Note that the amount is in the negative - (credit/arrears).
Click Here.
Printable View
Note that the amount is in the negative - (credit/arrears).
Click Here.
Listen to the end. When I contacted the proper office Page 3 above, the fellow paused and then became upset with me like something on the screen alarmed him.
heh. Not very helpful were they. OK, who can translate for the layman? The UCC3 appears to be adding a Debtor, Comptroller of Maryland, with BofA (Bank of America) as trustee. What's with the named trust E PLURIBUS UNUM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? As I see it, the 4 named debtors owe America $14.3 trillion. Which is a nice amount . . . . . for starters. :cool:
Yep. Looks like someone owes America $14.3T. Perhaps the U.S. Social Security Administration is somehow tied to the Comptroller of the State of Maryland.
Attachment 663
80 Calvert Street...
http://www.dgs.maryland.gov/Faciliti...alvert_St.html
Attachment 664
Yeah this sure is a tangled web to weave for understanding, let me make some observations here;
All property is owned by the state, this is why the Comptroller of Maryland is named, but the business who is licensed with the state to do business is the entity holding residence/tenancy at that location. We know banks are part of the FRS so that is why they are named in debtor side.
The secured party having a lien interest is the U.S. Department of Treasury/IRS, so technically speaking here all that is happening is the IRS put a agricultural lien on Bank of America and all of it's assets, security withholding e.t.c. So nothing new here about IRS foreclosing on a tenant with a security interests elsewhere.
Another thing I wanted to point out here is the Military Occupation noted, their address is listed both in debtor side and secured party side;
1400 DEFENSE PENTAGON, WASHINGTON, DC 20301 - 1400
I did a corporate search on Manta.com and I could not find any NORTH AMERICAN POWER AND WATER ALLIANCE, however wikipedia did turn up some information on them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...Power_Alliance
I do not know about any of you, but it seems like the military wants that location awfully bad, big project plans possibly.
motla68
Thanks for that additional information/observation.
So far I seem to be the only one observing that the number is in brackets with a minus sign following. This is saying that the taxpayer owes the Treasury $14.3T and has quit paying up. I will go into it further tomorrow because that jumped right out at me for the timing. This will take some tricky composition to explain in a post or two so I will throw some items at you now, and catch up tomorrow after some more investigation. For those who do not know me, I believe in the metaphysics of law - that when the record is properly formed things happen beyond the power and authority of men, even properly seated and sworn-in justices.
The date of the Amendment is August 12, the Eve of August 13, 2011 ten years after the BoE [proof of service] for all the debt in the world and exactly 30 days prior Judgment Day - September 11th, 2001. Last month, in hindsight that lien against the taxpayers was exactly what I was expecting to see. August 2nd was the day that Congress raised the Debt Ceiling and avoided Default so that should not have deteriorated the good faith and credit of America. Yet America took a hit anyway - same day, August 2nd. - Right in Robert E. BLACKBURN's face (exclusive original cognizance of the US).
I knew something would be happening ten days later on August 12th/13th.
Picture yourself a taxpayer. There is now a lien against you. That means that the Treasury gave up on the Income Tax for American sustainabilty of debt maintenance. That is a pretty significant statement and I reserve the right to revise that as more information comes in. Before lunch/chess I found out some things, and discovered how difficult researching the Notice of Lien might become.
The first obstacle is that in Maryland, the Division of the Secretary of State does not exist as such. UCC filings are in a different Division as you read on the August 12th NoL. Maryland has its own Department of Assessments and taxation. My first call I was rudely in denial that the SoS could not access the NoL for me. They gave me a number for MDAT though, and listen carefully to the end of the audio to the guy there, Omar because I believe he pulled up the screen and was upset or alarmed. I deleted the pause so you may not really get it. Maybe I should have left the pause because he pulls it up and spent 30 seconds reading I believe. I got Steve at the SoS after that, still in denial and I put Omar's call after that; it should make sense as you listen; Click Here.
A little later I found the exact number for UCC Filings with MDAT and got a similar reaction from the woman, who I had to practically threaten to fire to get a verification that the NoL even existed there! Click Here. Listen carefully. I never get a chance to inquire about, the old one. [3:25 Minute Mark.] It was on my mind when she offered that I could speak to her supervisor so I jumped on that offer, you can imagine why, only for her supervisor never to pick up.
Here is the earlier rendition of the Lien - the August 12th rendition is an Amendment to it - reversing the charge upon the taxpayer as I see it. Of course the IRS being funded by the labor force of America - those subject to conditioning - SDR Certificate supporters who endorse private credit. The IRS is forming a lien against itself in the Amendment but I of course get to revise that interpretation as I learn. The way I see it though, people redeeming lawful money instead of endorsing private credit have undermined the sustainability of the debt currency system to the point where the Treasury liened itself for the national debt as of July 27th - $14.3T. [Can somebody find a link so we can find the national debt on any given day?]
There is some kind of globalization "green" theme there that is a bit perplexing as I write. Look at the end. Thank you for looking into that for us Motla68.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Thank you brain trust! Add this.
Click Here.
"7f. JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION" is "The United States of America", not "United States of America" or "United States". Very interesting.
The first item threw up a ?. The trailling - was noticed. However, the amount being in brackets in some views makes it a negative number..and therefore an imaginary number thus in brackets (i.e. it doesn't exist(on the page or otherwise)). Lack of dollar sign smells of "international accounting units". But the 2nd...that has : DAVID-WYNN:-MILLER 'quantum language' written all over it--red flag.
Also: http://www.myspace.com/559379549 (Brazillian?)
"E pluribus unum" is a term that points to the origins of corporations...
Its entirely possible that someone other than the apparent secured party filed those papers. "14.3T" is the current U.S. "debt limit". Keep in mind that if the FRS winds up, it goes to the U.S. Treasury. Also, Bank of America is the 'bank of choice' for the Pan America Union (been around for a long long time--since around 1889) aka/ala Organization of American States. I'm just not seeing that an attorney would put "UNITED STATES DEPARTEMENT OF THE TREASURY 1789" especially when UCC filings with defective names are know to be super fatal to claims. Perhaps it might not matter so much with respect to a secured party. However, if someone wanted to be clever and create something similar enough to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY..they could add a few digits after that. 1789 and the DAVID WYNN MILLER linguistics....hmmmmm.Quote:
THE honor of originally inventing these political constitutions entirely belongs to the Romans. They were introduced, as Plutarch says, by Numa; who finding, upon his accession, the city torn to pieces by the two rival factions of Sabines, and Romans, thought it a prudent and politic measure, to subdivide these two into many smaller ones, by instituting separate societies of every manual trade and profession. They were afterwards much considered by the civil law,1 in which they were called universitates [universities], as forming one whole out of many individuals; or collegia [colleges], from being gathered together: they were adopted also by the canon law, for the maintenance of ecclesiastical discipline; and from them our spiritual corporations are derived. But our laws have considerably refined and improved upon the invention, according to the usual genius of the English nation: particularly with regard to sole corporations, consisting of one person only, of which the Roman lawyers had no notion; their maxim being that "tres faciunt collegium ."2 ["Three make a college."] Though they held, that if a corporation, originally consisting of three persons, be reduced to one, "si universitas ad unum redit " ["if the university be reduced to one"], it may still subsist as a corporation, "et stet nomen universitatis "3 ["and retain the name university"].
Keep in mind that the largest creditor to the United States just maybe holds its primary offices at Baltimore, Maryland. And on that topic, even if one does R4LM, the SSA still gets their cut (which isn't necessary a bad thing)--> alluding to the the strength and solvency of the SSA.
