Printable View
I was viewing history as one sequential event leading into another, but now view things better as interactive holographic.
I was joking;
How do you find a magnet in a haystack?
ANSWER: Use a compass.
I think it worthwhile to view history in the light of the allegorical metaphors produced around reclamation of the Crown of Jerusalem.
It must be understood: they were 1,000 years too late. Even Ezekiel (like John) saw the New Jerusalem. The crowns were given to the saints of the most high. After 30AD, the blind and carnal may have still been looking for a "kingdom of heaven" that they could see with their physical eyes or for temples made with hands. Consider also, the saints and Jesus/Yeshua being conferred kingdoms at the right hand of the most high.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Which reminds me, once long ago I felt inclined to study an arrangement in the stars, looking beyond the Romanesque or Babylonian Zodiac and Constellations. I was after prayer inclined to seek out the representations of "the father's house" something that would be so simple even a child could see it. And there it was, at Cepheus a little house like the kind little kinds draw: a square with a triangle on top. Next I was inclined to make the determination of right and left from the vantage point of standing in the doorway of the house. And behold: the Crown to the right and Draco to the left!
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...epheus_IAU.svg
Interestingly Cepheus is mischaracterized by Kaballists as "The Fool". It may have been heretical Gnostics that decided to project the upside down image of the Cepheus on his throne onto the house in order to have Draco at Cepheus' right hand. Absurd and very telling--in that they likely knew the original meaning and set out to hide it!
The star making at the peak of the roof of the house is called Errai or Al Rai (which means Shepherd which relates to the word 'hero'). It is said that such star will become replace Polaris as the North Star in at least 2600 years.Quote:
... the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. ... But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God has chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty. 1 Cor. 25, 27 (v. 25 in part)
Related:
Mazzaroth or, the Constellations (by Frances Rolleston)
Celestial Wobble - in 26,000 years it will look the same as now. I enjoy SkyGlobe from NASA but I was impressed with the program a fellow uses in The Star of Bethlehem.
I think you circle back to my point about time. It is an illusion. This is the reference to the Alpha and the Omega - the ALEPH and the TAV. The Alphabet of Creation. My point though may not be pleasing to all. The guilt trip caused a stiff-necked and hard-hearted people; so much so that when one of theirs broke through to this natural birthright - biblical prophecy - they threw a small fortune at preserving it to the culture as a national treasure.
P.S. As I developed Artificial Intuition at the young age of 69 it feels more and more that Adolph read this Century Magazine clip in 1928, before he even knew he might need a national enemy to target. One nation's treasure is another man's weapon?
Hologram vs. illusion. An illusion might lack genuine importance, like a counterfeit or an imitation. However, a hologram nonetheless can carry original and intended meaning. Also, re: 26,000 years: that is presuming it won't be 'rolled up like a scroll'.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The trouble is that so many organizations/groups claim to be "Jews" for the purpose of grandstanding as "god's chosen"--to legitimize anything and everything they do. But of course, Israelites weren't lawless. The historic record (see Edwin L. Martin) shows that Gnostics, Samaritans and Islamists heavily regarded themselves to be "Jews"; eventually even Edom had joined in. After 70AD it also became fashionable to borrow the title "Christian". What does any given group actually mean by "Jew" or Christian? Jew as in Judean or Jew as in Idumean or Jew as in Samarian or Islamic Gnostic? Christian as in Simonian or as in among the saints so dubbed at Antioch? Which points to this: Another big con that was attempted to be foisted upon bible believers is the one were saints are equated with Gentiles. Consider that by 1000 AD, Palestine/Samaria came into Islamic hands. If Isaac quit an area, who was the next heir: Ishmael. What religion were the Templars held to ultimately embrace? Some say: Islam.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Post-Old-Dynasty Egypt Gnostics vs Moses (preserving the original doctrines)Quote:
A stele is dedicated to Qos-allah 'Qos is Allah' or 'Qos the god', by Qosmilk (melech - king) is found at Petra (Glueck 516). Qos is identifiable with Kaush (Qaush) the God of the older Edomites. The stele is horned and the seal from Edomite Tawilan near Petra identified with Kaush DISPLAYS A STAR AND CRESCENT (Gluek, Browning).
