Your scope is too wide. This is a subtle attempt at a wholesale dismissive.
Thus, unarmed means to gun them down?
I thought police officers were trained to handle such situations professionally? Perhaps they aren't as competent, as we've been led to believe?
False narrative of your own construction.
In the case of Tamir Rice, he was gunned down within 3 seconds of contact with the officer. The officer hadn't even given him a warning.
In the case of Eric Gardner, he was strangled to death with an illegal choke hold.
In the case of John Crawford III, he was merely holding a pellet gun while on the phone, while the officer decided to play "Counterstrike".
Can you explain to me where the three individuals above were "acting out destructively and violently".
I find it peculiar that
Ryan Groiux can go on a rampage in Arizona and
James E. Holmes can shoot up a movie theater, yet they can manage to capture them alive?
Heaven forbid a black male has a toy gun, sell cigarettes, or hold a pellet gun while talking on a cellphone in a store. Judge Dredd time?
What makes it credible is that it has shone a light on police brutality, especially with regard to African-Americans, in these United States.
It has also shone a light on judicial and governmental conrruption in Ferguson. So much so that
the state supreme court of Missouri took charge of all cases involving the municipality of Ferguson, MO.
Rather than condemnation, how about informing them?
If a person or group of persons won't take the time to inform themselves after being led to water, it will be what it will be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Sentencing_Act
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...04463789858002
Your request has been extinguished.