Cleansing the Temple

Source: Wikipedia

Quote:

---

The narrative of Jesus and the Money Changers, commonly referred to as the Cleansing of the Temple, occurs in all four Canonical gospels of the New Testament.

In this episode Jesus and his disciples travel to Jerusalem for Passover, where he expels the money changers from the Temple, accusing them of turning the Temple to a den of thieves through their commercial activities. In the Gospel of John Jesus refers to the Temple as “my Father’s house” thus in some views making a claim to being the Son of God.

This is the only account of Jesus using physical force in any of the Gospels. The narrative occurs near the end of the Synoptic Gospels (at Mark 11:15–19, 11:27–33, Matthew 21:12–17, 21:23–27 and Luke 19:45–48, 20:1–8) and near the start in the Gospel of John (at John 2:13–16). Some scholars believe that these refer to two separate incidents, given that the Gospel of John includes more than one passover.

---

How many of us are actively working to cleanse our lives and our property (temples) of the moneychangers (bankers) and their profits (interest) and estates (liens)?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shikamaru

How many of us are actively working to cleanse our lives and our property (temples) of the moneychangers (bankers) and their profits (interest) and estates (liens)?

---

We are working on it here at the treefarm.

I like what Chapter 65 of the book Desire Of Ages says about the temple cleansing episodes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shikamaru

Source: Wikipedia



How many of us are actively working to cleanse our lives and our property (temples) of the moneychangers (bankers) and their profits (interest) and estates (liens)?

---

I believe anyone who makes the demand for lawful money in earnest, and forms the record around that demand, is essentially "expelling the moneychangers" from the "Temple". The Federal Reserve (Den of Thieves) has contracted with the United States (Jerusalem) in order to issue elastic currency to the masses of people (their bodies as the temple; "my Father's house"). By conventional signature endorsment, the people accept the repugnance and abomination of false balances though self-bonding their temples as chattel behind the elasticity.

The demand for lawful money is an expulsion of the "thieves" from our temples and a cleansing of it as well.

Paying off debt is akin to working towards emancipation.

A true debt incurred, whereby both parties are fully aware and in agreement of ALL the terms and conditions with complete disclosure in good faith, is possible to "pay off". Most, if not all debt, incurred in this day and age is fraudulent due to the non-disclosure of the true nature of banking and "lending" which creates the funds, supposedly "loaned", by and through the signature of the "debtor". That bookeeping entry of newly created credit via signture is added as an asset and a liability which cancels each other out for the bank. The bank (or any entity operating under the federal reserve system as a credit issuer) then enjoys double enrichment via "priniciple" payments plus interest. Another angle is the coupon created by the "lending" entity as a financial instrument and an obligation of the United States, which when sent in along with payment as requested, is another source of increase for the bank.

All one can do is discharge debt in that scenario NOT pay it off. The payoff comes when the United States makes good on the original promise to pay on their notes. The people who signature endorse the FED's private credit and currency volunteer their substance, labor and property as collateral behind the fractional reserve elastic increase of the United States' obligations. It is impossible to pay off that type of debt.

However, when one separates one's self from that system of chattelizing the souls and bodies of men by making the demand for lawful money, fraud by omission vitiates any pretended contracts and debt action in assumpsit under such intentional obfuscation and deception.

One should rid one's self from this bondage one way or another, I agree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph

I believe anyone who makes the demand for lawful money in earnest, and forms the record around that demand, is essentially "expelling the moneychangers" from the "Temple". The Federal Reserve (Den of Thieves) has contracted with the United States (Jerusalem) in order to issue elastic currency to the masses of people (their bodies as the temple; "my Father's house"). By conventional signature endorsment, the people accept the repugnance and abomination of false balances though self-bonding their temples as chattel behind the elasticity.

The demand for lawful money is an expulsion of the "thieves" from our temples and a cleansing of it as well.

---

Contracted. Contraction. A contraction of the supply of lawful money currency, gradually replaced over the last 100 years by elastic currency from the Fed.

From.

Quote:

---

2 It came to pass that even the kings themselves did honour the place, and magnify the temple with their best gifts;

3 Insomuch that Seleucus of Asia of his own revenues bare all the costs belonging to the service of the sacrifices.

---

Therein lies the rub. The Catholics, believe it or not that is a Hebrew term for the priests in charge of the Temple finances, the accountants contracted the shekel and half-shekel (drachma) coins. They were hoarding them and keeping them out of circulation by accepting donations from foreign kings. However, the Jewish pilgrims coming to Jerusalem for the holidays were required to pay in shekel and drachma coins.

I spotted this on my own, guided I believe by the Holy Spirit of God, but once you realize what it was that made Jesus so angry, it is easy to see that many other producers and writers have also figured this same conclusion. - And that this commercial affront to the status quo was likely the single biggest reason that the Jews of the Priesthood monetizing sin wanted Jesus dead.

Video Snippet.

Thank you Treefarmer;


I prize my hardcopy. It is more like a romance novel with our Savior though; kinda girly. It reminds me about the parallel with Jewish wedding tradition and how the Holy Spirit is oil for the bridesmaids; we being the Bride. The groom to be would ask approval of the woman's family and then ask her. If she was willing then the groom would go back home and start adding on or building their home on the family estate. He would not be ready to go get her, by surprise until his father (our Father) approved the work of building the house. So there might be some time while the betrothed woman had to be patient and stay ready at any moment for her man to come by surprise, like a thief in the night, to take her for the wedding.

So I suppose I can man up and be girly. I am enjoying cracking this book again! I think that's a morning glory on the front cover...

I recently took Financial Peace University from Dave RAMSEY and that lets me onto his forums.

http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/7083/postheaderm.jpg


http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/2...nredeeming.jpg