"regardless of testosterone levels" lol Way to chastise the Mr. Man types
Printable View
"regardless of testosterone levels" lol Way to chastise the Mr. Man types
That's perhaps their key statement: according to their records. They seem to be telling us they have some evidence -- or a presumption -- of petitioner being a "US citizen". Correcting the error in their records by providing evidence one is not a "US citizen" would perhaps yield different results; namely, a proper non-US citizen passport.
I think you must look at it from the State Department's perspective. If somebody is born or naturalized on the districts then they are within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment. They do not provide the mythical American National passport. I think another way of saying it is that if you are an American National you do not require a passport at all. If international flight tickets were free and I had time to sit in holding cells being treated like a terrorist I would do some scientific experimentation myself. I find the thought of traveling to Iran or Israel pretty intimidating.
If one writes JOHN APPLE SMITH for "Applicant" and provides a CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH the applicant will be construed to an entity born (i.e. chartered/created) per the particulars of the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH. If you sincerely believe that you are that person then maybe fine who am I to tell you who you is or who you ain't is?--and would you like some refreshing fluoridated water to go with that?
Attachment 849
If one does not know who or what one is then who can tell anyone anything? If you are John Apple then ...why are you so sure that you are the Applicant? Care for a game of Boggle?
Attachment 850
shoot on sight: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...alse-data.html
as usual (these days) late to the game.
There is a thread in success stories about 'self insurance'.
i have seen a commercial bus in Vancouver BC (some time ago) with a red license plate with EXEMPT at the top left, and the 'numbers' part of the plate was OHIO DOT #. (Ohio DOT was on the left at an angle occupying the spot of a number).
as a general comment:
Why do those with knowledge as the questions?
How are you supposed to think for yourself if you do not understand how to arrive at the answer?
You have to be able to comprehend the situation, recognize invisible contracts - which was missed in this thread, and assess the best answer. If you cant think on your feet in a forum setting - forget it.
I personally used the self insurance in an encounter and the "officer" offered a citation for no insurance - 3 times - i countered with it is valid. it is private contract. no citation for no insurance was issued (about a 2000 $ fee).
Starting in 2014, virtually every legal resident of the U.S. and those who will be should face up to their civic responsibilities. "We're no longer going to subsidize the care of those who can afford to buy insurance but make a choice not to buy it."
Incorporating the effects of new federal legislation The Supreme Court upheld Obama's law as constitutional in a 5-4 decision this summer, finding that the insurance mandate and the tax penalty enforcing it fall within the power of Congress to impose taxes.
The penalty will be collected by the IRS, just like taxes.
The budget office said the penalty will raise $6.9 billion in 2016, Romney says insurance mandates should be up to each state. http://news.yahoo.com/tax-penalty-hi...194442599.html
Self insurance takes on a whole new meaning now doesn't it?
Self insurance is a must in this economy.
It has its risks, to be sure, but at least for risky professions it's highly recommended.
___________________________________
Dumitru from Customs trucks
Abracadabra makes such appearances. Appearances are often illusions.
Welcome Dumitri!
Insurance is a purchased indemnity. With insurance customers pay the company a fee (called a premium, deductible, etc.) in exchange for the insurance company agreeing to indemnify the customers for liabilities, costs or the like arising out of a motor vehicle or automobile incident. In other words they are PROMISE TO PAY the customer's liabilities or costs when incurred. As long as everyone drives safely and accidents are avoided, the insurance company gets to keep the money paid in. However, there can be additional expenses to pay for claims adjusters (or in the case of medical insurance: care managers or nurse managers).
It doesn't take rocket scientist to figure out (or does it) the parallels between hazard bonds, surety bonds, bail bonds and the like and insurance. Also, in any case the insurance company is making a promise to pay in some unknown or known sum in money.
The Code of Laws of the United States of America (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code, or U.S.C.) is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal statutes of the United States.
