What is Agenda 21?
AGENDA 21: It is the United Nations' plan in action for your community.
It doesn't matter whether you are on the Left or the Right on this issue; there is broad census amongst informed Democrats, awakening Middle America, some Republicans and Conservatives: Agenda 21 is bad news for you!
Democrats Against UN Agenda 21
Freedom Advocates
Agenda 21 and the Movement Toward a One-World Govt
Choose Freedom: Stop Agenda 21
You can, and should, stop Agenda 21 in your community - and you can do so within your political affiliation - and comfortably communicate across the divides: Agenda 21 is bad for everyone.
Pay attention now, this is the opening paragraph of the entry for Agenda 21 on wikipedia
Quote:
"Agenda 21 is an action plan of the United Nations (UN) related to sustainable development and was an outcome of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the UN, governments, and major groups* in every area in which humans directly affect the environment."
It's there in plain English, the United Nations has for the sake of sustainable development a comprehensive blueprint for action that includes your local community. The wikipedia article is dry in its explanation of Agenda 21. The best way to see it is in action, how it is being implemented locally, and how it affects you.
It's aimed squarely at reducing you to human cattle, to remove your influence from the environment. It is the growth of "smart city" planning wherein you'll be under the computerized eye 24/7, and the length, quality and span of your years totally regulated. All of that loss of freedom for the shibboleth of "sustainable development," that is, you are expected to be glad to make the sacrifice of your liberty and prosperity for the sake of protecting the environment.
Agenda 21 is a scam for transferring wealth, this is how it's done:
Over 600 American cities are participating, and they are drawn into compliance with United Nations Agenda 21 by each communities' General Plan. Zoning Boards that participate push a document, the General Plan, that parrots whole cloth many provisions of Agenda 21, whereby through the Zoning, and Redevelopment Agency of each community real estate is strategically devalued, and artificial incentives are created that make it inconvenient for people to live in the suburbs and rural areas. The aim of this economic sabotage is to force people off of the land, and into closely packed urban neighborhoods near public transportation hubs. The purpose this allegedly serves is to harmonize the population with the environment for "sustainable development." The reason for community leaders doing this on the sly is that {they are convinced that} people are too stupid and selfish to know it's in their own best interest.
It's a false justification, and the purpose too is ill served by the scheme. The only people served are those people, often unelected bureaucrats, and super-rich funders of the environmental movement, who are in the know about the details.
People are not too stupid to cooperate in their own best environmental interest.
Prosperity and private property have made for greater environmental protection than poverty and disenfranchisement from the land. We have seen this is true in the United States, and I've witnessed it first hand in New York, as I am sure some readers will recognize too upon reflection. Time and time again it is demonstrated: that private property makes for better stewardship of the earth than government programs.
..
In New York State as the western frontier was opened up first by the Erie Canal, and then the Cumberland Gap, the Eastern forests were largely cut down to fire up kilns to make bricks, and then later to make coke for the steel industry. People settled and farmed large swaths of New York and Ohio land. Yet after this burst of industrial activity with hard consequences to the land, it healed, the forest grew back. People left farming for other jobs, often forming new communities. For the sake of peace and quiet, and privacy, the automobile made it possible for millions to to grow up in wooded suburbia. During the Baby Boom this meant every patch of forest and woods had lots of foot trails made by children and teens. Yet now those trails are disappearing, the forests are encroaching on the lawns, and wild life is thriving. Many people like to live amongst nature, and let deer browse grow, feed songbirds, and individually manage many small plots of land to the benefit of wildlife, penning their dogs and belling the cats so that even predators such as wolves and coyote prowl.
They do this not by government decree, but for their own personal experience of the love of natural beauty, and sensible recognition of the balance of nature.
Agenda 21 on the other hand strives to kick them off, and force them into huge complexes of Soviet Era type housing, like could be seen in East Germany, the wasteful production of "projects" that no one wants to live in, and whose community is entirely contrived. Hundreds of thousands of apartment units were abandoned in Germany in the years after re-unification. Central planning and construction of such contrived communities is unwelcome, and counter-productive. But then Agenda 21 really isn't about the environment: it's about acquiring power, ( not to mention the insider profit from violating public trust and civic duty), and exercising it to spite people. Logic be damned.
Here are more examples:
Out West millions of acres of farmland lies fallow, the farmers paid not to farm, so as to stabilize market prices, and conserve the soil for f arming. Logically, to conserve the soil for this purpose the farmers must be conserved as well, that is living on the land if they choose to, and they do: but Agenda 21 defeats this working strategy for the nation's food security and thereby threatens national security, and attacks the liberty of people to live on the land in rural homesteads and suburbs.
