Printable View
I would like for us to explore into what the meaning might be.
What it meant then, and what it means now.Quote:
The law of nations is enforced by the municipal law which may facilitate or improve the execution of its decisions provided the great universal law remains unaltered 2 US (2 Dall.) 160, 162 (Pa. 1792)
The meaning of?!Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
"The law of nations is enforced by the municipal law which may facilitate or improve the execution of its decisions[...] "
I would surmise that this would be the decisions in determination of the Law of Nations' natural jurisprudence.
"Life of Vattel: Emer1 de Vattel’s Le droit des gens. Ou Principes de la loi naturelle, appliqués à la conduite & aux affaires des nations & des souverains (The Law of Nations, or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns) (1758) was the most important book on the law of nations in the eighteenth century. It was in great measure thanks to this work that the practical and theoretical influence of natural jurisprudence was extended down through the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras. " [Source]
[...] "provided the great universal law remains unaltered 2 US (2 Dall.) 160, 162 (Pa. 1792) "
I would imagine the 'great univeral law' would be consent.
The Law of Nations, is in fact, enforced at the municipal level. Peoples are expected to achieve self-determination within the framework of a given hosting nation-state provided that the state whose government represents the whole of the people or peoples resident within its territory, on a basis of equality and without discrimination, and respects the principles of self?determination, must provide access to the right to self-detemrination within its internal arrangements, and for this reason, such safeguards at the munipal level must be codified within such laws.
Like Hobbes and Locke, Vattel also argued that "liberty and independence belong to man by his very nature, and ... they can not be taken from him without his consent." Id.
As he noted later, "States are composed of men,their policies are determined by men, and these men are subject to the natural law under whatever capacity they act." Id. at 4.
[9. E. DE VATTEL, THE LAW OF NATIONS OR THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL LAW: AP-PLIED TO THE CONDUCT AND TO THE AFFAIRS OF NATIONS AND OF SOVEREIGNS, 3 (trans.,Oceana Publications, 1964).]
31. As was further noted by UNESCO in the 1947 Memorandum and Question-naire, supra note 29:
The world of man is at a critical stage in its political, social and economic evolution. If it is to proceed further on the path towards unity, it must developa common set of ideas and principles. One of those is a common formulationof the rights of man. This common formulation must by some means recon-cile the various divergent or opposing formulations now in existence. It must further be sufficiently definite to have real significance both as an inspirationand as a guide to practice, but also sufficiently general and flexible to apply toall men, and to be capable of modification to suit peoples at different stages of social and political development while yet retaining significance for them andtheir aspirations.Id. at 255.32. Article 1.
27. As Quincy Wright noted shortly after the completion of the UDHR:The universal maintenance of human rights may create conditions in whichthese relations between groups may become one of co-operation and the ex-pectation of peace. The rules of international law, which have defined therelations of State to State, must develop to meet this new situation. [...]
The rights of States must be considered relative to the rights of individuals. Both theState and the individual must be considered as subjects of world law and thesovereignty of the State must be regarded not as absolute, but as a competence defined by that law. Such development, however, implies that the world com-munity is sufficiently organised and sufficiently powerful to assure the security of States under law
That competance gives rise to sovereign recognition, and such state-sovereign recognition can only exist if it secures the right to self-determination within its internal arrangements, including, but not limited to the municipal laws if it seeks to maintain its territorial integrity.
This is reaffirmed in Father Araujo's essay where he makes note of the state's incomprehensible violations of human rights in history:
" While the exercise of State sovereignty has led to the unwar-ranted and unjustifiable deprivation of human dignity to mil-lions of innocent victims, it would be imprudent to conclude that State sovereignty must be curtailed in order to protect such basic human rights as those identified in the ICCPR and the ICESCR.'3 Arguably, sovereignty as a legal concept in domestic and international law has more than one dimension.'4 If this contention has merit, then it would be wise to investigate whether the exercise of State sovereignty can be, or is compati-ble with, the protection of these basic rights. It is the contention of this author that sovereignty, which is exercised by people in their exercise of self-determination, is also a matter that needs to be protected as an important human right. It is this kind of sovereignty - popular sovereignty - which is essential in the protec-tion of other human rights.'5 Should popular sovereignty be subjected to attack, the integrity of other rights identified in the UDHR will also be subject to attack.
