Wyoming "Doomsday" Bill HB0085

Wyoming Advances ‘Doomsday Bill’ to Help Residents During Possible Collapse (Feb. 27, 2012)

Quote:

---

Over the past few years, economic woes have led to both fear and uncertainty. The Blaze already told you about what “preppers” are doing to ready themselves should disaster become reality. GBTV, too, has brought you “Independence USA,” a reality show featuring a family trying to live off the grid. But now it seems even some politicians are getting in on the preparatory spirit, with officials in the State of Wyoming advancing what many are calling a “Doomsday Bill.” (Source)

---

Related: Doomed: Wyoming Lawmakers Shoot Down ‘Doomsday Bill’ Aimed at Possible Collapse; Text of State of Wyoming HB0085(PDF).

And of course the politicians voted it down, as this is not something that the state government wants the sheeple thinking about. If there is a crisis, that will be the optimum time for the politicians to something even stupider, as planning ahead is not something governments do, well or poorly.

Freed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freed Gerdes

And of course the politicians voted it down, as this is not something that the state government wants the sheeple thinking about. Freed

---

That's the thing with the voter's card, not one politician will ask for your opinion/vote, they just vote on how they feel about it. Its always about the corporation they represent.

And my point is like this.

So the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress, gave us the Affordable Care Act . And they did it with such urgency that they didn't care that not a single Republican in Congress voted for it, and they didn't care that it took legislative chicanery to pass it despite the Democrat super-majority. Nope, the millions of uncovered Americans desperate for affordable health insurance just couldn't wait any longer. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obamac...120000228.html

For the majority of people who are still in a trance regarding "their money"... the proverbial "jig" is becoming inevitably "up".

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/privat.../truthout.html

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publi...4/qb14q102.pdf

http://www.barefootsworld.net/banking-fed-quotes.html

The "knee-jerk" reaction to this truth finally unveiled will not be pretty.

"A deposit created through lending is a debt that has to be paid on demand of the depositor, just the same as the debt arising from a customer's deposit of checks or currency in the bank. Of course they do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts.
– Federal Reserve Bank, Chicago, Modern Money Mechanics, p. 6

Banks are prohibited from lending their ‘own money’ from their own assets, or from other depositors. So from where did the $$$ come? The contract we signed (our promissory note) was converted into a ‘negotiable instrument’ by the bank and became an asset on the bank’s accounting books. According to the UCC 1-201(24) and 3-104, it was our signature on the note which made it $$$.

Our promissory note (‘money’) was taken, recorded as an asset of the bank, and sold by the bank for cash without ‘equal valuable consideration’ given to us for our note. The bank gave us a deposit slip as a receipt for the money we gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when we make a deposit to the bank. It then created an account at the bank which would contain this $$$ which we just created. A check on this account was issued with our signature and this account is the source of funds behind the cheque which we received as a ‘loan’.

The bank risked none of its own assets in the so-called ‘loan’ to us; rather it used our note to pay the seller, in order to raise an asset for itself, and also used the face value of our note as ‘principal’ which it claims it ‘lent’ us and against which it charged interest. Consideration on the part of the bank is non-existent so the bank has nothing to lose. It can not possibly sustain a loss. Since consideration is essential to an enforceable contract and the note was obtained from us via fraud, the entire transaction/ contract is fraudulent.

Mortgage contracts are written in such a way to appear as if the bank lent us funds before they received our promissory note/ mortgage contract so that the bank can use it as a receipt which they can sell. The contract reads, “For a loan I have received...”, but, you haven’t received it yet. So in fact, we signed and gave the mortgage contract/note to the bank prior to their giving us the funds. So, the application for the loan created the funds (it has our signature on it) and the note (with our signature) covered the funds to ‘repay’ the loan. Again, constructive fraud."
- Mary Elizabeth Croft

"The actual process of money creation takes place primarily in banks ... bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving their promise to pay, or bank notes, to borrowers. In this way banks began to create money. Transaction deposits are the modern counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries crediting deposits of borrowers, which the borrowers in turn could ‘spend’ by writing checks, thereby ‘printing’ their own money."
– Modern Money Mechanics, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

"It is well enough that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
– Henry Ford