Essau/Edom/Idumeans (Qos) vs Israel (includes Judah)
Rome vs non-Catholics
Ishmael vs Isaac
Archers (Qos) vs Joseph
Nimrod (Men Hunters) vs Mankind
Day of Trumpets: 11-Sept-3BCQuote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Day of Atonement: 21-Sept=3BC
Feast of Tabernacles : 26 - Sept- 3BC
Num 24:17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth [Confusion].
Christ gave humanity the ability to raise itself to an understanding of the spiritual out of the life of intellect itself. inability to understand the spirit is our ignorance of the Holy Spirit,IF i talk only of the Father God and the Christ God.a far away one or internal one as i am willing to see and read it. is also for it is a revelation in and of itself man can understand those sensitivities through the spirit dwelling within him, if he only inclines himself to Christ. Holy Spirit appeared at the baptism of Christ. And with the appearance of the Holy Spirit
The Father is the unbegotten begetter who places the Son into the physical world. But at the same time the Father uses the Holy Spirit in order to tell humanity that in the spirit that we have from our pre-birth existence is raised to life through the Christ dwelling within us. And when Christ sent the Holy Spirit to his disciples this imparting occurred through the Christ, through the Son.that the Father is the unbegotten begetter, that the Son is the one begotten by the Father, and that the Holy Spirit is the one imparted to humanity by the Father and the Son. along with the teachings concerning that Trinity based on three parts or elements, especially the theological description of humans as consisting of body, soul, and spirit. Trinity
the divine principle working as Christ within evolving humanity cannot be understood without the Trinity. If, in the place of the Trinity, some other teaching concerning God were to enter, then basically speaking it would not be fully Christs teaching. Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. So actually it is the Holy Spirit who is sent by Christ in order that man might retain his consciousness of self, of his I, while Christ himself lives in the unconsciousness of human beings. Thus, if man realizes in the full sense of the word what his being really is, The effete ignorance might be me ignoring dogma not scripting Scripture I cant spirit stiff nobody i can however adjust my clouds.
Quote:
Holy Spirit appeared at the baptism of Christ.
Coronation.Quote:
Mar 11:28 And say unto him, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority to do these things?
Mar 11:29 And Jesus answered and said unto them, I will also ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things.
Mar 11:30 The baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men? answer me.
Rome vs non-Catholics In part it is due to this dogma. But neither may one speak of the soul. Of the real soul it is not permitted to talk because the religious faiths claim it as their prerogative to speak of the soul and — so far as their dogma allows — also of the spirit. It is their monopoly. If in any place something flares up and spirit is mentioned they are interfering in the affairs of religion. Nothing remains for this poor science of the world but to become material, materialistic, since the religious denominations deprive it of the possibility to touch on anything spiritual.When redeemable is a spiritual gift and one soul searching truth is realized its done in the spirit
most important to realise that the very powers responsible for materialism are the powers of the Western Churches. It is the Churches we have to thank for materialism. And materialism will go on increasing in strength if the Churches do not lose their administrative powers in the various religions and confessions. If we take our ROMAN civilization seriously it will be impossible for us to entertain any illusions in these matters. Today it concerns us all to take these matters seriously. Today we may not out of human weakness venture on any compromise. If in our ordinary activities we are forced into making a compromise, this must be done consciously and not lightly dismissed with a few words. It must be quietly admitted that it is necessary to yield to superior power of Christ. We must not make a compromise with what we know; we must not believe a thing to be right that we do at the dictates of coercion.Certainly nothing becomes Christian because in every third line Christ's name is mentioned.or it becomes Rabbinical when Moses name is mentioned. But when it is said out of the very spirit of the present and one is at pains to speak in this way, people come and say: Oh, but he is not talking of the God or Christ. He should be speaking with more depth. Then this so-called depth is put forward in the most external way possible that material matter of fact legal way. What we do individually, for example in teaching, must be done out of the knowledge that each man bears within him different impulses. But as physical man is out of his own powers he has now to seek union with the spiritual, the interest of the spirits above him. In any sense is warmed-up ancient knowledge. preach the old beliefs. And why shouldn't we be kindly disposed towards what comes from that direction? There is no reason why we should not. But for goodness' sake let us not take it seriously as the basis for what is truth today, We should just say: These people were brought up to this, it is true, they cannot change their calling later in life, so let them talk. But we should not think it necessary to agree with all they say except in a conventional way and without discussion.a citizen of Rome is civilization lacking Spirit
The history I am familiar with is how when Paul was young Saul there was an uprising in eastern Turkey (Asia Minor) and Saul's father took part in the civil skirmish, taking up with Rome. Rome won. So Saul's father gained an entitled Roman citizenship but would not have been privileged with dual citizenship. His citizenship (religion) would have been solely Roman. Saul as Paul would have been eligible, not entitled, as indicated by the Roman officer in Acts, to purchase his Roman citizenship at a high price.
