No troubles getting refunds here. I haven't paid income tax since 2007. Lawful Money works like a charm.
http://www.ctcwarrior.com/1040_2013_victory.pdf
Printable View
No troubles getting refunds here. I haven't paid income tax since 2007. Lawful Money works like a charm.
http://www.ctcwarrior.com/1040_2013_victory.pdf
Government officers, employees and even sub contractors, are trustees of the public trust. The people are the settlors / beneficiaries of that trust. Fiduciary duty requires that the trustees always act in the best interests of the settlors / beneficiaries. That most certainly includes not abrogating their rights. Though they seem to have cast a shadow of commerce across this relationship, they cannot act commercially and just ignore their duty. Since the rights are private (takes a party of interest for standing) the duty is owed individually. If their actions are not in the best interest of the man or woman and their rights, they breach their fiduciary duty. A strictly commercial entity can act in its best interests. The best interests of the public trust however is the interests of the people themselves since they are its creator.
I am posting a rendition of this thread on www.lawfulmoneytrust.com and would like to bump the thread here. The most recent FrivPen Memorandum is from 2014?
I found it attached to the Opening Post.
Does anybody get frivolous penalty letters anymore? I have only seen one billing and I don't think it was about "frivolous arguments". The lack of news is great and the trend is that when the IRS delays, interest and penalties are added pursuant to the time the Treasury delays sending the Refund.
Hope everyone is well...This is actually "Christopher-T:Farley"..I deleted the email account because when I set it up I was free with personal info. anyhow..sorry for being strange..I got a new job..I filled out the w-4, however in the signature part..Redeemed lawful money..on the I-9 I put the Estate..mainly cause I was nervous and HAD to fill it out there instead of taking it home to think about it...plus not sure what I was thinking..I just didnt want to answer the citizen and the ss as "mine" I wanted to clearify those titles are...I am exempt from FWIT and honored...FL don't have state..and wanted to find out about the states that do..My cheques was the third mistake...I stamped on the back of the paycheque "redeemed lawful money pursuant to 12 usc 411"...however I also stamped each private credit note that was given in exchange and scanned all..soo since it is transaction based.. have I corrected the cheque endorsement by endorsement of the private credit notes? I also am working on this General Post office Registered mailing for "warrant claim of title" and it is getting re routed everywhere..I want to post all the docs im speaking of but cant figure out how to mark out all personal info without damaging hard copies.
Hi Christopher Thomas;
It is good to have you back here... especially in your true name!
David Merill, Thanks for the Welcome...I read "Quatlosers" posts..some people might not only be brainwahed but maybe hypnotized..they're still sound asleep..
Allodial, Thanks for the info..I will learn the functions and post oneself's own attempt to handle one's own affairs..mistakes can also be learned from by two sides..surely what not to do and leader to correctness of repeating that same mistake..I think,therefore I am so I shall not be "insane"..I just totally made that up. got an app..leafly..pretty accurate.."may cause creativness..lol..in saying that im open to opinion..
My current "payday" routine is usually pick the cheque up go home, "Stamp & Scan" cheque, Go to the gas station and receive redeemed, go home, Stamp and Scan [frn's]. seems like more once I typped it. however, the "extra stuff" adds up..literally. anyways i'm wondering about true and correct reproduction of more than one page as one document..is there a way that I can scan originals and number them in the pdf to show more than one page on the print out?
Im so confused about this dba filing...One is record-owner once appears to show there is no abandonment...then one is now entitled to use that property [title] so why would i want to go to the state for another title?
I learned something today.Quote:
...mistakes can also be learned from by two sides.
Quote:
DOCUMENTS SIGNED IN BLANK I. A RECURRING question in commercial and property law is which of two innocent people is to suffer for the fraud of another. The purpose of this article is to consider one particular type of fraud, namely the incorrect completion of a document signed in blank. Four types of documents seem particularly vulnerable to this practice-bills of exchange, share transfers, insurance proposal forms and hire purchase proposal forms. The problem arises when an individual signs a document in blank and that document comes into the hands of another (the intermediary). Subsequently the intermediary fraudulently, or perhaps mistakenly, fills in tha blanks incorrectly and the document is passed on to a third party. The latter may enter the picture in various ways. The document may be a contractual offer which is addressed to him, or the intermediary may have assigned an apparently valid contract between the signatory and himself to the third party, or the third party may be the holder of a bill of exchange which has been negotiated to him. In any event, the question that then arises is whether the signatory is bound by the terms appearing in the document as against the third party. Looking at the situation in terms of offer and acceptance, and ignoring for the time being the principles of agency and estoppel, it is apparent that the offer made by the signatory is different from that accepted either by the intermediary or the third party. On this basis there is no concluded contract.
