That is a productive mental model - thank you!
Printable View
I would like to reconcile perspectives.
Government is an insurance policy. I lay my claim when I pull a car onto the road or even accept police protection (presumption). I think this is demonstrated especially when I enter into the downtown district of the city. I hear that is where police protection originated; a safe place for meeting between commercial vendors and customers.
This (public) kind of insurance premium rate is governed by how much of the Federal Reserve's private credit is changing hands - a sales tax, or an income tax. Like in the mental model I just described though, the Federal Reserve is a private agreement, in at least that one can choose to contract (endorse private credit) or to redeem lawful money by demand.
Social Security.
Quote:
26usc 3101
(a) Old-age, survivors, and disability insurance
In addition to other taxes, there is hereby imposed on the income of every individual a tax equal to the following percentages of the wages (as defined in section 3121 (a)) received by him with respect to employment (as defined in section 3121 (b))—
Social Security and Medicare is it a tax or is it insurance. Which is it?
Trust Fund Taxes
A trust fund tax is money currency withheld from an employee's wages (income tax, social security, and Medicare taxes) by an employer and held in trust until paid to the Treasury.
When you pay your employees, you do not pay them all the money they earned.
As their employer, you have the added responsibility of withholding taxes from their paychecks.
The income tax and employees' share of FICA (social security and Medicare) that you withhold from your employees' paychecks are part of their wages you pay to the Treasury instead of to your employees.
Your employees trust that you pay the withholding to the Treasury by making Federal Tax Deposits (PDF). That is why they are called trust fund taxes.
Through this withholding, your employees pay their contributions toward retirement benefits (social security and Medicare) and the income taxes reported on their tax returns.
Your employees' trust fund taxes, along with your matching share of FICA, are paid to the Treasury through the Federal Tax Deposit System.
The withheld part of these taxes is your employees' money, and the matching portion is their retirement benefit.
For additional information, refer to Employment Taxes and the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP).
Employment tax deposits are a current expense.
Postponing paying them is not the same as making a late payment on your phone bill or to a supplier.
Congress has established large penalties for delays in turning over your employment taxes to the Treasury.
The longer it takes to pay that money, the more it will cost you.
For more information, refer to Publication 15, Circular E, Employer's Tax Guide.
Rate the Small Business and Self-Employed Website
http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-...ust-Fund-Taxes
Child custody
I am glad to know more about this website..Very great knowledge on this website about Child custody..Government is an insurance policy. I lay my claim when I pull a car onto the road or even accept police protection (presumption). I think this is demonstrated especially when I enter into the downtown district of the city. I hear that is where police protection originated; a safe place for meeting between commercial vendors and customers. Thanks for sharing all that great information..For more information you can visit on this website:
cherylsteinesq.com
Thank you and welcome Geetika!
An addition to seal the witness to any mailing is the use of a Firm Mailing Book of Accountable Mail obtained free from the Post Office.
The Form 3877 Accountable Mail book is the Postal Clerk's inspection of who the mail is addressed to and the count of mailpieces and the postal clerk signs it making the clerk signature and the signature on the Return Receipt Two Witnesses !
Here is a case involving the IRS that the court discusses the Form 3877
https://www.casetext.com/case/welch-...5#.VAE0JPk7uM4
Also, Title 15 is the way to shift the burden of proof onto the IRS's collection process not assessment process. The IRS can make up any numbers and say/do anything they want for the sheer reason they are just debt collectors and are not responsible to know anything. Not responsible for knowing the law and of course they have no first hand personal knowledge and operate on all assumption and presumption aka Prima Facia nothing-ness.
My approach is to conditionally agree with their offer upon proofs of claims of (a list of hundreds of presumptions are true) and this conditional acceptance is supported by an affidavit written in negative averment stating "( I ) Affiant has not seen nor been presented with any material facts or evidence that ..."
For instance:
Affiant has not seen nor been presented with any material facts or evidence that the nature of each deposit was not Special in nature, and believes none exists.
Affiant has not seen nor been presented with any material facts or evidence that it is not the intent of the endorser to redeem the instrument in lawful money per Title 12 §411, and believes none exists.
Affiant has not seen nor been presented with any material facts or evidence that source of the income is not a Foreign Estate, and believes none exits.
etc