Church Marriage Not Recognized In Most States for Decades

Why aren't people making death threats (of course, they shouldn't!) over the fact Christian marriage, or lawful marriage, hasn't been recognized in most U.S. States for decades; that baptismal certificates stopped being acknowledged by DMVs for over a decade. But yet those who have a 'sexual orientation' that cannot be readily determined from their physical appearance make death threats over rights they claim to have yet no citizen has the right to engage in practices that undermine the public health. Not a single public officer in the United States ever had the right to license buggery or to promote deviate sexual behavior.

Attachment 2562

Only twelve states recognize marriages that would be conducted at law or under the auspices of the ecclesia. Yet, regarding the forgoing, the media isn't making a big stink about discrimination and hasn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allodial

Why aren't people making death threats (of course, they shouldn't!) over the fact Christian marriage, or lawful marriage, hasn't been recognized in most U.S. States for decades; that baptismal certificates stopped being acknowledged by DMVs for over a decade. But yet those who have a 'sexual orientation' that cannot be readily determined from their physical appearance make death threats over rights they claim to have yet no citizen has the right to engage in practices that undermine the public health. Not a single public officer in the United States ever had the right to license buggery or to promote deviate sexual behavior.

Attachment 2562

Only twelve states recognize marriages that would be conducted at law or under the auspices of the ecclesia. Yet, regarding the forgoing, the media isn't making a big stink about discrimination and hasn't.

---

as far as I can see this is a separation of the sheep from the goats. Rather perhaps the goats from the goats. Religious beggars under 501c3 cannot discriminate against the laws of the State and therefore the State will just make it legal for same sex marriage and then the 501c3 beggars will be exposed. For any smart lawyer will just decry Sexual Discrimination and then that 501c3 organization will most likely lose its tax exempt status.

More concisely, there are those who assert that in the OT believers were held to covenants made to non-believers not just to covenants made to believers. With respect to the organic states of America, such administrative law has zero weight. No doubt, there is a sorting process.

If I were to write a judicial or ecclesiastical opinion on the matter, I would likely find it necessary to point out the issue of covenants with strangers by members of those of the Christ lawful assembly.

David Merrill's edifications regarding refusal for cause are also important because many of those being sued could use R4C. Not to mention, that they could wage countersuits. What if those organization allegedly established to defend Christians really are a kind of false opposition? (Don't turn to Egypt for help?)

The term "in the United States" is probably more likely to be subjected to the interpretation of "being within the purview of some administrative court of the United States".

The 'enforcement' of alleged "gay rights" is being done as an attachment to administrative law jurisdiction associated with business licenses. Child support and divorce proceedings are much the same.

P.S. Once long ago while studying signal processing and filters and considering how such relates to some deeper nuances of physics, I began to wonder if the entire universe wasn't in some way a very complex filtration system.

Related:

• The Fiction and Tyranny of "Administrative Law"
• Contracts and Covenants by Richard Anthony (ecclesia.org)