hi all,
not sure how legit this is but I came across it elsewhere on the internet.
http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/images/law_war_manual15.pdf
Printable View
hi all,
not sure how legit this is but I came across it elsewhere on the internet.
http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/images/law_war_manual15.pdf
Sure its legit. Compiled, updated and comprehensive war rules. However, a big question is: is the UN party to or subject to the treaties which bind its members?
Related:
Politics is war (analogue).
The thread that deals with Boris and usufruct I believe developed many of their ideas out of UN treaties, Law of Nations, enemy combatant etc
www.iamsomedude.com
Doug555 is probably better qualified to comment on than me
Canadiansolution
Boris , However, in general, he seems to be believe that the whole system is based on military law. His theory focuses on elements of the Lieber Code, admirality, the 1907 Hague Convention, etc. he uses a number of words that are largely unfamiliar to me such as “usufruct” and “usufructuary”—which I, for now, suppose to be roughly synonymous with “res” and “beneficiary” in trust law—but which he seems to think are far more powerful.
Boris like many others that make youtube videos, etc. has likely been reading our forums and things we've been discussing for decades. I specifically have for decades (so as DM) mentioned the Lieber Code, Law of Land Warfare, Law of Naval Warfare (being applied on land ala Admiralty / Maritime contracts), Invisible Contracts (book), etc. Over and over it has been stated that the U.S. Government has taken a form of martial law since 1862.
The RIGHT of USUFRUCT means to "USE and ENJOY a THING of which the PROPERTY of which belongs to another"Quote:
Originally Posted by Chex
Usufructuary is vested with the Right of Usufruct.
The object is the Thing and who has the Property Rights and who has the Right to Enjoy and Use. Most times folks incorrectly assume that both of these rights are vested in One but that is not always true.
If the Usufruct is PERFECT, then that means the End User could not alter or destroy the Thing, they could only Use and Enjoy.
=====
What of this elusive term Enjoy?
ENJOYMENT. The right which a man possesses of receiving all the product of a thing for his necessity, his use, or his pleasure.
USE, civil law. A right of receiving so much of the natural profits of a thing as is necessary to daily sustenance; it differs from usufruct, which is a right not only to use but to enjoy. 1 Browne's Civ. Law, 184; Lecons Elem. du Dr. Civ. Rom. §414, 416.
USUFRUCT, civil law. The right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing.
Chex, I like to think of Res as the substance of Trust and Beneficiary of who has the Right of Equity under the Trust Agreement. Essentially those for whom the trust is made - for instance - "ourselves and our Posterity". The ownership is held in Legal Title but Enjoyment and Use may be licensed to another for a Fee.
Look carefully at a College. It is run by a Board of Trustees.
"If the Usufruct is PERFECT, then that means the End User could not alter or destroy the Thing, they could only Use and Enjoy."
The question then is, what is the trust property?
"Res" means thing. The res with respect to a trust would simply refer to that which is being held in trust also known as the trust corpus or the trust estate. The term usufruct is nifty but Boris hasn't seemed to arrive at realization that a military in occupation is not the sovereign. A resident is not necessarily the beneficiary. There is a term called remainderman.
Furthermore, the right of using and abusing neither vests in state officers nor in the occupying military. One of the ancient functions military is to dispense civil government until lawful government can be restore. However, even a military has a source of authority.