Many years ago I was trying to figure out David Wynn's technology and it seemed only to give me an intellectual headache. I believed the rumor that David is an extremely dyslexic individual and have dismissed him for the last fifteen years. But from what I know, the little that I know I believe you. I think the easiest way to apply my point in the opening Post:
One has to simply read the opening lines of the 9/11/01 Waiver of Tort:Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/992/beijing2.jpg
It calls in all the debt. Debt is a negative expression of energy - wealth/energy.
Answer: The heir apparent. Delivery Confirmation. Complaint against Deutsche Bank. (three links) Notice how I mentioned the original Charter for Freedoms and Exemptions Granted to Patroons on the Bill of Exchange.Quote:
Energy
Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is the study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science, theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems: mathematics. Therefore, mathematics is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.
All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?
On the Bill of Exchange if you study it you will find the somewhat perplexing Zionism Cancellation Algorithm and if you listen to the News you find Zionism indeed being cancelled. By reading the Bible interpretation at the Mason Museum and Library we find that Zionism was never intended to be.
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/page1.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/page2.jpg
Who is the Author of the Movement? Rabbi HERTZL.
That is but one major outward expression of the same metaphysic.
We find sixteen years after the 31-Government Shutdown (come Christmas "Vacation") we will have an amplified version of "All Non-Essential Personnel" staying home for a month unpaid.
I am making it all complicated again just because I tend to show the evidence and timelines.
My point is that the brackets, indicating a negative amount reverse the lien. Negative money is debt. The Treasury/IRS is accomodating my Bill of Exchange, on the Eve of August 13th, ten years after. Another way to look at the negative amount on the $14.3T lien is that the obligation is against the Secured Party - meaning the IRS, synonimous with the taxpayers still conditioned to endorse private credit. Paul invented the Roman Welfare State and his Letter - Romans 13 still enforces it.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Another constructive trust is A-China-Ca.
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1E...iMDFh&hl=en_US
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1E...xNGYw&hl=en_US
Now I see what you are saying Allodial. Ergo I was after who is behind the Customer Number.Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
Thanks for your assessment; especially that clue about David Wynn MILLER. This is fascinating to me that his technology might be interwoven into the metaphysics. When I dismissed him years ago I did recognize an inherent power in his linguistics to be that dyslexia had him interpreting sentences from right to left (Hebrew) as easily as left to right as written in English pleadings etc.
The main clue for me on that is:
IN GOD WE TRUST - on the coins and bills
SO HELP ME GOD - standard on all federal judge oaths of office
WITH TRUST IN GOD - on the Collateral page.
It looked to me like the IRS/Treasury filed the lien. Since the filing party wanted acknowledgment sent to them.
Interesting offer of connection there as it nearly matches theQuote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
current debt: http://www.usdebtclock.org/
I am trying to break this down in my head when you said they liened themselves on the backs of taxpayers .
Defintions:
Secured Party; Pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, "Secured party" means a person in whose favor a security interest is created or provided for under a security agreement, whether or not any obligation to be secured is outstanding. Moreover, the term includes a person that holds an agricultural lien.
Debtor is a person who owes an obligation to pay a sum of money to another. According to bankruptcy laws, the person whom a bankruptcy case concerns is a debtor. Section 9-102 of the Uniform Consumer Code defines a debtor as;
(B) a seller of accounts, chattel paper, payment intangibles, or promissory notes.
In reference to these, it seems the Treasury (SP) has liened up against the Banks (debtor). Could it be the Republic which is the Estate has a Lien against the Democracy a cartel of banks? and wouldn't you think this had anything to do with the not too long ago Audit on the Federal Reserve ?
Another note to make here is that some time ago Bank of America was chosen to do a majority of the ACH transactions for the Treasury. I think that this is all a sign the system is about to collapse itself so that a new monetary system can be put in place, it is either that or we are returning to a Lawful Money system since so many people are making demands for it now. Hold on to your hats you all for a wild ride.
http://www.inquisitr.com/86180/gold-...-machines-usa/
http://youtu.be/6gAhwR9qKXQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
Thank you for dispelling that particular illusion Allodial!
Listen to this.
