Presumption of Voluntary Debt Servitude

As suggested by Freed:


100 years ago the US government chartered a central bank, the Federal Reserve (see 12 USC). The primary feature of this central bank was that it had/has a monopoly on loaning debt to the government. It does this by issuing non-interest bearing notes (a note is evidence of a debt) called FRN's, in exchange for interest bearing Treasury bonds (a bond is evidence of a debt). These bonds are then sold to the rentier class or retained by the Fed; interest is paid on the bonds yearly. The initial charter was for 20 years, so in 1933 the charter came up for renewal. By this time, the US (corporate) government had borrowed enough money to be unable to pay the interest on it, so Congress passed JR792 (a Joint Resolution is not law, and only applies to the corporate government) admitting that the federal government was bankrupt, and FDR issued a presidential edict creating a trust, and pledging all the assets of the US (corporate) government into the trust, to be held by the bankers as collateral for the now unpayable debt. At the same time, the Labor Department began issuing birth certificates (a certificate is proof of ownership) for all new-born Americans. By issuing these certificates, after first registering the birth (regis: king; registration assigns ownership to the king), the US corp-gov was claiming ownership of its citizens, and pledging them as collateral for its debts.

Since there is nothing in the Constitution that authorizes the govt to claim ownership of its citizens, the legal sleight of hand began with the creation of Social Security, posited as a 'social contract' which would provide security for Americans in their old age. The SC later ruled that SS is not a contract, it is a welfare program, but it is also voluntary, and taxes may be collected to support its costs. A condition of volunteering for SS is to select a domicile in Washington, DC, the only territory within the continental US where the federal (corporate) govt has exclusive jurisdiction. By volunteering for SS, the free man becomes a 'contracted' voluntary debt slave. The contract, which is itself unconscionable (containing conditions which no honest man would offer, and no intelligent man would knowingly accept), makes the free man into a 14th Amendment citizen, a 'US citizen,' and a statutory citizen. Such a citizen has no Constitutional rights, having contracted them away to the US corp-gov; now all laws, rules, and statutes apply to this citizen. All his assets and all his future labor are pledged to the collateral for the corp-gov debt, so the state now has an interest in protecting its property, and can apply endless statutes (statutes are municipal law, enforceable only through contract), and normally applied to your corporate person, the legal persona created by your birth certificate, and enrolled into the trust against/without your consent.

All Federal Reserve banks are willing participants in this debt servitude scam. Note that the central bank never loaned any money to the corp-gov, it only loaned your credit. When it 'buys' Treasury bonds from the corp-gov, it 'pays' for them with newly printed currency, debt notes, not money. Every time you endorse a paycheck, you are taking responsibility for the creation of this amount of debt. Your employer and the bank cheerfully report the amounts of debt money you accepted responsibility for, and the IRS then expects you to pay 'income tax' as your share of the cost of paying the interest on this debt. The banks and the corp-gov, which is owned by the banks, understand that they will never pay off the debt; it is in their interest to increase the debt, thus increasing the interest due to them for creating the debt notes to 'pay for' all this debt. It is a scam to take money from you through taxes, and give it to the bankers, whose only contribution was to coerce politicians into setting up the scam. Money and power...

Now, today, the IRS keeps a permanent record (for the US Treasury) of all the debt you endorse. When you demand lawful money, you are taking the transaction out of the bankruptcy system. You are not using the Federal Reserve credit system, so no obligation to pay income tax is incurred. And because you use lawful money to buy things, no capture of the ownership of the asset occurs; the asset is not pledged as collateral for the corp-gov debt. So you can obtain legal title to the asset. However, if you do not rebut the presumption that you are a statutory citizen, the IRS will presume that the asset is pledged as collateral, making you subject to other taxes on property.

