Printable View
Has anyone from the brain trust encountered this website?
http://www.lockeanliberty.org/
This guy also apparently produced this book:
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/lawf...%2btax%2bavoid
From what I have read so far his views seem to be mostly in harmony with the themes on this site in reguards to monetary history/lawful money and the current mess. Might be worth someones time to vett it a little better then I can.
That website is awesome.
It coincides with what I'm reading from the book, "Debt: The First 5,000 Years" by David Graeber.
Thanks a bunch!
Looks like this guy is demanding lawful money :).
Using a McCulloch Demand Letter ....
Quote:
“Dear Bank,
You are hereby notified of my claim under McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) to have my account(s) held exclusively in U.S. Treasury Direct coin or coin-based currencies. At no time are funds to be received, dispersed or held in my accounts in Federal Reserve notes or any other substitute money.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru
Wonderful. There are verifications galore once you can understand enough to spot them.
Good book....pay particular attention to page 17
http://archive.org/details/scienceofmoney00delmrich
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
Thanks Brian;
Fixed volume - inelastic.
I highly recommend all of the works of Alexander Del Mar.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Phenomenal reads.
I have read the Lawful Tax Avoidance book. It is not a how to, but focuses on Supreme Court cases and the evolution of taxation in federal law. It has very helpful flow charts for understanding the evolving tax powers of Congress and how the Tax power has become more closely related to the Monetary Powers and Regulatory Powers of Congress in the modern era. Great analysis of some otherwise difficult to decipher (or fully appreciate) Supreme Court rulingsQuote:
Originally Posted by Brian
The upshot of the book is very much in line with the ideas in this forum--the use of FRN's is an excise taxable activity, and the fact that people are not informed they have a choice to use U.S. notes causes them to be deprived of their fundamental property right to be paid for their personal labor without taxation. The book helped me to better understand other nexuses for federal taxation: excise tax on privileged activity (supporting Peter Hendrickson's thesis in Cracking the Code that the income tax for most of us is just a misapplied tax on the privilege of working for or on behalf of the federal government) and the privilege of making FICA contributions from your paycheck in exchange for potential "benefits". He also mentions the tax on income per se--that is a gain or profit from business.
Quote:
...and the fact that people are not informed they have a choice to use U.S. notes causes them to be deprived of their fundamental property right to be paid for their personal labor without taxation.
Yes! That is the essence of redeeming lawful money right there.
Probably many are familiar with Invisible Contracts by George Mercier, but have you really taken a close look at the chapter entitled "Federal Reserve notes"? Just another way to disconnect your presumed taking of a compelled benefit. http://www.mediafire.com/view/ebxoep...ERVE_NOTES.pdf I don't happen to agree with him that the presumption can't be broken ab initio. But that's just me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru
You bet he is.............
After 1986 I abandoned the so-called “tax protest movement” for a few reasons: I lost faith in Mr. Schiff’s reasoning; I came to understand that as a corporation and small business employer I had no legal right to object to taxes on income; and most important, I discovered that our legal system was making a distinction between money that was issued directly by the Treasury Department (“lawful money of the United States”) and money that was indirectly issued by the quasi-public Federal Reserve corporation (“lawful money”), which meant there may be ways to legally disengage from the Federal Reserve system at any U.S. incorporated bank, without the risk and inconvenience of sending deposits to the NCBA.
So, for more than 15 years after reconciling with the IRS in 1986 and closing my account at the NCBA, I limited my protest at local banks by making checks payable in “Lawful Money of the United States” and endorsing check deposits: “For Deposit Only in Lawful Money of the United States.”
Founder’s Story American Association for Lockean Liberty, Inc.
I came across his website and book. I being from Massachusetts and seeing he graduated from the Massachusetts school of law there. I want to pick up a copy. I was hoping he would add some perspective on dealing with lawful money in my particular state. As I recall, he or a reviewer on Google specifically mention this site. :cool:
I silenced the Massachusetts Dept of Revenue using Lawful Money: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ences-Mass-DOR
This evidences the Mass. DoR recognizes Federal Reserve income is different than Lawful Money income; that it can be nontaxable.
"THEY" shall be redeemed - you know, because lawyers are lazy. I mean, c'mon folks. The tool of a lawyer is words! And a vague pronoun is used?Quote:
Originally Posted by lorne
There is much evidence that the founding principles of the sovereigns of America were not based on Locke, Newton or Descarte or radical British liberalism, but instead moreso on the likes of Leibniz. I suspect the videos and books that talk about America and Atlantis and Francis Bacon, etc. are talking about plan to hijack America rather than the original intents of the de jure sovereignty. Most if not all of the 'occult symbology' came after the hijacking began around 1787.
Related:Quote:
The American Revolution was directed, not only against the corrupt ideology of Locke and Newton, but also against the very institutions and policies which both of them had personally labored to establish. Locke, especially, was a dedicated and declared enemy of American liberties, and of every principle of justice and morality upon which a republican form of government may be founded.
Locke was a prototype for the well-paid populist ``neo-conservative'' demagogue. He managed to amplify simple-minded populist nostrums--such as ``balanced budget,'' ``free market,'' and ``free trade''--into shameless justifications for each and every crime of the British Empire. During his career as an imperialist functionary and propagandist, Locke advocated, among other wickedness: usury, feudalism, black chattel slavery, white slavery (serfdom), and forced child labor; and the unbridled taxation, exploitation, and political repression of the American colonies. (source)
- Locke and Newton As Enemies of America
- The American Revolution and War of Independence Was Not A Rebellion (By Gray W. Clark)
- How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England
- The Venetian Takeover of Enland: A 200-Year Project
- The Leibniz-Swift Connection to the American Liberty
- Leibniz, Not Locke, Inspired the Declaration of Independence <<< :cool: