services for cash only, how to convert FRNs to Lawful money?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

JESUS DID NOT DIE ON THE CROSS AT ALL!!

ABRAHAM'S INCEST WITH SARAH DID NOT KILL OFF THE ISRAELITES!!

---

Honor thy Father and thy Mother - well in the flesh that is simply a moral code which is subject to all sorts of interpretations such as HOW DO I HONOR them? There is many denominations here - Scisms of thought - there does not exist ONE TRUTH in the flesh because in THE MAN Christ JESUS can only be found subjection. Thus folks opine on and on about stuff that does not matter at all.

Those walking out their existence according to their Five Senses do so to their Death [these cross over Jordan]. There is no deliverance - they are oppressed each and every day by Goliath. For the Central Nervous System rules their house [flesh tabernacle] and their spirit SLUMBERS - will someone please awaken David son of Jesse? The spiritual child must be birthed. Until then the flesh remains DEAD. The flesh is the VINEYARD - Isaiah 5.

Language matters. Yeshua, Yehoshuah, Jesus, Iousus - died. Michael Joseph is dying to self such that from glory unto glory I may be transformed into the image of Christ. I can't do it in my own imaginations. I must be Led into this path. Thus I ask the Holy Spirit [as Esther did]: What does the King like? My own vain thoughts [that's not what it means to me] means absolutely NOTHING.

I construct a "golden calf" in my VAIN, WORTHLESS thoughts.

=======================

Abraham's incest?: This is absurd to me. The relationship is what is being conveyed. Sarah was taken from amongst a PECULIAR PEOPLE - She is the barren that didst not bring forth. She Births the CHILDREN OF PROMISE. She births the children of Election. As the relationship gets more and more degraded we eventually find Jacob married to a SLAVE.

The bondwoman is one who is under the Law in her free will. She in her free will chooses to keep the Law. She is a slave.

The Children of Promise are led by the Holy Spirit and are therefore set free from the burden of the Law. This group or company takes their orders from the ADMINISTRATION of the Holy Spirit. Is the Law of God annulled ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Abraham who is the Leadership was granted this Promise. Well there was another Promise made even before the World even came into existence. I will get there shortly. I notice that 430 years after Abraham was granted that Promise [IN EQUITY] the Law was founded. So which is greater? Can the Law annul the Promise? HARDLY. Can the Promise annul the law, ABSOLUTELY NOT. There is Law AND Equity and these TWO merge into ONE under the Administration of the Holy Spirit.

But look around you what do you see? I see MEN trying to KILL the Promise. These men in their ignorance seek to put man under law.

The Israel of El Elyon is FREE in the PROMISE - however She [Israel] is DEAD or a SLAVE in the Law. And yes, Israel is the feminine in the analogy. The Men of Judah [or Leadership] is masculine.

So insert any woman you choose into the Analogy. Which one do you identify with? Which one would you like to identify with?

I choose Eve before she fell, says one, but that too is only halfway home. Says WISDOM, I choose to see the TWO in ONE before the BREACH. This is the putting together of the two sticks. And yet men opine on and on in their own vanity.

Did not the 12 disciples submit? How many cranial nerves do you have? See how it plays out in you? The answer is 12. There is one cranial nerve that went down into Egypt. It supports all of the organs. Funny how the medical profession calls this the JOSEPH NERVE.

How many elders are around the throne - 24 right? Each cranial nerve has two branches - 2 x 12 = 24. And yet as fantastic as that is - it is WORTHLESS. This is flesh and flesh - while it is the CONTAINER of the Symbolic meaning of Spiritual matters - the flesh will not inherit. For we shall receive a NEW HEAVEN and a NEW EARTH.

So what do Abraham and Sarah represent? The Spiritual Path.

He is a man of Faith - the Leader [Heb 11:1 Now faith is the title-deed of things hoped for, the proof of things not seen.] and

She is the woman of Faith - the Laity : Spiritual Church : [Isa 54:1 Shout in triumph, O barren [Sarah], thou that didst not bear; break forth into singing, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail with child: for more are the sons of the desolate than the sons of the Married Lady, saith the LORD. ]

He and She BIRTH the Elect Children. The Elect Church births the Elect Children. The Elect Church is Led by the Holy Spirit.

========================

Anyone teaching the Scriptures in the Flesh is building a DESOLATE HOUSE.

Isa 5:9 In Mine ears said the LORD of hosts, Of a truth many houses shall be desolate, even great and fair, without inhabitant.

Oh these houses are full of folks who are living for this day - but they are Spiritually DEADER than a box of hammers. Essentially DIRT - BAGS full of hot air but their spirit has yet to be birthed.

========================

Oh yes LET Sarah shout in TRIUMPH for she did not bring forth in her SELF WILL - Her Child - WAS A CHILD OF PROMISE.

So lets get to that Promise shall we?

Tit 1:1 PAUL, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, and the full knowledge of the truth which is after godliness;

Tit 1:2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;


Tit 3:4 But when the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, [Ref Psalm 27 v. 1]

Tit 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we did, but according to His mercy He saved us, by the washing of Spiritual rebirth, and renewing by THE Holy Spirit;


Now wherein is the FLESH? Pray tell - I can't find Sarah's womb anywhere in the foregoing. I however do see that this Heavenly Woman is THE CHURCH OF THE FIRSTBORN - according to the Promise.

So what now of this incest argument? It finds no root in my garden. I find it to be a weed. For this is rooted in Christ JESUS and this is far from Jesus CHRIST. I find many today denying the Christ because the WORD was encrypted into the FLESH nature. To say that Jesus did not die [flesh] is to deny the current state of affairs.

Please bear with me in my foolishness:

1. Has the WORD been beaten, put on trial, denied and essentially buried [entombed] within the "BELLY OF A GREAT FISH"?

2. Who did this to the WORD was it not the one who denied Him three times? The Church = Peter.

Continuing...

Continuing....


3. Notice Peter [the Church] HAD THE TRUTH meaning He [leadership] was being led by the Holy Spirit at one time :

Mat 16:15 He saith unto them, But who say ye that I am ?

Mat 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, "Thou art the Messiah, the Son of the living God."

Mat 16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Happy art thou, Simon, son of Jonah: for flesh and blood [mortal human being] hath not revealed it unto thee, but My Father Which is in the heavens.

And yet Peter will DENY THE WORD yet another time just before the start of the New DAY. For a rooster crows at the DAWNING OF THE NEW DAY. He is blind in his flesh.


Therefore what do I expect to see? I expect to see a Church teaching a MORAL CODE subject to 50,000 interpretations - for they are drunk of the wine of Babylon [water] but there comes a time when that WATER shall turn to WINE. But NOT at the hands of men.

Happy are Thou Simon Bar JONAH. SON OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.

My Sister my Spouse IS A GARDEN ENCLOSED. Eve within the Body of Adam = Kingdom - The citizenry and the King in perfect harmony.

Can you catch LEVIATHAN with a hook? Kingdoms of man! HOWEVER long before these kingdoms came to be THERE EXISTED A PROMISE. Before NIMROD's court and long before even matter came into existence. The Promise was renewed in ABRAHAM / SARAH even in their degradated estate.


4. Now how many DESOLATE HOUSES do you see today being led by leadership such as LABAN? Who would SELL the Church for his own GAIN? Pray tell you do see them, yes?

Gen_29:15 And Laban said unto Jacob, "Because thou art my nephew, shouldest thou therefore serve me for nought? tell me, what shall thy wages be?"

Gen_29:16 And Laban had two daughters: the name of the elder was Leah, and the name of the younger was Rachel.

Gen_29:25 And it came to pass, that in the morning, behold, it was Leah: and he said to Laban, "What is this thou hast done unto me? did not I serve with thee for Rachel? wherefore then hast thou beguiled me?"



