-in for a real participant who secretly controls activities. Sometimes a straw man is involved when the actual owner is not permitted to act, such as a person with a criminal record holding a liquor license. 2) an argument which is intended to distract the other side from the real issues or waste the opponent's time and effort, sometimes called a "red herring" (for the belief that drawing a fish across a trail will mislead hunting dogs). http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Straw+Man
The CQT is interesting because you have to look at all the parties of the trust.
Settlor - Not me - Some Lawyer working for principal - State or Kingdom
Trustor/Creator = State or Kingdom which established the Use in some cases the Cestui Que Use
Grantor = State/Kingdom and man or woman
One will ask how does the State/Kingdom grant and what exactly is granted? Rights, Titles, Interests where are established by Contract which preceded the formation of the CQT.
The man/woman or corporation of men and women may grant equity held in trust in the name of the CQT.
Trustee = State and man/woman actually co-trustees
Beneficiary = State and man/woman actually co-beneficiaries
==========================================
The State itself can be placed into Trust to protect the interest of the Settlors and Beneficiaries. The Trustees of that trust act in Corporate status establishing the POLICIES or bylaws acting as a Board of Trustees and its many members. A Board of Directors might be established and the minutes of these two boards are recorded in some Registry.
The Corporate Trust may not be subject to the Contract which preceded its formation and establishment and said trust may effect its own internal policies to govern its own private affairs. Many do not understand this law boundary and as such commit adultery as they try to mix different venues in their ignorance.
A choice simply has to be made concerning the business affairs of an individual. Noone forces me to use a SSN. I can if I desire if I desire the benefits that come within that trust structure but if I receive those benefits I may be with some obligations - so with everything a choice exists. I find that most just want all the benefit and no obligation. Who wants an obligation anyway?
Gold is for international contracts without the private trust boundary which is run by corporate policies [statutes and codes]. Have you ever noticed that the many parts that make up a truck are most likely copy protected thru patent? What then is purchased when I buy a truck? Do I now have full ownership and dominion to do with all of those parts as I please? Can I go now and create a factory and mass produce any of those parts just because I purchased the truck? OR, did I only purchase a LICENSE to USE that truck? In fact it is a conditional license.
I know I am just winning friends here but that is the cold hard fact. I can make a conditional use of that truck. Therefore who will govern the conditions and ensure no trespass occurs upon intellectual copy protected patented parts? Is that not fair? Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. You create a great widget that gets put in millions of homes. Some clown claiming he paid off his house now owns that widget and begins to mass produce it as your competitor. That is plain and simply theft. That clown did not put in the hours of hard work to develop the widget, he just stole a grand idea and started making that which was patented.
Now the question is begged how does the enforcement arm get the ability to enforce the patent laws? I mean just because I walk into Walmart does not make me subject to its policies. I become subject to those policies when I enjoin myself in trust or employment. And I might do such a thing if it is to my benefit or to the benefit of others, in charitable giving.
Presuming I have enjoined myself to the Corporate Trust, by way of making a Use of the means and methods [statutes and codes], then I have implied trust and perhaps express trust in signature. This means I have placed my TRUST IN the Corporate Scheme. If I have lodged my trust in you and I begin to benefit from your stewardship of my estate, then I am subject to the bylaws and policies of our agreement. I cannot pick and choose that which I do not wish to obey.
Should I choose to revoke that trust I am able to do so and this is made plain upon a candid world by and thru the RIGHT OF SELF DETERMINATION. The Corporate Trust may do what it needs to do according to the Law of Necessity in order to protect a higher mandate of Order. Who can't see this happening all around us?
After years of studying codes, statutes, laws, ancient laws and international law, I have come down to a simple premise - it is honorable to keep my word. If I contract, I bind myself freely to that contract. In the end I hope that war does not come to my land. Because I lack an army to defend against the interests of the mass. Therefore the public ruler of the mass defines the policy of the mass and that is the way the world works. At least for my entire life.
It seems to me that everything works by contract. There are of course levels as states or kingdoms contract with each other. But don't be fooled - no Ruler ever ruled absent the power of the Church! The two swords are really in the hands of the Church but the temporal sword is placed in the hand by GRANT of the Church to a King [as Beneficiary] who then undertakes upon the grant as GRANTEE/TRUSTEE. Polices are made to govern the grant and all of its many uses. Each use is subdivided and polices are then developed to govern its subdivisions according to agencies and departments. And all of the foregoing is supposedly set up by the Shepherd of this World [look hard to see if you can spot them] in Corporation Sole acting in benevolence to keep the Peace and Order.
Unfortunately the Shepherds are mostly fundamentalist religionists who maintain they are on a mission from God. And it is okay to kill all of those heathen who don't agree. All of this is interconnected. Don't think you can separate from this worldwide network of Finance, Politics, Education and Religion absent any persecution. For even family, friends, neighbors, assocations, affiliations, bystanders will hate you for taking a stand against the common will of the ignorant mass. ESPECIALLY if you challenge their meager view of Salvation.
Whist the mass has their hands out - like lame beggars at the gate - they lack any "vow" there is no "pledge" and therefore "no honor". Society is a fickle bird. There are no easy answers. For even if you obey the codes and statutes to a tee - the Law of Necessity may still overrule.
Like I said, it is simple in reality keep my word in contract. Contracts exist which govern the CQT which we are not even aware of and yet they nevertheless exist. So then a global ignorance exists of the Law. And yet the masters of war will say "ignorance of the law is no excuse." Seeing that I can never have enough insurance and I do not have enough time to know the Law - I like to keep it simple - "I have no trust in you" - and I am trying damn hard not to trespass upon you and yours.
Back to Jurisdiction: Say that deed you did for another, did you receive any money for that? Bingo - Jurisdiction solved.
Regarding a strawman it is a DUMMY and what do you think that makes the one acting in and for it? I think Blacks 5th or 6th has the meaning of DUMMY.
Shalom,
Michael Joseph
P.S. What is very interesting is that we see Canon Law governing the worlds estates and the so called Shepherd supposedly overseeing the worlds estates in benevolence and yet Jesus Christ said the Kingdom of God which the fundamentalists will agree with one voice is in our midst - is it now? - Jesus said the Kingdom is found WITHIN us individually - personally. Yet again to reiterate the fundamentalists rule with their iron rod with their perception of being on a mission from God.
Hag 1:8 Go up to the mountain, and bring wood, and build the house; and I will take pleasure in it, and I will be glorified, saith the LORD.
Hag 1:9 Ye looked for much, and, lo, it came to little; and when ye brought it home, I did blow upon it. Why? saith the LORD of hosts. Because of mine house that is waste, and ye run every man unto his own house.
Everyman indeed runs into his own house - of State of Religion of Education etc. And look around you what do you see? Looks like a drought to me! And this war is an internal war within each man - but that which is internal plays out in society and it is the rulers of the mass which manipulate the Beast - which is to say the carnal minds of the human species - these perpetuate Hell on Earth and in Earth.
Attachment 2553
Attachment 2552
a warrant being administrated bye A peace officer or sheriffs deputy is one with discretion as the True Name is upper lower case and family NAME is always upper its a offer to come to court as the NAMED very polite and civilized. with a warrant from a clerk 72 hrs is the time your holders have to identify you Police bring you in front of clerk within 24hrs to answer for the NAME if you refuse that NAME sent back until no claim for that NAME has been established in assuming the true name one cant be identified as a person or has identified himself as a Man with courts seizing persons and property Identity is a Man,s trust and cant be breeched remaining silent or silenced is exactly what happens in a court that cant see or hear a Man. any and all witlessness need to identify a Man not a name
Legal Word of the Day
Criminal Intent: The intent to commit a crime: malice, as evidenced by a criminal act; an intent to deprive or defraud the true owner of his property. People v. Moore. 3 N. Y. Cr. R. 458. (source: Black's Law Dictionary).
Here's a few to get the ball rolling, feel free to expand on these and add your own!
Society
1. A society is a number of persons united together by mutual consent.
2. Societies are either incorporated and known to the law, or un-incorporated, of which the law does not generally take notice.
3. By civil society is usually understood a state, a nation or a body political.
4. In civil law, by society is meant a partnership.
Statute
1. Legislative act: an act passed by a legislative body.
2. A formal written enactment of a legislative authority that governs a county, state, city or county
3. Legislated rule of society which has the force of Law
Person
1. A corporation treated as having the rights and obligations of a person. Counties and cities can be treated as a person in the same manner as a corporation. However, corporations, counties and cities cannot have the emotions of humans such as malice, and therefore are not liable for punitive damages unless there is a statute authorizing the award of punitive damages.
Here's what wiki says.
"Statutory law or statute law is written law (as opposed to oral or customary law) set down by a legislature or other governing authority such as the executive branch of government in response to a perceived need to clarify the functioning of government, improve civil order, to codify existing law, or for an individual or company to obtain special treatment. Examples of statutory law comprehend traditional civil law and modern civil code systems in contrast to common law. In addition to the statutes passed by the national or state legislature, lower authorities or municipalities may also promulgate administrative regulations or municipal ordinances that have the force of law — the process of creating these administrative decrees are generally classified as rulemaking. While these enactments are subordinate to the law of the whole state or nation, they are nonetheless a part of the body of a jurisdiction's statutory law."
(Common law) "Legislated rule of society which has the force of law "
A strawman is defined by Black’s Law dictionary 8th Edition as STRAWMAN?
