Quote:
Originally Posted by loveunderlaw
Government in Miniature is not allowed to exist without judicial review and oversight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
What does that mean exactly ? I know without a contract they have no real power over you, but I'm not clear on the rest of what you meant.
Administrative government is "Government in Miniature" and for sake of expedition there are no checks and balances within it. Therefore it cannot exist without judicial review and oversight.
Where do you find the judicial oversight? Through constitution and law.
I have a great demonstration handy. A long-time suitor was arrested and charged with several felonies. He wanted my help so I kept sending him to the Courthouse and the County Clerk and Recorder and to the Secretary of State too. He was able to get the first Register of Action Certified Copy but they quickly stopped because he was filing everything into his Libel of Review (evidence repository) and so now he can get copies, just not Certified. From the Register of Action and the Affidavit of Probable Cause I pointed him to all the actors' oaths of office and by the constitutions where he should be able to find them, and also if he cannot to get Certificates of Fact that that actor HAS NOT filed an oath of office there.
It looked grim until we got all the oaths, including all the oaths of the Witnesses who cosigned the oaths. The County Sheriff who tackled the suitor had a proper oath, of correct form but signed by the County Judge. This County Judge also signed the subsequent Warrant for Arrest and the suitor was arrested a couple weeks afterward on that warrant. Well the County Court Judge has not signed an oath at all since 2006 and even so, has never filed an oath at all at the County Clerk and Recorder's office where it is supposed to be published and available according to the State Constitution. We found the 2006 oath of office published at the Secretary of State only. It is like the County Judge, also a small mountain town attorney never even read the State Constitution he swore to uphold.
All that to get to the point. We stopped process with an Abatement - Notice of Appeal; meaning the suitor was filing an interlocutory appeal before he was even arraigned! Felonies in that State are heard in District Court - which is significant to Forum. DISTRICT is the same as District of Columbia and is that global municipal jurisdiction; city of Washington, District of Columbia. So when he filed the Abatement in the District Court they would not take it, even though they were already hearing the felonies from County Court without charging a filing fee. So it was properly lodged and the clerk ignored the term Abatement on the Register of Action that the clerk would not Certify...
What I am really getting to is that the District Clerk gave Orders and Instructions with the Filing and so the suitor Refused the Presentments for Cause. He sensed honor with the District Judge so we included a Memorandum to explain how the matter of the Abatement was already adjudicated res judicata. The Jurists adjudicating it were all the judicial officers in the abatement who had their oaths of office in order and properly published! Everybody had genuine bona fide oaths of office except the one County Judge! They convicted him of pretending to be a County Court Judge while running a vacant office on bogus and absent oaths of office for so many years.
...to summarize.
Administrative government for all intents and purposes needs no constitutional provisions like oaths of office. Here (attached), the official intentionally avoids the oath process by swearing but without any authority to swear before except the bond of $5K posted by Traveler's Insurance Company. The entire Judicial District panicked and dissociated themselves from the IN GOD WE TRUST trust (bonding system through the Treasury/State Comptroller) simultaneously hours after I perfected a $20M lien based in properly filed and published oaths.
I have attached the oaths of the chief judge before and after the lien went into effect. Once the suitor - saving to suitors, in all cases the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it - instates remedy the judicial officers are without judicial and/or sovereign immunity because they are in violation of statute.
One votes their own incompetence however by endorsing private credit from the Fed. That is where the suitor consents to be considered in the Federal Reserve District. Do you see? Districts are extra-territorial and the dominion of the priestcraft - the cities and their suburbs (I Chronicles 6). Since the District has no territorial boundaries who is to say where the Fed Districts end and the 4th Judicial District begins?
Attachment 2172
This might be worth adding: New York State is probably a territory (or administrative district) of New York or of the people of the State of New York.
Hint: the gold / silver coin limitation is probably inapplicable in territories.
Unless the specific term is used by the New York legislature its moot. The Wikipedia 'street talk' language is 'baby talk' and errant --and likely not binding upon the State of New York. The ratification was necessary to validate the constitution which established the State of New York. If looking for precise and exact names of states, governments or titles of officers I would look to specific founding documents, law books, court cases rather than to Wikipedia. (Officially, to knowledge, there is an "Attorney General of the State of New York" and a "New York State Attorney General" but not a "New York Attorney General" regardless of what the newspapers say.)Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveunderlaw
Case in point. If you look at the Wikipedia article on the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles you might get the impression that Charles A Harnett was the first head of the the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles and that the the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles existed since 1924.
The truth is that Charles A. Harnett held the office of Commissioner of the "Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York" (1924-1960).
Attachment 2173
Attachment 2175
Attachment 2174
Quote:
Prior to the official opening of the DMV Albany Central Office on January 3, 1961, we were known as the Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1924-1960). (NYSDMV)
Between the lines, it is likely that the state's motor vehicle regulations went from state law to territorial or administrative law in 1961 (under Governor John Rockefeller). What a coincidence, silver coin stopped circulation in 1961. The New York State Department of Motor Vehicles did not exist prior to 1961--it is a new creation. The new agency assumed the functions of the former Bureau of Motor Vehicles was of the State of New York.Quote:
He said after speaking to his traffic unit who “eat and sleep cars,” they gave him a lesson on DMV history.
The state began registering vehicles in April 1901 and was the first to enact driver licensing in 1903, but wasn’t mandated until 1924. It also didn’t require annual registrations until 1910.
In 1911, license plates began being issued under a private contractor and in 1921 all functions of vehicle registration were transferred to the State Tax Commission.
Two year later in 1923, the state began manufacturing its own license plates at the state correctional facility in Auburn.
In 1961, all functions were taken over by the newly created DMV. (source)
P.S. the original flag for the State of New York featured a white background. In 1901 a change was made for a blue background.