5. How many men and women do you see today DESOLATE HOUSES who sell themselves for hedonism? Jobbed out for Nothing. Empty inside - this is Pornography played out in real life. She [soul] is abused by all of her lovers as she refuses to submit to the one closest to her - her brother [spirit]. So she dotes over all her lovers, since she can't find love at home, and they USE her and ABUSE her. Is that about right? She is Delilah selling out Sampson.

Talk about eating Hog Slop. Even the SERVANTS in my Fathers house had it better. [She is Bilhah and Zilpah = SERVANTS]. Well pray tell, what do you see when you look around today?

SHALL WE CLIMB THE LADDER - SO THAT WE MIGHT COME BACK HOME?


Spirit - Abraham
Soul - Sarah

Now then, are you Sarah? You cannot become Eve without crossing the CRYSTAL SEA. [Ref Book of Adam and Eve and Revelation 15:2].

I will put it to you like this: Are you committing INCEST with yourself? HARDLY. And yet, have you even married her within the Tent? Many are widowed - there spirit sleeps on. SELF WILLED they are.

What about those DRY BONES?

Eze 37:2 And caused me to pass by them on every side: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry.

Eze 37:3 And He said unto me, Son of Adam, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest.

Eze 37:4 Again He said unto me, Prophesy over these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.

Eze 37:5 Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath [SPIRIT] to enter into you, and ye shall live:

6. Has the twin sticks been put together globally? No.

Can the two sticks be put together in one man? Yes.

===================================

To deny one part of Christ JESUS is to deny Jesus CHRIST. Faith is the title deed. By the way, it should be clear that I am in no way shape or form promoting dogma of the Subverted Woman. I propound THE WAY.

Joh 1:1 In the beginning [of the ages] was [already pre-existent] the Word [Christ], and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (Gen_1:1)

Joh 1:2 This Word was in the beginning with God.

Joh 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and tabernacled among us, (and we beheld His glory [The Shekinah], glory exactly like an only begotten Son sent from beside the Father,) abounding in grace and truth.



The Word = Jesus CHRIST.
The CHRIST condescending to the Estate of The Man = Christ JESUS.
The Man Spiritually REBIRTHED by the Holy Spirit = First Fruits. Christ JESUS was first of the first fruits.

What is the STUMBLING BLOCK to the Churches? FREE WILL over CHRIST.

Do you operate in your free will according to your five senses attempting to keep the way of Christ in your OWN POWER? This is Bondage. Insert any woman in the relationship [Leah and the Bond servants]

OR do you operate in your free will choosing to submit to the Holy Spirit [in Her Administration of your life]? Have you died at the Cross Roads [The River Jordan]? Have you crossed over to being led to CHRIST by the Holy Spirit?

"Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run
There's still time to change the road you're on." - Stairway to Heaven

Has David son of Jesse killed Goliath? Is it the Spirit, friend, or does the Flesh rule your house? Remember David son of Jesse did not kill Goliath in his own strength. And he struck the Giant where?

IN THE FOREHEAD. Time to resurrect those thoughts! Only She can do it.

Honor thy Father: Flesh aspect: Abraham.....Spiritual Aspect: my spirit, the church leaders

Honor thy Mother: Flesh aspect: Sarah.......Spiritual Aspect: my soul, the church congregation


CLIMBING THE LADDER:

Honor thy Father : His Majesty El Elyon
Honor thy Mother: El Shaddai, Wisdom, Holy Spirit

She gives BIRTH to the VERY ELECT - the First of the First Fruits.

================================================== ======

But if all you can appreciate is the flesh, then I suppose honor your father and mother in the best way that you deem appropriate. Of course that is subjective. Until that day LEVIATHAN keeps swimming in the sea of darkness.