Note that the corp-gov has no right to confiscate your property and pledge it as collateral to the banks without your consent. They presume that you gave consent when you signed up for SS, and that you are continuing to consent when you do business with a Federal Reserve bank without rebutting their presumption that you want to deal in debt notes. However, the nature of a trust is that the Trustee (the Sec of the Treasury, who is an employee of the IMF) holds and protects your assets for you the beneficiary. You don't own the assets, as the corp-gov has registered them (claimed ownership) due to the residual debt involved in using debt notes instead of money. Debt cannot discharge debt; a FRN is a promise to pay, not payment, so 'purchasing' an asset with debt creates a lien in favor of the debt issuer, the Federal Reserve. Thus legal title remains with the corp-gov, and you get only equitable title, the right to use the asset. So by creating this trust, the corp-gov could claim legal title to your assets without compensation, because the assets are still 'yours to use.' However, this arrangement makes confiscation much easier should the banks decide that you are not being a good corporate citizen...

Now a trust can be set up for you without your consent; such a trust is called a cestui que vie (what if you are dead?) trust. It was originally set up for you when you were legally incompetent (just born), and has persisted since then because you have done nothing to claim your estate from the trustee. Many comments on this web site have stated that the state 'owns' your legal name, and that you can't 'own' anything legally because you have 'no money;' such statements are confusing and unhelpful. The state registered your name, which was making a claim of ownership, but they did that to protect your estate, and they put the name into the trust, thus making a presumption that you wanted to contribute to paying off the bankers. And the state owns the trust. But the res of the estate is yours, including the name. However, until you claim it, the state owns it, and allows you to use the name, as long as you submit all your assets to them as collateral on the debt. The primary and mandatory presumption of a cestui que vie trust is that you are dead, or legally incompetent. When you make an appearance, you collapse the trust, and the trustee must return the res of the trust to you; the trustee is personally responsible for any debts he has allowed the trust to accept. So you need to make your demand for lawful money, ab initio (in the beginning) and nunc pro tunc (now for then) and file it in the public record. This constitutes the appearance which proves that you are not legally incompetent, and it collapses the trust. Further, since you are rebutting the original presumption that you wanted your assets pledged to the debt (they would not have been in the trust if you had been using lawful money from the beginning), you have discharged all debt claims against your estate; you have taken your assets out of the bankruptcy trust and claimed their legal ownership by your corporate person (YOUR NAME). However, your corporate person is still a US citizen, a statutory employee of the corp-gov, until you move the legal residence of YOUR NAME out of Washington, DC. To do this you must file with the Secretary of State of your state to claim YOUR NAME as a dba; the Secretary is required to record your claim to YOUR NAME in the state records, thus constituting an appearance to rebut the presumption that you want to be a statutory citizen. This restores your Constitutional rights, and takes YOUR NAME out of the jurisdiction of our current statutory courts. Statutory courts are not recognized by the Constitution; they are creations of the executive branch of our corporate government. They operate under contract law as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. When you own your corporate person and it resides outside of Washington, DC, you are not in contract with the Federal government, so statutes do not apply to your corporate person. Note that statutes, which are not law, but are basically corporate rules, only apply to corporate employees. If the statutory court cannot show a contract that your corporate person has knowingly entered into (and then violated), they have no jurisdiction over it. Statutory courts never have jurisdiction over natural persons: contracts must be between equals, and the court is a corporate subdivision of the corp-gov, thus it can only deal with other corporations.

Comments, corrections, and criticism are invited.

Freed

What if your corporate person is an agent for a foreign entity, the US corporation headquartered in Washington DC? Registering a dba is exactly what you are supposed to do if you want to do business in your state by operating a foreign enterprise.

Edit -- Or a Federal Reserve agent?

In Bible Study somebody mentioned how people on the government dole (no redemption) have passed 50% of America's population. America is a Christian nation and Paul invented (as far as I can tell) the welfare system by running to Felix for sanctuary first in jail (Tyre) and then conditions let up quite a bit when he was remanded to Rome. In Rome, he wrote the formula for Western Christianity so America becoming a welfare state makes perfect sense.