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
8 U.S. Code § 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
8 U.S. Code § 1408 - Nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth
Unless otherwise provided in section 1401 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens, of the United States at birth:
(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
(2) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are nationals, but not citizens, of the United States, and have had a residence in the United States, or one of its outlying possessions prior to the birth of such person;
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646 &c.) 28 U.S. Code § 453 - Oaths of justices and judges
The lesson they do not teach in law schools or high school civics classes: the Hoax of Federal Jurisdiction..........
“—Territorial jurisdiction. Jurisdiction considered as limited to cases arising or persons residing within a defined territory, as a county, a judicial district, etc. The authority of any court is limited by the boundaries thus fixed. . . .” Henry Campbell Black, A Law Dictionary, Second Edition (West Publishing Co.: St. Paul. Minn., 1910) (hereinafter “Black’s 2nd”), p. 673.
It might come down to if the STATE is providing the bond, they feel they own you even if its a paltry, measly, puny $200. But if you are some other is providing the bonding, different matter. One thing, in estate planning with children in mind is that if a policy for your son or daughter requires some kind of way to identify them. And that said a best use--if not THE best use--of state ID is to identify the principal to a bond or insurance policy. However, a policyholder's certificate or some kind of insurance card suffices. The USPS regards insurance cards to be an acceptable form of ID.
I know first hand of someone who prior to 1995 made an affidavit of having been born Free and Sovereign upon [name 1 of the original 12 or 13] land and who asserted status of say "Lawful Maryland National", the IRS deleted his entire tax record without hesitation. It was (not federal officers but) state-level d*ckheads (of one of the "states" established after the 1787 Constitution and/or after the Civil War) who tried to bypass and trespass upon his status for overt criminal reasons.
It might be that if you assert being "citizen of the State of {any established after 1861 or 1870}" they will read that as automatic U.S. citizenship in the sense of citizenship in a subdivision of the United States. Examples: State of Oklahoma, State Idaho, State Utah. Since I don't hold public office in I avoid asserting citizenship. Also, I have never asserted having 'constitutional rights' or insisted upon "my constitutional rights" and it has been established that my rights do not rely upon the 1787 Constitution for validity.
The idea of testosterone causing aggressive behavior might be a intentionally-fabricated myth: "These data, along with our own, provides support for the notion that estrogen may play a significant role in the production of aggressive behavior in both sexes. (source)". Estrogen is the culprit. It would make sense that the presence of a female and her estrogen would trigger defensive and protective aggression in males. I have observed for decades men get along just fine, but once a woman enters the scene there is a tendency toward aggressiveness (many man realize this). So you have the motto that some chant to remind them of priorities: "Bros before hoes". I have met women who pride themselves on being sh#t-stirrers when it comes to the affairs of men--one even boasted of being a Scorpio in the same context and quite proudly so.
So it makes sense, at the same time while they sought to drive the Bible and morality out of the public and private, they start upping the estrogen inducing hormones in foods, while at the same time filling TV and movie screens with violence. Of course saying "its testosterone'..that is a clever way to hide the fact that excess estrogen is the culpritwhich is what they've been putting in the water and food.
At the very least it may be that one can use the an AG, Sheriff, county attorney or the like as a repository and keep certificates of service on hand.
I wrote this paper... https://www.scribd.com/doc/271354344...Fiction-6-2015
[merged with above post]
[merged with above post]
ALL written law (codes and stats) ONLY apply to "persons". A "person" is a non-living entity. A "legal name" IS a person. ALL persons MUST be registered to transact business legally for a profit in this state. ONLY persons may transact business. If a man attempts to do this, he gets spanked because he is claiming to be a person. Any man that claims to be a person, citizen, taxpayer, etc...places himself at risk. No one forces you to make this claim of being that person/legal name. I have found the answer.... https://www.scribd.com/doc/271354344...Fiction-6-2015
When a person is arrested The Man forgets how his impersonation or acting like that person is just a legal description. Evidence is a public place separating private from public is how its understood identity isn't MAN/WOMAN its NAMING a male/female person.
