Thank you for explaining James. I usually just 'hit and run' when I find myself (from the past) posting here. It is usually a bit annoying to come across somebody defending the thinking I have left behind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
James NoMiddle
Is it pretty much certain that the clerk won't have a sworn oath, and if this is the case, how does that benefit me strategically?
Try getting a Certificate of Fact on that alleged officer. It states that the clerk could not find an oath of office.
Quote:
The lack of insurance was due to the lack of registration, and my not being able to find a way to have the former without the latter.
There is a interlinking circuit between all three papers - the driver license shows competence; the insurance company only covers competent operators and you have to show insurance to get titled. It seems to me that the insurance carrier is the most eager for your business so start there. Pay for the insurance - get a proof of insurance card and maybe the rest will fall in place.
Quote:
Would the officer not be able to make any positive identification simply because I've stated this, and if so, what is the advantage here?
Here you are relying on training. The officer is trained to be able to testify on the witness stand. He is tuned in to hear how you identify yourself roadside during the Stop. If he is honest he or she will repeat what you said on the stand at trial.
Quote:
Are Federal Reserve districts different than, say, the "Federal Zone" as a jurisdiction that one is [this may be misinformation I've picked up] assumed under if they have an address bearing a zipcode for example? There seems to be so much territorial overlay (the x,y,z coordinate analogy I've read on the board) and I'm still trying to figure out all the 'players.'
I think of any extraterritorial jurisdiction as a district. The Municipal League (METRO organization) through Public Administration Services seems to have unified everything that is not actual territory. I might be wrong about that but the mental model works so far. United Nations combinatoric math.
Quote:
I had figured that titling it in the State would have its issues, but I had hoped they would retain more rights overall than a full registration.
Private is private. Try it. The guy got up and met with the supervisor but it went over well for me. Just say it is private.
Quote:
A big question for me here is, just how do I find out what I do exactly subscribe to when I sign a car title or any other form that doesn't have its full disclosures right there in front of me? Do I need to backtrack who issues what, and request that information? Would they even be compelled to give me such info?
You assure yourself common law by redeeming lawful money. If you are in the districts then all you get is a gesture so as to appease.
Quote:
The paper trail has being weighing on my mind just as much as the court date, as it will still loom even as court passes.
Know who you are by how you relate to God, in whatever form you project. I once tried to form God for myself around what was popular. It seems I quit being a victim of others thinking they had a better formation of who and what God is.
Your true name will help. I just responded to a suitor asking if I could give him some kind of lesson about being a court of record.
Quote:
13-1-111. Courts of record
(1) Each of the following courts shall have a seal and shall be a court of record:
(a) The supreme court;
(b) The district courts;
(c) The county courts;
(d) The juvenile court in the city and county of Denver;
(e) The probate court in the city and county of Denver;
(f) Any court established by law and expressly denominated a court of record;
(g) Repealed.
(h) The court of appeals.
HISTORY: Source: L. 1887: p. 212, § 412.Code 08: § 447.Code 21: § 449.Code 35: § 449.CRS 53: § 37-1-12. C.R.S. 1963: § 37-1-12.L. 64: p. 224, § 57.L. 72: p. 590, § 53.L. 77: (1)(h) added, p. 279, § 24, effective June 29.L. 79: IP(1) amended, p. 596, § 2, effective July 1.L. 85: (1)(g) repealed, p. 572, § 12, effective November 14, 1986.
ANNOTATION
The acts of a court of record are known by its records. Judicial records are not only necessary but indispensable to the administration of justice. The court judgments can be evidenced only by its records. The acts of a court of record are known by its records alone and cannot be established by parol testimony. The court speaks only through its records, and the judge speaks only through the court. Herren v. People, 147 Colo. 442, 363 P.2d 1044 (1961).
Quote:
I will be sure to look over all of these points in order to strengthen my overall comprehension on the topics discussed throughout the forum.
Thank you. If you are comfortable in your identity; through your relationship with God then you can be responsible in the eyes of the law. This is why I suspect they will be so pleased not to have another Patriot to fight with in the courtroom they might drop everything.
Quote:
How many 'degrees of separation' does payment with FRNs extend? For example, when I titled the car it was "gifted," but at the same time I'm sure the original owner paid in FRNs.
Pay with US notes, in the form of FRN's. FRN's only discharge debt. They look the same unless you put your Stamp on the back. Did you call Tim and order up a stamp?
My point is that Joy, Peace and Love are all emotions - a state of mind.
Quote:
I've often wondering about the full details of the relationship between the State and the Amish communities, in regards to jurisdiction and law. Maybe when I get things all in order I could find peace in a simpler way of life; who knows?
Work your fingers to the bone! What do you get? - - - Bony fingers!
I fantasize about that too. Marry a simple girl who is a total knockout and doesn't even know it; just because she doesn't watch TV... Work hard all day at a job that requires only dedication, not a college education... sleep all night for about six hours anyway. Get up and do it again; except of course on the Sabbath.