George Washington A Mason (Literally!)

Attachment 2192

It turns out that George Washington may have been a mason (i.e. literal stonemasons and architects) and an architect particularly having an affinity for the works or style of an Andrea Palladio (1508-80). Palladian style architecture is overall regarded to be Venetian (think: Venetian blinds).

The book George Washington, Architect (by Allan Greenberg, January 1, 1999) ...

Quote:

---

...{e}xplores the first presidents overlooked innovations as a designer of buildings and landscapes. Washington was an exemplary form-giver whose best work was conducted in his own back yards: Mt. Vernon and Wash., D.C. He not only redesigned the exterior and interior of his mansion at Mt. Vernon, but also sculpted the terrain, rearranged vistas, designed farm buildings, and created one of the most beautiful American gardens. And, designed in 1791 by his handpicked choice Peter Charles L Enfant, Wash., D.C., symbolically expresses the principles of the first democratic federal republic in history. As executed by L Enfant, it was Washington s vision cast in stone. Over 200 full-color and black and white drawings and photos. Oversize.

---

Related:
Palladio: America's Architectural Grandfather
Palladian Window
The Palladian Style, in Pursuit of the Perfect House
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3u_VinejO8

Attachment 2195

Pope Francis in the Philippines. Francis was photographed making a Satanic hand sign while saying he would “punch anybody who insulted his mother.”

What is the relevance of that to George Washington having been an architect/stonemason?

That symbol means "I love you!"

"I" - the pinkie; "Love" - the pinkie and thumb; and the "You" is the pinkie and index finger.

Thanks for the thread! I had never thought of WASHINGTON as more than a symbolic Mason for laying cornerstones etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

That symbol means "I love you!"

"I" - the pinkie; "Love" - the pinkie and thumb; and the "You" is the pinkie and index finger.

Thanks for the thread! I had never thought of WASHINGTON as more than a symbolic Mason for laying cornerstones etc.

---

Look at Washington on the face of the $1 - See the OMEGA and the ALTER at the top of his head?

Washington symbolizes the Alpha and the Omega with the Alter at his head. To the RIGHT you see ONE. Fish out of the RIGHT side of the boat. The celestial man has access to the fruit of all the trees in the garden. But owns none of them.

HOWEVER, idols are nothing.

Helen Keller of course being an initiate into Theosophy fabricated this SO CALLED love sign.

Theosophy: The system of beliefs and teachings of the Theosophical Society, founded in New York City in 1875, incorporating aspects of Buddhism and Brahmanism, especially the belief in reincarnation....

I cringe every time I look at the SO CALLED peace sign - I see an upside down broken cross. Nevertheless, I recognize the magick being broadcast and CANCEL it in my mind. Notice these two in allodial's image are both wearing a Yamaka. Makes perfect sense, right[?], for a so called Christian to be wearing a yamaka - there SEEMS to be a hidden hand. Rofl....

So Peace and Love brethren absent falsehoods and symbols to hide my true intentions. With a wink of an eye or sleight of hand comes evil.

And Paul and Barnabas went DOWN INTO ICONIUM.

Yours in Christ,
Michael Joseph

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allodial

What is the relevance of that to George Washington having been an architect/stonemason?

---

Washington, Japans PM and the Pope are all Architects of deception.

allodial, have you seem this one?
Founding Fathers Fraud: George Washington was William Cavendish

http://xdisciple.blogspot.ca/2013/07...ud-george.html

As I suspected, you're making sure the propaganda continues--some people cannot let go of it. By attacking the foundations of sound doctrine, by putting words in the mouth of those long dead they are aiming to destroy confidence and undermine the societies they hate. The evidence is in favor of George Washington not having been a Freemason in the modern, 'occulitic' sense but like many were aiming to escape it by relocating to North America.

The same people that attack George Washington's legacy also suggest that ideals of liberty in America to have been based on the of Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton, John Locke and Rosicrucians when in fact they were more likely part of the faction out to destroy those ideals and out to destroy the English soul and out to straightjacket America with a soul-less Aristotlean oligarchy ruling by debt. They are the same people that try to convince us of homosexuality having been 'normal' in Greece and Rome when history show to the contrary.

1500s-1700s England was undergoing severe changes (i.e. under attack). It is said that a sinister kind of "occult ideology" was sweeping through France and pushing its way into the English royal court. There were factions out to undermine England and see to it that America was put under a burdensome rule, the same factions bent on throwing out the Christian principles of liberty and prosperity worldwide. The same factions are out to destroy everything you believe..if you let them.

American high schools have long been used to promoted a false kind of logic when it comes to history. Locke and Francis bacon have been portrayed as "Founding Fathers" when they were far from such. They have been used to conceal the truth about what was going on in England from 1500 to 1800 because the student's attention would be drawn to the moral conflict that led to the American Revolution. The Propaganda Machine fails miserably when pitted against plain truth. But perhaps one has to yearn for truth rather than some just cool, trendy stuff to talk about?

Read here to get an idea of what going on then:

• How The Venetians Took Over England and Created Freemasonry
• George Washington's Vision & Pre-1800s Freemasonry
• The Leibniz-Swift Connection to the American Liberty

This is also worth mention: Abraham Lincoln & Freemasonry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allodial

As I suspected, you're making sure the propaganda continues--some people cannot let go of it. By attacking the foundations of sound doctrine, by putting words in the mouth of those long dead they are aiming to destroy confidence and undermine the societies they hate. The evidence is in favor of George Washington not having been a Freemason but like many were aiming to escape it by relocating to North America.

---

"George Washington Masonic National Memorial"
Attachment 2211

George Washington was named Master in the Virginia charter of Alexandria Lodge No. 22.

What "evidence is in favor of George Washington not having been a Freemason" are you referring to???

Your question is loaded. Where is there a denial of George Washington being involved in any mason's guild? Just because someone claims all the awesome dead people were part of their organization, does it make it true? The Masonic guilds of America of the 1700s and the Freemasonry of today are not the same. The level of his involvement and type of Masonry is considered a thread. There were social clubs stone mason's guilds and there were the radical, occultic, Rosicrucian types. The Colonists were out to escape the radical, Luciferian or anti-Christian ideologies that has started to sweep Eurasia in the 1600 to 1700 period.

Quote:

---

..Though some cite the fact that George Washington was involved in Masonry, and may therefore have not been a true Christian, there is much historically documented evidence that George Washington was a truly Godfearing, and Christ-centered leader.

Although the lie is now being promulgated that America was founded by Mason apostates, scholar David Barton has extensively written about the fact that American Masonic teachings were decidedly Christian in tone in the past, and most American Masons were Christians that saw Freemasonry as a Christian organization.

However, Masonic beliefs changed abruptly in the 1800’s, and higher-level Freemasonry began to tout ideas taken from Pagan mystery schools. As a result, Masonic Lodges in America lost almost all of their members, who were outraged at the non-Christian agenda that had infiltrated Masonry from Europe and Great Britain. Consequently, American Freemasonry is no longer a Christian organization. But in George Washington’s era, it was decidedly Christian, and most of its members were devout Christians, as George Washington was.

---

This is for deep thinking and deep analysis not the shallow.

George Washington's Vision & Pre-1800s Freemasonry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Joseph

I cringe every time I look at the SO CALLED peace sign - I see an upside down broken cross.

---

Emmett Grogan from the book "Ringolevio" says he started the peace symbol movement in the USA.
He just got back from EU and was "flipping the bird" Italian style to some hippies on Hate and Asbury when one of them mistaken his insult for a olive branch. He laughed at how ignorant they were.
Great book.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Joseph

I cringe every time I look at the SO CALLED peace sign - I see an upside down broken cross. Nevertheless, I recognize the magick being broadcast and CANCEL it in my mind. Notice these two in {walter's} image are both wearing a Yamaka. Makes perfect sense, right[?], for a so called Christian to be wearing a yamaka - there SEEMS to be a hidden hand. Rofl....
Yours in Christ,
Michael Joseph

---

Correction...walter's image. see above, walter posted those images to derail the thread into propaganda for Rosicrucians or something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by allodial

Correction...walter's image. see above, walter posted those images to derail the thread into propaganda for Rosicrucians or something.

---

So you don't think the Pope lays a foundation for your brick layers club?

Speaking of propaganda, if you know so much about George Washington then tell us what is wrong with his portrait?
Attachment 2217

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walter

So you don't think the Pope lays a foundation for your brick layers club?

There are Freemasons who suggest to have taken over the Vatican and thusly to have taken over "Christianity". On that note, to knowledge, Rome didn't create the beliefs of early Christians--Rome didn't attempt to incorporate scriptural Christ-ianity (as opposed to Simon Magus / Simonianism or Mithraism) until around 400 years or so after the the Herod's Temple destruction and judgment of 66 to 70 AD. Rome and its religious system fiercely persecuted the believers so how is it that people suppose the beliefs to have come from Rome? They didn't. On the contrary Rome set out to destroy those beliefs and the believers. If you consider the Crusades, they didn't show up again in Judea/Palestine until about 1,000 years after 66 AD--almost exactly 1,000 years!
Speaking of propaganda, if you know so much about George Washington then tell us what is wrong with his portrait?
Attachment 2217

---

Do you know how often "archeologists" fake it in order to support their pet theories or to enrich themselves financially? How it is 'his' portrait if he is dead? Consider Cyrus Scofield and Oxford University. Although I am quite a fan of architecture, I'm unaware of being a member of any bricklayer's unions or guilds. TYVM. Closest I got was getting newsletters from a real estate developer's association. But I have touched bricks and stones and poured concrete? OH NOOO DOES THAT MAKE ME A STONEMASON TOO!? How about you?

How about this one?

Attachment 2218

Attachment 2219

Now that statute is one allegedly that Geo. Washington said to be his exact likeness.

Attachment 2222
Old photos of Wm. Cavendish former 4th duke of Devonshire and Prime Minister of Great Britain. "Of course" "we all know" that "no one else" wore their hair in a ponytail or wore ruffles and clothes like that but GEORGE WASHINGTON!! MUAHAHAH. (Sarcasm)


Attachment 2225
Perhaps Henry Cavendish (10 October 1731 – 24 February 1810) might be a closer match?

P.S. That 'portrait' per the record was painted in 1823 by a Rembrandt Peale--approximately 20 years after Geo. Washington's recorded death.

Related: Rebuilding the Third Temple 363 A.D.

OK you didn't like that painting (he was dead already fair enough) so here is one,
"Landsdowne" portrait by Gilbert Stuart, 1796.
He was still alive when it was painted and it hangs in the White House.

Attachment 2223

What is wrong with it?
Hint,
The error I am trying to point out seems to happen in many of his portraits for some strange reason.

The one of that one that hangs in the White House has a spelling error on the rightmost 'book' (reads "UNITED SATES" instead of "UNITED STATES") because its an 'original replica' ( Gilbert Stuart did it on purpose to make distinctions) unlike the one at the Smithsonian. FYI, you're attempting to "preach to the choir". The point I'm making is that you can spend all your life letting people poke holes in things and poking holes in things yourself. But what are you going to do constructively? Doesn't take much courage to put words in dead men's mouths, does it? The PSYOPS kittens can say anything one way or another. Either way, its your choice what you believe.

Attachment 2226

Do I believe George Washington to have been some perfect, infallible God-figure? No. Do I idolize him? No. Do I believe everything I read/hear? No. Did George Washington found the United States? No. Did George Washington sign the Declaration of Independence? No. He is attacked because he is an psychological "anchor" for many. Did George Washington draft the Articles of Confederation? No. Again, his image is attacked because he is a psychological "anchor" and warfare is being waged.

Perhaps these threads might be of interest to you?

Related:

Propaganda (master link)

Not the error I am concerned about. Or is it an error?
Its much bigger then a spelling mistake.
And it has happened in many portraits of him.
For some strange reason. Maybe not that strange if your eyes are opened.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walter

Not the error I am concerned about. Or is it an error?
Its much bigger then a spelling mistake.
And it has happened in many portraits of him.
For some strange reason. Maybe not that strange if your eyes are opened.

---

And what do you say the error might be? Are you for spreading truth or having contests?

The error is they painted George's eyes the wrong colour.
George had blue eyes, Not brown.
And it is painted this way in many portraits.
The last painted I posted by Gilbert Stuart had George pose for the portrait.
Gilbert Stuart was a very famous portrait painter in his time and was very well respected for his artist ability.
He had blue paint because he painted a blue sky in the window.

So the "contest" is to come up with the "true" correct answer for why he did it?

Hey...wait a minute... Cavendish's eyes were brown.
Further more why does Cavendish's child the 5th duke look just like George?
And the 3rd duke?

I have more suspicious details linking the two but I have to go out of town to a celebration.
Be back in a day or two.
Try not to miss me to much.

He was said to have blue-grey eyes AFAIK. The "Master Race" proponents would claim anyone significant had "blue eyes". If you can provide some proof of him having blue eyes--with it mentioned in some pre-1900 text specifically that would be great. From an artistic perspective, painting light blue or pale blue eyes on that portrait would look like holes "in his head and in the wall".