And what happens in court? When you admit to be the NAME on the charging papers, you’re offering yourself as a SURETY for the corporate NAME, so when the NAME is convicted, you assumed all the liability, including going to jail. BUT if you do the ASSUMED NAME REGISTRATION, you should have SEPARATED yourself from that legal fiction NAME.
Yes DouglasOfAvalon a lot more people are starting to realized the fraud the bankers did to everyone, for the love of their currency
The Texas Department of Public Safety is a subsidiary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, which is a subsidiary of the United States Secret Service, which is a subsidiary of the Treasury Department, which is owned the International Monetary Fund.
EVERYTHING IN COMMERCE IS FICTIONAL.
Attorneys are 'evidence police'. Police (municipal/corporate internal enforcement) are their assistants. In ancient England, municipal corporations were known to collect revenue directly and turn it over the Treasury without involving the sheriff. So consider the municipal attorneys' role in collecting revenue and bodies for debts and how municipal police might serve as his helpers. However, if you don't live in the municipality or the county stables in the first place....
'owner' can be synonymous with surety especially when one considers that things (such as mailboxes, sailboats and cars) are often personified. To 'own' does not necessarily mean "its exclusively mine".
Perhaps they should also come to terms with the fraud they've been doing themselves and each other.
If STATE OF TEXAS and other subdivisions of the United States are all property of the United States it would in some regard make a lot of sense if the Secret Service, part of the U.S. Department of the Treasury would be responsible for guarding U.S. property.
Forming the court based on the fiction is evident to everyone.We all been jailed paperwork possession is my term however the paperwork reads is all the law or legal evidence requires .No one is above the law and all being legally formed paperwork . OUR paperwork behavior on being arrested (such as mailboxes, sailboats and cars) the commercial address we know how traffic and traveling are registered actions . You inform or notice the municipalities of your fiction as it is a registered event and registered property is subjective to arraignment .PRIVATE PERSON with legal standing venue or re venue .The vehicle is you
Thank you for sharing your paper.
Speaking for myself, I feel that I have walked that path and many years ago. Michael Joseph has been showing me how to articulate usage of property and property rights so that the creator-ownership makes some better sense to me now. And the law boundary really seems to be about redemption. Citizenship may have its points and even findings of fact, but for the most part, it is a mental law boundary that is easily ignored by you being alive on a certain jurisdiction. When it is really a matter of understanding redemption.
Making your demand.
But welcome just the same. Enjoy learning here. If you are like me, you will need to do this. I did.
Upon first glance, I also recognized the "welcome to the PERSON" gist of the paper; sort of for 'beginners' if you will. However, I did notice a very interesting nugget and angle while scanning:
I struggle to find the tax target for the 'IRS' in this scenario.Quote:
“A person who does business for himself is engaged in the operation of a sole proprietorship. Anyone who does business without formally creating a business organization is a sole proprietor. Many small businesses operate as sole proprietorships. Professionals, consultants, and other service businesses that require minimum amounts of capital often operate this way. A sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity, like a partnership or a corporation. No legal formalities are necessary to create a sole proprietorship, other than appropriate licensing to conduct business and registration of a business name if it differs from that of the sole proprietor.
Because a sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity, it is not itself a taxable entity. The sole proprietor must report income and expenses from the business on Schedule C of her or his personal federal income tax return.”
This means that ALL income that “passes through” that business is tax exempt and since I am not the sole proprietor, I have no “personal income” and thus, no personal income tax liability. All the income is “business income” under the control of the “accountholder” which of course IS me and no tax filings are required whatsoever.
The premise, if you read the paper, is to acquire an Assumed Name Certificate from the S.o.S. (Minnesota ONLY is the recommendation), which is like a d.b.a., using the full LEGAL NAME as the business entity and associating the given S.S.N. with it as its T.I.N. From that point of registration/certification, the LEGAL NAME used is a business NAME which is the sole proprietor of the sole proprietorship it conducts. It is now also in "good standing" and able to legitimately conduct business and commerce with other 'United States' entities as the law requires.
This further clarifies that the NAME is NOT you - good.
This makes use of the S.S.N. as being a business entity T.I.N. ONLY - good.
