Manifesting a conscience from the bosom of man a moral law/Nature law

The following is an attempt to extrapalate one of the thoughts form the following post:

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...full=1#post718

Focusing on the manifestation of one's mind, where does one give anything value? Does not where one determines a law to moral by choice?
The following take into consideration that all of man in their natural capacity are equal, what one does effects the other. This was taken from the Archives of a Coresource Solution post:
==========================================
Law is contract and contract is law. Some insight on how an authority of a nation is created in the minds of people:

Here is excerpt from International law, notice the intent here where it says " bosom of people", it also mentions after that the incompetence of the people of antiquity, depends on how you look at it, from a biblical prospective "knowing" is having a relationship with something, if you do not know then you have no relationship to it correct? Also in second paragraph it shows the formation of a citizen versus a peaceful inhabitant, could it mean that a peaceful inhabitant is just one of the people of antiquity, see Galatians 4 from the bible in the context of children versus a son and heir after reading this -

s International Law, p. 50.

7 Droit des gens (1896), i. 22. Compare Savigny: " A community of judicial conscience can be formed among nations like that which positive law creates in the bosom of one people. The foundations of that intellectual community are constituted partly by a community of race, partly and especially by a community of religious convictions. Such is the basis of the law of nations which exists principally among European Christian states, but which was not known to the peoples of antiquity. We are entitled to look upon this law as a positive law, although it is an incomplete judicial formation " (eine unvollendete Rechtsbildung), System des heutigen rOmischen Rechts (1840), i. § 11.

from the engagements of a treaty, nor modify the stipulations thereof, unless with the consent of the contracting powers by means of an amicable arrangement." Even in 1908, when Austria-Hungary proceeded to the annexation of BosniaHerzegovina without obtaining the prior assent of the high contracting powers, who under the treaty of Berlin of 2878 had granted her temporary occupation of the annexed provinces, the protests of the powers concerned were answered by Austria-Hungary declaring that she had done nothing contrary to the law of nations or affecting the sanctity of treaties, because the powers had given their tacit consent to the practical transformation of her temporary into a permanent occupation.

The public opinion of the civilized world, in fact, plays in an ever-increasing degree the part of a sanctioning authority. With the growth of international intercourse[commerce) and international interdependence the danger of isolation or of discredit or even of " boycotting " becomes a matter of increasing importance in the conduct of states. The national press and periodical literature, with exceptions no doubt, are among the chief factors in the development of this public opinion, but it is by no means dependent upon them. Personal intercourse among citizens of the same country, and between statesmen, politicians and citizens of different countries has a still greater effect in the creation of the mental attitude of nations towards each other. This exposes any departure from recognized usage or any disregard for international obligations to such reprobation throughout the whole world, that, far from taking advantage of the absence of any coercive method of enforcing obedience to the principles of international law, states compete with each other in asserting their strict fidelity to such principles. And now successive diplomatic conferences have codified many of the chief branches of international usage, thus diminishing the possible cases in which states can take advantage of the uncertainty of the law and, by quibbling over its interpretation, escape from its obligations.

[[Watch for sentence that has" Conscience ", what is it? Pay close attention to the enlightenment
about to come:]]

The part played by conscience in relation to general moral laws and particular cases will vary according to the view taken of the character of the general laws. If, on what is called the "jural" theory, these laws are regarded as deriving their authority from an external source, the operation of conscience is so far limited. It may be held to recognize the validity of divine laws, for example; or it may be confined to the deductive process of applying those laws to particular cases, known as "cases of conscience" (see Casuistry). If, on the other hand, the general laws are regarded as intuitive, then the discernment of them may be taken as the true function of conscience. In either theory, conscience may be understood as the active principle in the soul which, in face of two alternatives, tells a man that he ought to select the one which is in conformity with the moral law. Apart from the two functions of discerning between right and wrong, and actively predisposing the agent to moral action, conscience has further a retrospective action whereby remorse falls upon the man who recognizes that he has broken a moral law.

See Ethics; also Butler, Joseph; and compare the "moral sense" doctrine of Shaftesbury.

Source: http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Conscience

Where is a man's moral law? In the " bosom of the people", is that not where the
heart is? You will notice at the end of above it says "moral sense", doctrine of
Shaftsbury, lets check out a quote from Shaftsbury:

" love of life, resentment of injury, pleasure, or appetite towards nourishment and the means of generation; interest, or the desire of those conveniences by which we are well provided for or maintained; emulation, or love of praise and honor; indolence, or love of ease and rest. "
Source: http://www.iep.utm.edu/shaftes/
In referencing the new testament our law was to be written upon our hearts, this does not mean paper, could it not be determined that the bosom of people is where the heart is?

Adding to this the underlining above notating " the consent of the contracting powers by means of an amicable arrangement."

Amicable arrangement simply means; meeting of the minds. So from this could we conclude where there is meeting of the minds, there is love?

Is love not then the currency of the 21st century?
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=118

Which law (JUDICIAL CONSCIENCE) will you choose? A B C D OR G ?
============================================

I hope this post has brought you much enlightenment and give you a tool in which to free your mind of the limitation placed upon our life on this earth, we are dislocated from the abundance promised to us and to each other through grace.
I would suggest reading through this at least 3 times before responding, you might find something new each time.

Peace be upon you all.

Thank you all for the 5 stars, much appreciated in the face of being accused of not explaining myself well enough by certain people.