Saul apparently cherished his (Edomite) Jewry so much to form an interesting strategy. Finding of fact, that Rome existed and apparently was not going anywhere for some centuries, Saul began flirting with the idea he might become a kind of liaison officer on the Temple Mount between the Babylonian Sanhedrin and Caesar. So after his scouting out the potential for the Gospel of Mark to fly among the Asia Minor pagans - being that Life, Death and Resurrection were the primary colors of the seasons and agriculture Saul/Paul spent the alms gathered while stopped in Cyprus - a Masonic (Mnason) cover-up to invest in the actual papers.
It is so obvious once you accept the still-living Jesus spent three years writing Mark with Peter and Paul visiting Damascus too.
If one avoids confusing extra-Hebraic practices of "baptism" with the OT Hebraic immersion/mikveh, it would be clear that the Holy Spirit's settling upon him would be the only thing at Mark 11 that has to do with coronation: anointing. The entire OT temple layout figured the process of salvation. Mikveh was required for the royal priesthood--full body immersion and neither sprinkling of blood, water, wine nor oil. To project foreign or copy-cat practices onto the practices of Hebrews would just serve to confuse. The Babylonians see reality through Babylonian eyes. The Hebrews were not Babylonians.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Attachment 3979
Note: the laver comes before entry into the congregation. The light of the oil-powered lampstands would hardly be directly visible from without! To see it one had to enter into the congregation, no?
That lots of people used the word "baptism" in connection with some "coronation" ceremony after 70AD as copycats or 'holy ritual designers' (whether to legitimize one claim or another to authority or to put on a really impressive show) doesn't make retroactive projection fit the OT plan or purpose.
Consider entry into the Temple becoming part of the House of God or the Assembly of the Anointed (Christ)--mikveh was about purification not coronation. There is nothing in the scriptures OT or NT to suggest otherwise. To get the general idea, consider the notion that subsequent to purification, the one now clean could access the presence of God. Mikveh itself is not coronation/anointing. Anointing is very specific.Quote:
A person was required to be ritually pure in order to enter the Temple. In this context, "purity" and "impurity" are imperfect translations of the Hebrew "tahara" and "tumah", respectively, in that the negative connotation of the word impurity is not intended; rather being "impure" is indicative of being in a state in which certain things are prohibited until one has become "pure" again by immersion in a mikveh. {Wiki author evidences lack of comprehension of what it means to be 'ritually unclean' due to failure to specifically utilize that term.}
For those who worshiped 'sea gods' or the saw the sea (Mari/mer/mar/mermaids/mercantilism/Mercury) as the 'holy sea' (Dagon, Oannes), sure application of water might be seen as a kind of coronation. But most certainly that was neither the Hebrew nor Melchizedek perspective. In the Hebrew realm, anointing was and is done with oil not water.
Attachment 3980
In the Temple, light was provided by oil-powered candles rather than by wicked candles. Note 'wicked' candles provide their own light and burn of themselves.