This is why the Queen is the Defender of the FAITH [click here]
In other words, the solution would not be to curtail the existence of the state in light of its past actioss, as that would invariably lead to chaos, but rather to structure the state under the umbrealla of popular sovereignty, within its fundamental purpose to secure the right to self-determination as a 'basic human right'.
The next question then becomes: what is meant by basic or fundamental human right? And where are you in relation to your stage of your social and human development? Where are 'we, as a people'.
And as the movie, Dawn of Justice codified self-determination and the great universal law:
Vikram Gandhi: We, as a population on this planet, have been looking for a savior. Ninety percent of people believe in a higher power — and every religion believes in some sort messianic figure. And when this savior character actually comes to Earth, we want to make him abide by our rules? We have to understand that this is a paradigm shift. We have to start thinking beyond politics.
Andrew Sullivan: Are there any moral constraints on this person? We have international law. On this Earth, every act is a political act.
We are not Gods, nor was Clark Kent, but that is not to say that he, and ourselves, do not encompass the Christ Within. [click here]
27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:Colossians 1:27 King James Version (KJV)
It has been a while since I have seen my being quoted from 2011! It gives me cause to review my personal evolution. For a decade I had already developed the Great Universal Law:
The computer program settled on Gadolinium 157 and I later found that number significant as the 156 Attributes of the Messiah. But better is that packed inside a Buckeyball C(60) gadolinium can be injected into the blood, and contained so as to pass 100% from the body without any chemical reaction of bonding. This means that the radioactive dye is still effective for a great MRI image to detect a tumor in soft tissues, without poisoning the patient in acquiring the image.
And this might well compliment that the Lost Word in Masonry is simply, "No!" With that formally taking place in our Refusal for Cause.Quote:
I would imagine the 'great univeral law' would be consent.
Very interesting and generates a necessity for deeper discussion, both public and privately in this thread (I will look cloer to Carbon 60 when I have the chance later this week);Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.Matthew 5:37 King James Version (KJV)
Evil, spelled backwards, is Live. Devil, spelled backwards, is Lived.
Evil is that which takes your life-force away, and the Devil is that which takes what once was alive, or a-live, and took is no longer - this is translated through the Spriit and Intent of the Civil Codes of the World and bonded by the Great Universal Law.
That being said, pay less attention to the legitmacy of their Oaths, and let us pay even more attention to ours - they will extend Honor for Honor.
Under the doctrine of Parens Patrie, the Judge, is indeed, no pun intened, our father. It is for this reason he is referred to as your honor - facilitating the channels and avenues necessary to exercise one's conviction to the Sixth Commandment of the Alimighty Living God, and bringing us closer to fostering His Will back to Earth as good stewards and children of God.
You know the other day it dawned on me that once you understand higher level fractal [images] then you see that the lower level fractals are in the exact image. For instance, let us consider that the Scriptures say that some search them thinking to find Salvation in those Scriptures. However, the central figure Yehoshuah [I AM Savior] relates the Scriptures witness to I AM. Before Abraham was [father time] I AM.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
So we see that our minds either rule us or we understand the mind as a tool that is to be used. We are told "order your conversation [thoughts]." When we realize that we are that Lord God that must sit down in this temple [the Me], then we see the mind is our "help meet." We see this is true of the individual and we see it is true of the universal. If we do not recognize I AM the State, then government, which is supposed to be our help meet, becomes our master.
As within - so without.
