A birth certificate is USEd as a form of evidence.
A record is created on one's behalf.
Would the NAME in fact be the name of the trust?
If it is a trust, would the beneficiary be the general public?
Printable View
A birth certificate is USEd as a form of evidence.
A record is created on one's behalf.
Would the NAME in fact be the name of the trust?
If it is a trust, would the beneficiary be the general public?
As I understand it, the birth certificate is a form of evidence of an event. What event? The creation of a new trust vessel by the STATE in which the event occurred. How did the event occur? The natural mother and father of the new born baby identified themselves as fiduciaries and volunteer trustees by providing the NAME of the trust vessel formed around their own nativity. Then, the information provided (Given Name + Family Nomen) was taken by the hospital and turned into the STATE so as to from and create yet another and distinct trust vessel around the new born baby: First Middle LAST. The hope is that when this baby becomes of age to produce sweat equity, that he/she will take on the same role as mommy and daddy and offer him/herself as the fiduciary for the First Middle LAST STATE creation in order for the STATE to harness and harvest that energy and sweat equity unto itself. I say "hope" in jest because there is little hope involved when there is total control of information, education and societal conditioning. It is virtually a "slam dunk" success 95-98% of the time - I wonder why???Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru
The trust NAME is created and a volunteer to take on the burdens of that vessel is conditioned into that role. The STATE would otherwise be the trustee with the burden, obligation and liability of that trust vessel. We have the choice to volunteer into that role/office or to decline that character even though we may be a mere user of it at arms length. We have the right of use since it was created around our nativity, however, we cannot be forced into the STATE's obligation and liability without our consent or silent acquiescence.
The beneficiary question, I imagine, will bring many answers and opinions.
If one believes that the United States of America is a private TRUST by and for only the 55 signors of the Constitution and their direct descendants, then the "Posterity" of those signors are the beneficiaries of anything created from within that Trust structure.
If one believes that the United States of America is the servant and governing force for all people on this land, then the people at large are the beneficiaries of that Trust structure.
I have not yet determined the actual nature and original intent of the Trust structure known as The United States of America.
Absolutely. The property (name) is pledged and held in trust. The beneficiary is the corporate STATE.
http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ledge-Document
I believe we must keep our focus on the Oaths of Office. Article VI of the federal constitution is where the trusts begin. And they end there too. An official must subscribe an oath of office, or an affirmation to be in a position of trust.
I Second .Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Oh snap! I forgot the name being property. So, the name is the asset.Quote:
Originally Posted by EZrhythm
Thanks, EZ :D.
Heh.... office of trust vs. office of profit :DQuote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
This offer for example is that you trust in a $5K bond captured by Traveler's Insurance.
Dan MAY, the vacant District Attorney.
Dan MAY's Oath of Office. Note how he swears but by no authority; other than an insurance policy.
Whereas his principal, John William the Attorney General's oath looks like a genuine financial instrument.
Looking closely Daniel has not given power of attorney - it is unsigned. He has not given Traveler's Insurance power of attorney to execute the policy action on DANIEL H MAY.
My favorite question for any "Executive" Agent . Will I ever get an answer from one of them ?Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru
More to the point herein this thread though;
Birth Certificate front.
Birth Certificate backside.
That is the suggested identity, reserved for the Trust society has granted (me the right to).
Construction of the Trust.
See the date at the bottom? Makes you wonder what I did at the age of twelve? I set up the Trust with the Social Security Administration. - That is when I had my first real job.
Recission of Novations.
I went to the SSA and learned that I do not have a SSN (personal TIN) unless I write it down or say it, identifying myself in trust with the Social Security Administration. So I decided to form the quorum for the first true name, David Merrill, my parents and express that truth. My Mom and Dad named me David Merrill when they welcomed me into the Van Pelt family.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. I have no Social Security Number.
P.P.S. I have in fact no Birth Certificate.
No. Their goose is cooked either way they answer :).Quote:
Originally Posted by Trust Guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trust Guy
Use the question to compel judicial performance - Click Here.
Sorry Anthony Joseph;
I imagine your leg is healed up enough for a good laugh!
[QUOTE=David Merrill;3755]Use the question to compel judicial performance - Click Here.
Interesting .
Interesting:
If your "Certificate of Live Birth" was recorded into the county by the Clerk of the Court it is a Court of Record document and it is also the document for all of your property and Rights to be attached to you.
You take your grounds of dominion "Certificate of Live Birth" Court of Record document and Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals to restore your rights and property to you and renounce Satan The SSN system of monetary exchange.
If your "Certificate of Live Birth" was not processed through the Court of Record, you may now have to have it processed through your State District Court Judge to make it a Court of Record Document. That gives it the Highest Authority for your Rights and Property. Insinuated by Patrick.
Yes, this is slick move, have done it a few times myself. It is called a simple trust, another way to do it is create an agreement for performance, don't forget to put the serial # of a U.S. Postal Money order in it, send it with the U.S. Postal Money order, when it is accepted and then send you receipt or you can have a tracer done on it to prove it was cashed they now have agreed to the performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Compelling judicial performance implies the person on the bench is a judicial officer.Quote:
Originally Posted by motla68
There ware ways and means in which to test if an officer is lawful and not simply operating under color of law ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chex
Quote:
Originally Posted by motla68
This collection might produce a coherent stream of thought Shikamaru;Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru
DANIEL is not judicial because DANIEL is a Taxpayer. That is significant past the financial endorsement of Wiley Young.
I filed my first Libel of Review before DANIEL on December 17th, 1995 - 16 years before the next 31-Day Government Shutdown.
My imagination has me studying the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah for the timeframe of the completion of the Babylonian Jew conquest of Israel by DARIUS? That is always interesting, watching the initial, ongoing and ultimate fulfilment of prophecy - especially the ongoing...
Fate falls away to destiny!
I urge you to take a moment to get my point, because you have to examine the context of what Walker Fowler is saying to tie this post to my last;