Divorce Corp (2014)

I am unsure how many People on this forum are into Family Law. I'll provide you the link to the Divorce Corp (2014) documentary. You'll have to kick aside a few pop-up windows before watching the documentary. It's worth it just to watch it.

P.S. I couldn't make it past the 35 minute mark. Shuftin>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Going Postal.

Shuftin

Quote:

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV...0,214,317_.jpg

Divorce Corp (2014)

More money flows through the family courts, and into the hands of courthouse insiders, than in all other court systems in America combined - over $50 billion a year and growing. Through extensive research and interviews with the nation's top divorce lawyers, mediators, judges, politicians, litigants and journalists, this documentary uncovers how children are torn from their homes, unlicensed custody evaluators extort money, and abusive judges play god with people's lives while enriching their friends. This explosive documentary reveals the family courts as unregulated, extra-constitutional fiefdoms. Rather than assist victims of domestic crimes, these courts often precipitate them. And rather than help parents and children move on, as they are mandated to do, these courts - and their associates - drag out cases for years, sometimes decades, ultimately resulting in a rash of social ills, including home foreclosure, bankruptcy, suicide and violence. Solutions to the crisis are sought out in countries where divorce is handled in a more holistic manner.

5 Attachment(s)

Much of family law in the United States of America and in the Dominion of Canada was imported from the Soviet Union along with the social diseases that hit the Soviet Union due to the Soviets/Bolsheviki waging war against the family. There is zero biblical basis for communism. The effect of the Soviet family law system was basically to turn females into state hookers and breeding posts and make normal intimacy between men and woman into a terrible tax for men. No-fault divorce allowed a state hooker or state-farm breeding post to deceive a man into a marriage contract without the man getting the required consideration of marriage. While many woman might bask in the alleged 'liberty' the result is that they have become moreso chattel property of the State rather than the property of any one man.

Quote:

Many people would be shocked to learn that much of the current “family law” system we have today, which is at the heart of so much of our modern social upheaval and America’s “welfare state,” was born in the Soviet Union. Still more shocking would be the revelation that when the Soviet Union discovered its system was a disastrous failure, it instituted serious reforms in the early 1940’s to try to restore the family and the country. The Soviets made these changes when fatherlessness (which included children from divorced fathers) reached around 7 million children and their social welfare structure (day cares, kindergartens, state children’s facilities, etc.) was overburdened. Yet in America, some studies suggest that we are approaching 11 or 12 million such children. All the while, the social and financial costs of welfare and fatherlessness are just now gaining more widespread attention. America’s fatherlessness crisis is primarily by judicial making with the cooperation of the legions of lawyers and bureaucrats who profit from family destruction which rips America apart.

Dont be fooled its not "Blacks" its not "poor Whites" its institutionalized destruction of the family structure along with rogue females willingly playing along for profit and pleasure.

Related: Family Law, Child Support Comes from Marxism; No Fault Divorce; Abortion In Russia; No-Fault Divorce Born In the Soviet Union;

It takes wisdom and discernment to see when this..

Attachment 1605

might really be this..

Attachment 1606.

Attachment 1608

Attachment 1607.

Quote:

“Gramsci hated marriage and the family, the very founding blocks of a civilized society. To him, marriage was a plot, a conspiracy... to perpetuate an evil system that oppressed women and children. It was a dangerous institution, characterized by violence and exploitation, the forerunner of fascism and tyranny. Patriarchy served as the main target of the cultural Marxists. They strove to feminize the family with legions of single and homosexual mothers and ‘fathers’ who would serve to weaken the structure of civilized society.”

The family structure is what kept women and children from being abandoned by irresponsible men and is what kept them under lifetime protection of watchful, caring men. But once the Soviet-style state took the obligation of the child and the woman to the man away, they unleashed a monster and created an unconscionable contract. Quartering of soldiers vs quartering of state-hooker-agents? Which would you prefer?

Quote:

Careful study and review shows that Gramscian Marxist Communism encompasses today’s “feminist” movement. [iv] Feminism’s goals are to use women to undermine and destroy the culture by abandoning marriage and by not carrying on the critical task of “transmitting the culture” to the next generation. Today’s feminists use women to advance the destruction of women, children, and families while convincing them they are somehow a “victim” of the patriarchal structure. And the patriarchal structure is nothing but Orwellian NewSpeak for the social structures and institutions that have kept Western civilization together long before the social decay we see today.

Is it not perplexing that even though they aim to interrupt the flow of knowledge and wisdom, they do NOTHING to change commercial law--it stays the same as it has been for thousands of years. Instead it may have been hidden and kept to a select few behind the scenes. (Think: Russian dolls, system within a system) If that isn't a clue.....

Quote:

"The new antimonopoly agencies in transition economies typically cannot recruit from a large pool of lawyers with competition policy expertise. Commercial law in communist or socialist regimes usually occupied a minor place in the practice of law. In the former Soviet Union and its satellites, the primary concern of legal education and practice was criminal law. Civil law rarely emerged as a major academic or practice concern, with the occasional exceptions such as domestic relations. The practice of commercial law was limited largely to the "arbitrazh" process by which government ministries resolved disputes between different state-owned enterprises." -The Modern Soviet Legal System In Comparative Perspective (Christopher Osakwe)

Attachment 1609

Interestingly, women and homosexuality fetish practicers are being used as tools to reduce themselves to chattel property and to slavery. Or perhaps they are deliberately being self-destructive. The women who are gaining pleasure and thrills out of the destruction, mayhem and chaos know exactly what they are doing. (Related: regicide; On Red Herrings and the Totalitarian Trap)

I will add to all of what allodial has said by encouraging you men to begin delving into "Red Pill" knowledge on the nature of women.

Here I present the top of the heap of red pill websites: http://therationalmale.com

You men have been socialized by society to go against your best interests to become willing indentured servants.

If you think you can handle "red pill", I'll be there to introduce you to MGTOW.