It is said in another place "arise O' god and judge the earth". And in another place, "as a man thinketh in his heart so is he." Salvation is the result of a "Way of Life."
Be Holy in all conversation!
With best regards,
MJ
I agree, the mind is a tool, either we will use it, or it will be using us, and somewhere in between along a specturm of physiology, the garden within [1], or lack thereof [2], and experience [3] and how it is compositted within the framework of our neural pathways - as within, so without.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
If we are to gain mastery over our minds, we must understand the battle, and invariably understand what it is from within the mind and further in that we are battling with - it is then when the battle be over, and the new life begins.
Salvation is codified within the framework of International and Domestic Law. To follow Christ, is to follow our Christian Rite established by Christ himself.
I take it you are referring to the Right of Self Determination as codified in the King James Version regarding Rehoboam and Jereboam. There is a natural outworking in manifestation of what is first created in Spirit. Gen 1 is creation in Spirit. Gen 2 is manifestation in Nature. Man of course is constituted as a State in Being. Man being the cross in Matter. Man also being the true Church/State.Quote:
Originally Posted by Esoteric_Christian
M = Feminine = Mother
A = Masculine = Father
N = Joinder of two triangles = Son
in the M we see the Vav and the two pillars. Jereboam did not leave the land but settled a new Church/State. It is said that none is greater than John the Baptist born of woman. He is symbol for the enlightened mind. Jesus who is the symbol for the Spiritual I AM says that the least in the Kingdom of Heaven is greater than John. So political States are as governors and tutors for the unenlightened child. The hope is perfection and the destruction of death. Political speakers are as tempting serpents luring my Soul away from what really matters.
I have troubled and labored quite a while to find "the Judge". With deviant oaths of office I keep getting bank tellers. And so I toil and trouble for an explanation, why and where the law might provide that one can change the oath from form.Quote:
Under the doctrine of Parens Patrie, the Judge, is indeed, no pun intened, our father.
B.T.W. I posted the Carbon 60 link by mistake. I was talking about finding the crux of science - reproducible results - within the naturally occurring isotopes:
Click Here.
Here is the program.
From the inner perspective, all men are as one man. Therefore the judges merely represent judgment as priests in the temple. Ref Hosea 4:6. There is but one Life, one Heart, one Love and it is His - Story. We live, move and have our being in God.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
MJ to friend: Religion is the opiate of the masses.
3rd party: I agree. Science is the only religion, there is no God.
MJ to 3rd party: Energy cannot be created or destroyed, right? So why is there energy?
I think I finally get your point Michael Joseph. It brings peace. Thank you.
No, as codified by certain non-derogable principles in Law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
What Man does shall dictate the direction he either leads, or chooses to be led by. It remains vested by his consent, enlightened, or otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Law comes before politics, politics and the state, both being creatures of law, are predicated upon the consent of man.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
As previously mentioned:
Like Hobbes and Locke, Vattel also argued that "liberty and independence belong to man by his very nature, and ... they can not be taken from him without his consent." Id.
As he noted later, "States are composed of men, their policies are determined by men, and these men are subject to the natural law under whatever capacity they act." Id. at 4.
31. As was further noted by UNESCO in the 1947 Memorandum and Question-naire, supra note 29:
The world of man is at a critical stage in its political, social and economic evolution. If it is to proceed further on the path towards unity, it must develop a common set of ideas and principles. One of those is a common formulation of the rights of man. This common formulation must by some means recon-cile the various divergent or opposing formulations now in existence. It must further be sufficiently definite to have real significance both as an inspirationand as a guide to practice, but also sufficiently general and flexible to apply toall men, and to be capable of modification to suit peoples at different stages of social and political development while yet retaining significance for them andtheir aspirations.Id. at 255.32. Article 1.
27. As Quincy Wright noted shortly after the completion of the UDHR:
The universal maintenance of human rights may create conditions in which these relations between groups may become one of co-operation and the ex-pectation of peace. The rules of international law, which have defined the relations of State to State, must develop to meet this new situation. [...]
The rights of States must be considered relative to the rights of individuals. Both the State and the individual must be considered as subjects of world law and the sovereignty of the State must be regarded not as absolute, but as a competence defined by that law. Such development, however, implies that the world com-munity is sufficiently organised and sufficiently powerful to assure the security of States under law.
Are there a non-derogable principles reserved designed to faclitate immunization from foreign interference, and a separation from the world, whilst peacefully coexisting, I would say, yes.
I understand. Probably when we choose to uphold ours, we will find the Right Honorable Judge. Deviant Oaths for the Deviant Public, for narrow is the gate and few that find it.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Thanks for the links, I will check them out when I have the chance, Thank you both.
Re: Hosea 4:6Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
It is also said of knowledge [among other things]: Woe to you, lawyers! for you have taken away the key of knowledge: you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered.Luke 11:52 ?
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. Matthew 23:13
There is not all but one life, when the soul is diverted by man's energy, if one so chooses to live a life of accommodation.
They hid the key, but not the knowledge itself.
Thanks. I added a highlight. Good point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Esoteric_Christian
Carefully regulated release valves for the highly compressed information infrastructure casting the spell that debt has any substance or value. I have dispelled - not misspelled.
I highlighted one as well :)Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
"Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not for swear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths" Matthew 5:33
How one 'lays down their life for another' is what determines what 'life' you choose to 'live', with whom, and for what, or who's purpose.
“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” John 15:13
More precisely, how what would then be, the children of god to decide to deliberate, or de-liberate,determine and act jointly for said then common pupose?
"And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors."-Matthew 6:12-Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
To be born in sin, is to be born in debt .
We must be reborn, without sin.
Where, and how, have we tresspassed.
“Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. ” - V for Vendetta -
I have a much different perspective. The swearing out, to become party in interest has a significant beginning at Nehemiah 10. The people of the land were in support of Enke, while those returning from Babylon (Jews) were in support of Enlil.
Im sorry, Im trying to understand your point here. I also tried watching the video, but the audio is choppy enough that it makes it difficult to clearly follow.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Sorry about that. The lectures at Yelm are pretty poorly corrupted in the YouTube renditions.
https://youtu.be/renMgRITBJk?t=613
My point is that a lot must be unlearned from the standard teaching and upbringing in Sunday School.
What you stir to my mind is a question I would like you to respond to without thinking - why did you register here in the User Name:Quote:
Originally Posted by Esoteric_Christian
Esoteric Christian
This might complete a process of filtering, so that I am not wasting your time trying to stimulate more amazing posts. I have not read some of these wonderful insights here for some time - a User named Allodial.
I hope that the attached is welcome and in subject matter.
Dpc 1 Indictment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The more I learn and experience it becomes clear that all is connected in some way which may not be at first obvious. Nevertheless, I must confess, that I had well over 10k hours of study in the Scriptures in both Hebrew, Greek and English and I was totally blind. The words on the page cannot save anyone especially if the understandings are false. When the eye turns within and quits looking without then does the Scripture bloom as a rose in the desert.
Thanks David Merrill,
MJ
You are welcome. I appreciate you, Brother.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Poor Dabney! Reading "excess pages" now as a career! I freed her early on... And having to defend the Department of Justice too. For a moment I thought it was embarrassing that I heard Daniel instead of Dabney L.Quote:
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dubelier, Eric) (Entered: 02/15/2020)
Attachment 5757
No witness.
This action is what sovereign means - holding your institutions accountable so that you can trust. It takes courage to trust - most are happy to merely complain. Rock on David Merrill.
I AM (rocking on).
Within a week of my sending the Amicus Brief to the defense attorneys, TRUMP was acquitted of the impeachment proceedings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Not wasting my time at all. I will be responding shortly. Been exercising my Right to Self-Determination.