1 Attachment(s)
Mass Migration Planned As Soft-Power Weapon In 2000 U.S. Intel Report
Mass Migration Pre-Planned As A Soft Power Weapon In 2000 U.S. Intelligence Report
Wayne Madsen
Attachment 3196
A December 2000 U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) report, written by the council’s Strategic Futures Group, outlines the use of coerced migrants as a U.S. soft power option. The present migrant crisis in Europe is a direct result of the implementation of mass migration as a U.S. soft weapon arising from American support for the Islamist destabilization of Syria, Libya, Iraq, and other countries of the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia.
The 2000 report, titled “Growing Global Migration and its Implications for the U.S.,” predicts the present migrant calamity sweeping Europe. The report foresaw that in “the next 15 years, globalization, demographic imbalances, and interstate and civil conflicts will fuel increasing international migration, much of it illegal. Such increase will have positive and negative consequences for sending and receiving countries alike. Key regional trends are presented for the Americas, Russia and other Eurasian states, Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia.”
There is little positive in the largely Muslim migrant invasion sweeping through Europe, except for the chance for large German corporations to replace the retiring “baby boomer” population with younger foreign and sub-minimum wage workers from the European periphery.
The NIC also saw promise in an influx of sub-minimum wage workers into Europe in a more recent 2012 report. The report, titled “Could Western Europe Cope with New Waves of Muslim Immigration?”, states, “With low projected economic growth, Western Europe would have many challenges with current levels of immigrant flows and immigrant residents. Assuming that Western European fertility remains at sub-replacement levels, countries can expect to experience a rapid shift in ethnic composition, particularly around urban areas.”
The U.S. intelligence planners determined where Europe would find new workers, lacking the full labor rights of European citizens, by looking at Europe’s far past and the Roman Empire and seriously considering “efforts to introduce gradations in immigrant citizenship status (as in Roman imperial efforts to give legal status to peoples from the periphery).” What the U.S. intelligence future planners failed to disclose is that the Roman Empire’s workers from the “periphery” were known as slaves.
Replacing Europe’s aging native workers with migrants was also on the drawing board of the U.S. NIC: “Aging populations and mismatches between education and labor demand will make labor migration more important to economic performance. In these aging societies, private sectors will likely sustain and increase demand for migrant labor—for both low-skill and high-skill or professional workers, even if politically and culturally sensitive. Despite episodic efforts to rein in migration, governments will generally be both unable to withstand private sector influences favoring migration and unable to systematically track and regulate individuals migrants.”
There is little doubt that what is prompting German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s invitation for the mass migration into Germany is the desire for fresh bodies to replenish Germany’s labor force.
(Source/more)
Related:
