not 'seeing' the link between oaths of office and federal reserve notes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David Merrill
That is why I posed it as a question. I like for others to see it. Magistrates are municipal officers of the DISTRICT, non-territorial. - Extraterritorial. Listen to THOMAS:
Monetary reserves of the United States. A bill of such origin would obligate the user for getting the benefit of private credit. This is the 501(c)(3) "church" looking for a tax exemption so that they are less obligated.
BTW I got a thank you text. By presenting faulty oaths of office and the fact that the defense attorney wanted this suitor to sign a waiver of speedy trial AFTER the speedy trial clock expired the prosecutor backed off two felony charges and made a suitable offer. The suitor plead but the nightmare is over. Key to my point though, is that this lawful remedy would not be available inside the administration of debt. The suitor had to be outside the Districts to acquire the Law of the Land and get their attention.
greetings and many thanks for the input, David Merrill.
at this point I simply don't/can't see the link between the oaths of office of Idaho officials and the information you posted regarding federal reserve notes and the remedy needing to come from without the administration of debt.
it seems like you may be hinting at the need to 'register' and/or 'record' an instrument, much like the notice and demand for lawful money posited into a federal repository, which would serve to 'take one out of (any of the federal reserve) district(s)'.
I just can't link that with the topic of oaths of office.
what am I missing? tons, I trust, but specifically in this case...?
any further questions or links for clarification are greatly appreciated.
peace, love and life to all...