Shalom,
Michael Joseph

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

To get something out of the thread though

---

thanks David, you have said way more than I think I was ready for, kinda speechless and now I have a headache.. from other things mainly but this read topped it off.

I need to go work it off now then come back and read it again and then the marvelous (im sure) post/reply by Michael Joseph which I am really looking forward to also.

Resurrection was done by Elijah in the OT, so resurrection has at least one OT precedent in the Bible.

Quote:

---

17 And it came to pass after these things, that the son of the woman, the mistress of the house, fell sick; and his sickness was so sore, that there was no breath left in him.
18 And she said unto Elijah, What have I to do with thee, O thou man of God? art thou come unto me to call my sin to remembrance, and to slay my son?
19 And he said unto her, Give me thy son. And he took him out of her bosom, and carried him up into a loft, where he abode, and laid him upon his own bed.
20 And he cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn, by slaying her son?
21 And he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, I pray thee, let this child's soul come into him again.
22 And the LORD heard the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived.
23 And Elijah took the child, and brought him down out of the chamber into the house, and delivered him unto his mother: and Elijah said, See, thy son liveth.
24 And the woman said to Elijah, Now by this I know that thou art a man of God, and that the word of the LORD in thy mouth is truth

1 Kings 17:17-24 (KJV)

---

Quote:

---

2 Kings 4:35 (KJV)
35 Then he returned, and walked in the house to and fro; and went up, and stretched himself upon him: and the child sneezed seven times, and the child opened his eyes.

---

More instances: click here.

What about transfiguration. Yes sir ree. Enoch, Elijah, maybe Moses (see ref in Jude). Jesus.

The caterpillar becomes a butterfly.

Shalom
MJ

The paradigm shift is to be redeemed from the guilt. It is guilt that causes one to blindly contribute to the national debt through endorsement of private credit. It caused a nation to give up its gold.

It is very radical and outside the box. I am grateful for people like James CAMERON who are just telling it like it is. But then, like James CAMERON I am not defending what I believe to be true. You can just look for yourselves. I linked the movie - The Lost Tomb of Jesus. It is very convincing.

The whole thing feels like learning the truth about Santa Clause at first and does nothing to threaten salvation. This is more leading to the true concept of redemption so that the linguistics can apply. Please remember where I placed the post, after somebody here sent a PM requesting clarity. I was not sharing my research to offend anybody and I truly believe that the precepts like what Michael Joseph is elaborating on are truly enlightening mathematics. To find the Truth, this is a very wonderful thing that just makes everything all the more fascinating! - Like the prophetic calculations for Daniel to send the Magi to Bethlehem.

This shows a whole new side to supernatural, unlocking the mysteries! But all in all I was simply feeling this is a good way to explain how and why we would furnish the national debt and provide the continuance of the abomination of fractional lending and elastic currency.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Joseph

Has David son of Jesse killed Goliath? Is it the Spirit, friend, or does the Flesh rule your house? Remember David son of Jesse did not kill Goliath in his own strength. And he struck the Giant where?

IN THE FOREHEAD. Time to resurrect those thoughts! Only She can do it.

Honor thy Father: Flesh aspect: Abraham.....Spiritual Aspect: my spirit, the church leaders

Honor thy Mother: Flesh aspect: Sarah.......Spiritual Aspect: my soul, the church congregation

Shalom,
Michael Joseph

---

That was a lot and many might be wondering why is he so off topic. I assure you I am NOT off topic!

The masculine, in the analogy, brings forth the IDEA - which is analogous to the SEED in man. Remember that FRUIT carries its own seed. That is why your underwear are called "Fruit of the Loom".

The feminine, in the analogy, naturally receives and conceives. So the IDEA or the Doctrine is masculine and the act or conception is feminine. Thru her function comes forth the Child or the DEED.

Now consider what is CASH but a Flesh level - understanding of a concept. I myself do not consider it necessary to actually put my hands on a piece of paper or some solid so that my senses might be appeased. The THOUGHT is Expressed in DEED. Thus I am not double minded.

Quoting the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY as follows:

“What are United States Notes and how are they different from Federal Reserve notes?"

"Both United States Notes and Federal Reserve Notes are parts of our national currency and both are legal tender. They circulate as money in the same way. However, the issuing authority for them comes from different statutes. United States Notes were redeemable in gold until 1933, when the United States abandoned the gold standard. Since then, both currencies have served essentially the same purpose, and have had the same value. Because United States Notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve Notes, their issuance was discontinued, and none have been placed in to circulation since January 21, 1971.

United States notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve notes. As a result, the Treasury Department stopped issuing United States notes, and none have been placed into circulation since January 21, 1971.”

[Thus the dual nature of the Federal Reserve Note bearing two seals and two signatures]


I HAVE FULLFILLED THE LAW BY MAKING MY ADMINISTRATIVE DEMAND FOR LAWFUL MONEY AS NOTICED ON THE BACK OF THE CHECKS PRESENTED TO REBUT ANY PRESUMPTION OF INTERCOURSE WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.

IF you follow the analogy INTERCOURSE would be the correct term. My spirit/soul [the two become one] do not wish to submit to the husbandmen in the Federal Reserve System in Marriage. My marriage bed is for Christ alone.

Thus I see the Trustees and I do not wish to Tort them. Said another way - and I will now go to Scripture as I always do - for where dear reader do you suppose the common law came from?

Tit 3:10 A man that is an heretick after the first and second warning reject;

Comment: A heretick creates scisms in the society - assembly. In Church one teaching Christ JESUS should be warned once, then twice and if he refuses to teach Jesus CHRIST, then reject him. Now stretch the tent chords of your MIND - and think about one who refuses to obey the bylaws of the Trust Agreement and yet desires to benefit under the Will. That would be called TAKING AGAINST THE WILL. That is a Tort. This is called a Tortfeaser. Let his wrong be upon his own head.

Tit 3:11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

Comment: One who is a tortfeaser sins against the Will and seeks to TAKE what he has no interest in. Therefore he brings judgment upon his own head. Therefore - enter stage left - the CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTEE - a.k.a. Trustee de son Tort. This one has not been appointed to be a Trustee by those who established the assembly - therefore he wrongfully acts.

Tit 3:14 And let our people also learn to maintain good works for necessary uses, that they be not unfruitful.

Comment: The law boundary has been established and the Trustees have been appointed. The MAN [leadership] is in place - and the WOMAN [citizenship] = our people. So then, let the people be about the USES established by the ADMINISTRATION - The Holy Spirit. BY THE WAY - does any of this seem to even remotely be ringing any bells? I sure hope so.

So then the use is established [necessary use] and then the people UNDERTAKE in those uses for the good of the Kingdom.

Tit 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.

Comment: The United States underwrote the debt of "The United States of America" - thus creating a "more perfect Union" = a peculiar people. You might say the U.S. redeemed the U.S.A. These types play out over and over and over again. And they will continue to do so.

What is interesting is that we also see playing out over and over and over again is the Woman [citizenship] being led into rebellion by a small people - sons of Cain. Thus the serpent in the garden plays out again and again. The insider leads the woman into apostasy. And she then leads her leadership into apostasy - she gives him the fruit [deeds]. For she receives and conceives the child.

=======================

Therefore MY INTENT is expressed and implied and therefore I fulfill the law. Simply put - if I make a promise, I keep the promise. Otherwise, I let the husbandmen do their job. It is not for me to interfere with them. Allodial Property is in the Husbandmen. Allodial Estate might be in the Wife in Fee Simple; however, perhaps she has been sold into Prostitution?

But first have you been experienced?

Hos 1:2 The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the LORD.


Shalom,
Michael Joseph

Quote:

---

Abraham's incest?: This is absurd to me.

---

Many Jews and Christians distort the passage. And that is really my point - avoid the distortion and then accept what is - the truth is true.

Quote:

---

Gen 20:12 And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

If you demand cash you have circumnavigated the entire issue; the demand for lawful money was either made by the buyer (of your goods and services) or not.

---

NQ1) if/when I accept this cash then how do I put it on record?

you have demonstrated to us in the past that you purchased a case file with cash and in doing so you recorded the serial numbers of each bill, now these bills could be either/or (lawful or not) so..

NQ2) in order to verify these are indeed lawful moneys, one must have a record of the demand that converted them, no?


David, Im not sure I will ever be able to comprehend this. Im not a bible basher and I enjoy most all the different perspectives of other people regarding the book BUT if at all possible, can you please answer the two new questions I have marked above without referring to the bible?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Merrill

So it is not only clearer why so many people who are insisting on being paid in cash, still misunderstand and want the need of additional exoneration from the guilt, to still be able to convert to just weights; the whole guilt trip as a business plan complicating our thinking and compelling us to seek redemption through sacrifice (priestcraft) is hereby put to the test!

In other words – [B][I]How could a nation be so guilt-ridden as to voluntarily join in this trust agreement?

---

yeah, Im not getting it (the guilt stuff) and it just complicates the issue since I am trying to determine the technique. if there was a schematic, we could save lots of time.

Ive been trying to "wrap my mind around this" for at least four years now. I am not the sharpest but I dont think Im even close to approaching dullness. Ive tried for a long time now to comprehend this without interaction with you because your time is limited and I didnt want for you to have to spend much on my account however, now Im starting to think it is not me that is making this more complicated than need be. having said that I dont think you are intentionally making it over complicated either. can you explain it mechanically?


about your biblical perspective, it is interesting.. if you dont mind my asking, do others share your seemingly unique viewpoint and if so, what is it called?


same question for you Michael Joseph also, if you dont mind?


thanks

NQ1) if/when I accept this cash then how do I put it on record?

Attachment 1904

What is critical to understand is the above payment verification for demand is superfluous because the claim is with me. As recipient of the funds I will and I have stayed in honor. The Payer now owns part of my claim - my BoE and stake in Wall Street as a Patroon etc. More elegant to some of Michael Joseph's teachings is that this suitor too has a claim to approval by signature of the Declaration of Independence and therefore comes into Party of Interest character with the People in the Preamble of the Constitution(s).

The Instructions at the bottom of the Libel of Review state:

Quote:

---

3) default judgment. After 21 days the issue is ripe for default judgment. There is a bill of exchange on file with Richard Grasso NYSE since August 13, 2001 for all the money in the world to back your judgment by fidelity bond (secured confidence.) However, it is preferable to simply rely on the truth - that the defendant never filed in the appropriate district court prior to exercising a claim. Compared to the truth, the bill is only ink on paper; a representation of the Bible's original estate belonging to the rightful heirs. Nobody has challenged the bill to date but confidence in the truth goes a lot further and requires no citing the bill.

---

The form above was simply practice so that the new suitor was ready for when it mattered:

Attachment 1905

Now this expresses a claim to the intellectual property of a Case in the US District Court that has no attachments or liens.

NQ2) in order to verify these are indeed lawful moneys, one must have a record of the demand that converted them, no?

No. Only on funds that you convert to cash. If the payer is giving you cash you have no need to get a record of their demand.

I can tell you are very intelligent and made the presumption that you have the social conditioning just the same. This is what I was proposing is causing you to complicate this. So I went a bit overboard in order to show everybody the roots of the guilt conditioning. My objective is that you understand so I will keep diagramming this for you until we are satisfied you do.

It is an unequivocal interpretation but the basics are expressed through teachings like Guardians of the Grail and Holy Blood; Holy Grail etc. One item to keep in mind is that the Book of Mark was first, and the other Gospels followed suit with the same objective - to protect the Bloodline of King Jesus.