David Merril, First thanks for the welcome...I also saw those post(s) from "Quataloosers" ha ha ha...Ignorance will be Man's downfall...literally...
Allodial, Thanks for the info. I did download the "Gimp2" program..not to savvy with this yet and seem to have some difficulties with saving...I'm ocd with my recordkeeping..anyhow, once figured out..I will upload..My usual schedule on payday is 1.get the cheque 2.Stamp and scan (just got a portable scanner saves going back and forth from home to arronds) 3. cash, Stamp and Scan the private credit in proper.
Now, I tried to respond a few days ago and typed everything which i am about to now and it didn't upload plus lost the response..Remedy: Copy before posting lol.. anyway...
On the I-9 form I feel I made mistakes..for the name under "family" I put "FARLEY, Estate" and my given name for the rest however correlating to the Estate...I put the SSN attached to the Estate and U.S. citizen and the birth date. for the signature.."By: LS (signature)" however forgot to space given and family.. On the W-4 I put the Estate...and "Exempt" in "7" (I first put my demand in that space there accountant sent it back and said just put "Exempt", so I signed it the way (above) detached it from the dotted lines...the Signature was: "Redeemed Lawful Money...Pursuant to 12 usc 411...(signature) By: LS
My first check, I redeemed lawful money on the back..first ending with my signature and thumb print...second, just redeemed lawful money..pursuant to 12 usc 411...same for third...this last one, I went in and I now have a custom stamp the gentlemen asked me to sign under the stamp..I noticed he put his Deposit stamp above mine..I sealed the signature..however worried since I did not scan the changed document..next time will just take my cheque back scan it then do it..
I also, did a warrant claim on the filing # of the COLB...so the Estate and it's title become one..since it is no longer abandoned...it has a new location..I asked to pay for the registered mail with ordinary stamps...rookie says (honestly, started that week) I MUST use Metered Strip for registered mail...I knew better..I also knew that as Trustee by special deposit I am able to refuse claim of mail...so I asked proper questions and still proceeded and spoke to the supervisor (she called about two days after I made the claim) and wanted to ensure this dont happen again to me or anyone else utilizing the mail process...I went to claim the mail piece and refused it as it is in conflict..the metered strip I feel is an account which uses private credit...so it would conflict with the bonding of title with lawful money...plus morally wrong as we are to For-give...
Today, going to the Comptroller's office to record my Solemn Act...my printer is not printing in blue and is 80% full..frustrating but patient..may have to go and get color print..
I watch "Last week tonight" by John Oliver...he had an episode where he "forgave" medical debt of about 15m...was curious about contacting bureau of public debt..and doing something similiar...
About True, Correct Reproduction of documents...if there is say (4) pages does each individual need to be sealed? or is the front sufficient?
I feel like i'm forgetting to share something...If remember, will post.
After a while it becomes second nature to create a record. Keep your health.
The Quatludes just don't do it for me anymore. I got some pearls there, because of the high attorney posts, but they just grew so far and few between...
BUMPING - for the latest and greatest!!! A suitor just emailed an article to me...
Quote:
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
Office of Audit
Actions Are Needed to Better Identify and Address Individuals Who File Tax Returns Using Frivolous Arguments
Final Report Issued on August 31, 2016
Highlights
Highlights of Reference Number: 2016-40-069 to the Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for the Wage and Investment Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
Individuals or businesses who oppose the Federal tax laws may use a frivolous tax argument to enrich themselves or evade paying tax. Generally, a frivolous tax argument is based on a frivolous or incorrect interpretation of the Federal tax laws. Individuals and businesses use these incorrect interpretations to support their claims that they are not subject to Federal tax laws.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
To date the IRS has identified 50 frivolous tax arguments used by taxpayers. During Fiscal Years 2012 through 2014, the IRS identified 36,648 frivolous tax returns in which the taxpayer used one or more of the 50 identified frivolous arguments. TIGTA performed this audit to assess the IRS’s efforts to identify and prevent the avoidance of individual income tax based on frivolous tax arguments.