No wonder so many slaves feel that they are free!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Now a trust can be set up for you without your consent; such a trust is called a cestui que vie (what if you are dead?) trust. It was originally set up for you when you were legally incompetent (just born), and has persisted since then because you have done nothing to claim your estate from the trustee. Many comments on this web site have stated that the state 'owns' your legal name, and that you can't 'own' anything legally because you have 'no money;' such statements are confusing and unhelpful. The state registered your name, which was making a claim of ownership, but they did that to protect your estate, and they put the name into the trust, thus making a presumption that you wanted to contribute to paying off the bankers. And the state owns the trust. But the res of the estate is yours, including the name. However, until you claim it, the state owns it, and allows you to use the name, as long as you submit all your assets to them as collateral on the debt. The primary and mandatory presumption of a cestui que vie trust is that you are dead, or legally incompetent. When you make an appearance, you collapse the trust, and the trustee must return the res of the trust to you; the trustee is personally responsible for any debts he has allowed the trust to accept. So you need to make your demand for lawful money, ab initio (in the beginning) and nunc pro tunc (now for then) and file it in the public record. This constitutes the appearance which proves that you are not legally incompetent, and it collapses the trust. Further, since you are rebutting the original presumption that you wanted your assets pledged to the debt (they would not have been in the trust if you had been using lawful money from the beginning), you have discharged all debt claims against your estate; you have taken your assets out of the bankruptcy trust and claimed their legal ownership by your corporate person (YOUR NAME). However, your corporate person is still a US citizen, a statutory employee of the corp-gov, until you move the legal residence of YOUR NAME out of Washington, DC. To do this you must file with the Secretary of State of your state to claim YOUR NAME as a dba; the Secretary is required to record your claim to YOUR NAME in the state records, thus constituting an appearance to rebut the presumption that you want to be a statutory citizen. This restores your Constitutional rights, and takes YOUR NAME out of the jurisdiction of our current statutory courts. Statutory courts are not recognized by the Constitution; they are creations of the executive branch of our corporate government. They operate under contract law as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. When you own your corporate person and it resides outside of Washington, DC, you are not in contract with the Federal government, so statutes do not apply to your corporate person. Note that statutes, which are not law, but are basically corporate rules, only apply to corporate employees. If the statutory court cannot show a contract that your corporate person has knowingly entered into (and then violated), they have no jurisdiction over it. Statutory courts never have jurisdiction over natural persons: contracts must be between equals, and the court is a corporate subdivision of the corp-gov, thus it can only deal with other corporations.

Comments, corrections, and criticism are invited.

Freed

---

I showed this part to a few people and this is what they said to me:

people one:

same ole crap
it is flawed
When you own your corporate person lol
and what corporate person would that be ?
your name ?
geeze
the corporate PERSON is NOT your name
One has to claim their name that's for sure

people two:

How do we know
it is a Cestui Que Vie Trust ?
the claim is based upon the rights inherent in the Security Agreement
not sure there is one wherein the bearer has specifically appointed them a Trustee, and deposited the 'Claim' to do so
and since there isn't one
they continue to ASSUME the BEARER to be TRUSTEE

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walter

I showed this part to a few people and this is what they said to me:

people one:

same ole crap
it is flawed
When you own your corporate person lol
and what corporate person would that be ?
your name ?
geeze
the corporate PERSON is NOT your name
One has to claim their name that's for sure

people two:

How do we know
it is a Cestui Que Vie Trust ?
the claim is based upon the rights inherent in the Security Agreement
not sure there is one wherein the bearer has specifically appointed them a Trustee, and deposited the 'Claim' to do so
and since there isn't one
they continue to ASSUME the BEARER to be TRUSTEE

---

I'm assuming here by "BEARER" that the meaning is us - the man.

I've been reading recently that one should have nothing to do with the surname/family name / last name....for the very reason that use of it makes us the "bearer/trustee". Any combination of first-middle and surname --> whether it be all caps, proper caps, all small, initials combinations, or hypens/colons -- makes use of the family name which has been corporatized.

We are given name / christian name / true name / first middle (or just first, if that be the case).....the name we were given by YHWH @ our nativity.

Did Adam have a surname?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ag maniac

I'm assuming here by "BEARER" that the meaning is us - the man.

---

if the man is caring gov. docs then yes the man is the bearer,

does the government hold the original BC?
no
every time they get a request for a BC they create a new one.
they never bear the original BC or any BC.

unless you send it back, then they get the hot potato,
you corner them to be the bearer of their own instrument.