The Secretary of State and Maryland Division of Assessments and Taxation does not verify who sent the Notice of Lien. The illusion is that the paper is filed by the party requesting confirmation. The presumption made assigning the Customer # is that the Customer is the Debtor.
Very edifying...
AFAIK, if the US went bust, the SSA and the States would have a priority lien on EVERYTHING as the primary creditor to the United States. Consider that the UN is headquartered in NY and that mail to the UN is considered to be domestic mail. Consider that Washington, D.C. is the *capital* for the Pan American Union which was established in 1889! The NAU? The Amero? THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ARE 122+ YEARS BEHIND THE TIMES! The SSA reports to the Comptroller General and Chief Financial Officer of the United States rather than to the Secretary of the Treasury of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The Comptroller of the United States is over the GAO. They keep lying about Social Security being defunct so they can hypnotize mislead masses into passing laws so that they can have dibs on the hidden private assets. The US Department of the Treasury HAS NO RIGHT TO ACCESS THE SSA ACCOUNTS without an I-9, W4 or 1040 being filled out. The IRS tax account is separate from the account in Baltimore, MD. Perhaps the FRS is merely a CUSTODIAN/TRUSTEE (but owner) for all of private securities being held as debts back to birth certificate and social security card holders? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The public side tax collection done by the SSA is via FICA and the like. However, public is not private and private often goes unmentioned--"off book".
While there might be sparse, sparse merit to the David Wynn MILLER-isms, IMHO he goes a bit too too far. Controlling tense and being precise and clear is important. "Bob shall mow grass tomorrow for John" is a suggestion..'shall' can mean 'should'. I've often seen boilerplate 'contracts' that are full of off-tense phrases, suggestions and overall formed so that they hardly form a contract--leaving it open for litigation and interpretation--more money for the attorneys. I tried to watch a long seminar he put on, but something just wouldn't allow me to...something about his spiel just was unsettling...'red flags' in the spirit realm. The main thing he is correct about is being clear, precise and concise in writing legal documents rather than being sloppy (he mentions that in about 10 seconds of speaking...anyone smart would go take a legal drafting course or something). I was hoping to catch a few nuggets here and there. But I noticed a common style between him and Jean KEATING this incessant bragging almost like they were both were running exactly the same software... or... something. (Also David Wynn MILLER doesn't seem to know the difference between an adverb, an adjective and a gerund).Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I am still excited about the Find and the Timing.
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/4...nstrategy1.jpghttp://img204.imageshack.us/img204/4...nstrategy1.jpg
It is not so important to me who authored it and what the recipients of the Acknowledgment think of it. - Not any more than what they think of my BoE and its Timing. If it was more important then I would pay for the Search the woman at Maryland's SDAT suggested this morning - especially into these reference numbers:
I might do that though. I may take a more careful look at it. I am convinced by the reactions yesterday though, that this Notice of Lien is valid. Something tells me that paying that lady for information would be simply infuriating and very unsatisfying!
The timing is quite interesting.
Perhaps this clarifies the conversation that you had.
The above quote actually refines to:Quote:
"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349
Likely the word 'man' means vassal in that context. :) They are likely presuming the filing to constitute public notice. Recently have revised the UCC system in places to allow for a DEBTOR to strike the record (ala UCC5 (Maryland)). Perhaps compare UCC3 (Amendment/Assignment/Continuation/Termination to Financing Statement) to UCC5 (Correction Statement). Interesting that UCC3 wouldn't be enough.Quote:
"The ability to place a lien upon a man's property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." 37 Wis. 2d, at 171, 154 N. W. 2d, at 264.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
We are on the same page you and I. I will add some details for the Readers' sake.
It might be a bit reckless to dismiss the form arises from the David Wynn MILLER camp because of the timing. I accept the Lien on the [IRS] to be a valid claim even with the funny 1789 Treasury jargon mostly for the term revenue hyphenated re-venue. The claim stands upon the waters of the world (admiralty/NAWAPA) while the human population is naturally land-locked and air-breathing.
[BTW - The United Nations campus in America (Manhattan) was declared International Soil by a very rich man named David ROCKEFELLER. The political clout to give 18 acres of America away to the world is mammon. Ergo the 14:00 and 20:00 Minute Marks are noteworthy. Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire (Crown) presents it like his NLP has had a stroke but the point is well researched I am sure. So not to lose you all, this will tie easily to an informal Masonic annointing to VAN PELT soon. Genome has stricter boundaries than ignorance [last signature].]
In other words Teunis Jansen Laenan VAN PELT had/has an estate on Manhattan Island where he built a large stone wall - Wall Street. Peaceable Reentry is primarily upon the Market. The Market was shut down for three days. Since this Notice of Claim arrived Monday before 1:00 pm EST and is still not on the docket report with PACER, I gather that www.savingtosuitorsclub.net and cyberspace in general will suffice. The original BoE doc was the one Tad sent to the NYSE. Ignoring a Notice while I have Delivery Confirmation is proof of service.
Allodial and I are on the Same Page in that Paul invented the Roman Welfare State and under a correct reading - out of his obstinance and cowardly nature. Reading the Book of Acts under an American pastor's guidance you will completely miss how the Holy Spirit kept warning Paul to stay out of Jerusalem (with his new Roman citizenship papers). Paul bravely went in anyway, having held jackets while people stoned Jesus' disciples basically, I deserve to die God, so I will be ignoring your warnings! I cannot say I blame him for having an instinct to survive but what happened next happened. Paul ran to Felix, the Roman marshal who jailed him in protective custody for two years and then remanded him to Rome for three more. To start connecting this flurry of dots though; try figuring why this poem is found on Page 8 of this 1928 Century Magazine Article.
Then of course you could always read the Book of Acts followed by the Book of Romans. Paul was convicted by the Sanhedrin of high treason against the Jews - and he lied about buying expensive citizenship papers in Cyprus. But more importantly, one Mnason (thinly encrypted) a Cypriot Jew lied about it so Paul bought probation (shaved head) long enough to make his escape from Jerusalem to go invent the Roman Welfare State - long since protected by his Romans 13 Doctrine.
My recent claim is upon the original 1639 Charter. Since my ancestry has preserved my perpetual inheritance unencumbered by the trappings of British fealty, I doubt there is much room for interpretation for the term perpetual.
The Masonic encryption is found in this Post by listening to Crown Testimony of Dr Dale, ESQUIRE above with this NY anointing, c. 1789 in mind.Quote:
However, author Harold D. Eberlein states: "there never was a duly and legally constituted Van Pelt Manor and this appellation has no defense whatever on any historic grounds.
This is how I see it anyway. You may interpret it differently.Quote:
Washington rode over the old highway in 1790, and was greeted in New Utrecht by the village people. There was great excitement when word came that the general was shortly to arrive. From the little school-house near VAN PELT Manor the school-chi1dren were hustled home for fresh linen and face-washings and hair-combings; and they were as quickly marched back, dressed in new clothes and company manners, for the great George Washington would pass their way. At last, after many anxious scannings of the road, they saw him riding toward the little school-house, and the children lined up and waited until he approached. Litte Peter VAN PELT was on the end of the line, and he was the last boy to whom George Washington spoke; and to little Peter he looked very tall, as he came near to him and laid his hand on Peter's head.
"Be a good boy, my son," said Washington, "and you will be a good man."
Little Peter VAN PELT probably remembered this admonition
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. The scope of the above post renders it moot in my opinion whether you want to cite the uncopyrighted Gutenberg Bible in the Library of Congress @ incun.1454.b5 (see link) or resort to Letters Patent of the Crown - Epistle Dedicatory 1, Epistle Dedicatory 2.
the term PERPETUAL is interesting indeed.
Article I. The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America."
look on any one-dollar note - there is that Stile - save, it is now CAPITALIZED - in Trust, perhaps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Two different subjects?
The first is from the 1629 Charter.