Any claim against LEGAL NAME after completing this simple process must now contend with the Assumed Name Certificate from the S.o.S. providing evidence that LEGAL NAME is a separate business entity and CANNOT be used for identification purposes.
If the A.N.C. is presented, any attempt to identify a man as that entity is Identity Fraud.
Seems like a straightforward and simple process which fits right in to the separation of man and PERSON idea.
Of course, the "accountholder" can still choose to have the sole proprietorship make demand for lawful money in ALL transactions. However, this seems to further, and more clearly, negate the presumption of identity with the LEGAL NAME and make LEGAL NAME recognized as a registered business entity in "good standing" that may legitimately conduct business and is able to defend itself against, or bring forth itself, claims in court.
I'd like to hear any opposing viewpoints regarding this.
The government agency that generally registers ALL legal business names “in this state” (which means “in the United States”) is the Secretary of State (SOS).
That’s statement is interesting.
By using this language, third parties will be put on notice that they are dealing with a legal entity (corporation, LLC, or limited partnership) with limited liability rather than an individual or general partnership (who assume personal liability for business obligations). Source http://www.minnesotaassumedname.com/
Here's a reported quote from Mark Zuckerberg: “There is some confusion about what our policy actually is,” the CEO wrote during a Facebook Q&A.
“Real name does not mean your legal name. Your real name is whatever you go by and what your friends call you. If your friends all call you by a nickname and you want to use that name on Facebook, you should be able to do that.”
Here is Bill Duffy https://www.facebook.com/help/commun...53185294828775
Here is BismoBeer Belly https://www.facebook.com/bismo.beerbelly
“The realm of commerce is not real and neither are any of those commercial laws (UCC) that are being thrown around on the internet.” https://www.scribd.com/doc/271354344...ATED-5-11-2016
Revised Article 9 contains a totally new set of provisions with respect to determining the sufficiency of a debtor name entered on a UCC financing statement.
These provisions separate Revised Article 9 law from the case law that should still apply both to pre-effective-date UCC financing statements and to all non- UCC notice filings.
However,
recent court cases have failed to recognize this difference. As a result, courts have been applying the wrong law to debtor name cases. To choose the right law, the court should first apply these two tests to any lien notice.
Trustee Recommendation: As part of your financing statement review procedures, make sure to consider whether the named debtor may have more than one correct name.
Especially with respect to individual names, do not assume that the obviously correct or full legal name is the only one a reasonable court will accept.
Only challenge debtor names that you are convinced are clearly and convincingly incorrect. Let a competing secured party do the heavy lifting if it wants to make a federal case based on a close call.
According to UCC §1-102(5)(a), words in the singular include the plural. The official commentary makes the point that according to this usage there may be more than one debtor or secured party listed on a financing statement.
However,
the commentary fails to note that the use of the word “name” includes its plural, “names,” as well.
Thus, there is no stricture in Revised Article 9 that a debtor may have only one name.
Question 1: What are all the correct names of the debtor under Rev. UCC §9-503?
https://www.cscglobal.com/cscglobal/...me_Dispute.pdf
This “status” distinction becomes self-evident with the proper filing of the ANC and is EXTREMELY important for you to understand because if I do not own anything, NOTHING can be taken from me. If a person/entity (like the IRS) wishes to take something owned by my business, they must FIRST take this up with the courts and file a lawsuit against THAT “person” (which is the registered legal business entity, not me) that allegedly owes the IRS money/tax.
Why Do I Need a Registered Agent? https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/w...gistered-agent
It seems like a lot of red tape to go through anyone person, registered legal business entity Trustee or a person of integrity to claim lawful money on a tax return.
Other items of interest.
Apostille Authentication http://www.sos.state.mn.us/notary-apostille/
A notary public is a person of integrity appointed by the Governor to serve the public as an impartial and unbiased witness. http://www.sos.state.mn.us/notary-ap...come-a-notary/
DBA is One in the Same Person:
Attachment 4589
See how it fails to identify which one I do business as?
So by the posts above I feel that there is a much different take on identification. Start by considering I have exposed a criminal syndicalism of judiciary that evades bonding; therefore there is no authority other than by force for the Department of Revenue to prosecute me for perjury. In last week's Complaint to the chief justice at the Tenth Circuit Court of Original Jurisdiction (not Appeals) for example I wish I had snapped a photo of the full page Oath that I Refused for Cause. Until Tim signs a proper bond, with the Secretary of State for a witness the whole complaint goes nowhere, because he is part of the fraud.
It matters not how big a band you gang up with in crime, it still separates you from God, from the Law. This is the essence of the PERSON as an individual. When one has coherent heritage and destiny, now is the time for peace. In late 1995 I filed my Certificate of Baptism from a Foursquare pastor into the transactions in the USDC Denver. This offer pulled a brick with my name on it from the Zigurat on the back of the US dollar:
It was a supporting brick, and this failure in the highly compressed information infrastructure opened the way for Securitization by all its names along the way (the next day was the first 31-Day Government Shutdown). I understood about the brick, I just did not get the Bailouts, Quantitative Easing, Housing Bubble, Stolen Notes - asset-backed feed-through certificates (Footnotes 4&6), easy Debt Ceiling raising etc. in the original prophecy.
A big component was that two weeks prior I had filed it In Forma Pauperis - objecting to having to pay the filing fee in the currency issued by the IMFIRS. That was refused but on my way back from Denver I received a page from co-author of Are You Lost at C? offering to pay the filing fee! He would pay by credit card and the court would stay open late if I went back to sign approval...
??
I accepted but only if the In Forma Pauperis was refused. No go. I had to approve that day or pay myself. James Harlan was also a 32nd Degree Freemason. This takes some processing to get, how badly they needed that supporting brick with my name on it.
Compare the finding of facts; The IMF.
...and a MLM Gold Bug looking to cash in on the loss of others' investments:
The next thing you read is...Quote:
A new kind of money
Dear Reader,
The admission of the Chinese yuan to the IMF’s special drawing rights (SDR) basket on 30 September 2016 was another step on the road to world money.
I’ll explain what I mean by that.
The IMF executive board announced the decision to add the yuan to the baket – alongside the US dollar, the euro, the pound and the Japanese yen – in November 2015.
This decision was purely political. The yuan did not meet the criteria for a true reserve currency and is unlikely to meet them for at least a decade.
A reserve currency requires a deep, liquid sovereign bond market. It requires hedging instruments, settlement and clearing facilities and a good rule of law.
China has none of these. Without bond market infrastructure, reserve holders have little to invest in.
But as I say, the decision was political. And the political symbolism of letting the yuan into the club is important.
It anoints China as a full member of the international monetary system. Just a few weeks after the decision to include the yuan in the SDR, Paul Ryan, Speaker of the US House of Representatives, slipped a provision into a budget bill that increased China’s voting rights at the IMF. I created the delirium that secondary markets could be created upon the illusion debt has value, and now I will terminate it.
These triumphs for Chinese power went hand in glove with China’s manic efforts to acquire gold since 2006, best understood as an initiation fee for this exclusive club. Publicly, the elite always US disparage gold. Privately, they hoard it as proof against the day confidence in paper money dies.
The United States has more than 8,000 tonnes of official sector gold. The Eurozone has more than 10,000 tonnes and the IMF has more than 3,000 tonnes. China’s stealth acquisition of 4,000 tonnes, with more on the way, gives China a seat at the table with the other gold and SDR powers. An important point about of the SDR’s rise as world money is that you can’t have any.
SDRs are issued by the IMF to its member nations. The IMF also has authority to issue SDRs to multilateral organisations including the United Nations and World Bank.
Individuals cannot have them – not yet.
In time, a private market for SDRs will develop. Large corporations like GE, IBM and Volkswagen will issue SDR-denominated bonds.
Large banks like Goldman Sachs will make markets in those SDR bonds and write derivative contracts in SDRs for hedging. SDR bank deposits will expand in the same way that Eurodollar deposits expanded in the 1960s.
