Driving on a Ticket; A Tricky Day in Municipal Court

Printable View

12-03-11, 03:28 PM
David Merrill

Driving on a Ticket; A Tricky Day in Municipal Court

One of the first publications I ever wrote was A Tricky Day in Municipal Court. Please note the date so that you understand why I will not rehash up fringes or whatever I believed from nearly twenty years ago. But rather I want you to listen to this instead about the oldest muncipal jurisdiction in the world, Damascus. Something big is going down in METRO 1313, which has its origins in Chicago, Illinois and that is where I now take you after this rather elaborate introduction.

I heard that term and took a doubletake, "What is Driving on a Ticket?" It sounded serious as the driver had no license. Here in Chicago when you get a moving violation they take your license as the bond and you get it back after you pay up the fines or appear in court.

Here in Colorado a patriot fellow (1995 mentality) got a speeding ticket and challenged jurisdiction. He received a notice in the mail that there was a warrant out for his arrest. He went to the clerk to check it out and was arrested in handcuffs for $250 cash bond! He was lucky to find somebody to come pay it by check only (Information Indicts) and then was free to go. So the $250 was worth about twice the amount of the infraction fines. Rule E(5)(b); General Bond Rule.

Quote:

Thereupon the execution of all such process against such vessel shall be stayed so long as the amount secured by such bond or stipulation is at least double the aggregate amount claimed by plaintiffs in all actions begun...
12-03-11, 04:53 PM
Frederick Burrell

Hey David, nice post. i particularly like the METRO 1313 article. I have read parts of it before, but was unsure of its truthfulness and for the most part lacking the knowledge to verify it. After reading it in the form your link it is making more sense. By that I mean the metro information. Read the protocols of zion at least 40 years ago and I'm not sure what to make of them even to this day. But they fit a lot of what has transpired Thanks fB
12-03-11, 05:45 PM
shikamaru

Isn't the gold fringe on the flag indicative of the jurisdiction of the Commander-In-Chief of the US military?
12-03-11, 07:08 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Isn't the gold fringe on the flag indicative of the jurisdiction of the Commander-In-Chief of the US military?

Exposing patriot bullshit that people rely on, first here is a claim from one site just as you mentioned:

The executive order: (No mention of gold fringe)

Here is the statutes mentioned on that site : ( again, no mention of gold fringe )

" Gold fringe is used on the National flag as an honorable enrichment only. It is not regarded as an integral part of the flag and its use does not constitute an unauthorized addition to the design prescribed by statutes. "
12-03-11, 07:17 PM
allodial

The gold fringed flag connotes a courts martial when flown indoors. Sing "in the Aaaaaarmy". The Naval ensign doesn't have fringe, it just has a different ratio of length to width. Perhaps check the dimensions of the courtroom flags at the nearest U.S. District Court building? Also, a U.S. president as "commander in chief" is nothing more than a 4-star flag officer. Omar Nelson Bradley (who was a 5-star general) probably outranked Eisenhower or whoever it was and so that is why the U.S. presidential flag was redone--but didn't really change much. Oddly, Eisenhower or whoever died quite soon after the flag was revised.

I recall an ancient treatise on admiralty that indicated that the term "civil" is synonymous with "admiralty".

P.S. Some might say that the gold-fringed flag is "ceremonial". Perhaps a trial is "ceremonial" in nature?
12-03-11, 07:27 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by allodial

The gold fringed flag connotes a courts martial when flown indoors. Sing "in the Aaaaaarmy". The Naval ensign doesn't have fringe, it just has a different ratio of length to width. Perhaps check the dimensions of the courtroom flags at the nearest U.S. District Court building? Also, a U.S. president as "commander in chief" is nothing more than a 4-star flag officer. Omar Nelson Bradley (who was a 5-star general) probably outranked Eisenhower or whoever it was and so that is why the U.S. presidential flag was redone--but didn't really change much. Oddly, Eisenhower or whoever died quite soon after the flag was revised.