WHAT TIGTA FOUND
Potentially erroneous refunds were paid as a result of undetected or insufficiently addressed frivolous tax return claims. Specifically, IRS processes and procedures do not ensure that all tax returns claiming a potentially frivolous tax argument are identified. As a result, the IRS paid more than $27.2 million in potentially erroneous refunds or tax credits to 1,938 taxpayers who claimed one or more frivolous tax arguments in Tax Year 2014. The IRS can assess a $5,000 frivolous penalty for each of the 1,938 returns for which a valid return is not provided by the taxpayer. IRS management informed us that the Frivolous Return Program (FRP) filters have been modified to ensure that returns with the same characteristics as those 1,938 confirmed as frivolous will be identified and referred to the FRP for additional frivolous filer review.
In addition, TIGTA identified that employees are not adequately trained to identify tax returns claiming frivolous tax return arguments. For example, 40 of the 50 frivolous arguments are identified as a result of an IRS employee’s manual review of paper-filed tax returns or correspondence. The IRS informed us that prior to Calendar Year 2013 annual FRP training was provided to its employees responsible for reviewing tax returns and correspondence. The IRS has developed two online frivolous return training courses. However, employees working in those units most likely to identify frivolous returns and correspondence are not required to take the training courses.
Finally, the FRP Correspondence Unit employees incorrectly identified for destruction correspondence containing potentially frivolous arguments. Our review of the 155 pieces of correspondence found that 11 (7 percent) pieces of correspondence should have been worked as frivolous correspondence but were incorrectly identified for destruction.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA recommended that the IRS ensure that the annual evaluation of the FRP filter criteria includes the identification and assessment of all original and amended tax returns, regardless of dollar tolerance, that meet the filter criteria and ensure that appropriate action is taken to address the 1,938 tax returns the IRS confirmed as being frivolous. In addition, the IRS should correct computer programming errors and ensure that all employees receive annual training on the processes for identifying potentially frivolous tax returns.
IRS management agreed with all of TIGTA’s recommendations.
READ THE FULL REPORT
To view the report, including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/auditr...01640069fr.pdf.
Let's see how they "legally" integrate redeeming lawful money, shall we?
P.S. Wow! I just looked through quickly for "lawful", "money", "411" and "redeem..." - NOTHING! Amazing! They still have the ZERO INCOME Return item but no new details. Please get back to us after you give it a thorough reading through.
I just searched within the PDF itself with 2 different PDF Readers... and NO HITS!
See Thread #161 for a good example of a 1040 LM Return and Refund using "TaxAct" program.
It's argument #51. Surprised you missed it.
Redeemed Lawful Money Is Not Taxable
The individual argues that his or her income can be non taxable because they were paid in U.S. notes (lawful money). NOTE: This is true. However this is generally unknown and omitted from the IRS frivolous list. Please don't tell the public as they might discover they've been victims of an elaborate scam.
Nope... he got me too David!!!
But, actually, IMO, that exact statement and position would truly be a frivolous one... BECAUSE all transactions are initially paid in FRNs, the default currency in the USA.
USNs only appear AFTER the 12 USC 411 demand is applied by the Trustees when they are given opportunity to REDEEM their associated FRNs "dollar for dollar" in accord with the HJR 192 Resolution Trust established by the Intent of Congress on June 5, 1933.
FRNs are "redeemed", NOT "precluded" upon demand!
Sorry about the panic. The omission is really a Wow! thing. I mean folks have been redeeming lawful money for what? about 10 years now publicly, using it to avoid income taxes and the IRS has never addressed it. There's NOTHING in the frivolous list. This is great news!
If this was a crazy patriot nutjob theory, the IRS would have included it by now in their Friv List. It's easy; I just wrote it for them as Argument 51. The fact it's missing reveals the argument is NOT frivolous. It's the truth.
Over at Lost Horizons we had a Glaring Omission thread about just this topic. It grew to be the longest thread in the history of the forum.
I felt a twinge of anxiety until about halfway down the post. No big thing. I enjoyed it.
I'm wondering about this financial institution AMSCOT dba FRB will not accept there own [properly endorsed] money order...?
I tried to inform the gentlemen any one of the people have right to their own endorsement....
As Michael Joseph emphasises that it is transaction based...