At Zechariah 4:14, "anointed ones" is literally "sons of oil" (b'nai ytzar).Quote:
...What are these two olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick and upon the left side thereof? And I answered again, and said unto him, What be these two olive branches which through the two golden pipes empty the golden oil out of themselves? And he answered me and said, Knowest thou not what these be? And I said, No, my lord. Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the Lord of the whole earth. Zech. 4:11-14 (11 in part)
One perspective: oil floats on water, water can extinguish fire and drown people. Another: The scriptural Israel wasn't about formation of secular state. Edom/Esau being carnally minded would miss this point. It was the secularization that prompted judgement even in Hezekiah's time.
30 AD to 70AD was a long grace period (two 20-year periods). The king's missionaries were in the field to maximize the extent of salvation. Who sends missionaries out for 5 seconds? There had to be adequate time to give those of the land to get clued up. Hedges of protection around Jerusalem were removed starting around 66AD and the Idumeans with other nations were standing at the gates. Judgment came ~66AD to 70AD. It has been suggested that Rome-Babylon along with the Idumeans (who were enemies of Israel and Judah) were used as instruments of such judgment. The Worthless Shepherd hardly fits Yeshua/Jesus: the war was waged on the spiritual level first and foremost, the carnally minded would miss the point entirely: the battle was won on the spiritual level. The Romans even blamed the saints for the failure of their oracles and the like subsequent to the crucifixion--even their records evidence something remarkable happened in the spiritual and psychic realms in those days.
P.S. Contrary to infant baptism proponents, it is said according to the Essenes that the age of 30 years had to be attained before any king could be anointed or perhaps even admitted to the congregation. 30 as the 'spiritual age of accountability'.
Related:
The Third Temple: Spiritual or Physical?
Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
Your post is flavorful with wisdom, Allodial.
Some tenets I believe in might clarify while justifying your points as well. Love destroys guilt. While fear may desire the illusion there is guilt though, guilt will always convert that love (that will destroy specialized ego) into currency.
As I proceeded through the fourth cycle of Christianity Explored I was comprehending the BRANCH and Coronation of Jesus. Sure enough, the facilitator gave me a book titled Jesus the King and its rendition of Mark, chapter 11 exposed the business plan around the Worthless Shepherd while validating my perception is true.
Attachment 3985
Attachment 3986
Skipping down... What I discovered was an alleged pastor was actually obfuscating the Baptism, while understanding the crucial role of the Execution by Sword in Zechariah.
Attachment 3987
Attachment 3988
Love for God, self and others curbs sin and thusly serves to bring guilt to an end. As for the name Yeshua/Jesus/Yehoshua it is suggested that the sound of 'eyeh' is encoded like a prefix (more like Joshua). The transliteration of the last part is questionable as 'ua'. There is a fellow who suggests that the only correct " tetragrammaton" is found at Exodus 3:14 while the other he suggest to have been penned/substituted into place by Talmudists after Babylonian exile. One Rabbinical source admits there to be "two tetragrammatons". Though the scribes may have tried to conceal the truth, (E)YEHSHU / (E)YEHSHA resonates with Exodus 3:14 profoundly! Especially if you discard the "DJ" sound for y=i=j. IESHA/YESHA + S => IESHAS ...JESUS.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
So many trying to master the enunciation finally turned me off, to anything but what the concordances all agree upon. Yehoshuah. I spoke with James PRICE who wrote a paper, he helped me get even that correctly pronounced.
Otherwise I stick to a book that cost a handful and therefore likely protect my investment -
Attachment 3990
It would seem mastery of the tetragammatron is a favorite all-time past-time.
Attachment 3989
Worthwhile mention: 'ahavah ' and 'ohev' mean love in Hebrew/Chaldee/Phonecian.
Attachment 3991Quote:
These are the names of the men which Moses sent to spy out the land. And Moses called Oshea the son of Nun Jehoshua. Numbers 13:16
Quote:
Originally Posted by allodial
I thank you again. Integrating the allegorical into the practicable is quite a meal! As I digest however I am reminded that the Book of Mark was completed first, and the others were "Friends" of Jesus, some actually Apostles who understood and subscribed to Peter, Mark, Paul and Jesus' political agenda, playing for the throne in Jerusalem, maybe even still upon the idolatry impeachment of Antipas HEROD. [Note, this is my intuitive judgment after studying the Book of Mark as described in the Gospel of Pragmatism.] A rough tenet of Pragmatism is that the entire universe is supernatural, as in the emotional attachments to sin cause the illusion of separateness from God. Therefore it is silly to make the presumptions of the supernatural, like in miracles that defy physics - in my exploration of your link; that the Veil in the Temple was actually torn in half, rather than the political event of Pilate accepting payment from Joseph to preserve Jesus' life but stage his death leading to the events in Mark.
It is important to remember that the original transcripts of Mark end a bit earlier - and in light of my perceptions, it pays to note what was added in long after the other Gospels were drafted.
Attachment 3993
Attachment 3994
Attachment 3995
My perceptions feel they develop knowledge as one "trusts" in the Holy Spirit, one breaks down the barrier (Veil) of self-preservation of identity created out of the ego's fears, most succinctly the loss of identity upon mortal death. With this barrier overcome by the new trust of the new creature, one is akin to being on the NZT-48 found in the series/movie Limitless. And maybe even breaching the physical limitations of the finite mind found in Lucy. Ergo Pragmatism in no way disqualifies the supernatural, only describes it in terms that fail to accuse God of violating his own natural laws; like that when a man dies, his body undergoes quick bacterial growth and rapid decay for lack of oxygen.
There is nothing in the Bible that puts other planets out of the question or that makes science out of the scope or comprehension of God or the saints. An electron 5' away like an electronic 5 billion miles away is obeying its contract: its definition in its nature. It is is secular or heretical Gnostic thinking that separates God from creation. Sin causes the soul to increase its distance from the body. There are protective mechanism that the spiritual aspects of a Man take when the body is attempting to dominate. The Bible explains how to minimize or eliminate adverse "Karmic" backlash by avoiding behaviors, thought processes and the like that amount to 'sin'. One loves God? One avoids sin.
I'm not sure what motivations Pilate had for playing into a conspiracy. Jesus Christ wasn't vying for the throne in Jerusalem, he was bringing the old system to an end--even the Rabbis of the day knew that: the 6,000 year point in the survey of time was upon them. The Esau-Cain legacy didn't want it to end. A torn curtain -> end of the show. Trying to render the Gospel in mere worldly political terms is contrary even to the OT. God is far from being a petty territorial squabbler. To think in solely in terms of what can be seen or experienced in terms of the local-universe-locked suit called the body is to be carnally minded. The Idumeans, like those of Cain were fixated on power and territory in the worldly sense.
The temple destruction spelled the end of the age. The kind of scepter Jesus and the saints were and are concerned about goes beyond the petty territoriality of secular states which might be inferior and subject to the Divine whether they like it or not. The kind of power of discussion is far above of the secular state.
Its very simple: creator has power over the created. It is in the nature of the physical realm to obey the Creator. A son inherits characteristics from the father--so no surprise if that which obeys a father also responds in kind to sons. The word 'nature' relates to the Old Dynasty Egyptian word 'neter'.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Natural law deals with the nature of things. Not necessarily meaning nature in the sense of bears in the woods. Nature in the sense the characteristic how things, persons and beings. By nature a corporation spun off from a public corporation has the powers of a public corporation. Because the nature of the parent follows to the child.
When a man dies the biology is abandoned: proof of a biological contract--the bacteria, etc. know that the body is up for grabs. Acid vs base is code: gradients and fields that exist while one is alive collapse. Experiments were done that suggested that a body weighs less after death.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The pharmaceutical industry and rogue medical industries through disdainful method for growing vaccines using fetal tissue have sought to find ways to throw that biological compact into confusion.
Re: Witches & Sorcerers
Even the most basic treatise on witchcraft and sorcery warn of the adverse consequences of doing evil on the psychic or spiritual planes. The Bible doesn't suggest men to be powerless. It was the ones who wielded power contrary to the Contract and made a mess of things that were the problem. It wasn't that the power didn't exist it was more about HOW TO WIELD IT. The Adversary/Serpant didn't want Adam wielding power in compliance with God's ways. That is the Adversary's/Serpent's trick is to intice someone with power to yield it OUT OF GOD'S HANDS. Adam was given dominion (that is conferring of a kingdom or rule). The Adversary/Serpent perceived that by capturing Adam/Mankind, the dominion could be captured.
Thusly the more established groups sorcerers/witches set up traps to ensnare someone to TAKE THE KARMIC HIT FOR THEM. They reject the one named at Exodus 3:14 and Jesus Christ and find themselves left alone to manage their KARMA AT SOMEONE ELSE'S EXPENSE--and without True Wisdom because they also have shut themselves out.
So, God was never trying to spoil the fun. Instead it was about maximizing prosperity in a way that avoided generating adverse recoil in the psycho-physical-spiritual continuum. Witches know this. It wasn't that Samuel or someone couldn't be summoned from the dead. The book of Enoch points to this: mankind in a carnal state wasn't ready for certain knowledge without adequate preparation or guidance. This is all so obvious even in child-raising and in organizations: people start small and are trained. Who sets an 8 y/o at the controls of a super-sonic nuclear-weapon equipped bomber without any training whatsoever?
Thank you again. There is no need to bicker about the differences in our faith. So I am going to put this thread back on track, at least according to me. Organic law states:
Attachment 3996
Breech of trust is what I was alluding to. An 8 y/o at the helm of a nuclear-weapon-equipped bomber isn't competent: so putting her behind the controls is a breech although not on her part. This almost-commonplace thing these days of persons holding office without intending to be bound to the oath of office is akin to theft (one-sided contract). Black magicians left alone to manage their own Karma oddly enough don't seem to have too much trouble finding a patsy (consider: child sacrifice). One witch admitted to me the real reason the Bible is despised: because it tells so many things that they'd rather not be known outside of their controlled structure.
People starting to think in terms of equity just might cause entrenched thieves to sweat profusely.
A key point about Jesus Christ is that the breech of trust must have been huge enough to prompt someone to incarnate (possibly even traversing from another star system)--to come down from such a high level--just to deal with the breech on another planet on a different star. To throw out the deeper spiritual aspects of Jesus Christ's mission might serve to to miss the point about the severity of the breech. If he was just some regular guy pretending to act out some fancy idea in a quirky way: then the breech of trust seems to be negligible.
Consider those who killed him must have been fully aware of the severity and scope of their own breech.Quote:
And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. Genesis 18:20-21 (KJV)
***
And so, not to bicker but to at the least entertain the potential broadness of scope, Scott Bartle found that when approaching alleged officials of 'the Australian Government' (as opposed to "the Commonwealth of Australia") concerning the penalties for pretending to be a government official: he was met with silence in that rather than admit they were faking it, they went silent and to the extent the problems he had with "customs" (perhaps Serco dba Australian Customs and Border Protection Service?) disappeared.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeYQNq7znH4
I wanted to add this treasure link. I forget how I found it, but I believe it is linked with the State Archives.
Great link. The section concerning the construction of statutes makes reference to 'distracted persons. Interesting. I wonder if 'distracted persons' includes persons lost at sea or persons locked in a hypnotic gaze or persons under the influence of fluoride or taken by various distractions posing as entertainment. Interesting is the notion of someone not paying attention to what matters as being effectively insane.Quote:
DISTRACTED PERSON
A term used In the statutes of Illinois (Rev. Laws. 111. 1833,p. 332) and New Hampshire (Dig. X. II. Laws, 1S30, p. 339) to express a state ofinsanity. Snyder v. Snyder, 142 111. 60, 31 N. E. 303.
Quote:
Those who are willing to hear what the Christ followers who were true contemporaries of Christ were not yet able to bear. Those who allow Christ's Grace to flow into their hearts in ever increasing abundance The ‘hard of heart’ will resist this Grace, saying: Go back to the Bible, to the literal text of the Bible, for that alone is true. This is a disavowal of the words which in Christ itself kindle light, words which we can take into our hearts: ‘I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.’ Good it will be for men when they can bear more and more in this sense: for thereby they prepare themselves for the ascent into the spiritual heights. And to these spiritual heights Christ leads the way. for the disciple who deciphers Gospels and Acts. Those whose conception of Christ bears the state of being are men who know that the words that Christ is with us to the end of time are true meaning that He is the constant Revealer of the New and at the same time its origin and source. increasing abundance The Luciferic Spirits gave man material desires; as their countermeasures the higher Beings introduced illness and suffering as the consequences of material desires and interests, to the end that he should not utterly succumb to this world of sense. And so there is exactly as much suffering and pain in the world as there is interest only in the physical and the material. The scales are held in perfect balance; the one does not outweigh the other — so many passions and desires on the one side, so much illness and pain on the other. R4C abundantly Revealed in ones redeemed balance Therefore Christ is the Power who has enabled man to turn earth-existence ultimately to good account, in other words to give karma its true configuration — for karma must be worked out on the earth.work the shit out abundantly plain TIME OUT That man finds in himself the force to profit by his karma in physical existence, that advancing evolution is possible for him — all this he owes to the working of the Christ Event, to the presence of Christ in the earthly realm.And so we see many diverse forces and beings working together in the evolution of humanity. Had Christ not come upon this earth, man would still have been in error, hardened within himself a globe on its own, knowing nothing of other beings, entirely self-enclosed, driven into that condition by error and sin.
Christ is verily the Light which leads out of error and sin, the Light which enables man to find the way upwards. What was it that was lost to man in that he descended from the spiritual world, was ensnared in desires and passions under the influence of Lucifer, and then, under his own influence, in error, illusion and lying in the earthly world? He lost direct vision of the spiritual world, he lost understanding of the spiritual world. Once there was a way to get back home Golden slumbers kiss your eyes,
Smiles awake you when you rise ;
Sleep, pretty wantons, do not cry,
And I will sing a lullaby,
Rock them, rock them, lullaby.
Care is heavy, therefore sleep you,
You are care, and care must keep you ;
Sleep, pretty wantons, do not cry,
And I will sing a lullaby,
Rock them, rock them, lullaby.
Golden Slumbers Kiss Your Eyes Poem by Thomas Dekker the fifth Beatle The ‘hard of heart’ will resist this Grace, saying: Go back to the Bible, to the literal text of the Bible, well integrity isn't in the book and grace wont jump of any page. Once there was a way to get back home Man just a globe on its own. each man has a way back home. detractors are abundantly distracted.great journeys need greater journals .
In my mind, distracted means guilted (golden calf imagery - foiled) into becoming the Individual who cannot sue under the 11th Amendment.
I will see you at lunch, my friend.
[Inside joke - sorry! But that is what inside jokes are about...]Quote:
Many thanks for the inadvertent vector, Victor. OR was that planned? Wandering minds wonder endlessly...
He noticed how the link to the federal Constitution has the Original 13th Amendment. Well I spent some time down there in the Archives and the Original 13th Amendment kept on here in Colorado until 1868! This is the real agenda behind the Civil War...
METRO organization facilities at the heart of the Fibb Spiral...
Attachment 3999
Spiral Out - Keep Going. I almost forgot to mention how the Treasury Vault is located on the SE Corner - the federal repository.
Attachment 4000
Attachment 4001
You might think that is the end of the journey... I am telling you, the security guard actually caught me running my camera, inside the US Notes repository - check into that term, repository - and was afraid to confront me about it. I suppose it is mine after all. Funny though, the transformation that came over him about rules.
Attachment 4002
Some might say I hypnotized him? Pressure broiled chicken on the brain? - Seals in the flavor and captures the soul.
P.S. You really can't miss how the Civil War was displayed outside the Treasury Vault (video linked above)!
Attachment 4003
Attachment 4004
I asked with the curator at the Mason Museum - he said, "God, NO!"
So I thought it kind of like when she says, "Oh, God!" or that God no, he couldn't care less...
Attachment 4005
Here I am showing the LINCOLN scepter to a religious leader. Can you say "Mind Bomb"?
Thank you xparte;
That is very encouraging. I like that poem too. It brings the song to mind and I never tried to understand it beyond the literal.