Imperceptibly, the dollar will go from being the world’s reserve currency to just another local currency. Important transactions will be counted in SDRs. World money will arrive on tiptoe.
Hedge fund and high-tech billionaires will discover they are billionaires in dollars only. The dollar itself will be devalued against the SDR, controlled by a small clique of countries beyond the reach of billionaires and their bankers.
World money means the dollar is worth what the G20 and IMF decide. Only gold is immune.
This is why tell investors they should have a 10% allocation to physical gold. If we enter a prolonged deflation and gold goes down, 10% isn’t going to sink you. But looking at the way major powers are hoarding gold, the metal could see a lot of upside if confidence in paper currencies evaporates.
That’s why you want to have some skin in the game.
And you may want to consider going further.
You see, a rare window has opened in the gold market.
And it means you could multiply your returns on gold several times over compared to owning bullion.
Click here to find out more
Jim Rickards
For Exponential Investor
I found this article about Jim too.
It is amazing that nobody sees on any Federal Reserve asset report gold will revalue to $42.22/fine troy ounce when it goes back into the system.Quote:
Risk warning
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares – you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. All gains are gross unless stated otherwise...
The LORD giveth, and the LORD taketh away. You watch. The end of Securitization draws nigh.
I could not help but be reminded by "Pastor" Tony King's encouragement to become "one with your strawman". The way branches are treated is that they are regarded to be separate persons. The one doing business as "X" is in fact seen as the owner or surety for X with X being a distinct and separate person. It is possible for X to transfer, sell, convey, bequeath their rights or interests in X to another meaning X is a separate person. However, if you are suggesting that David Merrill does business as DAVID MERRILL and also as DAVID MERRILL and intended to collapse them into the same person or suggest they were a singular entity that is what that form would suggest. It does not make David Merrill living sole one and the same as DAVID MERRILL, SOMEWHERE, CO. Unless of course you intended to bring arm's length down to culpability for and sameness with a legal entity.
Well that is what some people think. I have seen a case wherein a suitor pointed that out. Something like this: "Defendants' actions and modus operandi betray an underlying belief that if they tell lies together and in concert somehow their felonies would convert into acts of good. However, no how much they tell lies or deceive the People or themselves or their victims, their crimes are in fact crimes and their offenses are in fact punishable under both the laws of this state and the laws of the United States." (its important to note that the case was against persons alleging to hold public office but not against any officers or public officials.)
Individual and trust can at times be synonymous. Individual can refer to a component or member of something.
It tells you that they know what sin is or is not. Its that they wish to remain in sin without acknowledging the salvation or Karma Management methods of the one named a Exodus 3:14-15. Playing possum works how? Instead, they require victims. Statutes of frauds requires certain things to be in writing and willing. Being surety for a stranger is to be surety for them as they have estranged themselves from the Most High. However, a writing produced through fraud is voidable and unenforceable. They know what they are doing. I have seen someone decline U.S. citizenship only to have his relatives (secretly Marxist and secretly involved in secret societies) freak out. They did what they could to make them impersonate the fiction. The dead are without jurisdiction over the living and they know it. He recognizes that they willingly estranged themselves and had attempted to force them to estrange himself. He declined the offer for cause.Quote:
When one has coherent heritage and destiny, now is the time for peace. In late 1995 I filed my Certificate of Baptism from a Foursquare pastor into the transactions in the USDC Denver. This offer pulled a brick with my name on it from the Zigurat on the back of the US dollar:
It would follow that everything in ACH/Credit Card land is clearinghouse credit (Automated Clearing House).Quote:
A big component was that two weeks prior I had filed it In Forma Pauperis - objecting to having to pay the filing fee in the currency issued by the IMFIRS. That was refused but on my way back from Denver I received a page from co-author of Are You Lost at C? offering to pay the filing fee! He would pay by credit card and the court would stay open late if I went back to sign approval...
The end of false/forged/forced/coerced securitization and false-gospel Arbeit Macht Frei "salvation" through sweat and labor?Quote:
The LORD giveth, and the LORD taketh away. You watch. The end of Securitization draws nigh.
