COURT: Who’s Who and What to Say ... by Mary Elizabeth Croft
Ran across this recently, apparently from 2010 according to her website: http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=163
I won't say she's entirely accurate (we suitors are accessing common law, for example) but you might find it helpful in learning trust law.
Quote:
Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.
We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour
either plaintiff or defendant. But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor,
judge, and clerk all work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it must be about the administration of a trust.
They all represent the trust owned by the state and, if we are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee and Executor. So, if you detect the judge’s impartiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just want to let them know that you know this.
http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-cont...HAT-TO-SAY.pdf