A strawman is defined by Black’s Law dictionary 8th Edition as
1. A fictitious person, esp. one that is weak or flawed.
2. A tenuous and exaggerated counterargument that an advocate puts forward for the sole purpose of disproving it. – Also termed straw-man argument.
3. A third party used in some transactions as a temporary transferee to allow the principal parties to accomplish something that is otherwise impermissible. Cf.
DUMMY. 4. A person hired to post a worthless bail bond for the release of an accused. – Also termed stramineous homo.
See MEN OF STRAW.
The Social Security “strawman” is a grantor trust. Whenever you make application on a government form you are tendering an offer to contract.
The government just accepts your offer to contract or to enter an agreement.
The differences between the two can be found in the first article of the UCC – agreement vs. contract.
You will find that the difference between the two is the entry and acceptance methods.
However, the end result is the same.
In the Social Security trust you are the grantor since you (or your parents, it matters not) “made application” on Form SS-5 and then you assented when you filed your first Form 1040 with the IRS.
The First Annual Report on Social Security dated 1936 states on page 20, “Title VIII of the Social Security Act imposes an income tax upon the employees covered by the old-age benefits sections”.
Covered by?
Coverage.
Coverage denotes an assurance plan. Assurance denotes a limited liability plan. Admiralty / Maritime law only has four areas of concern; maritime wages, bottomry, salvage and limited liability.
Benedict on Admiralty covers workman’s compensation principles quite well and it states that you cannot enter into an admiralty/maritime agreement on land for covered employment without first going through equity.
A cursory study of equity law will illustrate we are discussing trust law.
In the Social Security relation you are the grantor, the co-fiduciary (with the USAG as Trustee in his capacity as Alien Property Custodian, 50 USC Appx 12) for tax form filing purposes, and a co-beneficiary.
Any time the same party is grantor and beneficiary you have a grantor trust.
This is also why “willful failure to file” is a felony because it is fiduciary misconduct as a fiduciary book keeper for a trust that you do not own.
Blackstone’s Commentaries volume 1, chapter 18 discusses trusts and corporations to be one in the same.
The United States Supreme Court still uses Blackstone’s Commentaries as an authoritative reference for determinations in law as our legal system is based upon the British (“Brit” is covenant in Hebrew and “ish” is Hebrew for man) legal system.
Therefore, the “strawman” in a Social Security relation is a grantor trust.
Therefore, the grantor trust is a corporation for the purposes of taxation.
Will you find that the trust is domiciled in the U.S. Virgin Islands?
Herefore, the grantor trust is foreign to the several states doing business as a foreign entity to the several states.
After all, a trustee holds legal title.
The legal title holder in any trust holds decision authority over the property in question – i.e. everything the “strawman” touches.
The beneficiary holds equitable title.
The equitable title holder gets to use the property held in trust as determined by the terms and conditions of the trust agreement.
Have the terms and conditions of the trust agreement ever been disclosed to you?
The reason anyone creates a trust (of any kind) is to promote domestic tranquility in his relations, whatever they may be.
In a grantor trust if the trustee breaches the principles of domestic tranquility the grantor may revoke legal title from the trustee and revest it in the grantor.
Well, if the grantor already holds equitable title (co-beneficiary or not) the trust collapses because now the trust assets are held by the same party, hence there is no one left to trust.
The form of the trust you describe is a SIMPLE TRUST by name and is revocable and therefore is part of the Grantor's Estate unless specifically expressed to be in charity to another corporation of men and women [heirs] or a singular man or woman.
There are many, many other trust formations whereof the Trustee holds BOTH the legal and the equitable titles in allodium fee simple - and the beneficial interest holders have only interest in the promises made in the contract. The ownership, management and dominion of the property and therefore estate is in the Board of Trustees. That is an irrevocable trust.
Now pray tell look around treating of government which do you suppose exists?
In the latter formation the beneficiary has claim in breach of trust or a tort in defamation which is to say libel or slander. But the beneficiary has no say in how the estates are managed and for the beneficiary to claim against that Will is "trustee de son tort" - and a Constructive Trustee is created. Meaning - "if he wants the liability, then give it to him."
In the latter formation, a beneficiary does not even have the ability to require the Board of Trustee to give account of the Trust Affairs UNLESS that requirement is written into the bylaws or trust minutes. In regard to government trust minutes are kept carefully in what is called the Congressional Record.
I can think of hundreds of examples whereof an irrevocable trust such as the foregoing is very advantageous. We are only limited by our own thinking. An interest in estate or an estate in property or a right in property or dominion over property are all legal formations and are subject to trust.
The entire universe runs on trust law.
Thanks for your post, Chex.
It matches what I have at http://usufructremedy.blogspot.com/p...ct-merger.html about "merger".
See "Divestiture Facts" section excerpt, page 407, item III, about when a usufruct ends, and revests to naked owner.
[QUOTE]"... III. And by not using it in a proper way and time"[/QUOTE]