SDR's are Piracy?

Here is an interesting case. I have attached the recent docket report.

From what I can tell the plaintiff is claiming that the county is plundering for the IMF through illegal and non-consensual Special Drawing Rights. The judge dismissed the case as nonsensical giving the plaintiff a chance to make some sense but he refused the Order and returned the mail as unfit for delivery. Strangely all the defendants started appearing? So the judge reiterated that the case is garbage but it would seem the plaintiff is the court of record using the USDC much as many suitors do.

Here are a couple dropbox links publicizing some of the nitty gritty:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sbw8jeiv5...t_03052013.pdf

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sbw8jeiv5lkhccy/2z_VWLKRJD

QUITE EXCELLENT! Thank You for sharing this David.

What is this guy Martin trying to do?

I can't make sense of his pleadings or filings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EZrhythm

QUITE EXCELLENT! Thank You for sharing this David.

---

You know it dawns on me, while the spin doctors would have us to believe in the "boogey man" hiding behind socialism or communism or fascism or even capitalism these are just labels on the real moving force with is MONEY- ISM. None of these ISM's can effectively operate without money. And therefore what is really being asserted is the extent that a government will interfere with markets. But if the government has been compromised by the Corporation thru loans - [MONEY-ISM] then the trustees no longer serve the people but they serve the private shareholders who are most times foreign to the nation-state being considered.

Therefore the SDR is just a Globalization currency which is in effect the same operation as the local currency FLAVOR within a local nation-state. The SDR is what I believe will nationalize the world into UNIONS - remember that capatilized terms in the preamble - 'a more perfect Union'.

Please dear reader show me with specificity the document that established the meaning of this capitalized noun. Finding it capitalized, it cannot have a meaning common to everyday usage. But I digress.

How can anyone place trust in this system? Hemath will plague Israel until the going down of the sun.

1Ch_2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.

Amo_6:14 But, behold, I will raise up against you a nation, O house of Israel, saith the LORD the God of hosts; and they shall afflict you from the entering in of Hemath unto the river of the wilderness.

It's all the same, only the names have changed.....Tyre has become New York.

I have correctly found decryption of derivatives* formed from the Federal Reserve Act. It carries authority for people to reduce the national debt, and like shown bank employees are fired when it finally comes down to not establishing special accounts outside the Federal Reserve.

That often boils over to people thinking that I am in support of or even have studied carefully interesting things I come across.

My initial glance at Martin's cause is the County (notice the noun in specific) came against him on the presumption that he is chattel in a bankruptcy proceeding that stems from international treaties including SDR programs. And not seeing Title 12 USC §411 or §16 of the Fed Act in play, I gather he endorsed his consent for that to happen. Therefore the judge is making no sense of things. Why would Martin support the System with his signature bond and then renege?


* Dissolving a derivative requires integration. However the offset is lost and often will be expressed as "...+ C". An unknown constant lingers. This ambiguity seems to be expressed by the Mammon (Union) to be lacking specificity and the judge therefore pleads ignoramus. Please explain that again so I can understand?


In other words if Martin had only been redeeming lawful money from the start, then there would have been no residual or first lien on what he thought was his property.

P.S. I should add that the cause smacks of negative averment. That is to say that all I hear speaking is Martin. The LoR process enters the Presenter's testimony Refused for Cause into the record.

One might look into the history of SDR's:

http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images.../SeizeGold.jpg

As the US banks (Suitors and StSCer's) are redeeming lawful money Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa bonded together to for BRICS - with informally Indonesia joining afterward - BRICI?