Who is off the taxpaying hook?

Do you have to file a tax return? Maybe not.

While the Internal Revenue Service gets around 140 million returns a year, millions of Americans are exempt from this annual duty.

Before you wish you were among that group, however, take a look at just who typically does not have to file a 1040. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/who-is...190255976.html

Why the decrease? TPC analysts cite two key reasons, and one key reason why the people have a reason, both related to the economy.
First, the recession meant a lot of individuals didn't earn enough to file a return.

Second, to help those struggling in the recession, the president proposed and Congress agreed to stimulus measures that reduced their taxes.

Third they followed the law. Private Credit vs. Lawful Money.


More from Bankrate:
• Who has to file taxes?
• Choosing a tax filing status
• States with no income tax

View Comments (913)

who is claiming i owe a debt?

I'm off the hook, although on its face you'd think I would owe:
http://jesse2012.com/my109912.jpg

Thankfully I discovered Redeeming Lawful Money!

"non-employee compensation"

nothing wrong with that, on its own

Earning income is a presumption of taxes owed.

Possessing insurance ...
Having a bank account ...
... as well as other indices are presumed evidence of income and a debt owed to government as well.

if one requires a verifiable claim of a debt due, on the record under oath or affirmation, then said presumptions can just be mistakes requiring correction

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph

if one requires a verifiable claim of a debt due, on the record under oath or affirmation, then said presumptions can just be mistakes requiring correction

---

Uncle Sam wants the filer to verify the debt via a tax form :).

The filer affirms the debt via their signature ... under penalty of course.

correct, only a man or woman can verify a debt; why not require the 'IRS' notice/letter writer to do so?

If you bank at HSBC in England, ( no NOT just England, have a friend that happened to him in the united states) don’t plan on making any large cash withdrawals.

At least not without a good explanation. Or, maybe even a permission slip.

Prove it: Bank blocking some customers from making large withdrawals without ‘evidence’ of spending need. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow...222425920.html

Started to read the replies like this

This happened to me in Buffalo NY at HSBC and at First Niagara. I had to withdraw 18,000 dollars in cash to pay for a home I bought at auction. We all know auctions are cash only, no checks or credit cards. They refused to give me my own money. so I did what any rational person would do. I asked for my account to be closed and for them to provide me with a cashiers check for my money. They then wanted to give me my withdrawal. But too late. I was already #$%$. I walked out the bank with my entire account balance of over 109,990 dollars in savings and also closed out all cd's and other financial products. When they ask you why you need your money, tell them to mind their own effin business and stick to banking, leave financial literacy to the consumer.

The best one is from Patrick the most replied one saying The nerve of these customers. You'd think it was their money. then the commemts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyCash

I'm off the hook, although on its face you'd think I would owe:
http://jesse2012.com/my109912.jpg

Thankfully I discovered Redeeming Lawful Money!

---

I do not want to presume - you did not pay any taxes, including FICA TAXES on the 2012 1099-MISC?
You simply redeemed lawful money on all checks relating to the total $79073? And this automatically includes not only federal income taxes but also social security and medicare taxes as well?
If this is the case, may I ask how did you back out the L56 - Self Employment taxes out of the 1040?

I did not pay any federal income tax, social security tax nor Medicare tax on the 2012 1099-MISC reported amount; nothing withheld, nothing paid. Full amount billed, full amount paid. I simply redeemed lawful money on all checks related to the total $79k. No obligation to file, no 1040 filed. Perhaps you're thinking, it cain't be this easy. Well I'm here to tell you it is. No income taxes paid since 2007.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyCash

I did not pay any federal income tax, social security tax nor Medicare tax on the 2012 1099-MISC reported amount; nothing withheld, nothing paid. Full amount billed, full amount paid. I simply redeemed lawful money on all checks related to the total $79k. No obligation to file, no 1040 filed. Perhaps you're thinking, it cain't be this easy. Well I'm here to tell you it is. No income taxes paid since 2007.

---

So in other words you did not file ANY 1040, even though you received a 1099-MISC for 2012? Thank you for the audio - but it really answered nothing except about listening to a webinar.

Have you ever sent notice to the IRS that you only redeem lawful money?

If any 1099 or W-2 is issued and you, the taxpayer does not "voluntarily" submit the "accounting and pay whatever tax is due", you will be sent a letter of demand from the IRS. Please explain further.

For those of you who only have false witness borne against you in the form of 1099s, the presumption that you engaged in a taxable activity is not nearly as strong as in the case of us "wage"-slaves who get a W-2. I recently was visited by a pair of goons from our favorite agency who told me that my filings made no sense and that if you work for someone else and get paid for it you owe a tax on that. Forget CtC, forget demanding lawful money, forget True Name DBA FIRST M LAST. Yeah, they wish. For the first, second, and (soon to be third) time my returns were accepted as filed, with the nominal refund applied to theft debts for previous years.

It is important to understand the difference between taxation and theft. Taxation is allowed by law, whereas theft is not. Knowledge of the truth cuts theft revenue, not tax revenue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by salsero

So in other words you did not file ANY 1040, even though you received a 1099-MISC for 2012?

---

Correct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by salsero

Have you ever sent notice to the IRS that you only redeem lawful money?

---

No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by salsero

If any 1099 or W-2 is issued and you, the taxpayer does not "voluntarily" submit the "accounting and pay whatever tax is due", you will be sent a letter of demand from the IRS.

---

I don't know about letter of demand, but I suspect in that case one should expect an IRS inquiry, or at least a WE MISS YOU letter. Nothing so far. Oh, and I just received another 1099 for 2013 (WOOHOO!) so I'll have to scan that for you.

Some years ago, my wife wanted to get several thousand dollars out of our then-bank for various reasons, and she wanted the money in the form of bank checks. The bank wanted to sock her with a fee for each check (fees are the prime reason why we no longer bank there); so my wife said "fine. I'll take the money in cash." A little while later, she had her checks. The reason, apparently, is that the bank needed a certain amount of cash on hand to meet the needs of its customers; and if a large amount is needed, the bank will ask for sufficient time to assemble the necessary cash. I suspect that this might have been one of the factors on why Chex had such a hard time (another, especially for older people, is that the bank might be trying to protect them against a scam like the 4-1-9 scam.

This is why I avoid large banks like the plague -- they "fee" you to death. I bank at a three-branch bank where everyone knows you; and while it is less convenient than the Takeit Bank or the Leaveit Bank, I'm much happier there.

I do agree that, if Chex didn't want to disclose the reason for wanting the $18,000, the bank had no business for demanding it.

Let me guess, Pottapaug. Was it Fleet Bank (aka Fleece Bank)?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chex

If you bank at HSBC in England, ( no NOT just England, have a friend that happened to him in the united states) don’t plan on making any large cash withdrawals.

At least not without a good explanation. Or, maybe even a permission slip.

Prove it: Bank blocking some customers from making large withdrawals without ‘evidence’ of spending need. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow...222425920.html

Started to read the replies like this

This happened to me in Buffalo NY at HSBC and at First Niagara. I had to withdraw 18,000 dollars in cash to pay for a home I bought at auction. We all know auctions are cash only, no checks or credit cards. They refused to give me my own money. so I did what any rational person would do. I asked for my account to be closed and for them to provide me with a cashiers check for my money. They then wanted to give me my withdrawal. But too late. I was already #$%$. I walked out the bank with my entire account balance of over 109,990 dollars in savings and also closed out all cd's and other financial products. When they ask you why you need your money, tell them to mind their own effin business and stick to banking, leave financial literacy to the consumer.

The best one is from Patrick the most replied one saying The nerve of these customers. You'd think it was their money. then the commemts

---

Your money in someone else's vault isn't your money :).

This is why one practices private banking :).

The IRS isn't full of bad persons. I've met and interacted with some very helpful and knowledgable IRS and Treasury Folk. With the emphasis on the IRS, one might do well to remember that a great deal of tax is paid in the form of GST, VAT, sales/use tax, state income tax, county/state/city property tax--not to mention fines and fees. If you make $40K in income in the USA, it might be divvied up between FICA, IRS Income Tax, State Income Tax, State sales/use tax, water/sewer fees or taxes. Its not all about the IRS.

Without those state or municipal taxes or fees, many state or local services would likely cease to exist unless some other source of funding was made available.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by John Howard

It is important to understand the difference between taxation and theft. Taxation is allowed by law, whereas theft is not. Knowledge of the truth cuts theft revenue, not tax revenue.

---

Look up the Feudal system. Specifically look for Villein.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Joseph

Look up the Feudal system. Specifically look for Villein.

---

http://www.meetup.com/National-Liber...read/41460432/

An excerpt from above post re: sovereignty of the people:

Quote:

---

It will be sufficient to observe briefly that the sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the Prince as the sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority, and from his grace and grant derives all franchises, immunities and privileges; it is easy to perceive that such a sovereign could not be amenable to a court of justice, or subjected to judicial controul and actual constraint. It was of necessity, therefore, that suability became incompatible with such sovereignty. Besides, the Prince having all the Executive powers, the judgment of the courts would, in fact, be only monitory, not mandatory to him, and a capacity to be advised is a distinct thing from a capacity to be sued. The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the Prince and the subject. No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.

---

I am posting this in response to MJ's mention of "Feudal system" and "Villein"... and USSC Chief Justice John Jay's statement in 1793 that the American Revolution supplanted the system of slaves (villein) being property of the lord of the manor (feud).

Also notice definition in Black's 4th for "feudal": Pertaining to feuds or fees.

Putting these cites together, perhaps taxation (FRN usage fees) is the merely the symptom of the bigger issue of the loss of the sovereignty of the people gained initially by the American Revolution in 1776?

Frederic Bastiat's essay entitled "The Law" shows how all governments gradually degenerate into "legalized plunder" (theft) over time...

The remedy always lies with the common people resuming their duty to "watch the watchers", which in this country, devolves upon the Common Law Grand Jury operating as the 4th Branch of government.

As promised, here is a Form 1099-MISC recently sent to me. Of course the amount reported wasn't federal income, it was redeemed lawful money, so I won't be filing a return of income. Just like last year's and so far the IRS has no problem with it.
http://jesse2012.com/my109913.jpg

Over on the othersite it appears Poppycock1938 has commented on the above:

Quote:

---

Re: Richard C DiMare
by Pottapaug1938 » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:11 am

Over on Planet Merrill, esteemed legal scholar jessejames posts a 1099-MISC (creatively redacted, Merrill-style, with spare change). It's typical Planet Merrill idiocy; but what caught my eye was the legal ... um, "treatise" next to it, written by none other than Richard D DiMare....

---

But somehow he has confused me with the nasty "jessejames" persona who's been banned just about everywhere but FreedomWatch. If the "1938" suffix on his username refers to birthdate that puts him at age 76, so I can forgive that error. As you may know, I believe "jessejames" to be an alt persona of some quatloser (likely Famspear), who I've made an amateur study of. I created the http://jesse2012.com site to make folks aware of how easily online forums can be infiltrated, derailed and manipulated by agents like "jessejames."

As for the Q, I sometimes wonder if the few posters left over there even realize what they're involved in... instead of exposing the scam, they're actually defending the Biggest Scam in the History of Mankind.

What othersite are you referring to? If I may ask?

It begins with the letter Q. It's so vile & nasty that I won't be responsible for linking anyone there; perhaps we could call it Parasites.com. Knowing the game they play it's possible to learn from them ... in a reverse way. They mock & ridicule all who reveal dangerous truth. Including Richard DiMare, the improbable attorney agreeing with David Merrill on the importance of LAWFUL MONEY. You may be interested to know we posted there awhile until they silenced David Merrill & myself. Probably for revealing too much truth that they could not defend against with facts & law.

I also validated from them that bitcoin is a good thing; good for us and bad for central banking. Confirmed when jessejames and the quatlosers trashed it. I use the Q as a validator, a sort of litmus test.

It's my non-professional opinion that our site is so threatening to the elite's scam that Quatlude personas control up to half the STSC logins here. Over at LostHorizons forum I believe the infection is worse, with fake-patriot chameleons behind over half the users there. And sometimes the ignorant Quatludes will talk about one of those dumb fake-patriot tax protesters not even realizing they're discussing one of Famspear's own personas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyCash

.....And sometimes the ignorant Quatludes will talk about one of those dumb fake-patriot tax protesters not even realizing they're discussing one of Famspear's own personas.

---

....heh-heh --> chasing their own tail....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyCash

It begins with the letter Q. It's so vile & nasty that I won't be responsible for linking anyone there; perhaps we could call it Parasites.com. Knowing the game they play it's possible to learn from them ... in a reverse way. They mock & ridicule all who reveal dangerous truth. Including Richard DiMare, the improbable attorney agreeing with David Merrill on the importance of LAWFUL MONEY. You may be interested to know we posted there awhile until they silenced David Merrill & myself. Probably for revealing too much truth that they could not defend against with facts & law.

I also validated from them that bitcoin is a good thing; good for us and bad for central banking. Confirmed when jessejames and the quatlosers trashed it. I use the Q as a validator, a sort of litmus test.

It's my non-professional opinion that our site is so threatening to the elite's scam that Quatlude personas control up to half the STSC logins here. Over at LostHorizons forum I believe the infection is worse, with fake-patriot chameleons behind over half the users there. And sometimes the ignorant Quatludes will talk about one of those dumb fake-patriot tax protesters not even realizing they're discussing one of Famspear's own personas.

---

OK, thanks for clarifying. I thought for a moment Rick was being called out as a bad actor. I don't think that is the case at all. Screw the Q's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyCash

It begins with the letter Q.

---

Serious skin/hypersensitivity reactions such as allergic-like, toxic epidermal necrolysis and erythema multiforme, reactions occur or are suspected may be at an increased risk of confusion or abnormal behavior in early illness listening to Financial & Tax Fraud Associates, Inc. http://www.corporationwiki.com/Calif.../42133651.aspx who are no longer active.

If feeling sick reading Quatloos.com a public educational website maintained by Financial and Tax Fraud Education Associates, Inc., a California non-profit company who has received a Determination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as a § 501(c)(3) exempt organization Monitor your for signs of abnormal behavior of 2002-2008 by Financial & Tax Fraud Associates, Inc. where they have All rights reserved whereas no portion of this website may be reprinted in whole or in part without the express, written permission of Financial & Tax Fraud Associates, Inc unless you are a drunk.

This site is http://www.quatloos.com may be very serious and cause brain damage. Discontinue reading quatlosers inappropriate comments if causing nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, seizure, confusion, or abnormal behavior, heart problems, breathing problems, a weakened immune system, kidney problems, mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and stomach pain.

Legal issues should be faxed to (877) 698-0678. Our attorneys are Grobaty & Pitet LLP (http://grobatypitet.com) and Riser Adkisson LLP (http://risad.com) where you will not receive any answers only that they are a § 501(c)(3) exempt organization, who are no longer active.

Jay D. Adkisson is also the registered agent for the company. Also known as a statutory or resident agent, the registered agent is responsible for receiving legal notifications regarding court summons, lawsuits, and other legal actions involving the corporate entity. Also lists Christopher M. Riser as Manager, in addition to Jay's role of Manager. This corporation was registered one year after Chobham LLC as a Domestic Limited-Liability Company in the State of Nevada on Wednesday, May 23, 2012.

If you have an allergic reaction reading any rubbish from quatlosers Riser Adkisson LLP a cute boutique law firm whose partners are Chris Riser and Jay Adkisson § 501(c)(3) exempt organization, or get a severe rash with Grobaty & Pitet LLP who are no longer active, stop taking it, and contact your doctor right away. People with the quatloos sickness, particularly children and adolescents, may be at an increased risk of seizure, confusion, or abnormal behavior early during their illness.

Also tell your doctor about any medications or nasal-spray where the Adkisson - Riser remarks that don’t pan out that caused mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and stomach pain and seek treatment at STSC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Earning income is a presumption of taxes owed.

---

A Presumption of a benefit passed - or an exchange or transfer of an estate. Thus the trustee is required to give account. The presumption is of course valid for one may make demands for lawful money at one time and not at another. Thus always with the presumption of liability.

This link may be of interest to the topic of trolls and directing group discussion


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...ube-facebook-a

CanadianSolution

They've been doing that kind of trolling for a long time.