Playing their Registry - Public Office Money Certificates.

I play one echo chamber against another:

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joey Smith

Hey, I thought that David Merrill said that this would work??????????

---

No. I have told you that when somebody tries to hypothecate on the registry themselves, they can get into trouble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gregg

They just can't seem to get the right magic words to unlock that Treasury Account we set up for everyone at birth...... :brickwall:

---

We spent that account getting out of the Great Depression.

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4556/...bondslarge.jpg

Quote:

---

5. At the Undersigned’s instruction, during December 2007, Petitioner requests a consolidating billing from IRS that includes all amounts which IRS alleges were owed by Petitioner.

6. On or about January 11, 2008, Petitioner receives a letter identified as LTR 681C with reference #0774035504 alleging a total amount due of $36,354.16.

7. On or about January 17, 2008, the Undersigned tenders payment for Petitioner’s account through Notary Public Kevin P. Mahoney in the form of Bonded Promissory Note No. HDG-1005-PN in the amount of $5,000,000.00 using Certified Mail No. 7001 1140 0002 9580 3371.

---

According to my calculation, somebody tried to hypothecate $4,963,645.84 in change.

One can however reverse the hypothecation that the Fed (Treasury) does on your credit, based in the registries (cars, homes and yes, your birth registry - SDR's [Special Drawing Rights - now quickly BRICS; Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa]).

http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/9008/pomc.jpg
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3...rofcredit1.jpg
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/448...rofcredit2.jpg

This works great so long as you do not get greedy. I was getting a lot of parking tickets because my car had no plates. I refused to pay rent on property held in trust for my use. So when I tried to set up an account for $15K for a lot of future tickets, in escrow so to speak, the Prosecutor (from a vacant office by the way) insisted that was theft; but could only charge me with Forgery because the POMC's look a lot like a typical banker's check for guess what? - Private credit FRNs legal tender. They never charged me with theft:

Quote:

---

This is chickensh*t. The pleadings by the taxpayer are pure gibberish, and instead of labeling them as gibberish, the Tax Court relies on a procedural issue, ruling that the taxpayer failed to properly plead/argue/brief the issue, and that it is deemed to be "abondoned."

This only encourages future delusions.

---

No. Your denial of the facts is delusional. You understand that the state registers mortgages, motor vehicles and birth certificates all the time but you will not allow what is in front of you to be seen and understood. The trouble begins when somebody tries to reverse the hypothecation in their private favor.


Regards,

David Merrill.

---

With Good Faith and Credit failing in the Western Dollar-based Registries an new Retaliatory Financial Regime - BRICS logically emerged.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. By the by; the morning after I filed that Return of Bill of Indictment (finding of facts) on the prosecutor, he cleaned out his office. The newpaper wondered why he was leaving office early but he would make no comment.

It gets better as you read.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Funny;


I always thought that Judge Roy Bean might be a real judge in true life. But it looks as though he is against oaths of office. I want to be remembered for saying,

Quote:

---

The essence of the political religion called Constitutional Republic is that the oath of office is a fungible fidelity bond.

---

To elucidate that means when any official is required to swear in to his new office, that his oath of office means that he is bound to his swearing and the penalty for misbehavior, like not upholding the bills of rights (federal and state) will have consequences - specifically that the people can sue the state against his bond. That is to say, more clearly that if he breaches his oath of office, and injures somebody doing so, that somebody has the right to monetary recourse. Here is the Security Agreement:

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4721/...tyagreemen.jpg

Now it would appear that Judge Roy Bean is for rogue judges who can rule arbitrarily and capriciously without any consequences? I am dissappointed that I have been putting stake in his posts for quite some time, presuming he put on the handle because he actually has real experience as a judge. At best it would appear that he may have been at a banker's bench for some time but never in any valid office I would consider "judge".

Like John William SUTHERS, he only holds sway with people who believe there is power in a vacant office.

Here is another example of what I am saying;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thule

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

John William SUTHERS is still to this day running a vacant office. His bond is no good! He had to subscribe it within 30 days - not 90. Here is what the state Constitution has to say about that.

---

Funny how planet Earth refuses to play along, his office seems to be running along just fine. They're even hiring new people.
http://www.coloradoattorneygeneral.gov/

Your little fibs are losing their entertainment value.

---

I have put it plain intentionally. John SUTHERS is running a vacant office by any reading of the law. His office is vacant - meaning, de facto. There are no courts of record in the Fourth Judicial District because the chief judge has switched out his valid Oath of Office for a bogus one, hours after my lien was published.

Your bond is No Good.

At least nobody can accuse me of being off topic!



Regards,

David Merrill.

---

What I've seen with IRS notices of deficiency often the invitation is to protest or dispute. They will give 90 days , some papers to sign and a 800 number to call. Often one can simply file the corrected 1040s if the deficiency is due to an automatic assessment made after years of not filing. As for 'unlocking the Trust Account" the Social Security Account is ..right ..there.. in Maryland.


Re private..hypothecation..etc. It might be that private banking was outlawed in the federal States long ago and the SSN and the BC were the alternate remedy. :) That is, private banking wasn't outlawed on the federal level (ala Federal Reserve Bank, SSA). Maybe that is why some banks make a point of flying US flag without a State flag?

Also re: credit vs money. Perhaps credit is the 'evidence of money'--as in the result of an accounting procedure done when money is deposited.

Very nice work btw.