Anyhow, I've been looking for the [Colorado issued] reproduction of 12 usc 411...I can't seem to remember the thread...
I believe that you might be speaking of the page from the US Code that a suitor published at the El Paso county Clerk and Recorder.
Interestingly the failure to properly cure the land into a Territory in 1861 equates to the US stealing the Territory - as the War Chest I have been referring to. Territorial Governor GILPIN issued the first notes to fund paying Union soldiers in Colorado. So you might be on to something by insisting on this particular rendition.
Absolutely.Thank you. it's funny that after this was posted and I was re-searching for the blank replica (without suitors recording info) and it came right up...
This link....https://youtu.be/5SkTT8rNx_I has been in the process of being passed around...unsure of reliability...interested in some factual proof of reliability if someone may know themselves.
I find it interesting...it speaks of redemption and SDR's however the denial of redemption...apparently recently being set in place...maybe a connection with above situation...
I will print the above and record in accordance with my indenture...as for her (who is experiencing this absurdity) if she wishes and once again properly assertively establish her Demand...when an action against a trustee's rights in the duties of administration occurs..a art.iii 3rd party claim should be administered for such deprivation...or am I still confusing theory and fact?
I listened to a few seconds.
Not fully understanding... Respected though. I didn't intend to offend anyone. Much appreciated.
Interesting report from the IRS-
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
Actions Are Needed to Better Identify
and Address Individuals Who File
Tax Returns Using Frivolous Arguments
August 31, 2016
https://www.treasury.gov/tigta/audit...01640069fr.pdf
Of course "redeeming lawful money" is not included as there is no "frivolidity" in the position or method but it may be interesting to some anyway.
Thank you for that. The IRS attorneys are pretty slick about casting illusions. Some feel the Trading with the Enemy Act has been "Omitted" from the Bankers' Code because it was redundant (Title 50 - Military Code) while not even realizing the implications of it being omitted from the Bankers' Code.
I gather we have these cited docs herein...
Attachment 4777
P.S. FrivPen Notice 2010-33 - Click Here.
The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments.
Just yesterday a student at www.lawfulmoneytrust.com called me elated that his letter regarding frivolous penalty was stopped due to one letter that he wrote based on what he learned on the site. Not only did the IRS stop their action, it was clear that there was some communication also with the State Revenue Department as he received his State withholdings which were on hold until determination could be made by the IRS if the taxpayer owed any tax.
In 2014 I read "The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" and looked up the court cases so that I might comprehend the arguments made. It is easy to see after some study how words can be twisted and how those who would issue a charge need only sit back and listen to the words which issue from the defendant. Most times the defendant hangs self with his own mouth.
As a matter of Law I would like to show that if one has issued a claim upon which relief may be granted, then it is the responsibility of the claimant to show the remedy in the Law so that one may be justified.
Isaiah 43:26* Put me in remembrance: let us plead together: declare thou, that thou mayest be justified.*
A king may not sit in a throne under Providence unless said king has written his Torah. Now you may ask, what does this have to do with anything? It has EVERYTHING to do with your current situation. King James wrote his Torah for the Realm and copyrighted his Torah to be the governing Law for the Realm. It was out of his Throne that the Trees were planted in America [colonies or plantations or Farms]. Thusly were these Estates held mediately in the Throne.
Thusly do we keep it simple. Those who have grown to understand Trust Law and how it works, will appreciate the following. It is NOT enough to know how you can do a deed, it is also needed to know why you can do said deed. My Will and my Intellect must be in accord - else I find self ripped in two.
Title 12 United States Code Section 411 (12 U.S.C. 411) is very clear that Federal Reserve Notes are not Lawful Money of the United States. While they are lawful to use as a legal tender they cannot ever pay a debt but merely discharge said debt to a future Day of Judgment. [paid in blood on battlefield] And relying on Scripture, I find this model made clear in the great book of Hebrews as follows:
Hebrews 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Therefore, these have no power to pay for sin and only push the sin [debt] forward to a future day of reckoning. Thus is the nature of the Federal Reserve System and its notes. However, clearly, 12 U.S.C. 411 allows that these Federal Reserve Notes and their associated credit system may be redeemed as there must always be choice. Noticing an alter atop George Washington's head and noticing that he is the Alpha flanked by an Omega, only he who is blind cannot see the symbolism. I comprehend that you need my consent to understand the Federal Reserve System and I have expressly withheld my consent by way of restrictive endorsement expressing my trust in United States Lawful Money. I am with my free will to choose and I choose to undertake on behalf of the United States in Lawful Money. I stand upon the Law (12 U.S.C. 411) hereinbefore quoted and maintain that I have no obligations or liability to even file a return as the Account is absent liability of the burden of taxation. Finding no transfer of Rights of Use, there can be no Fee! There only remains a presumption of which is timely rebutted herein! It is now time for Eve to be true to Adam. For once she had many lovers but now is she submitting to her Husbandman in Love.
If you don't have the "blood of the Lamb" upon the lintels and door posts [which is Truth], then you will pay with your own blood. And we know it is the blood of the victim which seals the covenant. Further, we know that "the life is in the blood" which relates that blood is synonymous with energy and labor which is related to truth vs. error. For in error we labor in vain. And this relates directly to a mark in the hand [labor] and in the forehead [thoughts]. For our thoughts allow us to express and imply our trust thru written/spoken deeds and action. And now we see it is not good enough to have knowledge but that the benefit and relief is in the Hand of the one that does. See now the Altar atop George Washington's head?
Many read and only see the outer garments which cloak the knowledge hidden in symbolic language [His Voice] - but some will change their clothes.
Rev 19:8* And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.*
Caught between Free Will and Destiny are these not two pillars - Hegelian in nature? I wonder can anyone escape the Matrix using the thoughts which "built this place"?
The World's most famous Weatherman
Because in the end, the Love you make is equal to the Love you take....Consider a life of faith absent love. Is this not akin to the Sun's rays without warmth? Is this not as Winter [pray your flight not be in Winter]? But what of Faith married to Love - is this not as Springtime of New Growth?
Love is what turns us on. For its wavelength is much shorter than fear and thusly hits upon more DNA. Can we think about serving our brethren in Unity? Or shall we continue to serve self? If in the latter - welcome to Groundhog Day - get comfortable. If the former, welcome to abundant Life.
Expressed Faith in the seedbed of Love is like having two great wings. Fly to your bliss!
Deu 32:29* O that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end!*
For there is but One Power - and those who sit in power today in Ministerial Trust, are only allowed. Herein is a great key.
============
A presumption exists. Why is a 1040 being issued if the one who issued said 1040 is not a trustee with obligations? For from the perspective of the IRS agent all who issue such are bound to obligation and subject to the form of which is established per code binding the trustee to give account of the management of the FRS property. In other words, who is this "farmhand" who declares he is not subject to the rent? The key is that there are TWO distinct districts. FRD [left] and USD [right]. Which side of the boat do you fish? For the Kingdom is built in trust and This State is legal to the Image. Thusly is Trust the Foundation.
Is it trust built on Faith [as in no Love] or trust built on Love whereof Faith is contemplated only in the Light of Love - Unity. In the latter we see there is only one life and that is God. And therefore, there is but One Love that comes from God. And the Light is Love and the Good is Truth and thusly can we come to be One? Or shall we remain two in intercourse with a foreign lover? Is that not adultery?
Of course Johnny B Agent, is just as ignorant as the rest of the mass and if something does not conform to the standard way of "doing business" it merely seems frivolous. And now with understanding we can see it is the duty of a trustee to prove his/her innocence and thusly we can see the appeals process - which in the Federal Reserve districts is understood by insurance policies - and NOT oaths of office to the people.
It is just good business Jack.
While traveling I stayed over with a suitor. Refusal for Cause on the 3175C FrivPen letter worked years ago to stop any billing - $30K in fines. Since then the wife has just gone Exempt with the W-4 and so they have no reason to file.
I keep thinking this is one of the more productive threads on StSC. Does anybody know of any new Memorandums?
I've seen nothing new. The IRS has failed to address redeeming lawful money. In itself further evidence your interpretation of the Federal Reserve Act is correct, all these years later.
Some may claim to redeem lawful money, file, then wonder why they don't get to the end zone, tax-free. As a successful nontaxpaying filer for years I can say you need to actually redeem lawful money, and be able to provide proof. You can't claim the ball crossed into the end zone, when you haven't established yourself as a runner (redeemer). You have to establish yourself as a “runner” first before the goal line means anything. To establish yourself as a runner (redeemer) you have to complete the catch. Jesse James never completed the catch. A receiver has to “survive the ground through the catch” and he didn’t.