...
Attachment 4592
Didn't we say that salvation is by works alone dammit!?!? Whose laughing now!
Anyone half awake should have been easily able to see the Nazis were snidely making the argument for salvation through works by hanging a sign "Arbeit Macht Frei" a snub in the face of both orthodox Christianity/Hebraism and Protestantism holding the view that salvation is through faith (even in the OT faith was key). You see the religious nature of World War I and World War II is right in your face.
Quote:
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. Ephesians 2:8-9 (KJV)
Quote:
For by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, for it is the gift of God; Not of works, that no man may glory. Ephesians 2:8-9 Douay-Rheims
Faith is *the* substance.Quote:
"...Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness..." James 2:23
Quote:
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good report. Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh. Hebrews 11:1-4
It might have been in the form of a bot, but Beijing hovers at www.bishopcastle.us and this might be related to Doc 6 service plus Doc 12 too. I suspect that there are servers inside that big palace.
There is a mirror complex across the road too.
Thank you for developing that. I am pondering that now, as you seem to see. This seems to come back to the law boundary - redeemed or deluded. One cannot fight their way off the battlefield. Whatever church you go to, follow the rules and you get peace. The individual is out of trust; breaking the law (bylaws).Quote:
Individual and trust can at times be synonymous. Individual can refer to a component or member of something.
Here is what I mean by 501(c)(3) bylaws - the Capture by Bill of Lading:
Attachment 4593
All I have to do according to the "law" is enjoy some of that birthday cake the first Sunday of the month.
Quote:
Being surety for a stranger is to be surety for them as they have estranged themselves from the Most High. However, a writing produced through fraud is voidable and unenforceable.
You touch upon a misunderstanding about Paul. Using the word "strangled" is the key to see that what Paul was teaching in Asia Minor (Turkey) was the Noachide Law. That is the "stranger" - NAKAR from NOKRIY as in Noahide Laws. This really busts through a lot of veils in Messianic Jew Torah study! - Or draws blank looks... Paul was not convicted for his teachings in Asia Minor because he taught exactly the law boundaries he was supposed to. He was back in Jerusalem with Roman citizenship papers hoping for acceptance with the Babylonian occupation on the Temple Mount, as a liaison officer from Rome - as a Benjamite Jew. When he saw it was not going to go over well he aborted and lied about the ship docking in Cyprus.
He became an individual from all three law boundaries (citizenship).
1) Roman citizen
2) Jewish (Babylon) citizen
3) citizen in heaven (on earth)
I am saying this because I hear that over 50% of Americans are on the government dole. This model is of Paul's making as he ran to Felix in Tyre for protective custody.
1928 take on War by Propaganda.
Its well known in certain circles that China pays attention to certain sites. If I recall correctly, the original purveyor of Australia the Concealed Colony website (http://www.basicfraud.com) said that the Chinese government took care to crawl and download his site contents at least twice. But now even archive.org omits some of the contents (the PDF documents). I noticed that only after a certain document was posted on this site did FRB St. Louis uploaded it to its own archives. Go figure. Those who believe all attorneys to be "in the know" are mistaken.
Re: Australia, IMHO what happened is that they established a territorial government (ala "the Australian Government" and the "Australian Parliament"--Canberra/ACT) and chose not to tell the Australians about the laws of succession with respect to the de jure Commonwealth of Australia.
Attachment 4596
Perhaps the tax exemption is pottage? If one reads the bible its clear that "the children are free". What if, with some stretch, the IRS rules were a way of preventing spread of a counterfeit gospel? As in those that actually knew the truth wouldn't be asking for an exemption but instead would be asserting it.
Attachment 4594
Paul likely knew that the lesser lights ruled the night (i.e. those in darkness), that the greater lights ruled the day (i.e. those in the light) and that in any case the Creator...
Attachment 4595
...trumps.
Hmmm... pottage? As in vessels...
Nice food for thought. Thank you.
Potter's field. Where Judas went to mourn his failure to fulfill The Worthless Shepherd prophecy.