Show the artifacts to back up your claim please ?
12-03-11, 07:34 PM
allodial

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Show the artifacts to back up your claim please ?

The gold fringed flag was carried by U.S. Calvary. Its a military flag. Study the various U.S. military manuals pertinent to flags. You can buy your very own Handbook for Marine NCO's via Amazon.com. The pertinent book on admiralty might actually be the John Hall one. For some reason, Joseph Story or John Jay come to mind. I've read a lot of law books. A lot of this was posted in detail on other sites. It would take some effort to rehash so, I point to search engines and Amazon.com at this time.Attachment 759
12-03-11, 07:43 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by allodial

Study the U.S. flag manuals. The gold fringed flag was carried by U.S. Calvary. Its a military flag. Study the various U.S. military manuals pertinent to flags.

Just because it was carried by U.S. Calvary? please, that is some manifested crap if i ever heard it.
Have you studied military manuals? I have and that flag being of military has nothing to do with being military by any statute or executive order for the purpose of a gold fringe and I cannot find any evidence of it's use being mandatory. What you will find though which I have verified by military personnel that horizontal stripes mean at war and vertical stripes mean at peace.

OPTIONAL

Marine colors are scarlet and gold. Unless your military it is optional.
12-03-11, 08:01 PM
allodial

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Just because it was carried by U.S. Calvary? please, that is some manifested crap if i ever heard it.
Have you studied military manuals? I have and that flag being of military has nothing to do with being military by any statute or executive order for the purpose of a gold fringe and I cannot find any evidence of it's use being mandatory. What you will find though which I have verified by military personnel that horizontal stripes mean at war and vertical stripes mean at peace.OPTIONAL

What is manifest is that you like to argue. Vertical vs. horizontal stripes? Where did that come from? Care for a game of Boggle?? You remind me of the types that were banned frequently from the older sites. Perhaps to keep things copacetic in motla69-land how about the rules be as follows: (1) flags mean nothing; (2) changes to the dimensions of flags mean nothing; (3) trials are in no way, shape or form ceremonial in nature; (4) the law of the flag means nothing and has nothings to do with contracts or any code dealing with the enforcement of contracts. Or would you like to argue about that too? Have you ever heard of "Rocks & Shoals"? I have. I've read it. Hmmm....wonder why.

Attachment 760
12-03-11, 08:11 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by allodial

What is manifest is that you like to argue. Vertical vs. horizontal stripes? Where did that come from? Care for a game of Boggle?? You remind me of the types that were banned frequently from the older sites. Perhaps to keep things copacetic in motla69-land how about the rules be as follows: (1) flags mean nothing; (2) changes to the dimensions of flags mean nothing; (3) trials are in no way, shape or form ceremonial in nature; (4) the law of the flag means nothing and has nothings to do with contracts or any code dealing with the enforcement of contracts. Or would you like to argue about that too? Have you ever heard of "Rocks & Shoals"? I have. I've read it. Hmmm....wonder why.

Your doing the same thing Shikamaru is doing, you point to some book or audio someone created/manifested and expect me to believe some law is in there somewhere. I normally show or refer to specific resource, but now your doggin me for the same thing you are doing yourself, it is quite ridiculous.
12-03-11, 08:31 PM
shikamaru

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Exposing patriot bullshit that people rely on, first here is a claim from one site just as you mentioned:

The executive order: (No mention of gold fringe)

Here is the statutes mentioned on that site : ( again, no mention of gold fringe )

" Gold fringe is used on the National flag as an honorable enrichment only. It is not regarded as an integral part of the flag and its use does not constitute an unauthorized addition to the design prescribed by statutes. "

Awfully hostile to a question, aren't we ?

Thanks for the cites!
12-03-11, 08:33 PM
shikamaru

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Your doing the same thing Shikamaru is doing, you point to some book or audio someone created/manifested and expect me to believe some law is in there somewhere. I normally show or refer to specific resource, but now your doggin me for the same thing you are doing yourself, it is quite ridiculous.

Like CoreSource method??

Did you even investigate allodial's sources before answering?

I'll wager a no.
12-03-11, 08:42 PM
allodial

3 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Your doing the same thing Shikamaru is doing, you point to some book or audio someone created/manifested and expect me to believe some law is in there somewhere. I normally show or refer to specific resource, but now your doggin me for the same thing you are doing yourself, it is quite ridiculous.

Is Shikamaru half-ignoring you too? Its obviously and plainly customary for a land military unit to fly a yellow-fringed version of a national flag. SO THAT ADEQUATE DISTINCTIONS CAN BE MADE.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attac...0&d=1322944870

U.S. Army Regulations ca. 1924. The interesting things is that the "Patriot Sites" purporting the gold fringe flag to signify "admiralty" seem to fail provide scans of their source material. Nonetheless, begs the question is why would the U.S. Army have a rule for putting yellow fringe on a flag and then it really meaning nothing? The U.S. Army has members which are highly skilled and knowledgeable concerning heraldric matters. The meaning, color and placement of the fringe could be said to be highly esoteric in nature.

It seems important to obviate the following: per ancient military law a standing army can set up a government or maintain continuity of the occupied goverment. That is, a government could strangely come to "within" an army. Related: Lieber Code, The Prince (Machiavelli). Considering the many, many war movies, why has Hollywood for the most part skirted around this topic? The U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy have accountants, quartermasters, finance divisions. The U.S. military branches are instilled with competence for dispensing GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS from tax collection to providing police services to sanitation to road maintenance. Its not just about shooting guns and dropping bombs. If you read the U.S. law that established the U.S. Deparment of Justice it would be obivated that the U.S. Navy JAG was put under the U.S. Attorney General. If you've never seen a traffic ticket from an MP--it looks very much like the traffic ticket thats issued "off base". One major difference is that where it says "Service number" on a "on base" traffic ticket, it would say "social security number" on an "off base" ticket.

Attachment 761
Attachment 762
Attachment 763
So begs the question that might just be entertained for the sake of the "utterly dense": Why are gold-fringed flags flying in military court rooms? DO THEY WANT YA TA MISTAKE IT FOR TRAFFIC COURT? ;)
12-03-11, 09:57 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Like CoreSource method??

Did you even investigate allodial's sources before answering?

I'll wager a no.

Coresource group is gone. If he had a resource of value noted then I would have responded. This court like any other court does not recognize general appearances as valid claims.
12-03-11, 10:05 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by allodial

Is Shikamaru half-ignoring you too? Its obviously and plainly customary for a land military unit to fly a yellow-fringed version of a national flag. SO THAT ADEQUATE DISTINCTIONS CAN BE MADE.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attac...0&d=1322944870

U.S. Army Regulations ca. 1924. The interesting things is that the "Patriot Sites" purporting the gold fringe flag to signify "admiralty" seem to fail provide scans of their source material. Nonetheless, begs the question is why would the U.S. Army have a rule for putting yellow fringe on a flag and then it really meaning nothing? The U.S. Army has members which are highly skilled and knowledgeable concerning heraldric matters. The meaning, color and placement of the fringe could be said to be highly esoteric in nature.

It seems important to obviate the following: per ancient military law a standing army can set up a government or maintain continuity of the occupied goverment. That is, a government could strangely come to "within" an army. Related: Lieber Code, The Prince (Machiavelli). Considering the many, many war movies, why has Hollywood for the most part skirted around this topic? The U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy have accountants, quartermasters, finance divisions. The U.S. military branches are instilled with competence for dispensing GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS from tax collection to providing police services to sanitation to road maintenance. Its not just about shooting guns and dropping bombs. If you read the U.S. law that established the U.S. Deparment of Justice it would be obivated that the U.S. Navy JAG was put under the U.S. Attorney General. If you've never seen a traffic ticket from an MP--it looks very much like the traffic ticket thats issued "off base". One major difference is that where it says "Service number" on a "on base" traffic ticket, it would say "social security number" on an "off base" ticket.

Attachment 761
Attachment 762
Attachment 763
So begs the question that might just be entertained for the sake of the "utterly dense": Why are gold-fringed flags flying in military court rooms? DO THEY WANT YA TA MISTAKE IT FOR TRAFFIC COURT? ;)

Yeah, and every single inhabitant is military personnel? If people get so caught up in general appearances they lose the forest through the trees, they do not know who they are.
12-04-11, 12:08 AM
allodial

Quote:

Originally Posted by motla68

Yeah, and every single inhabitant is military personnel? If people get so caught up in general appearances they lose the forest through the trees, they do not know who they are.

Are you actually competent to discern the difference between what you say or what you yourself think and what someone else does? Do you even know what an inhabitant is? Every single inhabitant of what? What about the term "Military-Industrial Complex" do you fail to comprehend? What is the "Civil Service"? What does it mean to be a civilian? Civilian as opposed to WHAT? Are you somehow convinced that "everyone" but you is clueless?

Related: War is A Racket (a book written by a former U.S. Marine Corps general.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...efflag.svg.png
Note that a four-star general that is simultaneously a four-star admiral gave the warning per the video above.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P772Eb63qIY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQNitCNycKQ

~50 years later?
12-04-11, 02:58 AM
David Merrill

I have as much about METRO as I do about the flags. The fringe, after all my inquiries over the years, is ornamental. It is to add flair to indoor flags of all sorts. Indoor flags do not look very lively. Putting the gold fringe is found on Army and other military flag protocol but means nothing more. The flag of the US is of course an Executive matter being the current law (Title 4 USC) was written by President Dwight D. EISENHOWER. One thing worth noting is that the Naval Ensign is so often confused with the Flag of the US that they are for all intents and purposes interchangeable. However, if it was legally significant I believe that there is enough vestigial martial law around, especially since we are still on fiat currency in America, that the military flag might just really mean exactly that especially in admiralty and municipal jurisdictions.

Like I said though, I am a bit sheepish about hashing up how ignorant I was sixteen years ago.

My take on the Protocols is that of the authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail. It is a forgery, not a fraud. That means there was a secret document that has been altered, framing the Jews as the authors. The real authors are logically some rendition of the Bloodline of Jesus CHRIST. The most famous name for this esoteric lodge is Priory of Sion. My favorite rendition of the mythology is Guardians of the Grail. Of course there are many more sources about this at the Mason Library. I think the Gospel of Philip the Deacon - 1934 might provide some wonderful insight but you have to believe in subconscious and preconscious crosstalk that some people call channeling. And not all channeling is kosher; like A Course in Miracles. With the channel for Jesus being Helen SCHUCMAN who went to co-worker William THETFORD complaining of voices telling her to write down her hallucinations, and THETFORD encouraging her to do so for seven years you have to suspect THETFORD was dosing her with psychotomimetic drugs. This of course would be leftover from THETFORD's Project Bluebird that evolved into MK-ULTRA. Just the same, I can buy into the notion of a universal Christ Mind and a tendency to understand Love and Fear for the sake of the kingdom of heaven on earth.

It is peculiar how the topic I hope will be interesting is usually the one that gets dropped through the cracks...

A member at SuiJurisClub - the original one - he hired me to do some research up at the Municipal League Archives. The archiver there had not heard about METRO 1313 but upon looking found two boxes on it in the immense amount of papers there. There was no cost structure that she knew of so she let me have at the copier for free.

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/648...ymunicipal.jpg

Here is a taste of the squabbling about METRO 1313. I think the Daughters of the American Revolution were the most adamatly against METRO development (socialism) as anybody!

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/9...agerletter.jpg
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/9...agerletter.jpg
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/263...ftofletter.pdf
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4...esponselet.pdf
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/3...ponselette.pdf
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/9...parestesti.pdf
12-04-11, 04:44 AM
stoneFree

OK, I'll ask the dumb questions:
-Did you ever get your hairbrush back?
-the unlicensed fellow from Colorado was speeding but cited for "Driving on a Ticket?"

I'm most intrigued by this...

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Something big is going down in METRO 1313

but still unsure of the connection, Syria perhaps realizing Shell was robbing them blind and making it so difficult they left. America perhaps realizing the banking cartel/Metro/FedCorp is robbing them blind and making it so difficult they leave our Republic? THAT WOULD BE BIG.
12-04-11, 05:22 AM
motla68

David,

Thank you for that additional corroborating vestige.

Allodial ,

There is a lot of things in this life that may have been injected into society that may sound so profoundly real, people will argue and fight to defend it. Mind control has been a valuable tool to keep as your second video say from everyone escaping. It is a matter of discerning the physical from the illusion, the key phrase is " mind control " , that video even concludes that a couple have escaped these entrapments. It is not easy to break free from that mental prison but it can be done.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXDASDDrDkM

MK was meant for Mind Control by German scientists.
12-04-11, 11:31 AM
shikamaru

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

I have as much about METRO as I do about the flags. The fringe, after all my inquiries over the years, is ornamental. It is to add flair to indoor flags of all sorts. Indoor flags do not look very lively. Putting the gold fringe is found on Army and other military flag protocol but means nothing more. The flag of the US is of course an Executive matter being the current law (Title 4 USC) was written by President Dwight D. EISENHOWER.

Wow... and you were able to do that without cursing!
Thanks, David.
12-04-11, 12:41 PM
EZrhythm

http://web.archive.org/web/200302050....com/flags.htm

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm
12-04-11, 02:57 PM
David Merrill

Quote:

Originally Posted by stoneFree

OK, I'll ask the dumb questions:
-Did you ever get your hairbrush back?
-the unlicensed fellow from Colorado was speeding but cited for "Driving on a Ticket?"

I'm most intrigued by this...

but still unsure of the connection, Syria perhaps realizing Shell was robbing them blind and making it so difficult they left. America perhaps realizing the banking cartel/Metro/FedCorp is robbing them blind and making it so difficult they leave our Republic? THAT WOULD BE BIG.

For some context about Syria/METRO/Damascus listen to this. Damascus is the world's oldest City, so the link may be hard to prove. It was on my mind though, as the Driving on a Ticket from Chicago came to my attention. METRO 1313 came out of Evanston just off the University campus. This thread is still about bonding if you want to think broadly.

Never got the hairbrush back.

The infraction occured in Chicago to somebody who had no license at the time because it was confiscated pending a violation from a week before - Driving on a Ticket. Bonding is through the Levites/Leviathan/LEVAH as in I Chronicles 6 on Mount Hermon through a Nehemiah 10 experience of Swearing out Oaths.

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/591...avalensign.jpg

Note the Naval Ensign has conquered the Christian Church, if heraldry is taken literally.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Wow... and you were able to do that without cursing!
Thanks, David.

You are welcome, but I certainly feel the bile expressed by Motla68. I find that reading people blundering through my mistakes from sixteen years ago downright disturbing. The patriot mythology that has built around the gold fringes seems bigger than the entire Strawman Redemption sometimes.

The entire thing is about cursing or not cursing. As the priestcrafters replaced the priesthood of Israel they Swore to the Laws of Moses in the first written Constitution:

Quote:

Neh 10:28 And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge, and having understanding;

Neh 10:29 They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes;

See how the officials, the Babylonian Jews (referred to as the Khazarian Elite in the METRO 1313 Article) were separated from the rest of the people? That is the same patriot mythology today about being a party to the Constitution! People who swear are cursed. What Would Jesus Do?
12-04-11, 04:23 PM
motla68

Quote:

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Wow... and you were able to do that without cursing!
Thanks, David.

And notice it was not directed at any one person, it was directed at the theory/practice of a certain ego.

http://www.barristerbooks.com/the-di...2486362.01.htm

bull·shit
n.
2. Something worthless, deceptive, or insincere.

bullshitter n
Usage: This word was formerly considered to be taboo, and it was labelled as such in previous editions of Collins English Dictionary. However, it has now become acceptable in speech, although some older or more conservative people may object to its use.