Merry Christmas!
I like the football "close enough" allegory. Lately I encountered searching my disk, an old American's News Bulletin article.
It is the oldest defense to the Libel of Review I have been utilizing since the late-1995 Are You Lost at C? - days. Rule 12 FRCP; Failure to State a Claim.
What I feel, being the geopolitical social engineer at the intelligence nexus of the brain trust, is that the Response to this correct interpretation was when Congress bolstered the FrivPen from $500 to $5000. And in all this time the only real damage on the FrivPen/NOFTL front has been with a new suitor who is being attacked by a rogue agent and Director. The IRS reports truthfully to the SSA:
More expressly here, I enjoy the MAGI acronym and may play with it in my imagination:
Attachment 5013
There it is!! The attorneys are allowing, if not leading the Director and Agent to go ahead with the "emergency" collections activity, even though they will not falsely report to a fellow government agency.
Sometimes I feel this thread is the very most productive thread on the entire website. God I miss Allodial though. Does anybody have a clue what happened to Allodial?
It appears that the Treasury's position on redeeming FRNs has changed. See its link below, and notice its excerpt below, especially the first sentence of the last paragraph:
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-ce...al-tender.aspx
Then see “Commodity” definition below:Quote:
What are Federal Reserve notes and how are they different from United States notes?
Federal Reserve notes are legal tender currency notes. The twelve Federal Reserve Banks issue them into circulation pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. A commercial bank belonging to the Federal Reserve System can obtain Federal Reserve notes from the Federal Reserve Bank in its district whenever it wishes. It must pay for them in full, dollar for dollar, by drawing down its account with its district Federal Reserve Bank.
Federal Reserve Banks obtain the notes from our Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). It pays the BEP for the cost of producing the notes, which then become liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks, and obligations of the United States Government.
Congress has specified that a Federal Reserve Bank must hold collateral equal in value to the Federal Reserve notes that the Bank receives. This collateral is chiefly gold certificates and United States securities. This provides backing for the note issue. The idea was that if the Congress dissolved the Federal Reserve System, the United States would take over the notes (liabilities). This would meet the requirements of Section 411, but the government would also take over the assets, which would be of equal value. Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them.
Federal Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, silver or any other commodity, and receive no backing by anything. This has been the case since 1933. The notes have no value for themselves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are legal tender, Federal Reserve notes are "backed" by all the goods and services in the economy.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commodity
Now, if one cannot redeem FRNs anymore for anything per above stated policy, is that not in violation of 12 USC 411 and Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act?
Is that not also in violation of Public Policy (Public Res. 73-10, 48 Stat 112) by demanding a particular KIND of currency for payment of obligations?
If now one can only "promise to pay" all obligations with only one KIND of currency (FRNs), then why not use this same KIND of currency (a promise to pay) to "pay" all obligations, following this same stated Treasury policy on non-redemption?
When the Messiah paid the tax in Mt 17:27, did He tender a coin with Caesar's image on it, in accord with His decision in Mt 22:21?
Likewise, should we simply tender currency that bears a "promise to pay" image, in accord with this system's monetary policy and instruments?
Yes, very productive thread. No info on what happened to Allodial but my guess is ... his/her objective was reached here; mission accomplished. And then told to stand down or, left on their own.
We are consistently winning versus the IRS with lawful money remedy. I have seen them occasionally threaten a lawful money tax return with a frivolous penalty. Probably these letters have worked so well for the IRS in the past they continue to send them. Here is a recent example:
Attachment 5014
Here the IRS tries to create an illusion, saying the tax return claims a frivolous position when in fact it does not. Bit of a psychological operation at play. Gamesmanship. Responding with the law will cause the IRS to back down, eventually. And the threats melt away like January snow.
I don't read the webpage that way. The law reads: They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...Quote:
Now, if one cannot redeem FRNs anymore for anything per above stated policy, is that not in violation of 12 USC 411 and Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act?
FRN shall be redeemed in lawful money, on demand.
Thank you Lorne. This is pleasing to the ear. If you authorize the redemption it "goes through".
