Attachment 4598
In 1863, Tsar Alexander II sent his navy to New York and San Francisco as a warning to Britain and France to stay out of the Civil War.
Related/More:
Printable View
Attachment 4598
In 1863, Tsar Alexander II sent his navy to New York and San Francisco as a warning to Britain and France to stay out of the Civil War.
Related/More:
The lyrics focus on atrocities in the history of mankind from the Devil's point of view.
The trial and death of Jesus Christ ("Made damn sure that Pilate washed his hands and sealed his fate"),
European wars of religion ("I watched with glee while your kings and queens fought for ten decades for the gods they made"),
The violence of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the 1918 shooting of the Romanov family
("I stuck around St. Petersburg when I saw it was a time for a change/Killed the Tsar and his ministers/Anastasia screamed in vain"),
and
World War II ("I rode a tank, held a general's rank when the blitzkrieg raged, and the bodies stank").
After Robert F. Kennedy's death on 6 June 1968, the line was changed to "I shouted out 'Who killed the Kennedys?'"
Kennedy’s executive order 11110
Sympathy For The Devil
And who replaced the "Tsar and his ministers" rendering the devil so gleeful?
sourceQuote:
Establishment historians pay little attention to the remarkable impact occult and Gnostic ideas had on the rise of Bolshevism and the victory of the Russian Revolution.
A number of social and political movements, including Marxism and Lenin’s Bolshevism, have been linked to Gnosticism, which flourished in the early centuries of the Christian era. The political scientists A. Besancon and L. Pellicani argue the intellectual roots of Russian Bolshevism are a structural repetition of the ancient Gnostic paradigm. A distinguishing feature of Gnosticism is an illusive, symbolic interpretation of reality, including history.
For the early Christian Gnostics the Absolute – termed the ‘Unknown Father’– has nothing in common with the wrathful ‘God’ worshipped by theist religion. In fact, for these Gnostics, the ‘God’ of the Old Testament is the adversary of their ‘Unknown Father’, the true God. Our world, including all human institutions, is not the work of the true God, but of a false creator, the Demiurge, who keeps us captive in the world, away from the divine light and truth.
Therefore, in Gnosticism, the world is merely a sort of illusion, a set of allegorical symbols, a reverse image of the real essence of history. Man, who is asleep to his inner potential, must awake and become an active partner of the ‘Unknown Father’ in the transformation of all life. Otherwise he remains a prisoner in what the eminent Russian Gnostic philosopher Vladimir Solviev (1853-1900) aptly described as “a kind of nightmare of sleeping humanity.” A number of Gnostic communities – like nineteenth century communists – held contempt for material goods and lived communally, teaching “the world and its laws, religious, moral and social, are of little relevance to the plan of salvation.”
Sense a familiar tone anyone???
Is it any wonder why the devil would be so happy to see the "Tsar and his ministers" eliminated?
The entire music/entertainment industry brainwashes and mesmerizes even while revealing the truth to you with pure arrogance.
The attack on orthodox Christian society and government is an attack on limits on 'the state', 'kings', 'the crown, 'public officers', 'ruling class' because orthodox Christianity asserts 'imago dei'. The alternative: unlimited usury, mankind as chattel, self-appointed Gods, society and cities as soul traps and energy siphons.
Mass Migration Planned As Soft Power Weapon In 2000 (U.S. Intel Report)Quote:
Originally Posted by Chex
Creating Persons is adding too Gods commandments only if he respected them since he nevertheless stated what a respecter gets. Our Hellenistic Heathen or a nation founded under God. Where acting accordingly.
The image of Paul (and Roman protective custody/welfare state) sets a contradiction, conundrum and convolution.
The universalist view misses that even though with the Ezekiel Temple the divide or bar between Judeans/Israelite and Gentiles were broken down, the Gentile wasn't and isn't necessarily forced to cross the barrier and enter into the temple to join the assembly of the saints. So how do those who refuse to partake or fail to partake magically become members of the Christ's assembly?). Furthermore in the OT it is found that someone who takes on obligations even to the ungodly would be expected to follow them. It is clear however that someone pretending to a non-Gentile is still a Gentile. It is also clear that the orthodox Christians aren't Gentiles according to the NT and OT.Quote:
Originally Posted by xparte
The lack of respect for persons could hardly be taken as promoting an utter disregard for kingships or dignities because the very same NT promotes a regard for dignities and kings are in fact referred to as kings. The saints themselves are regarded to be a royal priesthood. Also, what is universal among the saints isn't necessarily universally universal. There was a separate law for the stranger: this is an important facet of lawful government.Quote:
respecter of persons
someone who treats people according to their rank, status or importance
Paul likely realized that even Rome was yet another subordinate power--subordinate to the one named at Exodus 3:14-15. Principalities of darkness are referred to at Ephesians 1 and 2. The testimony is that even under Roman rule: The children are free. That is, to properly 'characterize' Paul one must properly characterize the station of the saints, the Christ's assembly and the divine impetus for the destruction of the temple at Jerusalem come 70AD which heralded the end of an entire system.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Attachment 4608
Now begs the question: What system met its end from 65AD to 70AD? Why would Paul or any of the saints cling to a system that was brought to its end? The resounding view is that the destruction of the temple at Jerusalem come 70AD was a divinely appointed event it was not the result of a merely secular conflict. The scepter departed from Judah approximately 70 years prior to the temple destruction.
The ecclesia, the temple made without hands survived. There might be something to this idea of "Embassy of Heaven": the ecclesia of Jesus/Yehoshua the Anointed of the Most High is altogether like the ark...the manifest arm of his Christ's administration of salvation and such. That is why the Ecclesia is being attacked and assaulted. The Edom-Canaanite-Ishmaelite alliance actually believes it stands a chance (ala Enoch 6).
It must be known that the merger of the Babylonian/Nebuchadnezzar and the Roman prerogative occurred with Attalus's bequeathing of his kingdom to the Romans, that Julius Casear would be the first to combine the mantels, that the mantel now is with the Bishop of Rome.
Likely, Paul knew this. The kingdom is in session and has been widely in session at least since Pentecost Day 30 A.D.Quote:
But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever. Daniel 7:18