It is also a matter of intent and usage, anyone can make anything of something it seems. Take a banana one could say the banana is evil and represents the urethra of the devil himself and the taking part of eating it is accepting the molestation of society and since your eating it your worshiping the monkey God.
But does that make it true ? not in this forum court.
12-04-11, 08:20 PM
allodial

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

However, if it was legally significant I believe that there is enough vestigial martial law around, especially since we are still on fiat currency in America, that the military flag might just really mean exactly that especially in admiralty and municipal jurisdictions.

Exactly. It had its origins in military scrip. So the exercise of CINC powers are duly associated with modern scrip and it makes perfect sense. The scrip + TWEA and the creation of military districts ca. 1861. Its cohesive.

People think "martial law" means "the sky is falling". If that's the case hasn't it been "falling" over a hundred years? There is a difference between martial law and tyranny. Hollywood creates the impression of martial law being equal to tyranny making a conditioning that makes it hard to detect martial law. Consider that California Highway Patrol or New York Police Department are regarded as "militia".

It was said that when they changed venues on the "OJ Simpson" trial from what I recall at one point, they took swapped the yellow-fringed flags for "regular ones". From what I recall there was a subtle change in venue as there was change in the nature of charge to the extent that the venue changed. Martial law just means that there is a military dispensation of government.

I have friends who were ex-JAG types or ex-military or who are still current military--even one of them was with US Army PSYOPS. I even almost went through JAG myself. There is a guy that works as an MP, a good friend, he makes a point to bring me one of my favorite culinary delights when I'm where I'm known to be. He would not at all dismiss the fringe on the flag as being merely 'costume jewelry'. He very much is aware that martial law pervades U.S. Governmental operations.

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/591...avalensign.jpg

That flag order is a travesty. But it shows you how stupified some folks have become. The counterfeit vs the Real McCoy. You'd figure the U.S. flag would fly lower ...all things considered. Perhaps some figure that Y'shua (/Jesus) would readily become a U.S. citizen and have an SSN and pay taxes?

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

You are welcome, but I certainly feel the bile expressed by Motla68. I find that reading people blundering through my mistakes from sixteen years ago downright disturbing. The patriot mythology that has built around the gold fringes seems bigger than the entire Strawman Redemption sometimes

I can relate to the aspect of being sick of misleading drivel. However, its helpful to comprehend the nature of PSYOPS. The guy that I knew who worked with US Army PSYOPS--he's the type of guy that you just never take a gift of washing detergent... always 'on the job', testing, scheming, manipulating like its deep in his blood. They mix the truth with lies but being blessed with a Divine Sieve is what one wants. Throwing the baby out with the dirty bathwater is undesirable.

And its interesting, when folks have inquired I have related akin to the following: Its not about being against the police or rebelling. Afterall, how can I rebel against servants? The thing is police are doing their job and simply keeping you to doing what you said you would do. They just presumed that I had somewhere signed something that I never actually signed or that I had entered into agreements or covenants that I never entered into. After all, why would I want to bind myself to a curse so-to-speak? The word police is related to the word "promise".

Since I don't live in a city ..that means that...
I didn't enter into a contract under a municipal charter ... and that means that
I cannot be a person bound to the policy that the policy enforcement agents (i.e. police) enforce.

To reiterate:

To "live in the city" is to be contracted/bound to the covenants UNDER the related municipal charter (see the famous Darmouth College case for clarification). City charters are private. AFAIK "the City's" residents aren't parties to the municipal charter--they are merely contracting UNDER it--understand?. (Consider the issue of being a party to the Constitution).
12-04-11, 10:22 PM
David Merrill

As a P.S. to Allodial's last point. When the city fills the county or borough (like NYC) then the local electorate goes municipal.
12-04-11, 10:35 PM
allodial

Anymore some works of fiction read like veiled, learned, legal treatises. Anymore...things like this make perfect sense.

http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_img/11177anubis.jpg
12-06-11, 05:53 PM
martin earl

Who, exactly, is Congress under-standing? http://indianapublicmedia.org/earthe...4074727929.jpg