Hello, I have redeemed lawful money for over 3 years and did the deduction on 2014, 2015, and 2016 returns which I filed a bit late. Just this week I received a CP15 notice of penalty charge for my 2014 return. The notice says due by Feb 5, 2018. How are people successfully refuting the frivolous filing penalty? Some have mentioned phone calls to the IRS. What information is being conveyed in the phone conversation? Are suitors just writing back to the IRS and explaining that the redemption of lawful money is not mentioned in any of the frivolous filing categories that are listed in the IRS documentation? Advice or links are greatly appreciated.
Regards, kevin in Phoenix
Did Congress & Trump Provide the Ultimate TAX Remedy? Hidden In the Rules?
https://www.youarelaw.org/did-congre...-the-new-bill/
I am researching this...
This may also be the "exigent circumstances" justifying a Garnishment action in Admiralty by a Clerk in USDC to bypass the seditious Judges!
And use those funds to offset damages from current IRS collections.
See Rule B (1)(c) below:
https://www.federalrulesofcivilproce...d-garnishment/
Something settled into my mind while having a delightful phone conversation with Francon.
With five garnishments in admiralty underway in the USDC DC, wherein the Garnishees (TRUMP and MNUCHIN) reside, that admiralty rules might not apply to the redeemed. Admiralty as a jurisdiction in America must arise from below the high tide mark, or be related to an insurance contract. The insurance contract can be drawn up at sea or anywhere inland.
The fractional lending requires insurance (FDIC or a Credit Union assurance). Suppose after all these years we have been pressuring the system into actual special deposit? I recall how a chain of credit unions closed down but years back is when some intrepid redeemed trustees began opening many trust accounts and moving large amounts of money through the credit union chain.
Out of the blue, trustees began hearing that they must quit all non-endorsing of checks. When the trustees claimed that they would sign as they pleased, the chain shut down.
I have always advocated that we do not bother patrolling or even monitoring the lawfulness of the activity happening behind the teller window. So my presumption has always been that nobody gives a flip and all the money is processed the same, in the vault. That it is all insured and fractionalized upon. The branch managers do nothing to make sure that those bills deposited or set aside upon a check deposit were set aside "special deposit" in the vault for when that particular redeemed customer came back for "his or her money". And for amounts less that (let me guess) $1000 that is still true.
My imagination has that the board of trustees for this credit union chain serving at the pleasure of the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) realized they had been breaking the law, by treating these deposits as though they are insured for fractional lending/reserve banking. Or maybe the OCC looked over the books and noticed a discrepancy worth mentioning?
The closure was silent correction. No discussion. Like pulling a weed and burning it.
Can anyone help me find evidence of Coast Guard Geodetic Survey Marks/Monuments being placed on mountain tops to justify bringing Admiralty/Maritime Law onto the Land?
http://www.peakbagging.com/Benchmark.htm
Benchmark Placement on Mountain Tops
Most of you reading this have probably been to a lot of summits which have had a benchmark in a prominent location that was easy to see. There may be a large rock at the summit and the benchmark will be cemented in place at the very highest point. Surveyors are concerned with visibility to other survey monuments and thus may place the benchmark near, but not actually on the highest point. The elevation of the benchmark will in these cases be lower than that of the true summit and the position as measured in latitude and longitude will not be that of the highest point.
........................................
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survey_marker
Survey markers, also called survey marks, survey monuments, or geodetic marks, are objects placed to mark key survey points on the Earth's surface. They are used in geodetic and land surveying. Informally, such marks are referred to as benchmarks,[1] although strictly speaking the term "benchmark" is reserved for marks that indicate elevation.
........................................
See: http://freedom-school.com/admiralty-...me-exposed.pdf
Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction Exposed.pdf (excerpt from page 7 below):
"As long ago as 1851 the Supreme Court recognized that the Congress has the power to extend the
jurisdictions of admiralty and maritime causes to the land under the commerce clause and deprive the
people of the right of a trial by jury. The following holding by the high court pretty much says it all.
"This power [of admiralty jurisdiction] is as extensive upon land as upon water. The
Constitution makes no distinction in that respect. And if the admiralty jurisdiction, in
matters of contract and tort which the courts of the United States may lawfully exercise
on the high seas, can be extended to the lakes under the power to regulate commerce, it
can with the same propriety and upon the same construction, be extended to contracts and
torts on land when the commerce is between different States. And it may embrace also
the vehicles and persons engaged in carrying it on. It would be in the power of
Congress to confer admiralty jurisdiction upon its courts, over the cars engaged in
transporting passengers or merchandise from one State to another, and over the
persons engaged in conducting them, and deny to the parties the trial by jury. Now
the judicial power in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, has never been
supposed to extend to contracts made on land and to be executed on land. But if the
power of regulating commerce can be made the foundation of jurisdiction in its
courts, and a new and extended admiralty jurisdiction beyond its heretofore known
and admitted limits, may be created on water under that authority, the same reason
would justify the same exercise of power on land." Propeller Genessee Chief et al. v.
Fitzhugh et al. 12 How. 443 (U.S. 1851)
.....................................
The below links are offline during the government shutdown:
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/datasheets/
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/Tidal_Elevation/
I based an indictment upon a monument on Mt Herman, Colorado.
Attachment 5025
There were three permanently mounted on the summit. Two of them pointed to the main one at ninety degrees. I knew there was something special about it from Mount Hermon of the Bible and how it overlooks Megachurch, USA from The North.
Attachment 5035
My intention was to utilize the monument as an escape from admiralty. - To prove that we are air-breathing high above the high-tide mark.
Attachment 5027
Attachment 5028
While camping a couple months later, I heard some strange pounding from my camp across the way. I did not think much of it but a few hours later went over to the summit and found that a group of men had carried a sledgehammer up and destroyed the metal cap. The two pointer caps remain there.
You may be on to something but I focus on DeLOVIO:
Attachment 5029
Here is my thinking - Fractional lending and reserve banking depend entirely on insurance. FDIC is the primary insurance but all endorsed bills are insured against the national debt for security. Therefore redemption restores one to that Mandatory Exception from the false balances of elastic currency.
But there is more. A FrivPen is Waiver of Tort... continued.
Attachment 5030
This is the municipal CODE of the Five Boroughs. My "new technology" is to apply Admiralty Rules for garnishments against TRUMP and MNUCHIN. For example:
Attachment 5034
Attachment 5031
Secretary Robert RUBIN resigned suddenly, in time for the Five O'Clock News. Look at the date above.
But if I am redeemed, MELCHIZEDEK then I have no business with LEVI. Sure enough. There is nothing going on because I am not separate. This is how difficult it is to climb over your egoistic mind and pull your head out of debt long enough to reconquer your idea set - brain trust. I am not alone. I am ONE with many. Unity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX-rV-WQn-U
It goes way back - Jim's NOFTL (Notice of Federal Tax Lien) was not released. It disappeared.
Attachment 5032
I thought it strange that Jim could never get Wiley Young DANIEL to pull off his administrative cap and put on original jurisdiction - his Article III cap. But then that is the point. For a party in interest to come up out of the sea, and state claim on land, they must first file a petition in the USDC.
Unless of course that party endorses private credit.
In response to the 'Waiver of Tort' mentioned above...
Here is an "Official Claim through a International Alien Tort Claim published by the Government of The United States of America!" for proceeding in an INTERNATIONAL VENUE for the "Trafficking of Persons" committed by the United States and the United States of America against Americans via COLB & SSN instruments.
https://reignoftheheavens.com/?p=3388
Since both the United States and the United States of America are private corporations, who "own" all USDC Courts, it appears that only an INTERNATIONAL VENUE is suitable for recourse.
See also: The Government of The United States of America and the American National Union of The United States of America declares independence from the British Empire!
https://reignoftheheavens.com/?p=3458
Notice item #7:
Notice page 4, 2nd last paragraph:Quote:
7: The British Empire created private international agreements under its private international law
that included but not limited to the Atlantic Charter of nineteen hundred and forty one, and
trafficked persons into the use of private Trusts (Internal Revenue) to facilitate human trafficking
under the guise of Social Security, forced payment of taxes to allegedly fund the 'government' when
those funds are really a 'tribute' payment to the Crown and the Vatican, and
Our "persons" have been trafficked under the guise of Social Security into offshore (Puerto Rico & Virgin Islands) internal revenue trusts... so would signing onto these 2 documents help those who are now dealing with the recent IRS Frivolous Filing charges and installment payment plans forced thereunder?Quote:
The British Empire British Agents shall never be allowed to file one more charge against anyone
outside of their borders, nor trafficked in persons within its borders
P.S. This may also help...
See: THE NEW INCOME TAX LAW (HR 1) DESTROYS the IRS, the DOJ, and ALL the JUDGES!
http://www.tax-freedom.com/BrokenSystem.pdf