http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAAztWC5sT8
Printable View
Another video from separate source, rather cohesively supporting. (Thermite sparkles)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-wXcJA-et0
Bush's behavior explained by Webster Tarpley.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Vjqm_oFfU
Additional confirmation re "Angel is Next" from Karl Rove.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE0zXuKgvxY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=O1GCeuSr3Mk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDX...layer_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DegLp...layer_embedded
INTRODUCTION
0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues
PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE
0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary
PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS
0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes
PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES
1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?
PART 4 - THE PENTAGON
0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary
PART 5 - FLIGHT 93
0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field
0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93
PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS
0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E
PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS (continued)
0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete
0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers
PART 7 - BUILDING 7
1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall
EPILOGUE
1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word
Phi and pi are integral in the mathematics of life. Pe is the paleo-Hebrew letter shaped like a mouth.
Now listen to the etymology of mouth and math. Do you see how with so many people looking up and speaking their theories and hypothesis, that so many plausible theories and hypothesis conclude in believable deductions?
I however awoke that day feeling it would be wise to watch the news for signs of a Judgment.
That is the essence of collapsing standing waves. Triggering the harmonic.
That is what came to mind again as I pondered over the matter. Regardless of the many theories, the above videos appear to convey the essence of what happened and based on what was known as far back as 1996. The perplexing thing about it being a kind of judgment is: judgment of who or what? Was the Bush faction judging itself? Or was the Bush-Dulles faction finally unseated in 2001? Or was a people held hostage being judged for being held hostage? Ah or is the entire charade imploding?Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The judgment would be 30 Days following the Order to forgive all the debt. That was on 9/11 - Judgment.
That is presuming that I am the trigger. Or at least part of triggering the harmonic that was staged to occur prior to 9/12 like in the video. The same thing happened with the Montana Freeman Standoff - I do not feel I caused it, the timing strongly suggests that by naming the IMFIRS on the Comptroller Warrent that I triggered it.
Also, I envisioned violence on the Temple Mount for two weeks prior to 9/28/00 calculating Daniel's timeline numbers as The Abomination that Maketh Desolate. So I have confidence in my demonstrations that biases my opinion.
The judgment would be 30 Days following the Order to forgive all the debt. That was on 9/11 - Judgment.
That is presuming that I am the trigger. Or at least part of triggering the harmonic that was staged to occur prior to 9/12 like in the video. The same thing happened with the Montana Freeman Standoff - I do not feel I caused it, the timing strongly suggests that by naming the IMFIRS on the Comptroller Warrent that I triggered it.
Also, I envisioned violence on the Temple Mount for two weeks prior to 9/28/00 calculating Daniel's timeline numbers as The Abomination that Maketh Desolate. So I have confidence in my demonstrations that biases my opinion. Then there was Robert RUBIN resigning suddenly on the same day that I indicted him for temple desecration. Many more that I cannot evidence in a timeline.
P.S. It would seem that a multitude of people read a personal story into 9/11 other than me. I was recording and publishing time stamps...
For you engineers, scientists and architects, I highly recommend Dr. Judy Wood's book Where Did The Towers Go?
I greatly enjoyed her book, which is of college text book quality, where she has collected some fascinating evidence and analysis related to 9/11. It's the most sensible investigation of what happened to the buildings and people in NYC on 9/11 that I've seen so far, and I've looked at many theories, investigations and opinions that have been offered to date.
She has some videos too, most of which I haven't had time to watch yet.
For you engineers, scientists and architects, some fascinating evidence and analysis related to 9/11. It's the most sensible investigation of what happened to the buildings and people in NYC.
Police and firemen examine a burned out office on the 79th floor of the Empire State Building, after a B-25 Mitchell bomber crashed into the north side of the building, July 28, 1945. The main part of the wreckage fell into the street, while leaking petrol set the upper stories of the building on fire. All three crew members and 11 office workers were killed. ( Keystone/Gamma/ Getty Images)
Attachment 1381
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzCygjiLMfw&feature=player_embedded
The North American B-25 Mitchell, a twin-engine bomber that became standard equipment for the Allied Air Forces in World War II, was perhaps the most versatile aircraft of the war. It became the most heavily armed airplane in the world, was used for high- and low-level bombing, strafing, photoreconnaissance, submarine patrol and even as a fighter, and was distinguished as the aircraft that completed the historic raid over Tokyo in 1942.
It required 8,500 original drawings and 195,000 engineering man-hours to produce the first one, but nearly 10,000 were produced from late 1939, when the contract was awarded to North American Aviation, through 1945.
Basically, it was a twin-tail, mid-wing land monoplane powered by two 1,700-hp Wright Cyclone engines.
Normal bomb capacity was 5,000 pounds. Some versions carried 75 mm cannon, machine guns and added firepower of 13 .50-caliber guns in the conventional bombardier's compartment. One version carried eight .50-caliber guns in the nose in an arrangement that provided 14 forward-firing guns. http://www.boeing.com/boeing/history/bna/b25.page
Attachment 1382
The Empire Sate Building
Attachment 1386
An underlying connection between the BOE and 9/11 WTC destruction seems quite plausible. I have pondered if it was a judgement against the United States of America or against some subfaction or simply something more abstract.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill