This is an attachment to every Libel of Review:
Click Here.
That is interesting in itself considering territorial claim and survey; with both my family trees (Mom and Dad) being of Patroons. When heritage and destiny are in accord there is peace. I am finding it more revelation the role of the Masons being custodians of the Record. Synchronicity is the conscious memory that everything is happening at once, time being an illusion.Quote:
HB 638 - AS INTRODUCED
2013 SESSION
13-0796
09/01
HOUSE BILL 638
AN ACT recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United
States Constitution.
SPONSORS: Rep. Tremblay, Rock 4; Rep. Baldasaro, Rock 5; Rep.
Christiansen, Hills 37
COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
ANALYSIS
This bill recognizes the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
1 Preamble and Statement of Intent. The general court hereby finds that:
I. In 1810, a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibited titles of nobility and which later became known as the original Thirteenth Amendment, was introduced, passed both houses of Congress, and was sent to the states for ratification. On December 9, 1812, shortly after ratification by Virginia, New Hampshire became the
thirteenth state to ratify the amendment. The amendment was therefore ratified by the requisite number of states and became Article XIII of the United States Constitution.
II. During the War Between the States, otherwise known as the Civil War, the country was under martial law, and all executive orders made by President Lincoln were, in effect, law. After the war, laws made during that period were to be abated; yet, vestiges of martial law remained and presidents continued to write executive orders.
III. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, otherwise known as the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district's municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.
IV. Today, what appears to the public as the United States Constitution is not the complete document, as it was never lawfully amended to remove the Thirteenth Amendment. Instead, the document presented as the United States Constitution is merely a mission statement for the corporation unlawfully established in the Act of 1871.
GO TO THE LINK TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL:
[link to legiscan.com]
This author, not being a suitor emailed me information without realizing how much of it is already integrated into the Libel of Review - Crosstalk:
Quote:
David,
Good day on you!
So, I recently read Luis Ewing’s flyers(attached) concerning Old Union/ New Union and Luis Ewing on State and Constitution. Don’t care much for his writing style, but once you get by his Did ya know ego statements there is some pretty good material in his work.
Now, the summary, as I get it, is:
1854 the Judicial districts are abolished/ reformed/ incorporated to, from JD of XXXX County, to First/ Second /Third JD of XXXXXXstate
May 28, 1861 the Union dissolves as the USA in Congress Assembled dissolves itself under parliamentary rules due to no quorum. The rump Congress though is STILL the government of the District of Columbia and environs.
April 1861 Lincoln convenes the rump congress, and they move forward as if they were still the entire congress under the ‘Doctrine of Necessity’, with support from Miliary and Financial interests. (And London, and Rome)
As the nation at this point is a dissolved group of independent states, under military control, apparently per Ewing’s research ALL Organic State constitutions were archived as not currently operating and placed in a state of suspension pending resolution of the emergency. Which never occurred.
Now, taking the above as correct, it certainly explains the current atmosphere amongst the LEO community including cops, prosecutors and judges. All corrupt and knowingly usurping powers. There are no organic offices to fill, only usurper offices. Per Ewing, they cannot be de facto if there is no de jure office, therefore, simple usurpation (tacit procuration if you like) with no one really objecting because they do NOT realize what happened. So the County Prosecutor that you slammed a few years back with no oath of office really did not have to take it, there IS NO OFFICE that he was occupying, only Usurpers acting under color of law as if there were, and laughing at the ignorant masses around them, while they take us to the cleaners.
It’s all Territorial.
When they abolished the County Judicial Districts, they also essentially took away the contract with common law that runs with the land, by removing to a fictious overlay (the judicial districts of multiple counties or states) territory. This territory created out of Necessity. To govern as if we had not dissolved (good luck with that). But with the constitution never being operable within DC, t’was a moot point about the ‘as if’. No constraints anymore, just took a few generations to realize it.
Also he has discovered that apparently, the Wash Constitution of 1878, which WAS ratified by the People, is actually the one in the military archives in Washington DC, and not the one from 1889 that is currently touted as the constitution of the State of Washington. Further, if you ask and pay for a certified copy from the Wash SOS, you get the 1878 one!! FNU LNU (Kenneth Wayne) and A guy named David Carrolle have also discovered this and put together affidavits and court injunctions to that effect that the only operable constitution was the 1878 one. Wayne eventually got too big for his pants and is grey bar hoteling for a few years now.
So, obviously:
“RCW 1.04.020
Code as evidence of the law — Rule of construction — Effect of amendment.
The contents of the Revised Code of Washington, after striking therefrom sections repealed or superseded by laws of the state of Washington enacted since January 1, 1949, as the revised code is supplemented or modified in the 1950 supplement, shall establish the laws of this state of a general and permanent nature in effect on January 1, 1951; except, that nothing herein shall be construed as changing the meaning of any such laws and, as a rule of construction, in case of any omissions or any inconsistency between any of the provisions of the revised code as so supplemented or modified and the laws existing immediately preceding this enactment, the previously existing laws shall control. Any section of the Revised Code of Washington (as supplemented or modified by the 1950 supplement) expressly amended by the legislature, including the entire context set out, shall, as so amended, constitute the law and the ultimate declaration of legislative intent.”;
wherein omissions or inconsistencies with previously published Law, unless EXPRESSLY AMENDED by legislative act, previously publish law stands as the Controlling law (as of 1951), regardless of the number of times said law may have been REVISED (vs Amended). Seems there are errors, omissions or inconsistencies all along the way. Should be dismissable under same, particularly due to a lack of full disclosure on the state’s part (constructive fraud).
Continued...