What government does have though is a matrix.

Thanks for the comments, guys. I'll take them in order:

Keith, your corporate person is a legal fiction, an imaginary entity which exists only in the abstract, rational world of thought. It serves as a public utility, perhaps being the acceptor of service is its highest goal. Because the federal government is a corporation, and it wants to control the populace through Lex Mercatoria, and has no jurisdiction over natural man, the living being, there is incentive for the government to make sure everyone has a corporate person. And it is to their benefit for this corporate entity to be in contract with the government, otherwise their statutory courts have no jurisdiction over the corporate entity (statutory courts are not actually courts, they are administrative offices to resolve contract disputes between corporate parties (and are corporate subdivisions of the federal corporation). Because so much of US business is run by corporations, and because corporations cannot contract with natural persons, it is actually beneficial to you to have a corporate entity under your control. [corporation: (from the Latin corpus - body, ie, without head]. You are the head of your corporate entity. It is not an agent for anyone; it is your servant, your gateway into doing business (negotiating contracts) with other corporations. And statutory courts exist to resolve disputes involving those contracts. Anyone can create a corporate entity by simply recording your desire to do so with the Secretary of State; this puts it into the public record, so others can see who owns the entity. You can operate without a corporate entity, but you will not be able to buy electricity service, phone service, have a bank account, etc.

Walter, who should own your NAME? Who can legally own your NAME? If you claim your NAME and record it in the public record, then your corporate person is indeed your NAME, all of it, given birth names and family nomen. When capitalized, YOUR NAME is the corporate fictional entity that exists only in the realm of rational thought; uncapitalized, it is you the natural person. You are the lawful owner of YOUR NAME. As noted to Keith above, you need a corporate entity to operate in our corporate world, and YOUR NAME is the ideal PERSON for you to use (keeps it simple). As to the trust set up by the Treasury at your birth, it is a typical trust that anyone might set up for say an orphan child. The Trustee takes on the responsibility to hold the title to and manage the estate until the child reaches maturity, which legally is sui juris. There is no Security Agreement - did you sign one? The Trustee took it upon himself to make the choice for the beneficiary to pledge his assets as security towards the federal debt. Until you put in an appearance and make a claim for your estate, that presumption by the Trustee stands. YOUR NAME is just the label under which the records are kept. Actually, the Trustee claimed your birth certificate, accepted it for value, and sold it (pledged it) as collateral for the debt. So there is a presumption that you have mortgaged your body, and the government gets to keep title to it until the debt is paid (never gonna happen). But that was also a presumption by the Trustee which will stand until you rebut it. When you make a demand for lawful money, you rebut the presumption by the Trustee that you want to be responsible for the federal debt. This unwinds all actions taken by the Trustee based on that now false presumption. The Trustee must pay back the debt secured by your birth certificate, so he can free it to give to you, the lawful owner. He must also pay back all the debt presumed to be secured by your assets, removing the lien imposed by the use of debt money, so he can deliver legal title to those assets. Legal title reverts to YOUR NAME. The Treasury keeps the account titled in YOUR NAME, but it is not a trust any more, as a trust is only valid when it has assets in it.
And Walter, I showed that part to my son, and he sputtered a variety of ill-conceived objections, too, because the concept of trusts is too legal for him, hence he is afraid. Education is the only thing that will overcome mindless fear, and we cannot force people to seek knowledge. They can remain in the trust, debt slaves for life.

ag-maniac, by bearer I presume you mean the person who answers for YOUR NAME. If you answer as YOUR NAME, and not as agent for YOUR NAME, then yes, the presumption has been confirmed: you are the beneficiary, and for today's court case, you will be assigned the status of trustee de son tort, liable for whatever contract YOUR NAME has been found to have violated. As accommodation agent for YOUR NAME, you have the right to choose with whom you will contract, so you can Refuse for Cause any statutory violation the court offers to contract for, but only if YOUR NAME is not a statutory citizen. If YOUR NAME and all your assets are still pledged to the national debt, then YOUR NAME is in contract with the corporate US government, and all statutes apply to it. Now you see why the Trustee pledged YOUR NAME as security for the national debt: it is about getting you into contract, so the statutes apply. Thus the court will find that it has jurisdiction, and that you the man will have to meet the obligations inherent in violating the statute. For instance, NC has a concealed carry permit program. Under the Constitution, you have a right to carry any weapon you want, concealed or not, but as a statutory citizen, you may have the privilege of carrying concealed only after you buy a permit. You begin to see what power the whole program of a bankruptcy trust, with its attendant pledge of your body and assets, gives to the corporate government: they can now turn unalienable rights into paid privileges...