The second if I may presume is from Dr Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire's interpretation of the Journals of the Continental Congress. If he is correct, and I believe a doctor in the law may well be, then you may be correctly interpreting that the nation was never formed by quorum a proper body politic but is rather a trust formed by New Utrecht - named New York after the British Indies Trading Company came into presences in the 1680's?
So my seemingly-"out there"-allusion for all these years (or decades) of "UN" being 'oddly enough' an acronym for "United Netherlands" might have some merit? ;) That State of New York failed to ratify a few key is perhaps quite telling.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bpQPPbayS-...00/NY+Flag.png
City of New York.
http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbn...66b235dae3e6c6
Missouri.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._la_France.png
France.
Attachment 668
Seems Wikipedia is seeing the light.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1ysODn_1Nr...commerical.JPG
http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbn...3b8623ac07fa6c
http://www.prattmuseum.com/archive/i...FortOrange.jpg
Orange.
Attachment 669Quote:
James, Duke of York:
He was the king of England, Ireland, and Scotland, and the son of Charles I. He escaped to the Continent in 1648 and returned to England at the Restoration in 1660. He became king on the death of his brother, Charles II, in 1685, but had a decreasing reputation due to his conversion to Catholicism. William of Orange and his wife, Mary, James's daughter, were invited to England by Whig and Tory leaders in 1688, and James was allowed to escape to France. He changed the Netherlands to New York and changed the name of the capital from Fort Orange to Albany.
This filing seems to be the original that was then amended; http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2...icaearlier.pdf
*Edit - I had attached the wrong file.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZrhythm
Amazing post Allodial!
You mean a more recent amendment since August 12th? I don't find an attachment. I think that's it. I am not finding Carmen's name on the links so far.
the filing gets a mention by George Ure this week:
A Troubling - or Inspired - UCC Filing
How is it that a traffic case and some ones notice to run for congress apply to this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
Other then that, just like any other corporation they will change their images to entice you into buying their crap!
"" • If an agent signs on behalf of his or her principal without the authority to do so, the principal will not be liable on the instrument, whereas the agent will be. ""
- simple contract law, whomever reserves the right to revoke in a action obviously is the one with liability. BUT have we absconded that liability by our own actions thus become subject to liability?
First big clue here on that sigil on the wall: " The Inc. Village ".
Thank you Stonefree,
Somebody emailed me that link and you beat me to posting it.
Thank you Allodial,
I get it. United Netherlands. Way back when; Tuesday Law Club Meetings Bruce lectured about how it is all Dutch East Indies Trading Company in proprietorship. I have seen bits and snippets that fit nicely into the puzzle. Having the Journals handy I suppose I should get down to the federal repository and verify that lecture from LIVINGSTON.
Acknowledgements for File Number: 0000000181425776 (History) Update
Thank you Chex!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chex
I am refreshing my take with your update. I dismissed this all as a bit pie in the sky but am taking another look...
The third party authorizing the latest amendment is circuit court clerk Loretta E Knight; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv..._E_Knight.html
This latest amendment looks like they are claiming the FOREVER stamp as collateral.
Looks to me like someone is getting ready to call in all FRN's and certain stamps.
I saw that big FOREVER (x20) stamp on the Collateral Area of the Amendment.Quote:
Originally Posted by EZrhythm
Please elaborate on your theory!
I'm thinking that stamps with a cent sign are considered lawful money and that "FOREVER" stamps are not lawful money but private credit of the FRS.
Also interesting is that OCCUPY WALLSTREET is trademarked on one of those statements and "44th President of the United States, Barack H. Obama" and "Impeachment" are also on one of the statements.
Notice the FOREVER stamps endorsed across.
The ORDER is from the Circuit Court for [NOT "OF"] MONTGOMERY COUNTY!
http://sdatcert3.resiusa.org/ucc-cha...6&Name=FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM&source=1
I grew bored before I got to that one!
Click Here.
After a bit I start feeling like whoever is doing this is intentionally targeting me to waste my time.