Keith, at 17459 in the Consent to Service of Process thread, that is an example of the matrix, since I doubt that more than 100 people have read that statute. The solution there would be to not register the certificate of title to your vehicle with the state. I am preparing a letter to DMV here in NC to explore that situation even now; the state is not likely to allow a situation where some vehicles are not plated (half the people who saw it would start investigating how they could avoid registration...), but at the minimum I want to get the vehicle off the state's tax rolls, as the state has no claim of ownership. I am not aware of any such statute here, but my approach would be to demonstrate that I am not a statutory citizen, and then employ UCC 1-308 because the terms of the contract were not fully disclosed, thus I did not consent knowingly. Certainly there is nothing in the drivers license form that suggests such an implied contract; nowhere did I agree to obey traffic laws. There are hundreds, you can't know them all, and half of them are stupid, so obey the ones that make sense and assist the peaceful flow of traffic, ignore the rest, and drive responsibly.

Freed

Walter, in further response to your questions about the Trust, I have found these citations from NC Statutes to be likely somewhat relevant:

§ 33B-2. Custodial trust; general.
(b) An adult may create a custodial trust of property by a written declaration which names as beneficiary an individual other than the declarant. The declaration shall be evidenced by registration of the property or by other instrument of declaration executed in any lawful manner, describing the property and designating the declarant, in substance, as custodial trustee under the North Carolina Uniform Custodial Trust Act. A registration or other declaration of trust for the sole benefit of the declarant is not a custodial trust under this act. A registration or declaration is executed in a lawful manner if the formalities, if any, of the transfer of the beneficial interest in the particular property under general principles of law are satisfied.
(c) Title to custodial trust property is in the custodial trustee, and the beneficial interest is in the beneficiary.
(d) Except as provided in subsection (e) of this section, a transferor may not terminate a custodial trust.
(e) The beneficiary, if not incapacitated, or the guardian of the estate of an incapacitated beneficiary, may terminate a custodial trust by delivering to the custodial trustee a writing signed by the beneficiary or guardian of the estate declaring the termination. If not previously terminated, the custodial trust terminates on the death of the beneficiary.

Suppose the declarant is the Secretary of Treasury, who registers the birth certificate, designates YOUR NAME as the beneficiary, and names himself as Trustee. The trust remains in effect until the beneficiary requests in writing that the trust be terminated. If the property was not owned by the beneficiary when the trust is created, it becomes his property when the trust is terminated. Thus, think of YOUR NAME the corporate entity to be a gift from the Sec of Treasury after you make your demand.

But then see this statue, also from NC, concerning jurisdiction:
§ 36C-2-202. Jurisdiction over trustee and beneficiary.
(b) With respect to their interests in the trust, the beneficiaries of a trust having its principal place of administration in this State are subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State regarding any matter involving the trust. By accepting a distribution from such a trust, the recipient submits personally to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State regarding any matter involving the trust.

I can imagine that the Federal government has a similar law on its books, conveying jurisdiction to all its administrative courts.

§ 36C-4-404. Trust purposes.
A trust may be created only to the extent that its purposes are lawful, not contrary to public policy, and possible to achieve. A trust and its terms must be for the benefit of its beneficiaries. (2005-192, s. 2.)

§ 36C-4-406. Creation of trust induced by fraud, duress, or undue influence.
A trust is voidable to the extent that its creation was induced by fraud, duress, or undue influence. (2005-192, s. 2.)

All of these trust terms and conditions are consistent with common law, which is also recognized in NC.

Freed